Asemptomatik hastalarda karotis arter stentleme ve karotis endarterektominin prosedürel ve orta dönem sonuçları: Tek merkez deneyimi

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 168 - 185, 22.06.2020

Ali Baran Budak Husniye Sarıyıldız Eren Gunertem Emre Kulahcıoglu Gurdal Orhan Naim Boran Tumer Atike Tekeli Kunt Kanat Özışık Serdar Günaydın

https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.739395

Öz

Amaç: Aterosklerotik Karotid Arter Stenozu (CS) tüm inmelerin %20’sinden sorumludur. Asemptomatik CS yönetimi daha belirsizdir. Hastaya özel tedavi için, Karotis Endarterektomi (KEA) işleminin daha riskli olduğu durumlarda, cerrahlar ayrıca karotis arter stentlemesi (KAS) yapabilecek tecrübe ve kapasitede olmalıdır. Bu çalışmada, tüm işlemleri (KAS ve KEA) aynı cerrah yapmış ve tek tip stent ve emboli koruma aracı kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca, prosedür sırasındaki monitorizasyon 24 saate yayılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, aynı operatör tarafından 1 yılda KAS veya KEA uygulanan asemptomatik CS hastalarının işlem ve takip sonuçlarını karşılaştırmaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: İnternal karotid arter ciddi oklüzyonu nedeniyle klinik ve anatomik risk profillerine göre, 1.Ocak.2018-31.Aralık 2018 tarihleri arasında Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Kalp-Damar Cerrahi Kliniğinde KAS (Grup 1, n=17) veya KEA (Grup 2, n=18) uygulanan asemptomatik hastaların retrospektif incelemesi yapıldı. Doppler Ultrason ve nörolojik değerlendirme hastalar işleme alınmadan, taburcu olmadan, prosedür sonrası 30.gün, 6.ay ve 1.yılda yapıldı. Hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri, anjiyografik değişkenleri, işlem sonrası 30 gün boyunca ölüm, inme ve miyokard enfarktüsü ve 1 yıllık ipsilateral inme oranları karşılaştırıldı. Teknik başarı, prosedür başarısı, birincil açıklık , klinik başarısızlık, işlem sırasında yardımcı manevraları içeren diğer birincil sonlanım noktaları ve komplikasyonlar, 12 ayda klinik olarak yönlendirilen hedef lezyon revaskülarizasyonundan kurtulma, ölümden kurtulma, tüm felçlerden kurtulma ve restenoz oranlarından kurtulma oranlarını içeren ikincil sonlanım noktaları değerlendirildi ve gruplar arasında karşılaştırıldı.
Bulgular: Sekiz hastada (47.0%) yüksek riskli anatomik kriter ve 11 hastada (%64.7) yüksek riskli klinik kriterler mevcuttu. Grup 2’deki hastalar daha yaşlı (67.7±7.4 vs 71.2± 6.9, p<0.05) idi, ancak hiperlipidemi (58.8% vs 44.4%, p<0.05), hemodiyaliz gerektiren kronik böbrek yetmezliği (11.7% vs 0.0%, p<0.05) ve sol ventrikül disfonksiyonu (17.6% vs 0.0%, p<0.05) sıklığı Grup 1’de fazlaydı. Grup 1’deki hastaların CCDS skoru Grup 2’ye göre düşüktü (4.7 ± 1.3 vs 7.3 ± 1.2; p<0.05). CEA yapılan hastaların lezyonları daha uzun (12.7 ± 2.6 vs 18.5 ± 4.2 mm.; p<0.05) ve daha kalsifikti (11.7% vs 50.0%, p<0.05). Benzer şekilde, grup 2’de damardaki darlık derecesi grup 1’e göre yüksek bulundu (81.4 ± 4.2 vs 88.3±6.4 %; p<0.05). Primer teknik başarı her iki grup için de %100 idi. Prosedürel klinik başarı Grup 1 için %100, Grup 2 için %94.4 idi. Primer patens oranları grup 1 için 1/6/12. aylarda 100%/ 94.1%/94.1%, grup 2 için 100%/100%/94.4%. restenozdan ve klinik olarak yönlendirilen hedef lezyon revaskülarizasyondan kurtulma oranları grup 1 için %94.1, grup 2 için %94.4 idi. Hiçbir hastada ölüm, major inme, miyokard infarktüsü ve sistemik komplikasyon gerçekleşmedi.
Sonuç: Bu çalışma, önemli karotis hastalığı olan asemptomatik hastalarda KEA ve KAS için benzer kısa ve orta dönem sonuçları göstermiştir. Hem KEA hem de KAS için iyi sonuçlar göstersek de, KAS açık cerrahi için uygun olmayan vakalarla sınırlı olmalı ve az risk faktörü ve uzun yaşam beklentisi olan hastalar için asemptomatik karotid arter hastalığının KEA ile tedavisi düşünülmelidir. Hem KEA hem de KAS asemptomatik hastalarda uzun süreli inme riskini azaltır. Uygun tedavi stratejisi, hastanın bireysel risk faktörlerine ve görüntüleme verilerine göre seçilmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

