A STUDY ON THE PARAMETERS EFFECTING YARN SNARLING TENDENCY

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1, 42 - 49, 25.03.2020

Hikmet Şehit , Hüseyin Kadoğlu

https://doi.org/10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.587866

Cited By: 1

Öz

The yarn is subjected
to many internal stresses due to the raw material and yarn spinning steps used. The yarn get rid of these stresses which it
subjected to and it gives opposite reaction againts rotation, which is
described as yarn liveliness. Yarn liveliness, may cause the spirality problem especially
in the structure of knitted fabrics.

 

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of yarn spinning
system, yarn count and twist coefficient on the tendency of yarn snarling. In this study,
yarns were produced using 100% cotton materials, in five different spinning
systems, taking two different twist coefficients  into consideration, and in two yarn counts. Yarn liveliness values of samples
were measured by Kringel Factor Meter Test Apparatus. As the twist coefficient
of the yarns increases and the yarn becomes thicker, the snarling tendency increases.
However, the highest yarn liveliness values were seen in the compact spinning
system.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yarn liveliness, snarling tendency, twist effect

Kaynakça

• Çelik, P. 2006, Kesikli Lif İpliklerinde Kendi Üzerine Kıvrılma Eğilimi (İplik Canlılığı) ve Bunu Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Yök Tez Merkezi (196932)
• Üreyen, M.E. 2005, Pamuk Ring İpliklerinde İplik Canlılığı ile Lif özellikleri ve Bazı İplik Özellikleri Arasındaki İlişkiler, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 15(1): 12-18.
• Murrells, C.M, Tao, X.M., Cheng, K.P.S., and Wang K.K. 2003, Production of Torque-free Singles Ring Yarns, Textile Asia, 58-60.
• Lord, P.R. 1981, The Econamics Science and Technology of Yarn Production, The Textile Institute, 78.
• Araujo, M and Smith, G. 1989, Spirality of Knitted Fabrics Part Ι: The Nature of Spirality, Textile Research Journal, 59(6): 247-256.
• Kadoğlu, H. 2000, Pamuk İpliklerinde Kendi Üzerine Kıvrılma Eğilimi (İplik Canlılığı) Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Tekstil Türkiye, 3: 26-31.
• Primentas, A. 2003, Direct determination of Yarn Snarliness, Indian Journal of Fibre &Textile Research, 28: 23-28.
• Marmaralı, A. 2005, Tek ve Çift Katlı İpliklerin Büküm Katsayılarının Düz Örgü Yapılarındaki Örgü Dönmesine Etkisi, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 15(1): 8-11.
• Çelik, P. and Kadoğlu, H. 2009, A Research on Yarn Liveliness Tendency of Staple Yarns, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 3: 189-196.
• Çelik, P, Bedez Üte., T and Kadoğlu, H. 2010, The Yarn Liveliness Properties of Sirospun Yarns, (2010, May), 41st International Symposium on Novelties in Textiles, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
• Xu, Bin Gang, Tao, Xiao Ming., and Murrels, Charlotte Marion. 2010, Evaluation of a Digital Image-signal Approach on the Automatic Measurement of Cotton Yarn Snarls, Textile Research Journal Vol 80 (12): 1151-1159.
• Şardağ, S. and Özdemir, Ö., 2013, Effects of Vacuum Steaming Process on the Twist Liveliness of Staple Yarns, Fibres &Textiles, 5(101): 49-53.Bilir, T.B. ve Şardağ, S., 2017, Tencel ve Pamuk Karışımlı İpliklerin Performans Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi, Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1): 13-27.
• Keisokki Kogyo Co. Ltd., Kringel Factor Meter Instruction Manuel Book.
• Ergün M., 1985, “SPSS for Windows”, Ocak Yayınevi, Ankara.