Effects of Age, Body Region and Mineral Contents on the Fleece Characteristics of Central Anatolian Merino Sheep

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 2, 108 - 114, 30.06.2022

Sedat Behrem , Mahmut Keskin , Sabri Gül , Engin Ünay , Abdulkadir Erişek

https://doi.org/10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.946761

Cited By: 2

Öz

The fibre characteristics of fleece determine its fate through the textile industry. Parameters such as diameter, length, elasticity and strength define the functional quality of fleece. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate effects of different environmental factors as well as wool mineral contents on fleece fibre quality traits in Central Anatolian Merino sheep. Additionally, the mineral contents of Central Anatolian Merino fleece were investigated. For this purpose, 300 samples were equally collected from 3 different body regions (shoulder, rib and rump) of 100 animals from five different age groups. Samples were analysed for fibre quality (diameter, length, elasticity and strength) traits and mineral contents (calcium, iron, potassium, magnesium, copper, manganese and zinc). A wide range of statistical relationships were found among the focused traits and those factors. The findings of this study highlight the importance of minerals as well as environmental factors on fleece quality parameters.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Central Anatolian Merino, sheep, wool quality, minerals, environmental factors

Proje Numarası

TAGEM/HAYSÜD/Ü/18/A4/P2/213

Kaynakça

• 1. Toups MA, Kitchen A, Light JE, Reed DL. 2011. Origin of clothing lice indicates early clothing use by anatomically modern humans in Africa. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28(1), 29–32.
• 2. Bahtiyari M, Akça C, Duran K. 2008. Novel Usage of Wool. Textile and Apparel 18(1), 4-8.
• 3. Van Dam JEG. Environmental benefits of natural fibre production and use. Proceedings of the Symposium on Natural Fibres 3–17. http://www.fao.org/3/i0709e/i0709e03.pdf.
• 4. IWTO. 2020. IWTO’s Specifications for Wool Sheep Welfare. https://iwto.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/IWTO-Wool-Sheep-Welfare.pdf.
• 5. Ingham VM, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR, Afolayan RA, Cummins LJ, Gaunt GM, Stafford J, Hocking Edwards E. Genetic evaluation of crossbred lamb production.
• 4. Genetic parameters for first-cross animal performance. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58(8), 839–846.
• 6. Cilek S. 2015. Determination of Fleece Qualities of Malya Sheep (11/16 Akkaraman X 5/16 Deutsches Merinofleischschaf) and Effect of Age and Sex on These Qualities. Pakistan Journal Agriculturel Sciences 52(2).
• 7. TUIK. 2021. Livestock Production, Number of Sheep and Goat. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=tarim-111%7B%5C&%7Ddil=1.
• 8. Ciani E, Lasagna E, D’andrea M, Alloggio I, Marroni F, Ceccobelli S, Pilla F. 2015. Merino and Merino-derived sheep breeds: a genome-wide intercontinental study. Genetics Selection Evolution 47(1), 1-12.
• 9. Dellal G, Söylemezoglu F. 2000. Anadolu Merinosu Koyunlarmın Bazı Yapağı Özellikleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 6(2), 48–53.
• 10. Atav R, Gürkan Ünal P, Soysal Mİ. 2020.Investigation of the Quality Characteristics of Wool Obtained from Karacabey Merino Sheep Grown in Thrace Region-Turkey. Journal of Natural Fibers 1-8. doi: 10.1080/15440478.2020.1795777.
• 11. Dellal G. 2001. Ile De France (If) X Akkaraman (Ak) (G1) Erkek Kuzularına Ait Yapağıların Tekstil Sanayinde Kullanım Yönünden Bazı Özellikleri. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 7(4), 48–51.
• 12. Olivier JJ, Cloete SWP, Bezuidenhout AG. 1993. Differences in mean fibre diameter and fibre diameter variance in fine wool, strong wool, and fine x strong wool Merino sheep sampled at five body locations. South Africa Journal Animal Science 23(5), 201–203.
• 13. Botha AF, Hunter L. 2010. The measurement of wool fibre properties and their effect on worsted processing performance and product quality. Part 1: The objective measurement of wool fibre properties. Textile Progress 42(4), 227-339.
• 14. Kaynak HK, Babaarslan O. 2015. Breaking strength and elongation properties of polyester woven fabrics on the basis of filament fineness. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics 10(4).
• 15. Uyanik S. 2019. A Research on Determining Optimum Splicing Method in Terms of Fiber Types and Yarn Count. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon 29(1), 22-29.
• 16. Sahoo A, Soren NM. 2011. Nutrition for wool production. Webmed Cent NUTR. 2(10), 1–11.
• 17. Hatcher S, Atkins KD, Thornberry KJ. 2005. Age changes in wool traits of Merino sheep in western NSW. In Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 16, 314-317..