asemptomatik, karotis arter stentleme, karotis endarterektomi

Procedural and mid-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatıc patients: A single center experience

Öz

Aim: Atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis (CS) is responsible for ~20% of strokes. The management of CS in an asymptomatic patient has been less clear. In situations were carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is thought to be more risky, surgeons must also have enough experience and capability to perform carotid artery stenting (CAS) to provide suitable, patient-tailored treatment. In this study, the same investigator performed all interventions (CAS and CEA), and one type of stenting device and EPD was used. In addition, periprocedural monitoring was carried out for at least 24 h. The objective of this study was to compare procedural results and 12-month follow-up outcomes of patients who were treated by the same operator- either CAS or CEA- in one year.
Material and Methods: A retrospective single-center review involving asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis of the ICA caused by atherosclerotic disease who was treated with either stenting with embolic protection (Group 1, n=17) or carotid endarterectomy (group 2, n=18) according to their clinical and anatomical risk profile between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 at Numune Research and Training Hospital, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ankara-Turkey was conducted. A duplex ultrasound (DUS) and neurological assessment was obtained prior to hospital discharge as a baseline, 30-days, 6 months, and 1 year thereafter. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics, angiographic variables, primary endpoints including the composite of death, stroke and myocardial infarction during the 30 days after the procedure or ipsilateral stroke during the 365 days after the procedure was compared. Primary endpoints also including primary technical success, periprocedural clinical success, primary patency, clinical failure, periprocedural adjunctive maneuvers and secondary endpoints including complications, freedom from clinically driven target-lesion revascularization at 12 months, freedom from death, freedom from all stroke and freedom from restenosis rates were assessed and compared between the groups.
Results: High-risk anatomical criteria were present in 8 (47.0%) patients, high-risk clinical criteria were present in 11 (64.7%) patients. Group 2 patients were older (67.7±7.4 vs 71.2± 6.9, p<0.05), but hyperlipidemia (58.8% vs 44.4%, p<0.05), chronic renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis (11.7% vs 0.0%, p<0.05) and left ventricular dysfuntion (17.6% vs 0.0%, p<0.05) were significantly more frequent in Group 1. CCDS of group 1 was significantly lower than group 2 (4.7 ± 1.3 vs 7.3 ± 1.2; p<0.05, respectively). The lesions of the patients undergoing CEA were significantly longer (12.7 ± 2.6 vs 18.5 ± 4.2 mm.; p<0.05) and more calcified (11.7% vs 50.0%, p<0.05) than the patients in group 1. Likewise, the degree of stenosis in group 2 was significantly more than that of group 1 (81.4 ± 4.2 vs 88.3±6.4 %; p<0.05, respectively). Primary technical success was 100% for both groups. Periprocedural clinical success was 100% for Group 1, and 94.4% for group 2. Primary patency rates at 1/6/12 months were 100%/ 94.1%/94.1% for group 1, and 100%/100%/94.4% for group 2. Freedom from restenosis and freedom from CD-TLR at 12 months was 94.1% and 94.4% for group 1 and group 2. No death, major strokes, miyocardial infarction and systemic complications occured.
Conclusion: This study showed similar short and mid-term results for CEA and CAS in asymptomatic patients with significant carotid disease. Although we have shown good results for both CEA and CAS, CAS should be limited to those cases that are not suitable for open surgery and treatment of asymptomatic carotid artery disease with CEA should be considered for patients with few risk factors and long life expectancy. Both CEA and CAS reduce the long-term stroke risk in asymptomatic patients. The appropiate treatment strategy should be selected according to the patient’s individual risk factors and imaging data.

