Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Understanding of the Maritime Future Mentality; Safe E-navigation and Safe Maritime Surface Communication

Year 2024, Volume: 10 Issue: Özel Sayı: 1, 1 - 18, 03.10.2024
https://doi.org/10.52998/trjmms.1519901

Abstract

Developing and changing technology affects all sectors globally. Although it primarily affects information systems digitally, it affects all sectors indirectly. Maritime transport, the most important transportation mode in the world, is affected by technological progress as seafarers, ships, and ports. When used for its intended purpose, the technology employs intelligent and rational solutions based on the logic of identifying previous errors and developing predictions accordingly. Maritime transportation is the movement of ships between ports safely and without harming the environment. The sea is a dynamic surface not previously exposed to fixed effects and is affected by meteorological and environmental conditions. As the international maritime authorities keep pace with technological advancements, they have embraced the e-navigation concept, a digital revolution that is set to transform the industry. This shift to Electronic Navigation requires all operations to be digital, making transmission easier and more efficient. It also mandates uninterrupted and high-quality digital communication with ships' land facilities during the entire voyage. ECDIS, one of the advanced automation technology products used for e-navigation, and the vector map ENC it uses are of great importance. ENC maps are produced with specific standards. S-100, which is described as the latest and most advanced standard, provides sailors with good opportunities for safe navigation and communication. The study has been prepared to explain e-navigation types of equipment, their standards, and how they communicate according to cyber security.