• 18. Khan MJ, Abbas A, Ayaz M, Naeem M, Akhter MS, Soomro MH. 2012. Factors affecting wool quality and quantity in sheep. African Journal of Biotechnology 11(73), 13761-13766.
• 19. Patkowska-Sokoła B, Dobrzański Z, Osman K, Bodkowski R, Zygadlik K. 2009. The content of chosen chemical elements in wool of sheep of different origins and breeds. Archives Animal Breeding 52(4), 410-418.
• 20. Szigeti E, Kátai J, Komlósi I, Oláh J, Szabó C. 2020. Newly Grown Wool Mineral Content Response to Dietary Supplementation in Sheep. Animals 10(8), 1390.
• 21. Behrem S. 2021.Estimation of genetic parameters for pre-weaning growth traits in Central Anatolian Merino sheep. Small Ruminant Research 197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2021.106319.
• 22. Baxter BP, Brims MA, Taylor TB. 1992. Description and performance of the optical fibre diameter analyser (OFDA). Journal of the Textile Institute 83(4), 507-526.
• 23. Walker JW, Stewart WC, Pope R, Spear SL, Ebert M, Murphy TW. 2018. Evaluation of mean fiber diameter measurements by FibreLux micron meter and OFDA2000 in Texas and Intermountain west wool. Small Ruminant Research 159, 31-37.
• 24. Behrendt R, Gloag C, Konstantinov K. 2004. Estimates of repeatability for wool traits measured by OFDA2000. Science Access 1(1), 216-216.
• 25. Steel RG, Torrie JH. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics a biometrical approach, 2 pp. 633pp.
• 26. R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
• 27. Altıntaş A. 1990. Mineral madde metabolizmasına bir bakış. Tarımda kaynak (TAKVA). Tarımsal Kalkınma Vakfı Yayın Organı 1(2), 19-21.
• 28. Aitken FJ, Cottle DJ, Reid TC, Wilkinson BR. 1994. Mineral and amino acid composition of wool from New Zealand Merino sheep differing in susceptibility to yellowing. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45(2), 391-401.
• 29. Kumaresan A, Kapioh MA. 1984. Hair as indictor of mineral status in Yankassa sheep. Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux 37(1), 61-64.
• 30. Georgievskii VI, Annenkov BN, SamokhinVT. 2013. Studies in the agricultural and food sciences. Mineral nutrition of animals, Elsevier. pp. 321–346.
• 31. Wojcikowska-Soroczynska M, Sztych D. 1994. Selected microelements in wool of Polish sheep. Annals of Warsaw Agricultural University. Animal Science 30, 59-68.
• 32. Gabryszuk M, Klewiec J, Czauderna R, Baranowski A, Kowalczyk J. 2000. The content of mineral compounds in sheep wool depending on the breed and physiological state. Rocz Nauk Zoot Supplemented 5, 147–151.
• 33. Krośnicka-Bombała R. 1996. Influence of a season of the year and a colour on pigment and microelements content in a coat of differently coloured sheep and goats. Zesz Nauk Przeg Hod PTZ 23, 117-32.
• 34. Szigeti E, Kátai J, Komlósi I, Oláh J, Szabó C. 2020. Newly Grown Wool Mineral Content Response to Dietary Supplementation in Sheep. Animals, 10(8), 1390.
• 35. Baranowski PIOTR. 2002. Genetic and environmental factors of macroelements concentration in blood serum and osseous tissue of lambs in north-west Poland. Archives Animal Breeding 45(6), 565-574.
• 36. Patkowska-Sokoła B, Dobrzański Z, Bodak E, Panyiotu P, Kołacz R. 2003. Comparative study on the concentration of elements in the wool of sheep of Cyprus and Poland origin. Chem Agric 4, 182–189.
• 37. McGregor BA, Butler KL. 2016. Coarser wool is not a necessary consequence of sheep aging: allometric relationship between fibre diameter and fleece-free liveweight of Saxon Merino sheep. Animal 10(12), 2051-2060.
• 38. Koyuncu M, Tuncel E, Ferik A. 1996. Anadolu Merinosu, Kıvırcık, Türkgeldi koyunlarinin yapaği verim ve özellikleri üzerine bir araştırma. Uludağ of University. Journal Agricultural Science 12, 101-108.
• 39. Scobie DR, Grosvenor AJ, Bray AR, Tandon SK, Meade WJ, Cooper AMB. 2015. A review of wool fibre variation across the body of sheep and the effects on wool processing. Small Ruminant Research 133, 43-53.
• 40. Arık İZ, Dellal G, Cengiz F. 2003. Anadolu merinosu, Akkaraman, Ile de France X Anadolu merinosu (F1) ve Ile de France X Akkaraman (F1) Melezi koyunlarda bazı yapağı fiziksel özellikleri. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 27(3), 651-656.
• 41. Wyrostek A, Kinal S, Patkowska-Sokoła B, Bodkowski R, Cholewińska P, Czyż K. 2019. The influence of zinc-methionine bioplex supplementation to pregnant and lactating sheep on selected wool parameters. Arch. Anim. Breed.62(1), 99–105.
• 42. Erol H, Akçadağ Hİ. 2009. Some production characteristics of Karagül sheep on insitu conditions. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araștırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 49(2), 91-104.