Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

CFD Analysis of Ilısu Dam Sluice Outlet

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 119 - 124, 01.03.2018

Öz

Ilisu Dam is one important energy projects in
Turkey. After it is completed, it is expected that it will contribute to the
country economy approximately $300 million annually. One of the most remarkable
engineering designs of the dam is the conversion of diversion tunnels of 12 m
in diameter and about 1 km in length into sluice outlet structure. In this
study, the CFD simulation of Ilısu Dam sluice outlet were performed with 1/40
scale. The obtained CFD results were compared with physical model observations conducted
by the State Water Works (SWW). A good agreement was achieved between both
results, and some useful results of CFD were presented for design of the
outlet.

Kaynakça

  • 1.Khan, L.A., Wicklein, E.A., Rashid, M., Ebner, L.L. and Richards, N.A. (2008). Case study of an application of a computational fluid dynamics model to the forebay of the Dalles Dam, Oregon, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(5): 509-519. 2.Cassan, L. and Belaud, G. (2011). Experimental and numerical investigation of flow under sluice gates. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 138(4), 367-373. 3.Zhang, Y., Xia, J, Shao, Q and Zhang, X. (2011). Experimental and simulation studies on the impact of sluice regulation on water quantity and quality processes. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17(4): 467-477. 4.Li, S., Cain, S. Wosnik, M., Miller, C., Kocahan, H and Wyckoff, R. (2010). Numerical modeling of probable maximum flood flowing through a system of spillways, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 137(1): 66-74. 5.Ebner, L.L: (2014). Practical Use of Computational Fluid Dynamic Models as a Design Tool-Limitations and Assumptions. Critical Transitions in Water and Environmental Resources Management, 2004, pp. 1-10. 6.Rakowski, C.L, Richmond, M.C. Serkowski, J.A. and Perkins, W.A. (2010). Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of the Bonneville Project: Tailrace Spill Patterns for Low Flows and Corner Collector Smolt Egress (No. PNNL-20056), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, (PNNL), Richland, WA (US). 7.Kökpinar, M.A. and Çelik, H.Ç. (2002). Deriner Baraji Tünelli Dolusavak Havalandiricilari Büyük Ölçekli Hidrolik Model Çalişmalari. 8.DSİ, (2013). Ilısu Barajı ve HES Projesi Dipsavak Tüneli Ek Hidrolik Çalışmaları (M-398), Fiziksel Model Deney Raporu, DSİ TAKK Dairesi Başkanlığı Hidrolik Model Laboratuvarı Şube Müdürlüğü. Ankara. Rapor No: Hİ-1022, 119 s. 9.Wikipedia, (2017), Ilısu Dam. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Il%C4%B1su_Dam, Accessed date: 26 Feb. 2017. 10.FLOW-3D (2016). User Manual, Theory Guide.
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 119 - 124, 01.03.2018

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1.Khan, L.A., Wicklein, E.A., Rashid, M., Ebner, L.L. and Richards, N.A. (2008). Case study of an application of a computational fluid dynamics model to the forebay of the Dalles Dam, Oregon, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(5): 509-519. 2.Cassan, L. and Belaud, G. (2011). Experimental and numerical investigation of flow under sluice gates. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 138(4), 367-373. 3.Zhang, Y., Xia, J, Shao, Q and Zhang, X. (2011). Experimental and simulation studies on the impact of sluice regulation on water quantity and quality processes. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17(4): 467-477. 4.Li, S., Cain, S. Wosnik, M., Miller, C., Kocahan, H and Wyckoff, R. (2010). Numerical modeling of probable maximum flood flowing through a system of spillways, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 137(1): 66-74. 5.Ebner, L.L: (2014). Practical Use of Computational Fluid Dynamic Models as a Design Tool-Limitations and Assumptions. Critical Transitions in Water and Environmental Resources Management, 2004, pp. 1-10. 6.Rakowski, C.L, Richmond, M.C. Serkowski, J.A. and Perkins, W.A. (2010). Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of the Bonneville Project: Tailrace Spill Patterns for Low Flows and Corner Collector Smolt Egress (No. PNNL-20056), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, (PNNL), Richland, WA (US). 7.Kökpinar, M.A. and Çelik, H.Ç. (2002). Deriner Baraji Tünelli Dolusavak Havalandiricilari Büyük Ölçekli Hidrolik Model Çalişmalari. 8.DSİ, (2013). Ilısu Barajı ve HES Projesi Dipsavak Tüneli Ek Hidrolik Çalışmaları (M-398), Fiziksel Model Deney Raporu, DSİ TAKK Dairesi Başkanlığı Hidrolik Model Laboratuvarı Şube Müdürlüğü. Ankara. Rapor No: Hİ-1022, 119 s. 9.Wikipedia, (2017), Ilısu Dam. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Il%C4%B1su_Dam, Accessed date: 26 Feb. 2017. 10.FLOW-3D (2016). User Manual, Theory Guide.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm TJST
Yazarlar

M. Cihan Aydin

Ali Emre Ulu Bu kişi benim

Çimen Karaduman Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 18 Şubat 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Aydin, M. C., Ulu, A. E., & Karaduman, Ç. (2018). CFD Analysis of Ilısu Dam Sluice Outlet. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, 13(1), 119-124.
AMA Aydin MC, Ulu AE, Karaduman Ç. CFD Analysis of Ilısu Dam Sluice Outlet. TJST. Mart 2018;13(1):119-124.
Chicago Aydin, M. Cihan, Ali Emre Ulu, ve Çimen Karaduman. “CFD Analysis of Ilısu Dam Sluice Outlet”. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology 13, sy. 1 (Mart 2018): 119-24.
EndNote Aydin MC, Ulu AE, Karaduman Ç (01 Mart 2018) CFD Analysis of Ilısu Dam Sluice Outlet. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology 13 1 119–124.
IEEE M. C. Aydin, A. E. Ulu, ve Ç. Karaduman, “CFD Analysis of Ilısu Dam Sluice Outlet”, TJST, c. 13, sy. 1, ss. 119–124, 2018.
ISNAD Aydin, M. Cihan vd. “CFD Analysis of Ilısu Dam Sluice Outlet”. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology 13/1 (Mart 2018), 119-124.
JAMA Aydin MC, Ulu AE, Karaduman Ç. CFD Analysis of Ilısu Dam Sluice Outlet. TJST. 2018;13:119–124.
MLA Aydin, M. Cihan vd. “CFD Analysis of Ilısu Dam Sluice Outlet”. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, c. 13, sy. 1, 2018, ss. 119-24.
Vancouver Aydin MC, Ulu AE, Karaduman Ç. CFD Analysis of Ilısu Dam Sluice Outlet. TJST. 2018;13(1):119-24.