SOCIAL ANXIETY IN ONLINE INSTRUCTIONAL DISCUSSION FORUMS: THE ROLE OF PARTICIPATION STYLES AND ICT INFRASTRUCTURE

Year 2024, Volume: 25 Issue: 2, 96 - 114, 01.04.2024

Murat Cinar , Omer Demir , Sinan Keskin

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1093630

Abstract

Examination of the personal characteristics (i.e., gender, participation styles) of participants and the technical infrastructure (i.e., device type, internet connection type) of Instructional Discussion Forums (IDFs) can provide functional clues for mitigating social anxiety in these settings. In this context, this research investigated variances in learners' participation styles and social anxiety in IDFs in terms of gender and ICT availability. In addition, it explored the predictive relationships between participation styles and social anxiety. A sample of 272 freshman undergraduate students discussed various topics related to Internet ethics for three weeks through an IDF. The results indicated that participation styles differed by gender and ICT availability in several respects. First, handheld devices and cellular internet connections exerted a medium-size effect on social anxiety. Further, “to get information” and “to fulfill requirement” purposes in the “Why” dimension of participation styles had a small predictive relationship with social anxiety, as did “analytical” and “practical” participation approaches in the “How” dimension. Of these, only the “to get information” purpose negatively predicted social anxiety. Overall, participation styles accounted for 19.1% of the variance in social anxiety. Based on the findings, future directions and practical implications are suggested for both researchers and practitioners.

Keywords

Asynchronous online discussions, social anxiety, participation styles, gender, device type, internet connection type

Supporting Institution

Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Scientific Research Projects Department

