AGE, GROWTH AND OTOLITH BIOMETRY-BODY LENGTH RELATIONSHIPS OF RED BANDFISH (Cepola macrophthalma L., 1758) IN THE SEA OF MARMARA, TURKEY

Ali İşmen; Mukadder Arslan İhsanoğlu; İsmail Burak Daban; Haşim İnceoğlu

doi:10.23902/trkjnat.714201

Araştırma Makalesi

AGE, GROWTH AND OTOLITH BIOMETRY-BODY LENGTH RELATIONSHIPS OF RED BANDFISH (Cepola macrophthalma L., 1758) IN THE SEA OF MARMARA, TURKEY

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 107 - 113, 15.10.2020

Ali İşmen , Mukadder Arslan İhsanoğlu , İsmail Burak Daban , Haşim İnceoğlu

https://doi.org/10.23902/trkjnat.714201

Cited By: 1

Öz

The age, growth, and the otolith biometry-total length relationships of Cepola macrophthalma (Linnaeus, 1758) were investigated. The individuals were caught with beam trawl in the Sea of Marmara from March 2012 to June 2014. The individual with 51.5 cm total length sampled in this study was recorded as the new maximum size of C. macrophthalma in the Marmara Sea. The length-weight relationship showed negative allometric growth with a 1.36 b value. Otolith length-otolith weight, otolith width-otolith weight, otolith length-total length, otolith width-total length, otolith length-otolith width and total length-otolith weight relationships were found as OW=0.0002*OL2.6377 (R2=0.91), OW=0.001*OWi2.6215 (R2=0.94), O=0.057*TL+3.2087 (R2=0.57), OWi=0.0316*TL+1.8511 (R2=0.55), OWi=0.527*OL+0.2015 (R2=0.86), OW=0.0004*TL+0.0029 (R2=0.58), respectively. Ages were estimated from 80 otolith readings and the minimum and maximum ages observed were 1 and 5 years, respectively. The growth parameters of the von Bertalanffy equation were calculated as L∞=61.95 cm, K=0.19 year-1, t0 = -0.05 years. A great majority of the stock (77%) consisted of younger individuals (1-2 age groups). Cepola macrophthalma stock consisted of mainly younger individuals which may indicate that an effective fishing pressure is effective on the stock.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Red bandfish, The Marmara Sea, lenght-weight, growth, age

