DEVELOPING INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS THROUGH COLLECTIVE ENTREPRENUERSHIP: AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1, 279 - 296, 10.06.2021

Özge Can

https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.770994

Öz

This study provides an extensive discussion on how collective entrepreneurship strategies by multiple organizational actors both within and across sectors can yield innovative solutions to several problems. Although the emphasis in the entrepreneurship literature has been largely on initiatives by single actors, combinations and complementarities of resources through partnerships can significantly help produce novel approaches to the ongoing socioeconomic, environmental, political and institutional challenges. How such collective entrepreneurial systems are developed, what the main collaboration dynamics among actors are, how these systems can be managed, and when and where such collective action can produce innovative results are only a few of the curious questions to answer. An important aspect is to understand how seemingly unrelated actors across diverse sectors collaborate. To this end, this study provides an inclusive theoretical framework on how collective entrepreneurial action stimulates innovative outcomes for organizations by evaluating the level, type and characteristics of entrepreneurial collectives. Even though there has been increasing interest in collective entrepreneurship, this is the first attempt where an integrated model is provided to understand this essential phenomenon.

Anahtar Kelimeler

collective entrepreneurship, cross-sectoral collaborations, market creation, innovation, public-private partnerships

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

Teşekkür

-

KOLEKTİF GİRİŞİMCİLİK YOLUYLA YENİLİKÇİ ÇÖZÜMLER GELİŞTİRME: KAPSAYICI BİR ÇERÇEVE

Öz

Bu çalışma, aynı ya da farklı sektörlerden gelen örgütsel aktörlerin ortak girişimcilik stratejileri sayesinde nasıl birçok soruna yenilikçi çözümler getirebilecekleri üzerine kapsamlı bir tartışma sunmaktadır. Girişimcilik yazını büyük ölçüde tekil aktörlerin girişimlerine vurgu yapsa da, ortaklıklar yoluyla kaynakların bir araya getirilmesi ve tamamlanması mevcut sosyoekonomik, çevresel, politik ve kurumsal sorunlara yeni yaklaşımlar üretilmesine önemli katkı sağlar. Bu tür kolektif girişimcilik sistemlerinin nasıl geliştirildiği, aktörler arasındaki temel işbirliği dinamiklerinin neler olduğu, bu sistemlerin nasıl yönetileceği ve bu kolektif eylemlerin nasıl ve ne zaman yenilikçi sonuçlar verebileceği yanıtlanması gereken sorulardan sadece birkaçıdır. Farklı sektörlerden gelen, görünüşte ilgisiz aktörlerin nasıl işbirliği yaptıklarını anlamak özellikle önemlidir. Bu çalışma, kolektif girişimciliğin düzeylerini, türlerini ve özelliklerini değerlendirerek örgütler için yenilikçi sonuçların nasıl ortaya çıktığı konusunda kuramsal bir çerçeve önermektedir. Yazında kolektif girişimciliğe yönelik artan bir ilgi olmasına rağmen, bu önemli olguyu anlamak için ilk kez kapsamlı bir model sunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

kolektif girişimcilik, sektörler arası işbirlikleri, pazar yaratma, yenilik, kamu-özel sektör ortaklıkları

Proje Numarası

-

Kaynakça

• Anderton, K., & Setzer, J. (2018). Subnational climate entrepreneurship: innovative climate action in California and São Paulo. Regional Environmental Change, 18(5), 1273–1284.
• Anglin, A. H., McKenny, A. F., & Short, J. C. (2018). The impact of collective optimism on new venture creation and growth: A social contagion perspective. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 42(3), 390–425.
• Auerswald, P. E., & Branscomb, L. M. (2003). Start-ups and Spin-offs Collective Entrepreneurship between Invention and Innovation. In: D. M. Hart (Ed.), The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Policy: Governance, Start-Ups, and Growth in the U.S. Knowledge Economy (pp. 61–91). Cambridge University Press.
• Austin, J., & Seitanidi, M. (2012). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part I. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(5), 726–758.
• Bijman, J., & Doorneweert, B. (2010). Collective entrepreneurship and the producer-owned cooperative. Journal of Cooperative Studies, 43(3), 5-16.
• Burress, M., & Cook, M. (2009). A primer on collective entrepreneurship: A preliminary taxonomy. Working Paper AEWP 2009-4, University of Missouri.
• Cantù, C. (2018). Discovering the collective entrepreneurial opportunities through spatial relationships. IMP Journal, 12(2), 276–295.
• Corbett, J., & Montgomery, A. W. (2017). Environmental entrepreneurship and interorganizational arrangements: A model of social-benefit market creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(4), 422–440.
• Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 25(4), 81-100.
• Doh, J. P., Tashman, P., & Benischke, M. H. (2019). Adapting to grand environmental challenges through collective entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(4), 450–468.
• Felin, T., & Zenger, T. (2009). Entrepreneurs as theorists: On the origins of collective beliefs and novel strategies. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), 127–146.
• Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679.
• Meijerink, S. and Huitema, D. (2010). Policy Entrepreneurs and Change Strategies: Lessons from Sixteen Cases. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 21-40.
• Miles, R. E., Miles, G., & Snow, C. C. (2006). Collaborative entrepreneurship: A business model for continuous innovation. Organization Dynamics, 35(1), 1–11.
• Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 738-770.
• Montgomery, A. W., Dacin, P. A., & Dacin, M. T. (2012). Collective social entrepreneurship: Collaboratively shaping social good. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 375–388.
• Morgan, K. (2016). Collective entrepreneurship: The Basque model of innovation. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1544–1560.
• Ndour, M., & Alexandre-Leclair, L. (2015). Community groups and female entrepreneurship in developing countries: A study of a Senegalese case. Proceedings of the European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, pp. 485–493.
• Lounsbury, M. (1998). Collective entrepreneurship: The mobilization of college and university recycling coordinators. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(1), 50–69.
• Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Pathak, S. (2019). Recommendations for under-represented entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 13(1–2), 167–177.
• Rao, H., Morrill, C., & Zald, M. N. (2000). Power plays: How social movements And collective action create new organizational forms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 237–281.
• Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Urbano, D. (2009). Overview of collaborative entrepreneurship: An integrated approach between business decisions and negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 18(5), 419–430.
• Sarpong, D., AbdRazak, A., Alexander, E., & Meissner, D. (2017). Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 142–152.
• Schoonhoven, C. B., & Romanelli, E. (Eds.). (2001). The Entrepreneurship dynamic: Origins of entrepreneurship and the evolution of industries, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Silva, M, R., & Rodrigues, H. (2005). Public-private partnerships and the promotion of collective entrepreneurship. FEP Working Papers, University of Porto, pp. 1–27.
• Wijen, F., & Ansari, S. (2007). Overcoming inaction through collective institutional entrepreneurship: Insights from regime theory. Organization Studies, 28(7), 1079–1100.
• Yan, J., & Yan, L. (2017). Collective entrepreneurship, environmental uncertainty and small business performance: A contingent examination. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 26(1). 1-26.
• Zito, A. R. (2001). Epistemic communities, collective entrepreneurship and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), 585–603.