Anahtar Kelimeler

asymptomatic, carotid artery stenting, carotid endarterectomy

Kaynakça

• 1. Müller MD, Lyrer P, Brown MM, Bonati LH. Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020 Feb 25;2(2):CD000515.
• 2. Benjamin E, Blaha M, Chiuve S, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146-e603.
• 3. Diao Z, Jia G, Wu W, Wang C. Carotid endarterectomy versus ca- rotid angioplasty for stroke prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11:142.
• 4. Sardar P, Chatterjee S, Aronow HD, et al. Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for stroke prevention: a meta-analysis of clinic trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(18):2266-2275.
• 5. Bonati LH, Lyrer P, Ederle J, Featherstone R, Brown MM. Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Cochrane Stroke Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(9):CD000515.
• 6. de Weerd M, Greving JP, Hedblad B, et al. Prevalence of asymptom- atic carotid artery stenosis in the general population: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Stroke. 2010;41(6):1294-1297.
• 7. Donnan GA, Davis SM, Chambers BR, Gates PC: Surgery for prevention of stroke; Lancet 1998;351:1372–3.
• 8. Aboyans V, Ricco JB, Bartelink ML, Björck M, Brodmann M, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in Collaboration With the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): Document Covering Atherosclerotic Disease of Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral, Mesenteric, Renal, Upper and Lower Extremity arteries Endorsed By: The European Stroke Organization (ESO) The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur Heart J. 2018 Mar 1;39(9):763-816.
• 9. Aichner FT, Topakian R, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Haring HP, Hill MD, et al. REACH Registry Investigators. High cardiovascular event rates in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: the REACH Registry. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16(8):902–8.
• 10. Roubin GS, Iyer S, Halkin A, et al. Realizing the potential of carotid artery stenting: Proposed paradigms for patient selection and procedural technique. Circulation 2006; 113:2021–2030.
• 11. Ricotta JJ, Aburahma A, Ascher E, Eskandari M, Faries P, Lal BK; Society for Vascular Surgery. Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:e1–e31.
• 12. Liapis CD, Bell PR, Mikhailidis D, Sivenius J, Nicolaides A, Fernandes e Fernandes J, et al; ESVS Guidelines Collaborators. ESVS guidelines. Invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37(4 suppl):1–19.
• 13. Writing G, Naylor AR, Ricco JB, de Borst GJ, Debus S, de Haro J, et al. Editor's choice—management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease: 2017 clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55:3–8.
• 14. Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, Bravata DM, Chimowitz MI, Ezekowitz MD, et al; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:2160–2236.
• 15. Bladin C, Chambers B, Crimmins D, Donnan G, Levi C, et al. Guidelines for patient selection and performance of carotid artery stenting. Intern Med J 2011;41(4):344e7.
• 16. Lam RC, Lin SC, DeRubertis B, Hynecek R, Kent KC, Faries PL. The impact of increasing age on anatomic factors affecting carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg 2007;45(5):875e80.
• 17. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1401–1407.
• 18. AbuRahma AF, DerDerian T, Hariri N, Adams E, AbuRahma J, et al. Anatomical and technical predictors of perioperative clinical outcomes after carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 2017 Aug;66(2):423-432.
• 19. Hofmann R, Niessner A, Kypta A, et al. Risk score for periinterventional complications of carotid artery stenting. Stroke 2006; 37: 2557– 2561.
• 20. Halliday A, Harrison M, Hayter E, Kong X, Mansfield A, et al. 10-year Stroke Prevention After Successful Carotid Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Stenosis (ACST-1): A Multicentre Randomised Trial. Lancet 2010 Sep 25; 376 (9746): 1074 - 84.
• 21. Safian RD, Jaff MR, Bresnahan JF, Foster M, Bacharach M, et al. Protected Carotid Stenting in High-Risk Patients: Results of the SpideRX Arm of the Carotid Revascularization with ev3 Arterial Technology Evolution Trial. J Interv Cardiol 2010 Oct;23(5):491-8.
• 22. Safian RD, Bresnahan JF, Jaff MR, Foster M, Bacharach M, et al. Protected Carotid Stenting in High-Risk Patients With Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 Jun 20;47(12):2384-9.