Destekleyen Kurum

General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policy of Turkey

Proje Numarası

TAGEM/HAYSUD/2011/09/02/04

Kaynakça

1. Appelbaum, S. & Hechte, T. 1978. Otolith length/fish length relationship of leptocephali, elvers, and sub-adult (reared) eels Anguilla anguilla. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 3(2): 245-247.
2. Atkinson, R.G.A. 1976. Some preliminary field observations of the burrows of the red band- fish, Cepola rubescens. Journal of Fish Biology, 9: 181-183.
3. Beverton, R.J.H. & Holt, S.J. 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. H. M. Stationary Off, London, 533 pp.
4. Bilge, G., Yapıcı, S., Filiz, H. & Cerim, H. 2014. Weight-length relations for 103 fish species from the southern Aegean Sea, Turkey. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 44(3): 263-269.
5. Bok, T.D., Gokturk, S.D., Kahraman, A.E., Alicli, T.Z., Acun, T. & Ates, C. 2011. Length-weight relationships of 34 fish species from the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advance, 10(23): 3037-3042.
6. Bostancı, D. 2009. Otolith biometry-body length relationships in four fish species (chub, pikeperch, crucian carp, and common carp). Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 24: 619-624.
7. Campana, S.E. & Thorrold, S.R. 2001. Otoliths, increments, and elements: keys to a comprehensive understanding of fish populations? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58: 30-38.
8. Carpentieri, P., Colloca, F. & Ardizzone, G.D. 2005. Day-night variations in the demersal nekton assemblage on the Mediterranean shelf break. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science, 63: 577-588.
9. Coll, M., Palomera, I., Tudela, S. & Sardà, F. 2006. Trophic flows, ecosystem structure and impacts in the South Catalan Sea, Northwestern Mediterranean. Journal of Marine Systems, 59: 63-96.
10. Colloca, F., Carpentieri, P., Balestri, E. & Ardizzone, G.D. 2004. A critical habitat for Mediterranean fish resources: shelf-break areas with Leptometra phalangium (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Marine Biology, 145: 1129-1142.
11. Dulčić, J., Kokan, B., Vrgoč, N., Glamuzina, B., Conides, A.J. & Skaramuca, B. 2008. Age, growth and mortality of red bandfish, Cepola macrophthalma (L.), in the eastern Adriatic Sea (Croatian coast). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 24: 351-353.
12. Froese, R. 2006. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22: 241-253.
13. Gaertner, J.C., Chessel, D. & Bertrand, J. 1998. Stability of spatial structures of demersal assemblages: a multitable approach. Aquatic Living Resources, 11(2): 75-85.
14. Gokce, G. & Metin, C. 2007. Landed and discarded catches from commercial prawn trammel net fishery. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23: 543-546.
15. Hajkova, P., Roche, K. & Kocian, L. 2003. On the use of diagnostic bones of brown trout, Salmo trutta m. fario, grayling, Thymallus thymallus and Carpathian sculpin, Cottus poecilopus in Eurasian otter, Lutra lutra diet analysis. Folia Zoologia, 52(4): 389-398.
16. Hare, J.A. & Cowen, R.K. 1995. Effect of age, growth rate, and ontogeny on the otolith size-fish size relationship in bluefish, Pomatomus saltatrix, and the implications for backcalculation of size in fish early life history stages. Canadian Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 52: 1909-1922.
17. Holden, M.J. & Raitt, D.F.S. 1974. Manual of fisheries science part 2- methods of resource investigation and their application. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 214 pp.
18. Hoşsucu, B., Kaya, M. & Taşkavak, E. 1999. An investigation of growth parameters and otolit-total length relationship of Solea solea (L., 1758) (Pisces: Soleidae) in İzmir Bay. Israel Journal of Zoology, 45: 277-287.
19. IUCN, 2015. The IUCN red list of threatened species. http://www.iucnredlist.org (Date accessed: 10.02.2020).
20. İlkyaz, A.T., Metin, G., Soykan, O. & Kınacıgil, H.T. 2008. Length-weight relationship of 62 fish species from the Central Aegean Sea, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 24: 699-702.
21. İşmen, A., Arslan İhsanoğlu, M. & İnceoğlu, H. 2018. Length-Weight Relationships of three Fish Species in the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Thalassas, 2: 373-376.
22. İşmen, A., Özen, Ö., Altinağaç, U., Özekinci, U. & Ayaz, A. 2007. Weight-Length Relationships of 63 Fish Species in Saros Bay, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23: 707-708.
23. Kallianiotis, A., Sophronidis, K., Vidoris, P. & Tselepides, A. 2000. Demersal fish and megafaunal assemblages on the Cretan continental shelf and slope (NE Mediterranean): seasonal variation in species, density, biomass and diversity. Progress in Oceanography, 46: 429-255.
24. Kaya, M., Özaydin, O. & Benli, H.A. 2001. Age and growth parameters of the red bandfish (Cepola rubescens L., 1766) in Izmir Bay. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 25: 111-116.
