BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Bibliometric Profile of Turkish Journal of Psychology

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 142 - 163, 01.04.2007

Öz

The Turkish Journal of Psychology has been indexed by the Social Science Citation Index since 1995. This study examines the Turkish Journal of Psychology and bibliometric features ofits articles. The research carried out covers 118 articles between the years 1995-2005. The following research questions have been addressed: 1 What are the subjects ofthe articles? 2 Is multiple authorship a prevalentfeature ofthe articles? 3 What are the institutional affiliations ofthe authors ofthe articles? 4 What are the common characteristics of the cited articles? 5 Which types ofsources journal articles, monographs, etc. get cited more often in the articles? 6 What are the mostfrequently cited journals in the TJP? 7 Does the distribution ofcitations to journalsfit Bradford's Law ofScattering? 8 Is there a relationship between the impactfactors ofjournals and the number ofcitations they get? 9 What is the rate ofliterature obsolescence in psychology? 10 With regard to impactfactor, what is the position ofthe TJP? Almost all ofthe articles were written in Turkish. The important part ofthe contributors was affiliated with Hacettepe, Ankara and the Middle East Technical universities. This research showed that 57% ofarticles 67 articles published in Turkish Journal of Psychology received no citations remaining 43% 51 articles were cited 135 times. The author self-citation ratio was 34%. In addition, journal self-citation ratio was 41%. Journals received 69% ofall citations in the Turkish Journal of Psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Turkish Journal of Psychology, Child Development, Developmental Psychology and Psychological Bulletin were among the most frequently cited journals. Articles that appeared in the top 18 journals received 33% ofall cita­ tions. The half-life ofsources cited in the Turkish Journal of Psychology was ten years. According to the impactfactor rank, the Turkish Journal of Psychology has been at the bottom ofpsychology journals which indexed by the Social Science Citation Index.