• 23. Safian RD, Bacharach M, Ansel GM, Criado FJ. Carotid Stenting With a New System for Distal Embolic Protection and Stenting in High-Risk Patients: The Carotid Revascularization With ev3 Arterial Technology Evolution (CREATE) Feasibility Trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004 Sep;63(1):1-6.
• 24. Jones DW, Brott TG, Schermerhorn ML. Trials and Frontiers in Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting. Stroke 2018 Jul;49(7):1776-1783.
• 25. Calvet D, Mas JL, Algra A, Becquemin JP, Bonati LH, Dobson J, et al; Carotid Stenting Trialists’ Collaboration. Carotid stenting: is there an operator effect? A pooled analysis from the carotid stent- ing trialists’ collaboration. Stroke. 2014;45:527–532.
• 26. Claus D, Huppert P, Bauersachs R, Diegel H, Hedtmann G. Endovascular therapy of carotid artery stenosis: a prospective case study. J Neurointerv Surg 2010 Mar;2(1):59-64.
• 27. Beach KW, Bergelin RO, Leotta DF, et al. Standardized ultrasound evaluation of carotid stenosis for clinical trials: University of Washington Ultrasound Reading center. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2010; 8: 39.
• 28. Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Peerless SJ, et al. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325:445-53.
• 29. Timaran CH, McKinsey JF, Schneider PA, Littooy F. Reporting standards for carotid interventions from the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 2011 Jun;53(6):1679-95.
• 30. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, DiSciascio G, Deligonul U, Topol EJ, et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease, in implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. Circulation 1990;82:1193-202.
• 31. Adams HPJr, delZoppoG, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, BrassL, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisci- plinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 2007;38:1655-711.
• 32. Easton JD, Saver JL, Albers GW, Alberts MJ, Chaturvedi S, Feldmann E, et al. Definition and Evaluation of transient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascu ar Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 2009;40:2276-93.
• 33. Crest HRW. Carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stent trial: background, design, and current status. Semin Vasc Surg 2000; 13:139-43.
• 34. Brott TG, Hobson 2nd RW, Howard G, Roubin GS, Clark WM, Brooks W, et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2010;363(1):11e23.
• 35. Bonati LH, Ederle J, McCabe DJH, et al. Long-term risk of carotid restenosis in patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 908–17.
• 36. Eckstein H-H, Ringleb P, Allenberg J-R, et al. Results of the Stent-protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 893–902.
• 37. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, Branchereau A, Moulin T, Becquemin JP, et al. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 2006;355(16):1660e71.
• 38. Lal BK, Hobson RW 2nd, Tofighi B, Kapadia I, Cuadra S, Jamil Z. Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 63–73.
• 39. Setacci C, Chisci E, Setacci F, Iacoponi F, de Donato G. Grading carotid intrastent restenosis. Stroke 2008; 39: 1189–96.
• 40. AbuRahma AF, Abu-Halimah S, Bensenhaver J, et al. Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48: 589–94.
• 41. Zhou W, Felkai DD, Evans M, et al. Ultrasound criteria for severe in-stent restenosis following carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 74–80.
• 42. Moresoli P, Habib B, Reynier P, Secrest MH, Eisenberg MJ, Filion KB. Carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2017;48(8):2150-2157.
• 43. Spangler EL, Goodney PP, Schanzer A, et al. Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy versus stenting in comparable medical risk patients. J Vascular Surg 2014;60:1227–31. 1231.e1221.
• 44. Rasheed AS, White RS, Tangel V, Storch BM, Pryor KO. Carotid Revascularization Procedures and Perioperative Outcomes: A Multistate Analysis, 2007-2014. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019 Jul;33(7):1963-1972.
• 45. Ederle J, Dobson J, Featherstone RL, Bonati LH, van der Worp HB, de Borst GJ, et al. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;375(9719): 985e97.
• 46. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, et al. For the Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy Investigators. Protected carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(15):1493–501.
