FEMİNİST BAKIŞ AÇISIYLA ÖRGÜTSEL ETNOGRAFİ

Yıl 2019, , 949 - 965, 31.12.2019

İlke Oruç

https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.531186

Öz

Bu çalışma, erkek egemen çalışma
yaşamında konumlanan kadınların, yasadıkları sorunları farklı bir açıdan görmeyi
sağlayabilecek bir yöntem tartışması yapmayı amaçlamaktadır. Örgütlerde
cinsiyet konusu uzun zamandır tartışılan ve araştırılan bir konu olarak karsımıza
çıkmaktadır. Özellikle çalışma yaşamında kadının yaşadığı ayrımcılık uygulamaları
varlığını sürdürmekte ve konu bu nedenle sürekli araştırılabilecek birçok
unsuru barındırmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, özellikle örgütlerde cinsiyet konusuyla uğraşan
araştırmacılar için kullanabilecekleri örgütsel etnografi yöntemine yönelik
bilgiler verilmeye çalışılacaktır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kadın, nitel araştırma, örgütsel etnografi

ORGANIZATIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY WITH FEMINIST PERSPECTIVE

Öz

This study aims at presenting
a methodological discussion that might assist researchers in identifying the problems
encountered by women in a working life dominated by men. Gender has a long
debated and studied theme in organizations. Similarly, the discrimination based
on gender differences is still on the agenda of working life and it involves a
lot of factors that are worth researching. In this study, the author will
present information about a method that might be applied by the researchers
studying gender in organizations. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Woman, qualitative study, organizational ethnography

Kaynakça

• Acker, J. (1992). Gendering organizational theory. Gendering Orgnaizational Analysis, (Ed. A. Mills ve P. Tancered), London: Sage Pub.
• Alvesson, M. (1998). Gender relations and identityat work: a case study of masculinities and Femininities in Adversiting Agency. Human Relations, 51(8), 969-1005.
• Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research (Ed. By Uwe Flick), SAGE Qualitative Research Kit.
• Barnett, C. (1998). The cultural turn: fashion or progress in human geography? Antipode, 30, 379–394.
• Berktay, F. (2003). Tarihin cinsiyeti. İstanbul: Metis Yayıncılık. 1. Baskı.
• Bierema, L.L. ve Cseh, M. (2003). Evaluating AHRD research using a feminist research framework. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 14(1), 5-26.
• Brewer, J.D. (2000). Ethnography. NY: Open University Press.
• Calas, M.R. ve Smircich, L. (1993). Dangerous liaisons: the feminine-in-management meets globalization. Business Horizons. 36(2), 74-81.
• Carless, S. A. (1998). Gender differences in transformational leadership: an examination of superior, leader and subordinate perspectives. Sex Roles, 23(7/8), 413-419.
• Coole, D.H. (1988). Women in political theory: from ancient misogyny to contemporary feminism. Lynne Rienner Publisher.
• Çaha, Ö. (1996). Sivil kadın. Ankara: Vadi.
• Donovan, J. (2007). Feminist teori: Amerikan feminizminin entellektüel gelenekleri. (Çev. Aksu Bora, Meltem Ağduk Gevrek ve Fevziye Sayılan). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınevi, 1. Basım.
• Evans, J. (1986). An overview of the problem for feminist political theorists. (Ed. J. Evans) Feminism and political theory. London: Sage Publications, 1-17.
• Freedman, J. (2001). Feminism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Friedan, B. (1983). Kadınlığın gizemi: kadınlar için yeni bir dönem başlatan kitap. (Çev. Tahire Mertoğlu). İstanbul: E Yayınları.
• Gattens, M. (1991). Feminism and philosophy: perspectives on difference and equality. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
• Hammersley, M. (1994). Introduction to Ethnography. Researching Languagenad Literacy in Social Context. (Ed. By D. Graddol, J. Maybin and B. Stierer). The Open University, 1-17.
• M. Hennik, I. Hutler and A. Bailey. (2011). Qualitative research Methods, Sage Publications, First published.
• Hinman, L. M. (2003). Ethics: a pluralistic approach to moral theory. Belmont: Thomson and Wadsworht. 3rd ed.
• Jaggar, A. J. (1983). Feminist politics and human nature. NJ: Allenheld.
• Johnson, B. ve L. Christensen (2004). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches, USA: Pearson Education Inc., Second Ed.
• Kandal, T. (1988). The women question in classical sociological theory. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
• Kark, R. (2004). The transformational leader: who is (s)he? A feminist perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 17-2.
• Kitcharoen, P. (2007). An ethnography of restaurant workers: Thai women in England. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 16(4), 555-577.
• Kondo, D. K. (1990). Crafting selves: power, gender, and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. University Of Chicago Pres.
• Kottak, C. P. (2008). Antropoloji: insan çeşitliliğine bir bakış. (Çev. S. Altunek vd.), Ankara: Ütopya Yayınları.
• Machin, D. (2002). Etnographic research for media studies. Great Britain: Arnold Publisher.
• Massey, D.B. (1989). Reflection on the debate: thoughts on feminism, Marxism and theory. Environment and Planning. A.21, 692-697.
• Mies, M. (1988). Women, the last colony. (Mies, M., V. Bennhodt-Thomsen ve C. Von Verlhof içinde). Zed Books, London.
• Michel, A.(1993). Feminizm. (Çev. Şirin Tekeli). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1. Basım.
• Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods. qualitative and qualitative approaches, USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
• Ollenburger, J.C. and H.A. Moore. (1992). A sociology of women: the intersection of patriarchy, capitalism and colonization. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 3rd ed.
• Payne, G. ve J. Payne. (2004). Key concepts in social research. London: SAGE Publications.
• Ramazanoğlu, C. (1989). Improving on sociology: the Ppoblems of taking a feminist standpoint. Sociology. 23(3), 427-442.
• Ryan, B. (1992). Feminism and the women’s movements: dynamics of change in social ideology and activism. NY: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc.
• Schwartzman, H. B. (1993). Ethnography in organizations. Qualitative Research Methods Series 27, A Sage University Paper, USA: Sage Publication.
• Smith, R. B. (1993). The paradox of gender voting: An exploratory analysis. Quality& Quantity. 27(3), 271-289.
• Smith, V. (2007). Ethnogrophies of work and work of ethnographers. Handbook of ethnography. (Ed. P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland ve L. Lofland), 220-233.
• Tong, R. P. (2006). Feminist düşünce. (Çev. Z. Çilingirlioğlu). İstanbul: Gündoğan Yayınları.
• Tong, R. P. (1992). Feminist thought: a comprehensive introduction. Rotledge.
• Van Maanen, J. (1979). The Fact of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly. 24, 539-550.
• Yıldırım, A., H. Şimşek. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin, 5. Bs.