References

  • Algarni, A. Acarer, T., Ahmad, Z. (2024). An Edge Computing-Based Preventive Framework With Machine Learning- Integration for Anomaly Detection and Risk Management in Maritime Wireless Communications, IEEE Access 12: 53646-5366. https://doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3387529
  • Androjna, A., Brcko, T., Pavic, I., Gredanus, H. (2020). Assessing Cyber Challenges of Maritime Navigation. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(10), p. 776. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8100776
  • Arıcan, O. H., Arslan, O., & Unal, A. U. (2023). The Importance of CATZOC in Passage Planning and Prioritization of Strategies for Safe Navigation. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 12(4), 445-458. https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.1333432
  • Bisping, R., Willbond, J., Strohmeier M., Vincent, L. (2024). Wireless Signal Injection Attacks on VSAT Satellite Modems, Accessed Date: 19.07.2024. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/sec24fall-prepub-538-bisping.pdf
  • Bolat, P., Kayişoğlu, G. (2022). Security Studies: Classic to Post-Modern Approaches, Section 7,Cyber Security,General Perspective on Cyber Security. (Editor: Arda Özkan and Göktürk Tüzsüzoğlu) Lexigton Book, 175-190
  • Brčić, D., Žuškin, S., Valčić, V., Rudan, I. (2019). ECDIS transitional period completion: analyses, observations and findings. WMU J Marit Affairs 18: 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00173-z
  • DiRenzo, J., Goward, D.A., Roberts, F.S. (2015). The little-known challenge of maritime cybersecurity. In Proceedings of the 2015 6th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA), 1–5, Corfu, Greece
  • eos-gnss, GNSS systems of the world, (2024). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024 https://eos-gnss.com/knowledge-base/gps-overview-1-what-is-gps-and-gnss-positioning
  • Hareide, O.S., Jøsok, Ø., Lund, M.S., Ostnes, R., Helkala, K. (2018). Enhancing navigator competence by demonstrating maritime cyber security. J Navig 71: 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463318000164
  • Jiao, C., Wan, X., Li, H., Bian, S. (2024). Dynamic Projection Method of Electronic Navigational Charts for Polar Navigation. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 12: 577. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12040577
  • Joseph, A., Dalaklis, D. (2021). The international convention for the safety of life at sea: highlighting interrelations of measures towards effective risk mitigation, Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping 5(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2021.1880766
  • IHO 16 September 2021 An all embracing data model S-100, (2021). Accessed Date: 19.07.2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfKqA7ZkN1w
  • IHO Definitions (2024). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024. https://iho.int/en/enc-production
  • IMO, MSC MASS Degrees, (2019). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024. https://maiif.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/MSC-100_20-Annex-20-1.pdf
  • IMO-Radio Communications, (2024). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024. https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Pages/RadiaCommunicationsSearchRescue-Default.aspx
  • International Maritime Organization (IMO), (2017a). ECDIS—Guidance for Good Practice, Resolution MSC.1/Circ.1503/Rev.1
  • International Maritime Organization (IMO), (2017b). Guidelines on Maritime Cyber Risk Management, MSCFAL.1/Circ.3
  • International Maritime Organization (IMO), (2017c). Maritime Cyber Risk Management in Safety Management Systems, MSC 98/23/Add.1
  • International Electrotechnical Commission, (2019). Maritime navigation and radiocommunication equipment and systems-cybersecurity-general requirements, methods of testing and required test results. IEC 63154 ED1
  • INMARSAT Coverage on Earth, (2024). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024. https://www.egmdss.com/gmdss-courses/mod/page/view.php?id=2370
  • KaleemAwan, M.S., AlGhamdi, M.A. (2019). Understanding the vulnerabilities in digital components of an integrated bridge system (IBS). J Mar Sci Eng 7: 350–370. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7100350
  • Kayişoğlu, G., Güneş, B.İ., Bolat, P. (2024). ECDIS Cyber Security Dynamics Analysis based on the Fuzzy-FUCOM Method. Transactions on Maritime Science, 13 (1). https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v13.n01.w09
  • Lee, E, Mokashi, A.J., Moon, S.Y., Kim, G. (2019). The maturity of Automatic Identification Systems (AIS) and its implications for innovation. J Mar Sci Eng 7: 287–304. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7090287
  • Lee, S., Kim, H. (2024). IHO S-100 Data Model and Relevant Product Specification. the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation., 18(2). https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.18.02.04
  • Leite Junior, W.C., de Moraes, C.C., de Albuquerque, C.E.P., Machado, R.C.S., de Sá, A.O.A. (2021). Triggering Mechanism for Cyber-Attacks in Naval Sensors and Systems. Sensors 21: 3195. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093195
  • Liangbin, Z., Guoyou, S.İ., Jiaxuan, Y. (2018). Ship Trajectories Pre-processing Based on AIS Data. The Journal of Navigation 71(5): 1210-1230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463318000188
  • Marine-digital, 21 different types of marine digital equipment’s, (2024). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024. https://marine-digital.com/article_21types_of_navigation_equipment,
  • Meland, P.H., Bernsmed, K., Wille, E., Rodseth, O.J., Nesheim, D.A. (2021). A Retrospective Analysis of Maritime Cyber Security Incidents, The Int. J. on Mar.and Safety of Sea Tranportation 15(3): 519-530, https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.15.03.04
  • Ming-Cheng, T. (2016), Multi-target collision avoidance route planning under an ECDIS framework, Ocean Engineering 121: 268-278, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.05.040.
  • NATO Shipping Centre, (2024). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024. https://shipping.nato.int/nsc/operations/news/2021/ais-automatic-identification-system-overview
  • RADAR Screen, (2024). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024. https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/using-radar-on-ships-15-important-points/
  • Rutkowski, G. (2018). ECDIS Limitations, Data Reliability, Alarm Management and Safety Settings Recommended for Passage Planning and Route Monitoring on VLCC Tankers the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation 12(3) https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.12.03.06
  • Shapiro, L.R, Maras, M.H., Velotti, L, Pickman, S., Wei H.L., Till, R. (2018) Trojan horse risks in the maritime transportation systems sector. J Trans Sec 8: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-018-0191-3
  • Safety4sea, e-nav concept, (2024). Accessed Date: 19.07.2024. https://safety4sea.com/cm-the-future-of-seafaring-in-an-age-of-safer-smarter-greener-shipping
  • Safety4sea ECDIS, (2024). Accessed Date: 19.07.2024. https://safety4sea.com/cm-ecdis-prons-and-cons-of-paperless-navigation/
  • Safety4sea (2024). Navigation and Communication on sea, Accessed Date: 19.07.2024. https://safety4sea.com/imo-navigation-communications-and-search-and-rescue-sub-committee-whats-on-the-agenda/
  • SHODB, (2024). Paper and ENC Charts together, Accessed Date: 19.07.2024. https://www.shodb.gov.tr/shodb_esas/index.php/tr/urunler/haritalar/elektronik-seyir-haritalari
  • Svilicic, B., Kamahara, J., Rooks, M., Yano, Y., (2019a). Maritime cyber risk management: an experimental ship assessment. J Navig 72: 1108–1120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463318001157
  • Svilicic, B., Kamahara, J., Celic, J., Bolmsten, J. (2019b). Assessing ship cyber risks: a framework and case study of ECDIS security. WMU J Marit Affairs 18: 509–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00183-x
  • Svilicic, B., Rudan, I., Frančić, V., Doričić, M., (2019c). Shipboard ECDIS cyber security: third-party component threats. Pomorstvo-Sci J Maritime Research 33:176–180. https://doi.org/10.31217/p.33.2.7
  • Tam, K., Jones, K. (2019). MaCRA: a model-based framework for maritime cyber-risk assessment. WMU J. Marit Affairs 18: 129–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00162-2
  • Uflaz, E., Sezer, I.E., Tunçel, A.L., Aydin, M., Akyuz, E., Arslan, O., (2024), Quantifying potential cyber-attack risks in maritime transportation under Dempster–Shafer theory FMECA and rule-based Bayesian network modelling, Reliability Engineering & System Safety 243(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109825.
  • Usluer, H. B., (2022). The effect of the developing and changing Electronic Bridge Equipment and Electronic Navigation Charts on Intelligent Maritime Transportation Systems. Akıllı Ulaşım Sistemleri Ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 5(1), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.51513/jitsa.1097807
  • Xiao, F., Ligteringen, H., Coen van Gulijk, A., Ale, B. (2015). Comparison study on AIS data of ship traffic behavior, Ocean Engineering 95: 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.11.020.
  • Wikipedia, NAVTEX, (2024). Accessed Date: 19.07.2024. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAVTEX#/media/Dosya:Navtex.jpg