Kaynakça

  • Anseel, F., Duyck, W., De Baene, W. ve Brysbaert, M. (2004). Journal impact factors and self-citations: Implications for psychology journals. American Psychologist, 59, 49-51.
  • Baker,J., Robertson-Wilson, J. ve Sedgwick, W. (2003). Publishing productivity insport psychology 1970-2000: An exploratory examination of the Lotka- Price Law. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 25(4), 477-483.
  • Buffardi, L.C. ve Nichols, J.A. (1981). Citation impact, acceptance rate, and APA journals. American Psychologist, 36, 1453-1456.
  • Buss,A.R. ve McDermott, J.R. (1976). Ratings of psychology journals compared to objective measures of journal impact. American Psychologist, 31, 675-678.
  • Carr, J.E. ve Britton, L.N. (2003). Citation trends of applied journals in beha­ vioral psychology:1981-2000. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(1), 113-117.
  • Earle, P., ve Vickery, B. (1969). Social science literature use in the UK as indi­ cated by citations. Journal of Documentation, 25, 123-141.
  • ESI. (2007). Essential Science Indicators. 18 Mayıs 2007 tarihinde http://por- tal.isiknowledge.com/ adresinden erişildi.
  • Furnham, A. veBonnett, C. (1992). British research productivity in psychology 1980-1989. Does the Lotka-Price law apply to university departments as it does to individuals? Personality and Individual Differences, 13(12), 1333­ 1341.
  • Garfield, E. (1994). The impact factor: ISI. Current Contents, 25, 3-7. 5 Nisan 2007 tarihindehttp://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/journalcitationre- ports/impactfactor/ adresinden erişildi.
  • Garfield, E. (1980). Bradford's Law and related statistical patterns. Current Contents, 19, 5-12. 5 Nisan 2007 tarihinde http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v4p476y1979-80.pdf adresinden erişildi
  • Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471-479.
  • Garfield, E. (1965). Can citation indexing be automated? in Statistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation, Symposium Proceedingspp. 189-192. Eds. Mary Elizabeth Stevens, Vincent E. Giuliano, Laurence B. Heilprin Washington: National Bureau of Standards. 5 Nisan 2007 tarihinde http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/V1p084y1962- 73.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  • Gupta, S. (1995). Structure of African psychological literature: 1927-1987. International Information and Library Review, 27(3), 203-223.
  • Hamilton, J.C., Sparrow, V., Waxmonsky, J. ve Deemer, H.N. (2001). Citation patternsin social psychology and clinical psychology articles in 1986 and 1996: Goodnews for the social-clinical interface. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20(2), 130-146.
  • Hardesty,L. ve Oltmanns, G. (1989). How many psychology journals are enough?Astudy of the use of psychology journals by undergraduates. Serials Librarian, 16(1/2): 133-153.
  • Haynes, J.P. (1983). An empirical method for determining core psychology jour­ nals.American Psychologist, 38, 959-961.
  • Hutz,C.S. ve Adair, J.G. (1996). The use of references in Brazilian psychology journals reveals trends in thought and research. International Journal of Psychology, 31(2), 145-149.
  • ISI (2005).Journal Citation Reports. 15 Mayıs 2006 tarihinde http://jcrweb.com adresinden erişildi.
  • Iwamasa, G.Y., Sorocco, K.H. ve Koonce, D.A. (2002). Ethnicity and clinical psychology:A content analysis of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(6), 931-944.
  • Koulack, D. ve Keselman, H.J. (1975). Ratings of psychology journals by mem­ bersof the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 30, 1049-1053.
  • Lawani, S.M. (1981). Bibliometrics: Its theoretical foundations, methods and applications. Libri, 31(4), 294-315.
  • Line, M.B. (1970). The 'half-life' of periodical literature: apparent and real obso­ lescence. Journal of Documentation, 26, 46-54.
  • Lluch, J.O. (2005). Some considerations on the use of the impact factor of sci­ entific journals as a tool to evaluate research in psychology. Scientometrics, 65(2), 189-197.
  • Mace, K.C. ve Warner, H.D. (1973). Ratings of psychology journals. American Psychologist, 28, 184-186.
  • Meadows, A.J. (1967). The citation characteristics of astronomical research lite­ rature. Journal of Documentation, 23, 28-33.
  • Myers, C.R. (1970). Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology.American Psychologist, 25, 1041-1048.
  • Omotayo,B.O. (2004). A content analysis of Ife psychologia, 1993-2002. The International Information and Library Review, 36, 95-103.
  • Pritchard,A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25, 348-349.
  • Schaffer, T. (2004). Psychology citations revisited: Behavioral research in the age of electronic resources. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(5), 354-360.
  • Shontz, D. (1992). The serial/monograph ratio in psychology: Application at the local level. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 11(2), 91-105.
  • Smith, L.C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30, 83-106.
  • Smith, M. (1958). The trend toward multiple authorship in psychology. American Psychologist, 13, 596-599.
  • Sylvia, M.J. (1998). Citation analysis as an unobtrusive method for journal col­ lection evaluation using psychology student research bibliographies. Collection Building, 17(1), 20-28.
  • Sylvia, M. ve Lesher, M. (1995). What journals do psychology graduate students need?A citation analysis of thesis references. College & Research Libraries, 56(4), 313-318.
  • Thomas,J. (1993). Graduate student use of journals: a bibliometric study of psychologytheses. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 12(1), 1-7.
  • Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. (2006). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 11 Mayıs 2006 tarihinde http://www.turkpsikolojidergisi.org adresinden erişildi.
  • Watkins, C.E. (1986). Gender type and publication records in the Journal of Individual Psychology: a fifteen year examination. Individual Psychology: The Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research & Practice, 42(1), 114-122.
  • White,E.C. (1985). Bibliometrics: From curiosity to convention. Special Libraries, 76(1), 35-42.
  • White, M.J. ve White, K.G. (1977). Citation analysis of psychology journals. American Psychologist, 32, 301-305.
  • Xhignesse, L.V. ve Osgood, C.E. (1967). Bibliographical citation characteristics of the psychological journal network in 1950 and 1960. American Psychologist, 22, 778-791.

