THE FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE INNOVATION PROCESS OF COMPANIES

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 5, 61 - 74, 01.06.2019

Ertan Aksoy Ahmet Oguz Demir

Öz

Innovation improves the product and process quality of companies, reduces production costs, enables them to grow faster and increase their efficiency. At this point, innovation appears to play a key role in the growth, development and sustainability of companies. On the other hand, there are variables affect the development of innovation at the firm level. This research examines the factors that affect the innovation process at the firm level. At this point, as a complement to each other, innovation ecosystem, innovation strategies and innovation resources at firm level are examined in this research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Firm Level Innovation, Innovation Ecosystem, Innovation Strategy, Innovation Resources

FİRMALARIN İNOVASYON SÜRECİNİ ETKİLEYEN UNSURLAR

Öz

İnovasyon, firmaların ürün ve süreç kalitelerini iyileştirmekte, üretim maliyetlerini düşürmekte, daha hızlı büyümelerini sağlamakta ve verimliliğini artırmaktadır. Bu noktada, inovasyonun şirketlerin büyümesi, gelişmesi ve sürdürülebilir olması açısından kilit role sahip olduğu görülmektedir. Diğer taraftan, firma düzeyinde inovasyonun gelişimini etkileyen birçok değişken bulunmaktadır. Bu araştırma firma düzeyinde inovasyon sürecini etkileyen unsurları incelenmektedir. Bu noktada, birbirlerinin tamamlayıcısı olarak genelden özele inovasyon ekosistemi ve firmaların inovasyon sistemi içerisindeki yeri ve önemi, firma düzeyinde inovasyon stratejileri ve firma düzeyinde inovasyon kaynakları ele alınmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Firma Düzeyinde İnovasyon, İnovasyon Ekosistemi, İnovasyon Ekosistemi, İnovasyon Stratejisi, İnovasyon Kaynakları