Denizciliğin Geleceği Mantığının Anlayışı; Emniyetli E-Seyir ve Emniyetli Suüstü İletişimi

Year 2024, Volume: 10 Issue: Özel Sayı: 1, 1 - 18, 03.10.2024
https://doi.org/10.52998/trjmms.1519901

Abstract

Gelişen ve değişen teknoloji küresel anlamda tüm sektörleri etkilemektedir. Öncelikle bilgi sistemlerini dijital olarak etkilese de dolaylı olarak tüm sektörleri etkilemektedir. Dünyanın en önemli ulaşım şekli olan deniz taşımacılığı, denizciler, gemiler ve limanlar gibi teknolojik gelişmelerden de etkilenmektedir. Teknoloji, amacına uygun kullanıldığında, geçmişteki hataları tespit edip buna göre tahminler geliştirme mantığına dayalı, akıllı ve akılcı çözümler kullanır. Deniz taşımacılığı, gemilerin limanlar arasında güvenli ve çevreye zarar vermeden taşınmasıdır. Deniz, daha önce sabit etkilere maruz kalmayan, meteorolojik ve çevresel koşullardan etkilenen dinamik bir yüzeydir. Uluslararası denizcilik otoriteleri teknolojik gelişmelere ayak uydururken, sektörü dönüştürecek dijital bir devrim olan e-navigasyon konseptini benimsemektedir. Elektronik Seyir’e geçiş, tüm işlemlerin dijital olmasını gerektirirken,iletimi daha kolay ve daha verimli hale getiriyor. Ayrıca tüm seyir boyunca gemilerin kara tesisleriyle kesintisiz ve yüksek kalitede dijital iletişim kurulmasını da zorunlu kılıyor. E-Seyir için kullanılan ileri otomasyon teknolojisi ürünlerinden biri olan ECDIS ve kullandığı vektör haritası ENC büyük önem taşımaktadır. ENC haritaları belirli standartlarda üretilmektedir. En yeni ve en gelişmiş standart olarak nitelendirilen S-100, denizcilere güvenli seyir ve iletişim konusunda önemli ve etkili faydalarda bulunmaktadır. Çalışma, e-navigasyon ekipmanlarının türlerini, standartlarını ve siber güvenliğe göre nasıl iletişim kurduklarını açıklamak amacıyla hazırlanmıştır.

