İnkomplet Partisyon Tip II bulunan Unilateral ve Bimodal Koklear İmplant Kullanıcılarının Konuşma, Uzaysal Algı ve İşitme Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 63 - 68, 28.12.2021

Selvet Akkaplan , Merve Batuk , Hilal Dinçer D'alessandro , Gonca Sennaroğlu

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, IP-II iç kulak anomalisi olan ve normal kokleaya sahip koklear implant kullanıcılarının çevrelerindeki konuşma ve çevresel sesleri ayırt etme, yönlendirme ve konumlandırma dahil olmak üzere işitme becerilerinin ölçeğe dayalı bir değerlendirmesini yapmak amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmaya; yaşları 18-55 arasında değişen, IP-II iç kulak anomalisi olan 15 katılımcı ve normal kokleaya sahip olan 15 katılımcı olmak üzere toplam 30 koklear implant kullanıcısı dahil edilmiştir. Çalışmaya dahil edilen tüm katılımcılar unilateral Kİ ve bimodal kullanıcılardan oluşmuştur. Katılımcılar, Konuşma, Uzaysal ve İşitme Kalitesi Ölçeği (KUİK) kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. IP-II iç kulak malformasyonu olan koklear implant kullanıcısı bireyler ile normal kokleaya sahip koklear implant kullanıcısı bireyler, işitsel becerilerini bireysel olarak puanladıklarında sonuçların benzer olduğu görülmüştür. Bimodal dinleyicilerin, unilateral Kİ kullanımına göre, tüm alt alanlar ve genel KUİK skorlarının daha iyi olma eğilimi gösterdiği gözlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

koklear implant, konuşma algısı, uzaysal algı, işitme kalitesi

Teşekkür

Çalışmamızın veri analizi aşamasında desteği olan Uzm. Ody. Zeynep Budak'a teşekkür ederiz.

Evaluation of The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing in Unilateral and Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users with Incomplete Partition Type II

Öz

The aim of this study was to perform a scale-based assessment of the hearing abilities of cochlear implant users with IP type II malformation and normal cochlea, including discrimination, orientation, and positioning of speech and environmental sounds in their environment.A total of 30 cochlear implant users, 15 participants with IP-II inner ear anomalies and 15 participants with normal cochlea, aged 18-55 years were included in this study. All participants included in the study are unilateral CI and bimodal users. Participants were assessed using the Speech, Spatial, and Hearing Qualities Scale (SSQ). When cochlear implant users with IP-II malformations and cochlear implant users with normal cochlea individually scored auditory abilities, the results were similar. It was observed that bimodal listeners tended to have all subdomains and overall SSQ scores compared to use of unilateral CI.