Project Number

SYD-2021-9505

References

• Afify, M. K. (2019). The influence of group size in the asynchronous online discussions on the development of critical thinking skills, and on improving students' performance in online discussion forum. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(5), 132-152. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i05.9351
• Author(s). (2022). [Details omitted for blind review].
• Anjomshoa, L., & Sadighi, F. (2015). The importance of motivation in second language acquisition. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 3(2), 126-137.
• Asher, M., Asnaani, A., & Aderka, I. M. (2017). Gender differences in social anxiety disorder: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 56, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.05.004
• Barnett, M. D., Maciel, I. V., Johnson, D. M., & Ciepluch, I. (2021). Social anxiety and perceived social support: Gender differences and the mediating role of communication styles. Psychological Reports, 124(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119900975
• Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354
• Blaauw, T. R. (2018). Do you prefer mobile instant messaging or face-to-face interaction?: Influence of personality and communication situations (Unpublished master's thesis, University of Twente).
• Bolsoni-Silva, A. T., & Loureiro, S. R. (2014). The role of social skills in social anxiety of university students. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 24, 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272458201410
• Bucheli, M. G. V. (2021). The argumentative structure in postgraduate students from virtual forums. Revista Conrado, 17(78), 234-239.
• Caspi, A., Chajut, E., & Saporta, K. (2008). Participation in class and in online discussions: Gender differences. Computers & Education, 50(3), 718-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.08.003
• Chan, C. K. K., & Chan, Y. Y. (2011). Students' views of collaboration and online participation in Knowledge Forum. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1445-1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.003
• Chiu, C. H., Yang, H. Y., Liang, T. H., & Chen, H. P. (2010). Elementary students' participation style in synchronous online communication and collaboration. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29(6), 571-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449291003686195
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
• Corfman, T., & Beck, D. (2019). Case study of creativity in asynchronous online discussions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(22), https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0150-5
• Cuming, S., & Rapee, R. M. (2010). Social anxiety and self-protective communication style in close relationships. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.09.010
• Dahlstrom-Hakki, I., Alstad, Z., & Banerjee, M. (2020). Comparing synchronous and asynchronous online discussions for students with disabilities: The impact of social presence. Computers & Education, 150, Article e103842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103842
• Author(s). (2015a). [Details omitted for blind review].
• Author(s). (2015b). [Details omitted for blind review].
• Diep, N. A., Cocquyt, C., Zhu, C., & Vanwing, T. (2016). Predicting adult learners’ online participation: Effects of altruism, performance expectancy, and social capital. Computers & Education, 101, 84-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.002
• Ding, L., Er, E., & Orey, M. (2018). An exploratory study of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers & Education, 120, 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.007
• Doorley, J. D., Volgenau, K. M., Kelso, K. C., Kashdan, T. B., & Shackman, A. J. (2020). Do people with elevated social anxiety respond differently to digital and face-to-face communications? Two daily diary studies with null effects. Journal of Affective Disorders, 276, 859-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.069.
• Durbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1971). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. III. Biometrika, 58(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332391.
• Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes, & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Erlbaum Press.
• Elhai, J. D., Rozgonjuk, D., Alghraibeh, A. M., & Yang, H. (2019). Disrupted daily activities from interruptive smartphone notifications: Relations with depression and anxiety severity and the mediating role of boredom proneness. Social Science Computer Review, 39(1), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319858008
• Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Lehman, J. D., Newby, T. J., Cheng, X., Mong, C., & Sadaf, A. (2010). Peer feedback in a large undergraduate blended course: Perceptions of value and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.43.1.e
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10ht ed.). McGrawHill Press.
• Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students' engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 43, Article e100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692
• Gaul, C., & Kim, M. K. (2020). Learner participation regulation supported by long-term peer moderation and participation feedback during asynchronous discussions. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(3), 295-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00158-5
• Ghadirian, H., Fauzi Mohd Ayub, A., & Salehi, K. (2018). Students’ perceptions of online discussions, participation and e-moderation behaviours in peer-moderated asynchronous online discussions. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1380695
• Ghadirian, H., Salehi, K., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2019). Assessing the effectiveness of role assignment on improving students' asynchronous online discussion participation. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 17(1), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdet.2019010103
• Guiller, J., & Durndell, A. (2007). Students’ linguistic behaviour in online discussion groups: Does gender matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2240-2255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.004
• Hair, J. F. J., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8 Ed.). Cengage Press.
• Heimberg, R. G., Horner, K. J., Juster, H. R., Safren, S. A., Brown, E. J., Schneier, F. R., & Liebowitz, M. R. (1999). Psychometric properties of the Liebowitz social anxiety scale. Psychological Medicine, 29(01), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798007879
• Kang, X., & Zhang, W. (2020). An experimental case study on forum-based online teaching to improve student’s engagement and motivation in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817758
• Karaca, S., Karakoc, A., Gurkan, O. C., Onan, N., & Barlas, G. U. (2020). Investigation of the online game addiction level, sociodemographic characteristics and social anxiety as risk factors for online game addiction in middle school students. Community mental health journal, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00544-z
• Author(s). (2020). [Details omitted for blind review].
• Kwak, S. G., & Kim, J. H. (2017). Central limit theorem: the cornerstone of modern statistics. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 70(2), 144-156. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.144
• Kurt, A. A., Küçük, B., Boynukara, M., & Odabaşı, H. F.. (2021). Digital distraction: A concept study. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 11(1), 48-64. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.691399