Türk Psikoloji Dergisi’nin Bibliyometrik Profili

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 142 - 163, 01.04.2007

Öz

Türk Psikoloji Dergisi TPD 1995 yılından beri Social Science Citation Index tarafından dizinlenmektedir. Bu çalışmada Türk Psikoloji Dergisi TPD ve Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 'ndeki makaleler bibliyometrik özellikleri açısından ele alınmak­tadır. Çalışmamızda 1995-2005 yılları arasında yayımlanan 118 makale incelen­mektedir. Araştırmamızda yanıt aranmakta olan sorular şunlardır: 1 TPD 'de yayımlanan makaleler psikolojinin hangi alt alanlarında yoğunlaşmaktadır? 2 TPD'nin çok yazarlık durumu nedir? 3 TPD'de yayımlanan makalelerin yazarları hangi kuramlarda çalışmaktadır? 4 TPD 'de yayımlanan yazıların atıf alanlarının özellikleri nelerdir? 5 TPD'de yayımlanan makalelerde en sık atıf yapılan kaynak türü dergi, kitap vb. hangisidir? 6 TPD 'de en sık atıf yapılan dergiler hangileridir? 7 TPD'de yayımlanan makalelerde dergilere yapılan atıfların dağılımı Bradford Yasasına uymakta mıdır? 8 TPD'deki makalelerin atıfları ile JCR'deki etki faktörü arasında bir ilişki bulunmakta mıdır? 9 Psikoloji literatürünün yaşlanma hızı nedir? 10 Etki faktörü açısından TPD'nin JCR'deki psikoloji dergileri arasındaki konumu nedir?Yayımlanan makalelerin neredeyse tamamı Türkçe'dir. Dergide makale yayımlayan kişilerin bağlı bulundukları kurumlara göre yapılan değerlendirmede en çok katkının Hacettepe, Ankara ve Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitelerindeki araştırmacılar tarafından gerçekleştirildiği görülmektedir. TPD'de yayımlanan makalelerin %57'sine 67 makale atıf dizinleri kapsamında yayımlanan makale­ler tarafından hiç atıf yapılmamıştır. TPD'de 1995-2005 yılları arasında yayım­lanan makalelere toplam 135 atıf yapılmıştır. Bu atıfların %34'ü yazarların kendi makalelerine yapmış olduğu atıflardır. Ayrıca TPD 'ye yapılan atıfların %41'i yine TPD'de yayımlanan makaleler tarafından yapılmıştır. TPD 'de atıf yapılan kaynakların %69'u dergidir. En çok atıf yapılan dergiler sıralamasında Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Child Development, Developmental Psychology ve Psychological Bulletin dergileri başta gelmektedir. Toplam atıfların %33'ü 18 ayrı dergide yayımlanan makalelere yapılmıştır. TPD'de atıf yapılan yayınların yarısı son on yılda yayım­lanmıştır. TPD'nin etki faktörüne bakıldığında Social Science Citation Index'de yer alan psikoloji dergileri arasında alt sıralarda yer aldığı görülmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Anseel, F., Duyck, W., De Baene, W. ve Brysbaert, M. (2004). Journal impact factors and self-citations: Implications for psychology journals. American Psychologist, 59, 49-51.
  • Baker,J., Robertson-Wilson, J. ve Sedgwick, W. (2003). Publishing productivity insport psychology 1970-2000: An exploratory examination of the Lotka- Price Law. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 25(4), 477-483.
  • Buffardi, L.C. ve Nichols, J.A. (1981). Citation impact, acceptance rate, and APA journals. American Psychologist, 36, 1453-1456.
  • Buss,A.R. ve McDermott, J.R. (1976). Ratings of psychology journals compared to objective measures of journal impact. American Psychologist, 31, 675-678.
  • Carr, J.E. ve Britton, L.N. (2003). Citation trends of applied journals in beha­ vioral psychology:1981-2000. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(1), 113-117.
  • Earle, P., ve Vickery, B. (1969). Social science literature use in the UK as indi­ cated by citations. Journal of Documentation, 25, 123-141.
  • ESI. (2007). Essential Science Indicators. 18 Mayıs 2007 tarihinde http://por- tal.isiknowledge.com/ adresinden erişildi.
  • Furnham, A. veBonnett, C. (1992). British research productivity in psychology 1980-1989. Does the Lotka-Price law apply to university departments as it does to individuals? Personality and Individual Differences, 13(12), 1333­ 1341.
  • Garfield, E. (1994). The impact factor: ISI. Current Contents, 25, 3-7. 5 Nisan 2007 tarihindehttp://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/journalcitationre- ports/impactfactor/ adresinden erişildi.
  • Garfield, E. (1980). Bradford's Law and related statistical patterns. Current Contents, 19, 5-12. 5 Nisan 2007 tarihinde http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v4p476y1979-80.pdf adresinden erişildi
  • Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471-479.
  • Garfield, E. (1965). Can citation indexing be automated? in Statistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation, Symposium Proceedingspp. 189-192. Eds. Mary Elizabeth Stevens, Vincent E. Giuliano, Laurence B. Heilprin Washington: National Bureau of Standards. 5 Nisan 2007 tarihinde http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/V1p084y1962- 73.pdf adresinden erişildi.
