Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

PRİMER DİSMENORESİ OLAN VE OLMAYAN KADINLARDA OMURGA POSTÜR VE MOBİLİTESİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1, 20 - 27, 10.04.2021
https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.677298

Öz

Amaç: Son zamanlarda primer dismenore (PD) ile muskuloskeletal sistemin düzgünlüğü ve fonksiyonları arasında bir ilişki olduğu ifade edilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, PD olan ve olmayan kadınlarda omurga postür ve mobilitesini karşılaştırmaktı.
Yöntem: Çalışmaya, PD olan (PD Grubu, n=23, yaş=20,91±2,02 yıl, vücut kütle indeksi [VKİ]=21,63±2,98 kg/m2) ve olmayan (Kontrol Grubu, n=22, yaş=20,18±1,22 yıl, VKİ=20,79±2,43 kg/m2) kadınlar dâhil edildi. Kadınların menstrual semptomları kaydedildi. Menstrual ağrı şiddeti Görsel Analog Skalası (GAS) ile omurga postürü ve mobilitesi Valedo®Shape omurga postür ve mobilite ölçüm cihazı (Hocoma, Idiag GmbH, Fehraltorf, Switzerland) ile değerlendirildi.
Sonuçlar: Grupların menstrual semptomları benzerdi (p>0,05). PD grubundaki kadınlarda menstrual ağrı şiddeti ortalaması 6,54±1,60 cm idi. Grupların sagital ve frontal düzlemdeki torakal, lumbal, sakral-kalça ve inklinasyon açıları arasında fark yoktu (p>0,05). PD grubunda kontrol grubuna göre sagital düzlemde sakral mobilitesinin (p=0,025), frontal düzlemde torakal (p=0,010) ve lumbal mobilitesinin (p=0,020) daha az olduğu bulundu. Diğer mobilite parametreleri gruplar arasında benzerdi (p>0,05).
Tartışma: PD grubunda, kontrol grubuna göre omurga postürünün değişmediği ancak omurga mobilitesinin azaldığı görüldü. Bu sonuçlara göre klinikte PD’nin değerlendirilmesinde ve tedavi yaklaşımlarında azalmış omurga mobilitesinin göz önünde bulundurulması önemli olabilir.

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

Teşekkür

-

Kaynakça

  • 1. Dawood Y. Primary dysmenorrhea advances in pathogenesis and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):428-41.
  • 2. Hailemeskel S, Demissie A, Assefa N. Primary dysmenorrhea magnitude, associated risk factors, and its effect on academic performance: evidence from female university students in Ethiopia. Int J Womens Health. Dove Press; 2016;19(8):489-496.
  • 3. Midilli TS, Yasar E, Baysal E. Dysmenorrhea characteristics of female Students of health school and affecting factors and their knowledge and use of complementary and alternative medicine methods. Holist Nurs Pract. 2015;29(4):194-204.
  • 4. Aktaş D. Prevalence and factors affecting dysmenorrhea in female university students: effect on general comfort level. Pain Management Nursing. 2015;16(4):534-543.
  • 5. Fernández M, Onieva-Zafra, MD, Parra-Fernández ML. The Impact of dysmenorrhea on quality of life among Spanish female university students. J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(5):713.
  • 6. Proctor M, Hing W, Johnson TC, Murphy PA, Brown J. Spinal manipulation for dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:1-27.
  • 7. Akerland M. Pathophysiology of dysmenorrhea. Acta Obstet Gynecl. 1979;58(87):27–32.
  • 8. Willman EA, Collins WP, Clayton SG. Studies in the involvement of prostaglandins in uterine symptomatology and pathology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1976;83(5):337-41.
  • 9. Blakey H, Chisholm C, Dear F, et al.: Is exercise associated with primary dysmenorrhoea in young women? BJOG. 2010;117: 222–224.
  • 10. Kim MJ, Baek IH, Goo BO. The effect of lumbar-pelvic alignment and abdominal muscle thickness on primary dysmenorrhea. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(10):2988-2990.
  • 11. Abaraogu UO, Igwe SE, Tabansi-Ochiogu CS, Duru DO. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of manipulative therapy in women with primary dysmenorrhea. Explore. 2017;13(6): 386e392.
  • 12. Kim MJ, Baek IB, Goo BO. The effect of lumbar-pelvic alignment and abdominal muscle thickness on primary. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(10):2988-2990.
  • 13. Blakey H, Chisholm C, Dear F, Harris B, Hartwell R, Daley AJ, et al. Is exercise associated with primary dysmenorrhoea in young women? BJOG. 2010;117(2):222–224.
  • 14. Genders WG, Hopkins SS, Lean EK, Bull PW. Dysmenorrhea and pelvic dysfunction: a possible clinical relationship. Chiropr J Aus Vol. 2003;33(1):161-163.
  • 15. Hitchcock ME. The Manipulative approach to the management of primary dysmenorrhea. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1976;75(10):909.
  • 16. Rasian F, Lynch CB, Rix J. Symptoms relieved by uterine ventro suspension. Gynecol Endosc. 1995;4(1):101-105.
  • 17. Lacovides S,Avidon I, Baker FC. What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: a critical review. Hum Repro Up. 2015;21(6):1-17.
  • 18. Collins SL, Moore RA, Mc Quay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain. 1997;72(2):95-97.
  • 19. Mannion AF, Knecht K, Balaban G, Dvorak J, Grob D. New skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewes fromthe literature. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:122-136.
  • 20. Kim MJ, Baek IH, Goo BO. Kim MJ, Baek IH, Goo BO. The relationship between pelvic alignment and dysmenorrhea. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(3):757–760.
  • 21. Özer Kaya D, Toprak Çelenay Ş. Fluctuations of state anxiety, spinal structure, and postural stabilityacross the menstrual cycle in active women. Turk J Med Sci. 2016; 23;46(4):977-84.