• Lan, Y. F., Tsai, P. W., Yang, S. H., & Hung, C. L. (2012). Comparing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of problem-based online asynchronous discussion in e/m-learning environments. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1122-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.004
• Leary, M. R. (1983). A Brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(3), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283093007
• Lima, D. P., Gerosa, M. A., Conte, T. U., & Netto, J. F. D. M. (2019). What to expect, and how to improve online discussion forums: the instructors’ perspective. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 10(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-019-0120-0
• Lin, Y., Dowell, N., Godfrey, A., Choi, H., & Brooks, C. (2019, March 4-8). Modeling gender dynamics in intra and interpersonal interactions during online collaborative learning [Paper Presentation]. 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 431-435), Arizona, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303837
• Mac Callum, K., & Kinshuk. (2008). Mobile technology in collaboration: Evaluation of a web-based discussion board. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 2(4), 318-328. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2008.020685.
• Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269
• Naranjo, M., Onrubia, J., & Segués, M. T. (2012). Participation and cognitive quality profiles in an online discussion forum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 282-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01179.x
• Newman, M. L., Groom, C. J., Handelman, L. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45, 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802073712
• Onyema, E. M., Deborah, E. C., Alsayed, A. O., Noorulhasan, Q., & Naveed, S. S. (2019). Online discussion forum as a tool for interactive learning and communication. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(4), 4852-4859. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D8062.118419
• Ouyang, F., & Chang, Y. H. (2019). The relationships between social participatory roles and cognitive engagement levels in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1396-1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12647
• Pailing, A. N., & Reniers, R. L. (2018). Depressive and socially anxious symptoms, psychosocial maturity, and risk perception: Associations with risk-taking behaviour. PloS one, 13(8), Article e0202423.
• Pala, F. K., & Erdem, M. (2020). Development of a participation style scale for online instructional discussions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3213-3233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09817-x
• Phirangee, K., Epp, C. D., & Hewitt, J. (2016). Exploring the relationships between facilitation methods, students’ sense of community, and their online behaviors. Online Learning, 20(2), 134-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i2.775
• Pierce, T. (2009). Social anxiety and technology: Face-to-face communication versus technological communication among teens. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1367-1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.06.003
• Pitcho-Prelorentzos, S., Heckel, C., & Ring, L. (2020). Predictors of social anxiety among online dating users. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, Article e106381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106381
• Prinsen, F., Volman, M. L. L., & Terwel, J. (2007). The influence of learner characteristics on degree and type of participation in a CSCL environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 1037-1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00692.x
• Purdon, C., Antony, M., Monteiro, S., & Swinson, R. P. (2001). Social anxiety in college students. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 15(3), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6185(01)00059-7
• Ruthotto, I., Kreth, Q., Stevens, J., Trively, C., & Melkers, J. (2020). Lurking and participation in the virtual classroom: The effects of gender, race, and age among graduate students in computer science. Computers & Education, 151, Article e103854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103854
• Salter, N. P., & Conneely, M. R. (2015). Structured and unstructured discussion forums as tools for student engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.037
• Sansone, N., Ligorio, M. B., & Buglass, S. L. (2018). Peer e-tutoring: Effects on students’ participation and interaction style in online courses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1190296
• Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597-599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning science (pp. 97-118). Cambridge University Press.
• Shalom, J. G., Israeli, H., Markovitzky, O., & Lipsitz, J. D. (2015). Social anxiety and physiological arousal during computer mediated vs. face to face communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.056
• Shan, J. H., & Wang, W. (2021). Making and sharing in asynchronous discussion: exploring the collaboration process in online maker community. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1916764
• Sönmez, E. (2021). Technology-Enhanced CT: A Systematic Review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100913
• Sun, Y. Y., & Gao, F. (2017). Comparing the use of a social annotation tool and a threaded discussion forum to support online discussions. Internet and Higher Education, 32, 72-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.10.001
• Tibi, M. H. (2016). Essential Components in Structuring Asynchronous Discussion Forums. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17 (2) ,88-97. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.12429
• Topham, P., Moller, N., & Davies, H. (2016). Social anxiety in learning: stages of change in a sample of UK undergraduates. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(1), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2014.895307
• XXX Statistical Institute (XXX). (2020a). XXX [Details omitted for blind review].
• XXX Statistical Institute (XXX). (2020b). XXX [Details omitted for blind review].
• Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782485
• Walji, S., Deacon, A., Small, J., & Czerniewicz, L. (2016). Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision. Distance Education, 37(2), 208-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1184400
• Wang, M., Ran, W., Liao J, & Jang, S. J. H. (2010). A performance-oriented approach to e-learning in the workplace. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 167-179. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.13.4.167
• Wise, A. F., Hausknecht, S. N., & Zhao, Y. (2014). Attending to others’ posts in asynchronous discussions: Learners’ online “listening” and its relationship to speaking. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-014-9192-9
• World Economic Forum. (2020). Global gender gap report 2020. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf
• Wu, B. (2021). Influence of MOOC learners discussion forum social interactions on online reviews of MOOC. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3483-3496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10412-z
• Xu, Y., Schneier, F., Heimberg, R. G., Princisvalle, K., Liebowitz, M. R., Wang, S., & Blanco, C. (2012). Gender differences in social anxiety disorder: Results from the national epidemiologic sample on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.08.006
• Yen, J. Y., Yen, C. F., Chen, C. S., Wang, P. W., Chang, Y. H., & Ko, C. H. (2012). Social anxiety in online and real-life interaction and their associated factors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0015
• Zhou, M. (2016). The roles of social anxiety, autonomy, and learning orientation in second language learning: A structural equation modeling analysis. System, 63, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.09.001