25. Labropoulou, M. & Papaconstantinou, C. 2005. Effect of fishing on community structure of demersal fish assemblages. Belgium Journal of Zoology, 135(2): 191-197.
26. Lamprakis, M.K., Kallianiotis, A.A., Moutopoulos, D.K. & Stergiou, K.I. 2003. Weight-length relationships of fishes discarded by trawlers in the North Aegean Sea. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 33(2): 145-152.
27. Le Cren, E.D. 1951. The length weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the Perch (Perca fuluviatilis). Journal of Animal Ecology, 20(2): 201-219.
28. Leblebici, S. 2007. Investigation on the biological properties of Red Bandfish (Cepola macrophthalma Linnaeus, 1758) in İzmir Bay. Ege University, Master Thesis, 89 p.
29. Machias, A., Karakassis, I., Labropoulou, M., Somarakis, S., Papadopoulou, K.N. & Papaconstantinou, C. 2004. Changes in wild fish assemblages after the establishment of a fish farming zone in an oligotrophic marine ecosystem. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 60(4): 771-779.
30. Molinari, A. & Tunesi, L. 2003. Characterization of the artisanal fishery activities in the Bergeggi Island's waters (Ligurian Sea). Biologia Marina Mediterranea, 10(2): 706-709.
31. Özaydin, O., Uckun, D., Akalin, S., Leblebici, S. & Tosunoglu, Z. 2007. Length-weight relationships of fishes captured from Izmir Bay, central Aegean Sea. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23(6): 695-696.
32. Özaydın, O. & Taskavak, E. 2006. Length-weight relationships for 47 fish species from Izmir Bay (eastern Aegean Sea, Turkey). Acta Adriatica, 47(2): 211-216.
33. Park, J.M., Gaston, T.F., Riedel, R. & Williamson, J.E. 2018. Biometric relationships between body and otolith measurements in nine demersal fishes from north-eastern Tasmanian waters, Australia. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 34: 801-805.
34. Pauly, D. & Munro, J.L. 1984. Once more on the comparison of growth in fish and invertebrates, Fishbyte, 2(1): 1-21.
35. Pereda, P. & Villamor, B. 1991. Relaciones biometricas en peces de la plataforma Cantabrica. Madrid Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Secretaría General Técnica, Spain, 39 pp.
36. Pineiro, C. & Sainza, M. 2003. Age estimation, growth and maturity of the European hake, Merluccius merluccius (Linnaeus, 1758) from the Iberian Atlantic waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 60: 1086-1102.
37. 36. Sanches, J.G. 1991. Catálogo dos principais peixes marinhos da república de Guiné-Bissau. Instituto Nacional de Investigação das Pescas, Portugal, 429 pp.
38. Sanchez, F., de la Gandara, F. & Gancedo, R. 1995. Atlas de los peces demersales de Galicia y el Cantábrico, Otoño 1991-1993. Instituto Español de Oceanografia, Madrid, Spain, 99 pp.
39. Smith-Vaniz, W.F. 2015. Cepola macrophthalma, the IUCN red list of threatened species 2015. (Date accessed: 10.02.2020)
40. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.L. 1987. Introduction to biostatistics. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, 363 pp.
41. Stergiou, K.I. 1991. Biology, ecology and dynamics of Cepola macrophthalma (L., 1758) (Pisces: Cepolidae) in the Euboikos and Pagassitikos Gulfs. Aristotle University, Ph.D. Thesis, Thessaloniki, Greece, 222 pp.
42. Stergiou, K.I. 1999. Intraspecific variations in size and age at maturity for red bandfish, Cepola macrophthalma. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 54: 151-160.
43. Stergiou, K.I., Economidis, P. & Sinis A. 1992. Age, growth and mortality of red bandfish, Cepola macrophthalma (L.), in the western Aegean Sea (Greece). Journal of Fish Biology, 40 (3): 395-418.
44. Stergiou, K.I. & Papaconstantinou, C. 1993. Natural mortality of red bandfish, (Cepola macrophthalma (L.), in the Aegean Sea (Greece): comparison of direct and indirect estimation methods. Fisheries research, 16: 347-361.
45. Torres, M.A., Ramos, F. & Sobrino, I. 2012. Length-weight relationships of 76 fish species from the Gulf of Cadiz (SW Spain). Fisheries Research, 127-128: 171-175.
46. Türker Çakır, D., Torku Koç, H., Başusta, A. & Başusta, N. 2007. LengthWeight Relationships of 24 Fish Species From Edremit Bay Aegean Sea. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy Natural and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 47-51.
47. Vallisneri, M., Piccinetti, C. & Tommasini S. 2006. Age, growth, and gonad organization in red bandfish (Cepola macrophthalma L., 1758) from the Adriatic Sea. Acta Adriatica, 47 (2): 217-221.
48. Whitehead, P.J.P., Bauchot, M.L., Hureau, J.C., Nielsen, J. & Tortonese, E. 1986. Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. United Nations, Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris, 849 pp.
49. Wilson, D.P. 1953. Notes from the Plymouth aquarium. II. Journal of Marine Biological Association UK, 32: 199-208.