A COMPARISON OF SPINAL POSTURE AND MOBILITY IN WOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT PRIMARY DYSMENORRHEA

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1, 20 - 27, 10.04.2021
https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.677298

Öz

Proje Numarası

-

Kaynakça

  • 1. Dawood Y. Primary dysmenorrhea advances in pathogenesis and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):428-41.
  • 2. Hailemeskel S, Demissie A, Assefa N. Primary dysmenorrhea magnitude, associated risk factors, and its effect on academic performance: evidence from female university students in Ethiopia. Int J Womens Health. Dove Press; 2016;19(8):489-496.
  • 3. Midilli TS, Yasar E, Baysal E. Dysmenorrhea characteristics of female Students of health school and affecting factors and their knowledge and use of complementary and alternative medicine methods. Holist Nurs Pract. 2015;29(4):194-204.
  • 4. Aktaş D. Prevalence and factors affecting dysmenorrhea in female university students: effect on general comfort level. Pain Management Nursing. 2015;16(4):534-543.
  • 5. Fernández M, Onieva-Zafra, MD, Parra-Fernández ML. The Impact of dysmenorrhea on quality of life among Spanish female university students. J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(5):713.
  • 6. Proctor M, Hing W, Johnson TC, Murphy PA, Brown J. Spinal manipulation for dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:1-27.
  • 7. Akerland M. Pathophysiology of dysmenorrhea. Acta Obstet Gynecl. 1979;58(87):27–32.
  • 8. Willman EA, Collins WP, Clayton SG. Studies in the involvement of prostaglandins in uterine symptomatology and pathology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1976;83(5):337-41.
  • 9. Blakey H, Chisholm C, Dear F, et al.: Is exercise associated with primary dysmenorrhoea in young women? BJOG. 2010;117: 222–224.
  • 10. Kim MJ, Baek IH, Goo BO. The effect of lumbar-pelvic alignment and abdominal muscle thickness on primary dysmenorrhea. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(10):2988-2990.
  • 11. Abaraogu UO, Igwe SE, Tabansi-Ochiogu CS, Duru DO. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of manipulative therapy in women with primary dysmenorrhea. Explore. 2017;13(6): 386e392.
  • 12. Kim MJ, Baek IB, Goo BO. The effect of lumbar-pelvic alignment and abdominal muscle thickness on primary. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(10):2988-2990.
  • 13. Blakey H, Chisholm C, Dear F, Harris B, Hartwell R, Daley AJ, et al. Is exercise associated with primary dysmenorrhoea in young women? BJOG. 2010;117(2):222–224.
  • 14. Genders WG, Hopkins SS, Lean EK, Bull PW. Dysmenorrhea and pelvic dysfunction: a possible clinical relationship. Chiropr J Aus Vol. 2003;33(1):161-163.
  • 15. Hitchcock ME. The Manipulative approach to the management of primary dysmenorrhea. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1976;75(10):909.
  • 16. Rasian F, Lynch CB, Rix J. Symptoms relieved by uterine ventro suspension. Gynecol Endosc. 1995;4(1):101-105.
  • 17. Lacovides S,Avidon I, Baker FC. What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: a critical review. Hum Repro Up. 2015;21(6):1-17.
  • 18. Collins SL, Moore RA, Mc Quay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain. 1997;72(2):95-97.
  • 19. Mannion AF, Knecht K, Balaban G, Dvorak J, Grob D. New skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewes fromthe literature. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:122-136.
  • 20. Kim MJ, Baek IH, Goo BO. Kim MJ, Baek IH, Goo BO. The relationship between pelvic alignment and dysmenorrhea. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(3):757–760.
  • 21. Özer Kaya D, Toprak Çelenay Ş. Fluctuations of state anxiety, spinal structure, and postural stabilityacross the menstrual cycle in active women. Turk J Med Sci. 2016; 23;46(4):977-84.
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Rehabilitasyon
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Ayşenur Karakuş 0000-0002-6322-3127

