TÜRK GENÇ ELİT ERKEK HENTBOL OYUNCULARINDA YARALANMA RİSKİ TARAMA ÖLÇÜMLERİNİN SAHA İÇİ POZİSYONLARA GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 2, 163 - 170, 28.08.2020

Umut Ziya Koçak , Bayram Ünver Derya Özer Kaya

https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.583463

Cited By: 1

Öz

Amaç: Hentbol, en sık yaralanma belirtilen takım sporlarından biridir. Hareket analizleri ve fonksiyonel olarak sınırlı alanları tespit etmek, yaralanma risklerini ortadan kaldırmak için son derece önemlidir. Bu çalışmada genç Türk elit erkek hentbol oyuncularında yaralanma risklerinin belirlenmesi ve sahadaki pozisyonlara göre karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Yöntem: Araştırmaya, U17 Milli Hentbol Takımı'na davet edilen 54 oyuncu (yaş=15,69±0,47 yıl, boy=182,80±6,53 cm, vücut ağırlığı=82,09±14,28 kg, vücut kütle indeksi=24,52±3,77 kg/m2) katıldı. Fiziksel özelliklerden tanımlayıcı veriler elde edildi. Yaralanma riski, Fonksiyonel Hareket Analizi (FHA) testi, Y Denge Testi (YDT)-Üst Ekstremite ve YDT-Alt Ekstremite testleri kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Tüm denekler için toplam FHA, YDT-Üst Ekstremite ve YDT-Alt Ekstremite puanları hesaplandı. Sonuçlar: Saha içi pozisyonlar, kaleci (n=7), oyun kurucular (n=24), kanat oyuncuları (n=13) ve pivot (n=10) olarak dağılmaktaydı. Sahadaki pozisyonlara göre, pivotlar ve kaleciler FHA ve YDT-UE değerlendirmelerinde en düşük puanlara sahip olarak belirlendi (p<0,05). Tartışma: Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre, kaleci ve pivot pozisyonlarında oynayan oyuncuların düşük FHA ve YDT-Üst Extremite skorları nedeni ile daha yüksek yaralanma riskine sahip olabileceği belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlar, antrenörlerin ve oyuncuların mevcut durumu gözlemlemelerine ve yaralanma önleme programlarını uygulamalarına olanak sağlayacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sporcu, Yaralanma, Risk Değerlendirmesi, Spor

A COMPARISON OF INJURY RISK SCREENING TOOLS IN TURKISH YOUNG ELITE MALE HANDBALL PLAYERS BASED ON FIELD POSITIONS

Öz

Purpose: Handball is one of the team sports that common injuries reported. Movement analyses and detecting functionally limited areas have been of utmost importance for eliminating injury risks. This study aimed to determine the injury risks and compare them according to field positions in young Turkish elite male handball players. Methods: Fifty-four players (age=15.69±0.47 years, height=182.80±6.53 cm, weight=82.09±14.28 kg, body mass index=24.52±3.77 kg/m2) who were invited to the U17 National Handball Team participated in the study. Descriptive data with physical characteristics were obtained. Injury risk was assessed using the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) test, Y-Balance Test (YBT)-Upper Extremity, and YBT-Lower Extremity tests. The overall scores for FMS, YBT-Upper Extremity, and YBT-Lower Extremity were calculated for all subjects. Results: The field positions were distributed as goalkeepers (n=7), back players (n=24), wing players (n=13), and pivots (n=10). Based on the field positions, pivots and goalkeepers were determined as having the lowest scores regarding FMS and YBT-Upper Extremity (p<0.05). Conclusion: Players who compete in the positions of goalkeeper and pivot might have higher injury risk due to lower FMS and YBT-Upper Extremity scores. These results would allow the trainers and players to observe the current status and to implement the injury prevention programs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Athlete, Injury, Risk Assessment, Sports