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 107 - 113, 15.10.2020

Ali İşmen , Mukadder Arslan İhsanoğlu , İsmail Burak Daban , Haşim İnceoğlu

https://doi.org/10.23902/trkjnat.714201

Cited By: 1

Öz

Cepola macrophthalma (Linnaeus, 1758)’in yaş, büyüme ve otolit biyometri-total boy ilişkileri araştırılmıştır. Bireyler Mart 2012-Haziran 2014 tarihleri arasında Marmara Denizi'nde algarna ile yakalanmıştır. Bu çalışmada örneklenen 51,5 cm'lik C. macrophthalma bireyinin boyu, Marmara Denizi'nde bu tür için maksimum olarak kaydedilmiştir. Boy-ağırlık ilişkisi denklemine göre büyüme tipi negatif allometrik olarak belirlenmiştir (b=1,36). Otolith boyu-otolith ağırlığı, otolith genişliği- otolith ağırlığı, otolith boyu-total boy, otolith genişliği-total boy, otolit boyu-otolit genişliği, total boy-otolit ağırlığı ilişkileri OW=0,0002*OL2,6377 (R2=0,91), OW=0,001*OWi2,6215 (R2=0,94), OL=0,057*TL+3,2087 (R2=0,57), OWi=0,0316*TL+1,8511 (R2=0,55), OWi=0,527*OL+0,2015 (R2=0,86) OW=0,0004*TL+0,0029 (R2=0,58) olarak hesaplanmıştır. Yaşlar 80 adet otolit okumasından hesaplanmıştır; gözlemlenen en küçük ve en büyük yaşlar sırasıyla 1 ve 5’tir. von Bertalanffy denklemine göre hesaplanan büyüme parametreleri değerleri L∞=61,95 cm, K=0,19 yıl-1, t0 = -0,05 yıl olarak belirlenmiştir. Stoğun büyük çoğunluğu (%77) genç bireylerden (1-2 yaş grubu) oluşmaktadır. Marmara Denizi’nde C. macrophthalma stoğunun daha çok genç bireylerden oluşması stokların av baskısı altında olduğunu düşündürmektedir.