Derya Özer Kaya 0000-0002-6899-852X

Şeyda Toprak Çelenay 0000-0001-6720-4452

Proje Numarası -
Yayımlanma Tarihi 10 Nisan 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Karakuş, A., Özer Kaya, D., & Toprak Çelenay, Ş. (2021). PRİMER DİSMENORESİ OLAN VE OLMAYAN KADINLARDA OMURGA POSTÜR VE MOBİLİTESİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Türk Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 32(1), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.677298
AMA Karakuş A, Özer Kaya D, Toprak Çelenay Ş. PRİMER DİSMENORESİ OLAN VE OLMAYAN KADINLARDA OMURGA POSTÜR VE MOBİLİTESİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Turk J Physiother Rehabil. Nisan 2021;32(1):20-27. doi:10.21653/tjpr.677298
Chicago Karakuş, Ayşenur, Derya Özer Kaya, ve Şeyda Toprak Çelenay. “PRİMER DİSMENORESİ OLAN VE OLMAYAN KADINLARDA OMURGA POSTÜR VE MOBİLİTESİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Türk Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 32, sy. 1 (Nisan 2021): 20-27. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.677298.
EndNote Karakuş A, Özer Kaya D, Toprak Çelenay Ş (01 Nisan 2021) PRİMER DİSMENORESİ OLAN VE OLMAYAN KADINLARDA OMURGA POSTÜR VE MOBİLİTESİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 32 1 20–27.
IEEE A. Karakuş, D. Özer Kaya, ve Ş. Toprak Çelenay, “PRİMER DİSMENORESİ OLAN VE OLMAYAN KADINLARDA OMURGA POSTÜR VE MOBİLİTESİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”, Turk J Physiother Rehabil, c. 32, sy. 1, ss. 20–27, 2021, doi: 10.21653/tjpr.677298.
ISNAD Karakuş, Ayşenur vd. “PRİMER DİSMENORESİ OLAN VE OLMAYAN KADINLARDA OMURGA POSTÜR VE MOBİLİTESİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 32/1 (Nisan 2021), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.677298.
JAMA Karakuş A, Özer Kaya D, Toprak Çelenay Ş. PRİMER DİSMENORESİ OLAN VE OLMAYAN KADINLARDA OMURGA POSTÜR VE MOBİLİTESİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Turk J Physiother Rehabil. 2021;32:20–27.
MLA Karakuş, Ayşenur vd. “PRİMER DİSMENORESİ OLAN VE OLMAYAN KADINLARDA OMURGA POSTÜR VE MOBİLİTESİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Türk Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, c. 32, sy. 1, 2021, ss. 20-27, doi:10.21653/tjpr.677298.
Vancouver Karakuş A, Özer Kaya D, Toprak Çelenay Ş. PRİMER DİSMENORESİ OLAN VE OLMAYAN KADINLARDA OMURGA POSTÜR VE MOBİLİTESİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Turk J Physiother Rehabil. 2021;32(1):20-7.