• 47. Rosenfield K, Matsumura JS, Chaturvedi C, Riles T, Anse GM, et al. ACT-1 Investigators. Randomized Trial of Stent Versus Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis N Engl J Med 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1011-20.
• 48. ACST-2 Collaborative Group, Halliday A, Bulbulia R, et al. Status Update and Interim results from the asymptomatic carotid surgery trial-2 (ACST-2). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;46(5):510-518.
• 49. Yoshida S, Bensley RP, Glaser JD, Nabzdyk CS, Hamdan AD, Wyers MC, et al. The current national criteria for carotid artery stenting over- estimate its efficacy in patients who are symptomatic and at high risk. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:120–127.
• 50. Meschia JF, Bushnell C, Boden-Albala B, Braun LT, Bravata DM, Chaturvedi S, et al; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology; Council on Hypertension. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/ American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:3754–3832.
• 51. Nicolaides AN, Kakkos SK, Kyriacou E, Griffin M, Sabetai M, Thomas DJ, et al; Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Risk of Stroke (ACSRS) Study Group. Asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis and cere- brovascular risk stratification. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:1486–1496.e1
• 52. Mathur A, Roubin GS, Iyer SS, Piamsonboon C, Liu MW, Gomez CR, et al. Predictors of stroke complicating carotid artery stenting. Circulation 1998;97:1239-45.
• 53. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive . Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA . 1995;273:1421–1428.
• 54. Baker WH, Howard VJ, Howard G, Toole JF. Effect of contralateral occlusion on long-term efficacy of endarterectomy in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS). ACAS Investigators. Stroke 2000;31:2330–2334.
• 55. Silver FL, Mackey A, Clark WM, Brooks W, Timaran CH, Chiu D, et al; CREST Investigators. Safety of stenting and endarterectomy by symptomatic status in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST). Stroke. 2011;42:675–680.
• 56. Mukherjee D, Roffi M. Minimizing Distal Embolization During Carotid Artery Stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019 Feb 25;12(4):404-405.
• 57. Hussain MA, Mamdani M, Tu JV, et al. Long-term outcomes of carotid endarterectomy versus stenting in a multicenter population-based Canadian study. Ann Surg 2018;268:364–73.
• 58. Alhaidar M, Algaeed M, Amdur R, et al. Early outcomes after carotid end- arterectomy and carotid artery stenting for carotid stenosis in the ACS- NSQIP Database. J Vasc Intervent Neurol 2018;10:52–6.
• 59. Jalbert JJ, Nguyen LL, Gerhard-Herman MD, et al. Comparative effec- tiveness of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy among Medicare beneficiaries. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2016;9:275–85.
• 60. Obeid T, Arnaoutakis DJ, Arhuidese I, et al. Poststent ballooning is associated with increased periprocedural stroke and death rate in carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 2015;62:616–23.
• 61. Mutzenbach SJ, Millesi K, Roesler C, et al. The Casper Stent System for carotid artery stenosis. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:869–73.
• 62. Kastrup A, Groschel K, Krapf H, Brehm BR, Dichgans J, Schulz JB. Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: a systematic review of the lit- erature. Stroke. 2003;34:813–9.
• 63. Zahn R, Mark B, Niedermaier N, Zeymer U, Limbourg P, Ischinger T, et al. Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: better results than stenting without protection? Eur Heart J. 2004;25: 1550–8.
• 64. Zahn R, Ischinger T, Hochadel M, Zeymer U, Schmalz W, Treese N, Hauptmann KE, Seggewiss H, Janicke I, Haase H, Mudra H, Senges J. Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians: results from the ALKK Carotid Artery Stent (CAS) Registry. Eur Heart J 2007;28:370–375.
• 65. Langhoff R, Schofer J, Scheinert D, et al. Dou- ble filtration during carotid artery stenting using a novel post-dilation balloon with integrated embolic protection. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2019; 12:395–403.
• 66. Schermerhorn ML, Liang P, Jorgensen JE, Cronenwett JL, Nolan BW, et al. Association of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization vs Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting With Stroke or Death Among Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis. JAMA 2019 Dec 17;322(23):2313-2322.