Kaynakça

• 1. Langevoort G, Myklebust G, Dvorak J, Junge A. Handball injuries during major international tournaments. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007;17(4):400-7.
• 2. Åman M, Forssblad M, Henriksson‐Larsén K. Incidence and severity of reported acute sports injuries in 35 sports using insurance registry data. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26(4):451-62.
• 3. Bere T, Alonso J-M, Wangensteen A, Bakken A, Eirale C, Dijkstra HP, et al. Injury and illness surveillance during the 24th Men's Handball World Championship 2015 in Qatar. Br J Sports Med. 2015:bjsports-2015-094972.
• 4. Bonazza NA, Smuin D, Onks CA, Silvis ML, Dhawan A. Reliability, validity, and injury predictive value of the functional movement screen: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The American journal of sports medicine. 2017;45(3):725-32.
• 5. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function‐part 1. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2014;9(3):396.
• 6. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function‐part 2. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2014;9(4):549.
• 7. Gonell AC, Romero JAP, Soler LM. Relationship between the Y balance test scores and soft tissue injury incidence in a soccer team. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(7):955.
• 8. Fuller JT, Chalmers S, Debenedictis TA, Townsley S, Lynagh M, Gleeson C, et al. High prevalence of dysfunctional, asymmetrical, and painful movement in elite junior Australian Football players assessed using the Functional Movement Screen. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(2):134-8.
• 9. Hotta T, Nishiguchi S, Fukutani N, Tashiro Y, Adachi D, Morino S, et al. Functional movement screen for predicting running injuries in 18-to 24-year-old competitive male runners. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(10):2808-15.
• 10. Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight ML. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason functional movement screen? North American journal of sports physical therapy: NAJSPT. 2007;2(3):147.
• 11. Fox D, O’Malley E, Blake C. Normative data for the Functional Movement Screen™ in male Gaelic field sports. Phys Ther Sport. 2014;15(3):194-9.
• 12. Slodownik R, Ogonowska-Slodownik A, Morgulec-Adamowicz N. Functional Movement ScreenTM and history of injury in assessment of potential risk of injury among team handball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017.
• 13. Shultz R, Anderson SC, Matheson GO, Marcello B, Besier T. Test-retest and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen. J Athl Train. 2013;48(3):331-6.
• 14. Gulgin H, Hoogenboom B. The Functional Movement Screening (FMS)™: An inter‐rater reliability study between raters of varied experience. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(1):14.
• 15. Gorman PP, Butler RJ, Plisky PJ, Kiesel KB. Upper Quarter Y Balance Test: reliability and performance comparison between genders in active adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(11):3043-8.
• 16. Del Vecchio FB, Gondim DF, Arruda ACP. Functional Movement Screening performance of Brazilian jiu-jitsu athletes from Brazil: differences considering practice time and combat style. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(8):2341-7.
• 17. Portas MD, Parkin G, Roberts J, Batterham AM. Maturational effect on Functional Movement Screen™ score in adolescent soccer players. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(10):854-8.
• 18. Garrison M, Westrick R, Johnson MR, Benenson J. Association between the functional movement screen and injury development in college athletes. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(1):21.
• 19. Sprague PA, Mokha GM, Gatens DR. Changes in functional movement screen scores over a season in collegiate soccer and volleyball athletes. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2014;28(11):3155-63.
• 20. Parenteau-G E, Gaudreault N, Chambers S, Boisvert C, Grenier A, Gagné G, et al. Functional movement screen test: A reliable screening test for young elite ice hockey players. Phys Ther Sport. 2014;15(3):169-75.
• 21. Abraham A, Sannasi R, Nair R. Normative values for the functional movement screentm in adolescent school aged children. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(1):29.
• 22. Perry FT, Koehle MS. Normative data for the functional movement screen in middle-aged adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(2):458-62.
• 23. Chorba RS, Chorba DJ, Bouillon LE, Overmyer CA, Landis JA. Use of a functional movement screening tool to determine injury risk in female collegiate athletes. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2010;5(2):47.
• 24. Kiesel KB, Butler RJ, Plisky PJ. Prediction of injury by limited and asymmetrical fundamental movement patterns in american football players. J Sport Rehabil. 2014;23(2):88-94.
• 25. Rowan CP, Kuropkat C, Gumieniak RJ, Gledhill N, Jamnik VK. Integration of the functional movement screen into the National Hockey League Combine. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(5):1163-71.
• 26. Mcguine TA, Greene JJ, Best T, Leverson G. Balance as a predictor of ankle injuries in high school basketball players. Clin J Sport Med. 2000;10(4):239-44.
• 27. Chimera NJ, Smith CA, Warren M. Injury history, sex, and performance on the functional movement screen and Y balance test. J Athl Train. 2015;50(5):475-85.