  • Gupta, S. (1995). Structure of African psychological literature: 1927-1987. International Information and Library Review, 27(3), 203-223.
  • Hamilton, J.C., Sparrow, V., Waxmonsky, J. ve Deemer, H.N. (2001). Citation patternsin social psychology and clinical psychology articles in 1986 and 1996: Goodnews for the social-clinical interface. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20(2), 130-146.
  • Hardesty,L. ve Oltmanns, G. (1989). How many psychology journals are enough?Astudy of the use of psychology journals by undergraduates. Serials Librarian, 16(1/2): 133-153.
  • Haynes, J.P. (1983). An empirical method for determining core psychology jour­ nals.American Psychologist, 38, 959-961.
  • Hutz,C.S. ve Adair, J.G. (1996). The use of references in Brazilian psychology journals reveals trends in thought and research. International Journal of Psychology, 31(2), 145-149.
  • ISI (2005).Journal Citation Reports. 15 Mayıs 2006 tarihinde http://jcrweb.com adresinden erişildi.
  • Iwamasa, G.Y., Sorocco, K.H. ve Koonce, D.A. (2002). Ethnicity and clinical psychology:A content analysis of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(6), 931-944.
  • Koulack, D. ve Keselman, H.J. (1975). Ratings of psychology journals by mem­ bersof the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 30, 1049-1053.
  • Lawani, S.M. (1981). Bibliometrics: Its theoretical foundations, methods and applications. Libri, 31(4), 294-315.
  • Line, M.B. (1970). The 'half-life' of periodical literature: apparent and real obso­ lescence. Journal of Documentation, 26, 46-54.
  • Lluch, J.O. (2005). Some considerations on the use of the impact factor of sci­ entific journals as a tool to evaluate research in psychology. Scientometrics, 65(2), 189-197.
  • Mace, K.C. ve Warner, H.D. (1973). Ratings of psychology journals. American Psychologist, 28, 184-186.
  • Meadows, A.J. (1967). The citation characteristics of astronomical research lite­ rature. Journal of Documentation, 23, 28-33.
  • Myers, C.R. (1970). Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology.American Psychologist, 25, 1041-1048.
  • Omotayo,B.O. (2004). A content analysis of Ife psychologia, 1993-2002. The International Information and Library Review, 36, 95-103.
  • Pritchard,A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25, 348-349.
  • Schaffer, T. (2004). Psychology citations revisited: Behavioral research in the age of electronic resources. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(5), 354-360.
  • Shontz, D. (1992). The serial/monograph ratio in psychology: Application at the local level. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 11(2), 91-105.
  • Smith, L.C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30, 83-106.
  • Smith, M. (1958). The trend toward multiple authorship in psychology. American Psychologist, 13, 596-599.
  • Sylvia, M.J. (1998). Citation analysis as an unobtrusive method for journal col­ lection evaluation using psychology student research bibliographies. Collection Building, 17(1), 20-28.
  • Sylvia, M. ve Lesher, M. (1995). What journals do psychology graduate students need?A citation analysis of thesis references. College & Research Libraries, 56(4), 313-318.
  • Thomas,J. (1993). Graduate student use of journals: a bibliometric study of psychologytheses. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 12(1), 1-7.
  • Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. (2006). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 11 Mayıs 2006 tarihinde http://www.turkpsikolojidergisi.org adresinden erişildi.
  • Watkins, C.E. (1986). Gender type and publication records in the Journal of Individual Psychology: a fifteen year examination. Individual Psychology: The Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research & Practice, 42(1), 114-122.
  • White,E.C. (1985). Bibliometrics: From curiosity to convention. Special Libraries, 76(1), 35-42.
  • White, M.J. ve White, K.G. (1977). Citation analysis of psychology journals. American Psychologist, 32, 301-305.
  • Xhignesse, L.V. ve Osgood, C.E. (1967). Bibliographical citation characteristics of the psychological journal network in 1950 and 1960. American Psychologist, 22, 778-791.
Toplam 40 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Umut Al

Recai Çoştur Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Nisan 2007
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2007 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Al, U., & Çoştur, R. (2007). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi’nin Bibliyometrik Profili. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 21(2), 142-163.

Bu dergi içeriği CC BY 4.0cc.svg?ref=chooser-v1by.svg?ref=chooser-v1 ile lisanslanmaktadır.