VIEWS OF FRESHMEN STUDENTS ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE COURSES DELIVERED VIA E-LEARNING

Year 2016, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 31 - 47, 11.01.2016

Fatma Ozudogru , Murat Hısmanoglu

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.18660

Cited By: 7

Abstract

With the increasing number of foreign language courses via e-learning in higher education institutions, it is important to investigate whether the quality of e-learning is up to the standard. This study aimed at finding out the views of freshmen students on foreign language courses delivered via e-learning and revealing whether there were any statistically significant differences between students’ views in terms of age, gender, time spent on using e-learning system and the faculty they studied at. This research was designed using the survey model. The sample of the research consisted of 478 freshmen students who were studying at four faculties and one vocational college in a state university in Turkey. The research data were collected through a scale, proposing a sixdimensional assessment of e-learning systems, which was developed by Ozkan and Koseler (2009) and tested for its reliability by the researchers. Data were analyzed using frequencies, mean, standard deviation, independent samples t-test and one-way Anova. The results indicated that the students’ views on foreign language courses delivered via e-learning were negative with an ‘overall’ part mean score of 2,14 (Std=1,17). Also, the students disagreed ‘learners’ perspective’ dimension (x̅=2,24) and partially agreed ‘instructor attitudes’, ‘system quality’, ‘information content quality’, ‘service quality’ and ‘supportive issues’ dimensions. Furthermore, it was revealed that there were no significant correlations between students’ views and age and the time spent on using elearning. However, statistically significant differences were found between students’ views and gender and the faculty students were studying at (p<0.05). The e-learning system should be developed in order for students to have valuable e-learning experiences and benefit from e-learning more.

Keywords

E-learning, freshmen student, online courses, language learning

References

• Antoine, J. E. (2011). E-Learning: A student’s perspective a phenomenological investigation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Northeastern University.
• Baturay, M. H. (2011). Relationships among sense of classroom community, perceived cognitive learning and satisfaction of students at an e-learning course. Interactive
• Learning Environments, 19 (5), 563-575. Cakir, G., &Yurtsever, B. (2012). An implementation of distance education program for teaching common necessary courses in formal education: Karabuk university sample.
• Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 17-195. Cakir, R., & Solak, E. (2014). Exploring the factors influencing e-learning of Turkish efl learners through tam. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13 (3), 79-87.
• Calli, L., Balcikanli, C., Calli, F., Cebeci, H. I., & Seymen, O. F. (2013). Identifying factors that contribute to the satisfaction of students in e-learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education TOJDE, 14 (1), 85-101.
• Can, T. (2012). Yabancı dil öğretimi bağlamında öğrenen özerkliğinin sanal öğrenme ortamlari yoluyla desteklenmesi. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9 (1), 72-85.
• Cetin, H., & Akar, H. (2012). Perceptions of teachers about electronic language education system. 4th International Future-Learning Conference on Innovations in Learning for the Future 2012: E-Learning, 14-16 November 2012, İstanbul.
• Clements, F. T. (2010). Improving e-learning at a community college through program evaluation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University.
• Compton, L. K. L. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: A look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22 (1), 73-99. DOI: 10.1080/09588220802613831
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. USA: Pearson International Edition.
• Dajani, N. N. (2009). Perceptions of Arab students, faculty members, and administrators at the American university in Cairo towards e-learning: An exploratory case study.
• Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Capella University. Gamble, A. L. (2009). The effectiveness of e-learning in a multicultural environment.
• Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Capella University. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Grosu, L.M. , & David, I. (2013). E-learning in foreign language teaching: What is gained and what is lost. JADLET Journal of Advanced Distributed Learning Technology, 1 (2), 44
• Inozu, J., & Ilin, G. (2007). How do learners perceive e-language learning programs in their local context. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 9(4), 280-288.
• Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (Scientific research methods). Ankara: Nobel Press.
• Kilickaya, F., Krajka, J., & Latoch-Zielinska, M. (2014). E-learning in foreign language instruction in Turkey: Curriculum models and course design guidelines. Usak Universitesi
• Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19, 165-185. Murday, K., Ushida, E., & Chenoweth, A. N. (2008). Learners' and teachers' perspectives on language online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21 (2), 125-142.
• Oz, H. (2015). Investigating the relationship between foreign language learning and call attitudes among EFL freshman students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 1049.
• Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation.
• Computers&Education, 53, 1285-1296.
• Rashid, N., & Rashid, M. (2012). Issues and problems in distance education. Turkish
• Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 13 (1), 20-26. Rowe, F. A. & Rafferty, J. A. (2013). Instructional design interventions for supporting self- regulated learning: Enhancing academic outcomes in postsecondary e-learning environments. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9 (4), 590-601.
• Sahin-Kizil, A. (2011). Efl teachers attitudes towards information and communication technologies (ict). 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, 24 September 2011, Fırat University, Elazıg, Turkey.
• Selman, A. (2013). The students’ perceptions about e-learning in a higher education institution in Turkey. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Middle East Technical University.
• Selvi, K. (2010). Motivating factors in online courses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 819-824.
• Simsek, N. (2010). Türkiye’deki e-öğrenme uygulamalarının sektörel aktörleri, kullanılan teknolojiler ve yararlanıcılarına ilişkin analitik bir betimleme (An analytical description of sector players, used technologies, and beneficiaries in Turkish e-learning practices).
• Educational Sciences and Practice, 9 (18), 101-123. Srichanyachon, A. N. (2013). Attitudes of undergraduate students towards an online
• English course. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14 (2), 225-232. Sun, P.C., Tsai, R.J., Finger, G.,Chen, Y.Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e- learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction.
• Computers & Education, 50, 1183–1202.
• Trajanovic, M., Domazet, D., & Misic-Ilic, B. (2007). Distance learning and foreign language teaching. Paper presented at Balkan Conference in Informatics (BCI 2007),
• Bulgaria (27-29 September). Yang, Y., & Cornelious, L.F. (2005). Preparing instructors for quality online instruction.
• Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8 (1), 1-16. Yuksel, I. (2009). Instructor competencies for online courses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1726-1729.
• Womble, J. (2008). E-learning: The relationship among learner satisfaction, self-efficacy, and usefulness. The Business Review, Cambridge, 10 (1), 182-188.
• Zamorshchikova, L., Egorova, O., &Popova, M. (2011). Internet technology-based projects in learning and teaching English as a foreign language at Yakutsk State University. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12 (4), 72-76.