REFAH DÜZEYİ PATENT SAYISINI ETKİLER Mİ?

Yıl 2021, , 149 - 160, 23.08.2021

Zeynep Karaca

https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.865296

Öz

İnovasyon, yeni fikirlerin, ticari ve endüstriyel yöntemlerin yanı sıra teknolojilerin keşfedilmesi, geliştirilmesi, öğrenilmesi ve uygulanması için karmaşık ve devam eden bir süreç olarak tanımlanabilir. İnovasyon çabalarından elde edilen süreçlerin ve tekniklerin çoğu birikimli ve birbirine bağımlıdır. Bir ülkenin bu çabaları geliştirme yeteneği; eğitim kalitesi, araştırmayı destekleyecek altyapıların mevcudiyeti ve piyasaların sağlıklı işlemesine bağlıdır. İnovasyon ekonomik büyümede ve refah düzeyinde önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu çalışmada refah düzeyinin inovasyon üzerindeki etkisini araştırmak için 2010-2017 dönemini kapsayan 36 OECD ülkesine ait veriler kullanılmıştır. Kurulan havuzlanmış regresyon modelinde bağımlı değişken patent sayısı iken; bağımsız değişkenler işgücü verimliliği, Ar-Ge harcamaları ve sosyal harcamalardır. Ar-Ge harcamalarının ve sosyal harcamaların patent sayısını pozitif yönde etkilediği bulunmuştur. Refah düzeyinin artması ülkenin inovasyon potansiyeline katkıda bulunarak büyümeyi destekleyecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

inovasyon, refah düzeyi, sosyal harcamalar

DOES THE WELFARE AFFECT THE NUMBER OF PATENTS?

Öz

Innovation can be defined as a complex and ongoing process for the discovery, development, learning and implementation of technologies, as well as new ideas, commercial and industrial methods. Most of the processes and techniques from innovation efforts are cumulative and interdependent. The ability of a country to develop these efforts depends on the quality of education, the availability of infrastructures to support research and functioning of the markets. Innovation plays an important role in economic growth and welfare. In the study, data from 36 OECD countries covering the period 2010-2017 were used to investigate the impact of welfare on innovation. While the dependent variable was the number of patents in the pooled regression model established; independent variables are labour productivity, R&D spending and social spending. It was found that R&D spending and social spending positively affect the number of patents. Increasing welfare will contribute to the country's innovation potential and will support growth.

Kaynakça

• Adak, M. (2015). Technological progress, innovation and economic growth; the case of Turkey. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 776-782.
• Alam, S., Sultana, A., Butt, M. S. (2010). Does social expenditure promote economic growth? a multivariate panel cointegration analysis for Asian Contries. European Journal of Social Sciences, 14 (1), 44-54.
• Amabile, T. Does happiness effect your creativity?. Erişim tarihi: 11.02.2020, www.creativityatwork.
• Andergassen, R., Nardini, F., Ricottilli, M. (2017). Innovation diffusion, general purpose technologies and economic growth. Structual Change and Economic Dynamics, 40, 72-80.
• Atkinson, A. B. (1999). The Economic Consequences of Rolling Back the Welfare State, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Berkay, F. (2013). 1980-2010 döneminde sosyal refah devleti çerçevesinde Türkiye’de sosyal güvenlik harcamalarının gelişimi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 4(9), 1-20.
• Binswanger, M. (2006). Why does income growth fail to make us happier? searching for the treadmills behind the paradox of happiness. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 366-381.
• Bond, E. W., Saggi, K. (2020). Patent protection in developing countries and global welfare: WTO obligations versus flexibilities. Journal of International Economics, 122, 1-16.
• Bourke, J., Roper, S., Love, J. H. (2020). Innovation in legal services: the practices that influence ideation and codification activities. Journal of Business Research, 109, 132-147.
• Brooks, C., Manza, J. (2006). Why do welfare states persist?. Journal of Politics, 68(4), 816-827.
• Carr, A. (2011). Positive Psychology, Routledge, Second Edition, New York.
• Dahl, E., Wel, K. A. van der. (2013). Educational inequalities in health in European welfare states: a social expenditure approach. Social Science & Medicine, 81, 60-69.
• Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27, 35-47.
• Filippetti, A., Guy, F. (2016). Skills and social insurance: evidence from the relative persistence of innovation during the financial crisis in Europe. Science and Public Policy, 43(4), 505-517.
• Firebaugh, G., Beck, F. D. (1994). Does economic growth benefit the masses? growth, dependence, and welfare in the third world. American Sociological Review, 59 (5), 631-653.
• Galindo, M., Méndez, M. T. (2014). Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: are feedback effects at work?. Journal of Business Research, 67, 825-829.
• Giacinto, M. D., Ferrante, F., Vistocco, D. (2007). Creativity and happiness. Conference Paper, 14-17 June.
• Hasan, I., Tucci, C. L. (2010). The innovation- economic growth nexus: global evidence. Research Policy, 39, 1264-1276.
• Jaskyte, K., Kisieliene, A. (2006). Determinants of employee creativity: a survey of Lithuanian nonprofit organizations. Voluntas, 17, 133-141.
• Jensen, K. W., Liu, Y., Schøtt, T. (2017). Entrepreneurs innovation bringing job satisfaction, work-family balance, and life satisfaction: in China and around the world. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1, 193-206.
• Jiang, X., Fu, W., Li, G. (2020). Can the improvement of living environment stimulate urban innovation? analysis of high-quality innovative talents and foreign direct investment spillover effect mechanism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, 1-12.
• Koo, J., Choi, Y. J., Park, I. (2019). Innovation and welfare: the marriage of an unlikely couple. Policy and Society, 1-19.
• Lawson, B., Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 377-400.
• Lee, N., Nathan, M. (2010). Knowledge workers, cultural diversity and innovation: evidence from London. Int. J. Knowledge-Based Development, 1, 53-78.
• Liu, N., Zhang, A. (2016). The impact of social security fund & insurance fund on corporate innovation. 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management.
• Maradana, R. P., Pradhan, R. P., Dash, S., Gaurav, K., Jayakumar, M., Chatterjee, D. (2017). Does innovation promote economic growth? evidence from European countries. Journal of Innovation And Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 1-23.
• Maradana, R. P. Pradhan, R. P., Dash, S., Zaki, D. B., Gaurav, K., Jayakumar, M., Sarangi, A. K. (2019). Innovation and economic growth in European economic area countries: the granger causality approach. IIMB Management Review, 31, 268-282.
• McCallum, J., Blais, A. (1987). Government, special interest groups and economic growth. Public Choice, 54, 2-18.
• McKenna, J. (2017). Why does Sweden produce so many startups. Erişim Tarihi: 18.02.2020. World Economic Forum, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/10/why-does-sweden-produce-so-many-startups/.