Proje Numarası

TAGEM/HAYSUD/2011/09/02/04

Kaynakça

1. Appelbaum, S. & Hechte, T. 1978. Otolith length/fish length relationship of leptocephali, elvers, and sub-adult (reared) eels Anguilla anguilla. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 3(2): 245-247.
2. Atkinson, R.G.A. 1976. Some preliminary field observations of the burrows of the red band- fish, Cepola rubescens. Journal of Fish Biology, 9: 181-183.
3. Beverton, R.J.H. & Holt, S.J. 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. H. M. Stationary Off, London, 533 pp.
4. Bilge, G., Yapıcı, S., Filiz, H. & Cerim, H. 2014. Weight-length relations for 103 fish species from the southern Aegean Sea, Turkey. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 44(3): 263-269.
5. Bok, T.D., Gokturk, S.D., Kahraman, A.E., Alicli, T.Z., Acun, T. & Ates, C. 2011. Length-weight relationships of 34 fish species from the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advance, 10(23): 3037-3042.
6. Bostancı, D. 2009. Otolith biometry-body length relationships in four fish species (chub, pikeperch, crucian carp, and common carp). Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 24: 619-624.
7. Campana, S.E. & Thorrold, S.R. 2001. Otoliths, increments, and elements: keys to a comprehensive understanding of fish populations? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58: 30-38.
8. Carpentieri, P., Colloca, F. & Ardizzone, G.D. 2005. Day-night variations in the demersal nekton assemblage on the Mediterranean shelf break. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science, 63: 577-588.
9. Coll, M., Palomera, I., Tudela, S. & Sardà, F. 2006. Trophic flows, ecosystem structure and impacts in the South Catalan Sea, Northwestern Mediterranean. Journal of Marine Systems, 59: 63-96.
10. Colloca, F., Carpentieri, P., Balestri, E. & Ardizzone, G.D. 2004. A critical habitat for Mediterranean fish resources: shelf-break areas with Leptometra phalangium (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Marine Biology, 145: 1129-1142.
11. Dulčić, J., Kokan, B., Vrgoč, N., Glamuzina, B., Conides, A.J. & Skaramuca, B. 2008. Age, growth and mortality of red bandfish, Cepola macrophthalma (L.), in the eastern Adriatic Sea (Croatian coast). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 24: 351-353.
12. Froese, R. 2006. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22: 241-253.
13. Gaertner, J.C., Chessel, D. & Bertrand, J. 1998. Stability of spatial structures of demersal assemblages: a multitable approach. Aquatic Living Resources, 11(2): 75-85.
14. Gokce, G. & Metin, C. 2007. Landed and discarded catches from commercial prawn trammel net fishery. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23: 543-546.
15. Hajkova, P., Roche, K. & Kocian, L. 2003. On the use of diagnostic bones of brown trout, Salmo trutta m. fario, grayling, Thymallus thymallus and Carpathian sculpin, Cottus poecilopus in Eurasian otter, Lutra lutra diet analysis. Folia Zoologia, 52(4): 389-398.
16. Hare, J.A. & Cowen, R.K. 1995. Effect of age, growth rate, and ontogeny on the otolith size-fish size relationship in bluefish, Pomatomus saltatrix, and the implications for backcalculation of size in fish early life history stages. Canadian Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 52: 1909-1922.
17. Holden, M.J. & Raitt, D.F.S. 1974. Manual of fisheries science part 2- methods of resource investigation and their application. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 214 pp.
18. Hoşsucu, B., Kaya, M. & Taşkavak, E. 1999. An investigation of growth parameters and otolit-total length relationship of Solea solea (L., 1758) (Pisces: Soleidae) in İzmir Bay. Israel Journal of Zoology, 45: 277-287.
19. IUCN, 2015. The IUCN red list of threatened species. http://www.iucnredlist.org (Date accessed: 10.02.2020).
20. İlkyaz, A.T., Metin, G., Soykan, O. & Kınacıgil, H.T. 2008. Length-weight relationship of 62 fish species from the Central Aegean Sea, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 24: 699-702.
21. İşmen, A., Arslan İhsanoğlu, M. & İnceoğlu, H. 2018. Length-Weight Relationships of three Fish Species in the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Thalassas, 2: 373-376.
22. İşmen, A., Özen, Ö., Altinağaç, U., Özekinci, U. & Ayaz, A. 2007. Weight-Length Relationships of 63 Fish Species in Saros Bay, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23: 707-708.
23. Kallianiotis, A., Sophronidis, K., Vidoris, P. & Tselepides, A. 2000. Demersal fish and megafaunal assemblages on the Cretan continental shelf and slope (NE Mediterranean): seasonal variation in species, density, biomass and diversity. Progress in Oceanography, 46: 429-255.
24. Kaya, M., Özaydin, O. & Benli, H.A. 2001. Age and growth parameters of the red bandfish (Cepola rubescens L., 1766) in Izmir Bay. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 25: 111-116.
25. Labropoulou, M. & Papaconstantinou, C. 2005. Effect of fishing on community structure of demersal fish assemblages. Belgium Journal of Zoology, 135(2): 191-197.