References

  • Algarni, A. Acarer, T., Ahmad, Z. (2024). An Edge Computing-Based Preventive Framework With Machine Learning- Integration for Anomaly Detection and Risk Management in Maritime Wireless Communications, IEEE Access 12: 53646-5366. https://doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3387529
  • Androjna, A., Brcko, T., Pavic, I., Gredanus, H. (2020). Assessing Cyber Challenges of Maritime Navigation. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(10), p. 776. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8100776
  • Arıcan, O. H., Arslan, O., & Unal, A. U. (2023). The Importance of CATZOC in Passage Planning and Prioritization of Strategies for Safe Navigation. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 12(4), 445-458. https://doi.org/10.33714/masteb.1333432
  • Bisping, R., Willbond, J., Strohmeier M., Vincent, L. (2024). Wireless Signal Injection Attacks on VSAT Satellite Modems, Accessed Date: 19.07.2024. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/sec24fall-prepub-538-bisping.pdf
  • Bolat, P., Kayişoğlu, G. (2022). Security Studies: Classic to Post-Modern Approaches, Section 7,Cyber Security,General Perspective on Cyber Security. (Editor: Arda Özkan and Göktürk Tüzsüzoğlu) Lexigton Book, 175-190
  • Brčić, D., Žuškin, S., Valčić, V., Rudan, I. (2019). ECDIS transitional period completion: analyses, observations and findings. WMU J Marit Affairs 18: 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00173-z
  • DiRenzo, J., Goward, D.A., Roberts, F.S. (2015). The little-known challenge of maritime cybersecurity. In Proceedings of the 2015 6th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA), 1–5, Corfu, Greece
  • eos-gnss, GNSS systems of the world, (2024). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024 https://eos-gnss.com/knowledge-base/gps-overview-1-what-is-gps-and-gnss-positioning
  • Hareide, O.S., Jøsok, Ø., Lund, M.S., Ostnes, R., Helkala, K. (2018). Enhancing navigator competence by demonstrating maritime cyber security. J Navig 71: 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463318000164
  • Jiao, C., Wan, X., Li, H., Bian, S. (2024). Dynamic Projection Method of Electronic Navigational Charts for Polar Navigation. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 12: 577. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12040577
  • Joseph, A., Dalaklis, D. (2021). The international convention for the safety of life at sea: highlighting interrelations of measures towards effective risk mitigation, Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping 5(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2021.1880766
  • IHO 16 September 2021 An all embracing data model S-100, (2021). Accessed Date: 19.07.2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfKqA7ZkN1w
  • IHO Definitions (2024). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024. https://iho.int/en/enc-production
  • IMO, MSC MASS Degrees, (2019). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024. https://maiif.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/MSC-100_20-Annex-20-1.pdf
  • IMO-Radio Communications, (2024). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024. https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Pages/RadiaCommunicationsSearchRescue-Default.aspx
  • International Maritime Organization (IMO), (2017a). ECDIS—Guidance for Good Practice, Resolution MSC.1/Circ.1503/Rev.1
  • International Maritime Organization (IMO), (2017b). Guidelines on Maritime Cyber Risk Management, MSCFAL.1/Circ.3
  • International Maritime Organization (IMO), (2017c). Maritime Cyber Risk Management in Safety Management Systems, MSC 98/23/Add.1
  • International Electrotechnical Commission, (2019). Maritime navigation and radiocommunication equipment and systems-cybersecurity-general requirements, methods of testing and required test results. IEC 63154 ED1
  • INMARSAT Coverage on Earth, (2024). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024. https://www.egmdss.com/gmdss-courses/mod/page/view.php?id=2370
  • KaleemAwan, M.S., AlGhamdi, M.A. (2019). Understanding the vulnerabilities in digital components of an integrated bridge system (IBS). J Mar Sci Eng 7: 350–370. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7100350
  • Kayişoğlu, G., Güneş, B.İ., Bolat, P. (2024). ECDIS Cyber Security Dynamics Analysis based on the Fuzzy-FUCOM Method. Transactions on Maritime Science, 13 (1). https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v13.n01.w09
  • Lee, E, Mokashi, A.J., Moon, S.Y., Kim, G. (2019). The maturity of Automatic Identification Systems (AIS) and its implications for innovation. J Mar Sci Eng 7: 287–304. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7090287
  • Lee, S., Kim, H. (2024). IHO S-100 Data Model and Relevant Product Specification. the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation., 18(2). https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.18.02.04
  • Leite Junior, W.C., de Moraes, C.C., de Albuquerque, C.E.P., Machado, R.C.S., de Sá, A.O.A. (2021). Triggering Mechanism for Cyber-Attacks in Naval Sensors and Systems. Sensors 21: 3195. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093195