Kaynakça

• Acs, Z., & Gifford, S. (1996). Innovation of Entrepreneurial Firms. Small Business Economics, 203-218,.
• Ahlin, B., Drnovsek, M., & Hisrich, R. (2014). Entrepreneurs’ creativity and firm innovation: the moderating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Small Bus Econ, 101–117.
• Amason, A., Shrader, R., & Tompson, G. (2006). Newness and novelty: relating top management team composition to new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 125–148.
• Andersson, M., & Loof, H. (2012). Small business innovation: firm level evidence from Sweden. J Technol Transf, 732–754.
• Ankrah, S., & AL-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities—industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 387-408.
• Ansoff, H., & Stewart, J. (1967). Strategies for a technology-based business. Harvard Business Review.
• Atalay, M., Anafarta, N., & Sarvan, F. (2013). The Relationship between Innovation and Firm Performance: An Empirical Evidence from Turkish Automotive Supplier Industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226-235.
• Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1994). Evaluating technological infor-mation and utilizing it: scientific knowledge, technologicalcapability and external linkages in biotechnology. J. Econ. Behav.Org., 91-114.
• Audretsch, D., Coad, A., & Segarra, A. (2014). Firm growth and innovation. Small Bus Econ, 743–749.
• Ayalew, M., Xianzhi, Z., Dinberu, Y., & Hailu, D. (2019). The Determinants of Firm’s Innovation in Africa. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade.
• Baglieria, D., Baldib, F., & Tuccid, C. (2018). University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all. Technovation.
• Barney, J. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 656–665.
• Bassis, N., & Armellini, F. (2018). Systems of innovation and innovation ecosystems: a literature review in search of complementarities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1053–1080.
• Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Res. Policy, 1477-1492.
• Body, J., & Habbal, F. (2016). The Innovation Ecosystem. In B. Banerjee, & S. Ceri, Creating Innovation Leaders, Understanding Innovation (pp. 25-51). Springer International Publishing.
• Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2002). R&D cooperation and spilllovers:some empirical evidence from Belgium. Am. Econ. Rev., 1169-1184.
• Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition. Management Science, 68–82.
• Christensen, J. (1995). Asset Profiles for Technological Innovation. Research Policy, 727-745.
• Cohen, W. (2010). Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. In W. Cohen, Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (pp. 129–213). Elsevier: Elsevier.
• Dess, G., Lumpkin, G., & Covin, J. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests of contingency and configurational models. . Strategic Management Journal, 677–695.
• Drucker, P. (1984). Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
• Fasnacht, D. (2018). Open Innovation Ecosystems. Zurich: Springer International Publishing.
• Fernandes, C., Ferreira, J., & Raposo, M. (2013). Drivers to firm innovation and their effects on performance: an international comparison. Int Entrep Manag J, 557–580.
• Gnyawali, D., & Park, B.-J. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 650–663.
• Gomez-Mejia, L., & Balkin, D. (1987). Toward a contingency theory of compensation strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 169−182.
• Guan, J., Yam, R., Tang, E., & Lau, A. (2009). Innovation strategy and performance during economic transition: Evidences in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 802–812.
• Gu, Q., Jiang, W., & Wang, G. (2016). Effects of external and internal sources on innovation performance in Chinese high-tech SMEs: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 76–86.
• Güngör, P. (2011). The Relationship between Reward Management System and Employee Performance with the Mediating Role of Motivation: A Quantitative Study on Global Banks. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1510–1520.
• Hamel, G. (2006). The why, what and how of management innovation. Harvard Business Review, 72–84.
• He, Z. , & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci., 481–494.
• Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., & Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 13-28.
• Jieun, C. (2017). Internal vs. External Sources of Innovation and Firm Productivity. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
• Karatas-Ozkan, M., Murphy, W., & Rae, D. (2005). University incubators in the UK. In Entrepreneurship and Innovation (pp. 41-51).
• Kor, Y., & Mesko, A. (2013). Dynamic managerial capabilities: configu- ration and orchestration of top executives’ capabilities and the firm’s dominant logic. Strateg. Manag. J., 233-244.
• Lam, A. (2015). Shifting Institutional Boundaries. In E. Reale, & E. Primeri, The Transformation of University Institutional and Organizational Boundaries (pp. 1-28).
• Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. . Sci Public Policy, 279–286.
• Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 1123–1134.
• Mantysaari, P. (2012). Corporate Governance and Innovation. In P. Mantysaari, Organising the Firm. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
• Mansour, A., & Kanso, L. (2017). Science park implementation – A proposal for merging research and industry in developing Arab countries. HBRC Journal.
• March, J. (1994). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci., 71–87.
• Matej, L., & Lidija, B. (2014). Technological innovation capabilities as a source of competitive advantage: A case study from the home appliance industry. Transformations in Business and Economics, 144-160.
• Miles, R., & Snow, C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process.
• Ning, J. (2019). The impact of accounting restatements on corporate innovation strategy. J. Account. Public Policy, 219–237.
• Ning, J. (2018). Corporate innovation strategy and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 155–173.
• Ngari, J. (2013). Structural Capital and Business Performance of Pharmaceutical firms in Kenya. International Journal of Applied Research and Studies, 191-211.
• Nooteboom, B. (1994). Innovation and Diffusion in Small. Firms: Theory and Evidence. Small Business Economics, 327-347.
• Parveen, S., Senin, A., & Umar, A. (2015). Organizational Culture and Open Innovation: A Quadruple Helix Open Innovation Model Approach. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 335-342.
• Pique, J., Berbegal-Mirabent, J., & Etzkowitz, H. (2018). Triple Helix and the evolution of ecosystems of innovation: the case of Silicon Valley. Springer.
• Poon, J., & MacPherson, A. (2005). Innovation strategies of Asian firms in the United States. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 255–273.
• Robben, H., & Hultink, E. (1995). Measuring new product success: The difference that time perspective makes. Journal of Product Innovation Management.
• Rosell, D., & Lakemond, N. (2012). Collaborative innovation with suppliers – A conceptual model for characterizing supplier contributions to NPD. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 197-214.
• Scaringella, L., Miles, R., & Truong, Y. (2017). Customers involvement and firm absorptive capacity in radical innovation: The case of technological spin-offs. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 144–162.
• Schrankler, J. (2018). The Role of University Technology Transfer. In K. Behrns, B. Gingles, & M. Sarr, Medical Innovation (pp. 31-41).
• Schepers, S. (2017). Innovation Ecosystem Development: A Necessary Instrument to Escape the Mid-Income Trap. In S. Schepers, & S. Sener, Innovation, Governance and Entrepreneurship: How Do They Evolve in Middle Income Countries?
• Schumpeter, J. (1942). Socialism, Capitalism, and Democracy. Harper and Brothers.
• Schein, E. (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Sloan Manag. Rev.
• Shahzad, F., Xiu, G., & Shahbaz, M. (2017). Organizational culture and innovation performance in Pakistan's software industry. Technology in Society, 66-73.
• Shi, X., Wu, Y., & Fu, D. (2019). Does University-Industry collaboration improve innovation efficiency? Evidence from Chinese Firms. Economic Modelling.
• Snell, S., & Dean Jr, J. (1992). Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: A human capital perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 467-504.
• Strecker, N. (2009). Innovation Strategy and Firm Performance. Springer.
• Statsenko, L., & Zubielqui, G. (2019). Customer collaboration, service firms' diversification and innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management.
• Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 450-463.
• Teece, D. (2010). Technological Innovation and the Theory of The Firm: The Role of Enterprise-Level Knowledge, Complementarities, and (Dynamic) Capabilities. In B. Hall, & N. Rosenberg, Handbooks in Economics (pp. 680-730). Elsevier.
• Therrien, P. (2003). City and innovation: different size, different strategy. the DRUID Summer Conference 2003 on Creating and Sharing and Transferring Knowledge. The role of Geography Institutions and Organizations. Copenhagen.
• Tsai, K., Hsieh, M., & Hultink, E. (2011). External technology acquisition and product innovativeness: the moderating roles of R&D investment and configurational context. J. Eng. Technol. Manage., 184–200.
• Tushman, M., & Benner, M. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Manage. Rev., 238–256.
• Uotila, J., Maula, M., Thomas, K., & Zahra, S. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strateg. Manag. J., 221–231.
• Valkokari, K., Amitrano, C., Bifulco, F., & Valjakka, T. (2016). Managing Actors, Resources, and Activities in Innovation Ecosystems – A Design Science Approach. Collaboration in a Hyperconnected World (pp. 521–530). Porto: Springer.
• Wessner, C. (2005). Entrepreneurship and the Innovation Ecosystem Policy Lessons From the United States. In D. Audretsch, H. Grimm, & C. Wessner, Local Heroes in the Global Village (pp. 67-89). Boston: Springer.
• Wu, J. (2014). Cooperation with competitors and product innovation: Moderating effects of technological capability and alliances with universities. Industrial Marketing Management, 199–209.
• Xiuli, S., Haizheng, L., & Vivek, G. (2019). Firm-level Human Capital and Innovation: Evidence from China. China Economic Review.