• 67. Lamanna A, Maingard J, Barras CD, Kok HK, Handelman G et al. Carotid Artery Stenting: Current State of Evidence and Future Directions. Acta Neurol Scand 2019 Apr;139(4):318-333.
• 68. Wissgott C, Schmidt W, Behrens P, Brandt C, Schmitz KP, Andresen R. Experimental Investigation of Modern and Established Carotid Stents. Rofo 2014 Feb;186(2):157-65.
• 69. Munster AB, Franchini AJ, Qureshi MI, Thapar A, Davies AH. Temporal trends in safety of carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients: systematic review. Neurology. 2015;85:365–372.
• 70. Hadar N, Raman G, Moorthy D, O’Donnell TF, Thaler DE, et al. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis treated with medical therapy alone: temporal trends and implications for risk assessment and the design of future studies. Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;38:163–173.
• 71. Hawkins BM, Kennedy KF, Aronow HD, Nguyen LL, White CJ, Rosenfield K, Normand SL, Spertus JA, Yeh RW. Hospital variation in carotid stenting outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:858–63
• 72. Nallamothu BK, Gurm HS, Ting HH, Goodney PP, Rogers MA, et al. Operator Experience and Carotid Stenting Outcomes in Medicare Beneficiaries. JAMA 2011 Sep 28;306(12):1338-43.
• 73. Lindström D, Jonsson M, Formgren J, Delle M, Rosfors S, Gillgren P. Outcome After 7 Years of Carotid Artery Stenting and Endarterectomy in Sweden e Single Centre and National Results. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 43 (2012) 499e503.
• 74. Gray WA, Yadav JS, Verta P, Scicli A, Fairman R, Wholey M, et al. The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;70: 1025–33.
• 75. Gaba K, Ringleb PA, Halliday A. Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Intervention or Best Medical Therapy?. Curr Neurosci Rep 2018 Sep 24;18(11):80.
• 76. Naggara O, Touze E, Beyssen B, Trinquart L, Chatellier G, Meder JF, et al; EVA-3S Investigators. Anatomical and technical factors associated with stroke or death during carotid angioplasty and stenting: results from the endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe ca- rotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial and systematic review. Stroke 2011;42:380-8.
• 77. Chaturvedi S, Matsumura JS, Gray W, Xu C, Verta P; CAP- TURE 2 Investigators and Executive Committee. Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians: periprocedural stroke risk predictor analysis from the multicenter Carotid ACCULINK/ ACCUNET Post Approval Trial to Uncover Rare Events (CAPTURE 2) clinical trial. Stroke 2010;41:757-64.
• 78. McCabe DJH, Pereira AC, Clifton A, et al. CAVATAS Investigators. Restenosis after carotid angioplasty, stenting, or endarterectomy in the carotid and vertebral artery transluminal angioplasty study (CAVATAS). Stroke 2005;36:281e6.
• 79. Groschel K, Riecker A, Schulz JB, et al. Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 2005;36:367e73.
• 80. Khan M, Qureshi A. Factors associated with increased rates of post-procedural stroke or death following carotid artery stent placement: a systematic review. J Vasc Interv Neurol 2014; 7: 11-20.
• 81. Sayed S, Stanziale SF, Wholey MH, Makaroun MS. Angio- graphic lesion characteristics can predict adverse outcomes after carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:81-7.
• 82. Nejim B, Obeid T, Arhuidese I, Hicks C, Wan S, et al. Predictors of Perioperative Outcomes After Carotid Revascularization. J Surg Res 2016 Aug;204(2):267-273.
• 83. Galinanes EL, Dombroviskiy VY, Hupp CS, Kruse RL, Vogel TR. Evaluation of readmission rates for c arotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting in the US Medicare population. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2014; 48(3): 217-23.
• 84. Dakour Aridi H, Locham S, Nejim B, et al. Comparison of 30-day readmission rates and risk factors between carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2017;66:1432–44. e1437.
• 85. Moore WS, Popma JJ, Roubin GS, Voeks JH, Jones M, Howard G, et al. Carotid angiographic characteristics in the CREST trial were major contributors to periprocedural stroke and death differences between carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2016;63:851e7.
• 86. Anand SS, Bosch J, Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Diaz R, Widimsky P, et al. Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in patients with stable peripheral or carotid artery disease: an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391:219–29. Subgroup analysis of patients with asymp- tomatic carotid stenosis in the COMPASS trial.