  • Liangbin, Z., Guoyou, S.İ., Jiaxuan, Y. (2018). Ship Trajectories Pre-processing Based on AIS Data. The Journal of Navigation 71(5): 1210-1230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463318000188
  • Marine-digital, 21 different types of marine digital equipment’s, (2024). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024. https://marine-digital.com/article_21types_of_navigation_equipment,
  • Meland, P.H., Bernsmed, K., Wille, E., Rodseth, O.J., Nesheim, D.A. (2021). A Retrospective Analysis of Maritime Cyber Security Incidents, The Int. J. on Mar.and Safety of Sea Tranportation 15(3): 519-530, https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.15.03.04
  • Ming-Cheng, T. (2016), Multi-target collision avoidance route planning under an ECDIS framework, Ocean Engineering 121: 268-278, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.05.040.
  • NATO Shipping Centre, (2024). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024. https://shipping.nato.int/nsc/operations/news/2021/ais-automatic-identification-system-overview
  • RADAR Screen, (2024). Accessed Date: 20.07.2024. https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/using-radar-on-ships-15-important-points/
  • Rutkowski, G. (2018). ECDIS Limitations, Data Reliability, Alarm Management and Safety Settings Recommended for Passage Planning and Route Monitoring on VLCC Tankers the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation 12(3) https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.12.03.06
  • Shapiro, L.R, Maras, M.H., Velotti, L, Pickman, S., Wei H.L., Till, R. (2018) Trojan horse risks in the maritime transportation systems sector. J Trans Sec 8: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-018-0191-3
  • Safety4sea, e-nav concept, (2024). Accessed Date: 19.07.2024. https://safety4sea.com/cm-the-future-of-seafaring-in-an-age-of-safer-smarter-greener-shipping
  • Safety4sea ECDIS, (2024). Accessed Date: 19.07.2024. https://safety4sea.com/cm-ecdis-prons-and-cons-of-paperless-navigation/
  • Safety4sea (2024). Navigation and Communication on sea, Accessed Date: 19.07.2024. https://safety4sea.com/imo-navigation-communications-and-search-and-rescue-sub-committee-whats-on-the-agenda/
  • SHODB, (2024). Paper and ENC Charts together, Accessed Date: 19.07.2024. https://www.shodb.gov.tr/shodb_esas/index.php/tr/urunler/haritalar/elektronik-seyir-haritalari
  • Svilicic, B., Kamahara, J., Rooks, M., Yano, Y., (2019a). Maritime cyber risk management: an experimental ship assessment. J Navig 72: 1108–1120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463318001157
  • Svilicic, B., Kamahara, J., Celic, J., Bolmsten, J. (2019b). Assessing ship cyber risks: a framework and case study of ECDIS security. WMU J Marit Affairs 18: 509–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00183-x
  • Svilicic, B., Rudan, I., Frančić, V., Doričić, M., (2019c). Shipboard ECDIS cyber security: third-party component threats. Pomorstvo-Sci J Maritime Research 33:176–180. https://doi.org/10.31217/p.33.2.7
  • Tam, K., Jones, K. (2019). MaCRA: a model-based framework for maritime cyber-risk assessment. WMU J. Marit Affairs 18: 129–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00162-2
  • Uflaz, E., Sezer, I.E., Tunçel, A.L., Aydin, M., Akyuz, E., Arslan, O., (2024), Quantifying potential cyber-attack risks in maritime transportation under Dempster–Shafer theory FMECA and rule-based Bayesian network modelling, Reliability Engineering & System Safety 243(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109825.
  • Usluer, H. B., (2022). The effect of the developing and changing Electronic Bridge Equipment and Electronic Navigation Charts on Intelligent Maritime Transportation Systems. Akıllı Ulaşım Sistemleri Ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 5(1), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.51513/jitsa.1097807
  • Xiao, F., Ligteringen, H., Coen van Gulijk, A., Ale, B. (2015). Comparison study on AIS data of ship traffic behavior, Ocean Engineering 95: 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.11.020.
  • Wikipedia, NAVTEX, (2024). Accessed Date: 19.07.2024. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAVTEX#/media/Dosya:Navtex.jpg
There are 45 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Maritime Transportation Engineering, Marine Electronics, Control and Automation, Maritime Engineering (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Hasan Bora Usluer 0000-0001-8988-9288

Early Pub Date August 9, 2024
Publication Date October 3, 2024
Submission Date July 21, 2024
Acceptance Date August 5, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 10 Issue: Özel Sayı: 1

Cite

APA Usluer, H. B. (2024). Understanding of the Maritime Future Mentality; Safe E-navigation and Safe Maritime Surface Communication. Turkish Journal of Maritime and Marine Sciences, 10(Özel Sayı: 1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.52998/trjmms.1519901

Creative Commons Lisansı

This Journal is licensed with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).