Anahtar Kelimeler

cochlear implant, speech perception, spatial perception, hearing quality

Kaynakça

• Batuk, M. Ö., Çınar, B. Ç., Özgen, B., Sennaroğlu, G., & Sennaroğlu, L. (2017). Audiological and radiological characteristics in incomplete partition malformations. The journal of international advanced otology, 13(2), 233.
• Berrettini, S., Baggiani, A., Bruschini, L., Cassandro, E., Cuda, D., Filipo, R., . . . Forli, F. (2011). Systematic review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in adult patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 31(5), 299-310.
• Berrettini, S., Forli, F., De Vito, A., Bruschini, L., & Quaranta, N. (2013). Cochlear implant in incomplete partition type I. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 33(1), 56-62.
• Bouccara, D., Blanchet, E., Waterlot, P., Smadja, M., Frachet, B., Meyer, B., & Sterkers, O. (2016). Benefit of contralateral hearing aid in adult cochlear implant bearers. European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases, 133(3), 161-165.
• Capretta, N. R., & Moberly, A. C. (2016). Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users? Laryngoscope, 126(3), 699-706. doi:10.1002/lary.25525
• Ching, T. Y., Incerti, P., & Hill, M. (2004). Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear, 25(1), 9-21. doi:10.1097/01.Aud.0000111261.84611.C8
• Ching, T. Y., Psarros, C., Hill, M., Dillon, H., & Incerti, P. (2001). Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear? Ear Hear, 22(5), 365-380. doi:10.1097/00003446-200110000-00002
• Choi, S. J., Lee, J. B., Bahng, J., Lee, W. K., Park, C. H., Kim, H.-J., & Lee, J. H. (2016). Effect of low frequency on speech performance with bimodal hearing in bilateral severe hearing loss. The Laryngoscope, 126(12), 2817-2822. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26014
• Coudert, A., Vigier, S., Scalabre, A., Hermann, R., Ayari-Khalfallah, S., & Truy, E. (2019). Analysis of inner ear malformations associated with a facial nerve anomaly in 653 children fitted with a cochlear implant. Clin Otolaryngol, 44(1), 96-101. doi:10.1111/coa.13246
• Cox, R. M., Alexander, G. C., & Gray, G. A. (2003). Audiometric correlates of the unaided APHAB. J Am Acad Audiol, 14(7), 361-371.
• Devocht, E. M. J., Janssen, A. M. L., Chalupper, J., Stokroos, R. J., & George, E. L. J. (2017). The Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality. Trends in Hearing, 21, 2331216517727900. doi:10.1177/2331216517727900
• Dincer D'Alessandro, H., Ballantyne, D., Boyle, P. J., De Seta, E., DeVincentiis, M., & Mancini, P. (2018). Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. Ear Hear, 39(4), 679-686. doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000525
• Erdem, B. K., & Çiprut, A. (2019). Evaluation of Speech, Spatial Perception and Hearing Quality in Unilateral, Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users. Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, 57(3), 149-153. doi:10.5152/tao.2019.4105
• Hinder, D., Linder, T. E., Schlegel-Wagner, C., & Candreia, C. (2017). Benefit of Bimodal Stimulation with Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid in Elderly Patients. Laryngo-rhino-otologie, 96(7), 456-460.
• Isaiah, A., Lee, D., Lenes-Voit, F., Sweeney, M., Kutz, W., Isaacson, B., . . . Lee, K. H. (2017). Clinical outcomes following cochlear implantation in children with inner ear anomalies. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 93, 1-6.
• Jackler, R. K., Luxford, W. M., & House, W. F. (1987). Congenital malformations of the inner ear: a classification based on embryogenesis. Laryngoscope, 97(3 Pt 2 Suppl 40), 2-14. doi:10.1002/lary.5540971301
• Kamogashira, T., Akamatsu, Y., Kashio, A., Ogata, E., Karino, S., Kakigi, A., . . . Yamasoba, T. (2016). Development of auditory skills after cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 136(1), 78-82. doi:10.3109/00016489.2015.1087047
• Laske, R. D., Veraguth, D., Dillier, N., Binkert, A., Holzmann, D., & Huber, A. M. (2009). Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults. Otol Neurotol, 30(3), 313-318. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819bd7e6
• Marsella, P., Giannantonio, S., Scorpecci, A., Pianesi, F., Micardi, M., & Resca, A. (2015). Role of bimodal stimulation for auditory-perceptual skills development in children with a unilateral cochlear implant. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 35(6), 442.
• Noble, W. (2010). Assessing binaural hearing: results using the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale. J Am Acad Audiol, 21(9), 568-574. doi:10.3766/jaaa.21.9.2
• Noble, W., & Gatehouse, S. (2004). Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap. International Journal of Audiology, 43(2), 100-114. doi:10.1080/14992020400050015
• Noble, W., & Gatehouse, S. (2006). Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ). International Journal of Audiology, 45(3), 172-181. doi:10.1080/14992020500376933
• Noble, W., Tyler, R., Dunn, C., & Bhullar, N. (2008). Unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants and the implant-plus-hearing-aid profile: comparing self-assessed and measured abilities. Int J Audiol, 47(8), 505-514. doi:10.1080/14992020802070770
• Rachovitsas, D., Psillas, G., Chatzigiannakidou, V., Triaridis, S., Constantinidis, J., & Vital, V. (2012). Speech perception and production in children with inner ear malformations after cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 76(9), 1370-1374. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.06.009
• Ramakers, G. G. J., Smulders, Y. E., van Zon, A., Van Zanten, G. A., Grolman, W., & Stegeman, I. (2017). Correlation between subjective and objective hearing tests after unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord, 17, 10. doi:10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y
• Sennaroglu, L., & Saatci, I. (2002). A New Classification for Cochleovestibular Malformations. The Laryngoscope, 112(12), 2230-2241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200212000-00019
• Tyler, R. S., Parkinson, A. J., Wilson, B. S., Witt, S., Preece, J. P., & Noble, W. (2002). Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: speech perception and localization. Ear Hear, 23(2), 98-105. doi:10.1097/00003446-200204000-00003
• Zhang, J., Su, J., Wang, M., & Zhou, H. (2016). Study on bimodal stimulation for aural rehabilitationdevelopmentin infants with a unilateral cochlear implant. Lin Chuang er bi yan hou tou Jing wai ke za zhi= Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, 30(22), 1774-1777.