26. Lamprakis, M.K., Kallianiotis, A.A., Moutopoulos, D.K. & Stergiou, K.I. 2003. Weight-length relationships of fishes discarded by trawlers in the North Aegean Sea. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 33(2): 145-152.
27. Le Cren, E.D. 1951. The length weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the Perch (Perca fuluviatilis). Journal of Animal Ecology, 20(2): 201-219.
28. Leblebici, S. 2007. Investigation on the biological properties of Red Bandfish (Cepola macrophthalma Linnaeus, 1758) in İzmir Bay. Ege University, Master Thesis, 89 p.
29. Machias, A., Karakassis, I., Labropoulou, M., Somarakis, S., Papadopoulou, K.N. & Papaconstantinou, C. 2004. Changes in wild fish assemblages after the establishment of a fish farming zone in an oligotrophic marine ecosystem. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 60(4): 771-779.
30. Molinari, A. & Tunesi, L. 2003. Characterization of the artisanal fishery activities in the Bergeggi Island's waters (Ligurian Sea). Biologia Marina Mediterranea, 10(2): 706-709.
31. Özaydin, O., Uckun, D., Akalin, S., Leblebici, S. & Tosunoglu, Z. 2007. Length-weight relationships of fishes captured from Izmir Bay, central Aegean Sea. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23(6): 695-696.
32. Özaydın, O. & Taskavak, E. 2006. Length-weight relationships for 47 fish species from Izmir Bay (eastern Aegean Sea, Turkey). Acta Adriatica, 47(2): 211-216.
33. Park, J.M., Gaston, T.F., Riedel, R. & Williamson, J.E. 2018. Biometric relationships between body and otolith measurements in nine demersal fishes from north-eastern Tasmanian waters, Australia. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 34: 801-805.
34. Pauly, D. & Munro, J.L. 1984. Once more on the comparison of growth in fish and invertebrates, Fishbyte, 2(1): 1-21.
35. Pereda, P. & Villamor, B. 1991. Relaciones biometricas en peces de la plataforma Cantabrica. Madrid Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Secretaría General Técnica, Spain, 39 pp.
36. Pineiro, C. & Sainza, M. 2003. Age estimation, growth and maturity of the European hake, Merluccius merluccius (Linnaeus, 1758) from the Iberian Atlantic waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 60: 1086-1102.
37. 36. Sanches, J.G. 1991. Catálogo dos principais peixes marinhos da república de Guiné-Bissau. Instituto Nacional de Investigação das Pescas, Portugal, 429 pp.
38. Sanchez, F., de la Gandara, F. & Gancedo, R. 1995. Atlas de los peces demersales de Galicia y el Cantábrico, Otoño 1991-1993. Instituto Español de Oceanografia, Madrid, Spain, 99 pp.
39. Smith-Vaniz, W.F. 2015. Cepola macrophthalma, the IUCN red list of threatened species 2015. (Date accessed: 10.02.2020)
40. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.L. 1987. Introduction to biostatistics. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, 363 pp.
41. Stergiou, K.I. 1991. Biology, ecology and dynamics of Cepola macrophthalma (L., 1758) (Pisces: Cepolidae) in the Euboikos and Pagassitikos Gulfs. Aristotle University, Ph.D. Thesis, Thessaloniki, Greece, 222 pp.
42. Stergiou, K.I. 1999. Intraspecific variations in size and age at maturity for red bandfish, Cepola macrophthalma. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 54: 151-160.
43. Stergiou, K.I., Economidis, P. & Sinis A. 1992. Age, growth and mortality of red bandfish, Cepola macrophthalma (L.), in the western Aegean Sea (Greece). Journal of Fish Biology, 40 (3): 395-418.
44. Stergiou, K.I. & Papaconstantinou, C. 1993. Natural mortality of red bandfish, (Cepola macrophthalma (L.), in the Aegean Sea (Greece): comparison of direct and indirect estimation methods. Fisheries research, 16: 347-361.
45. Torres, M.A., Ramos, F. & Sobrino, I. 2012. Length-weight relationships of 76 fish species from the Gulf of Cadiz (SW Spain). Fisheries Research, 127-128: 171-175.
46. Türker Çakır, D., Torku Koç, H., Başusta, A. & Başusta, N. 2007. LengthWeight Relationships of 24 Fish Species From Edremit Bay Aegean Sea. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy Natural and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 47-51.
47. Vallisneri, M., Piccinetti, C. & Tommasini S. 2006. Age, growth, and gonad organization in red bandfish (Cepola macrophthalma L., 1758) from the Adriatic Sea. Acta Adriatica, 47 (2): 217-221.
48. Whitehead, P.J.P., Bauchot, M.L., Hureau, J.C., Nielsen, J. & Tortonese, E. 1986. Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. United Nations, Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris, 849 pp.
49. Wilson, D.P. 1953. Notes from the Plymouth aquarium. II. Journal of Marine Biological Association UK, 32: 199-208.

Toplam 49 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil	İngilizce
Konular	Hidrobiyoloji
Bölüm	Araştırma Makalesi/Research Article
Yazarlar	Ali İşmen 0000-0003-2456-0232 Mukadder Arslan İhsanoğlu 0000-0003-0072-5848 İsmail Burak Daban 0000-0002-2973-5698 Haşim İnceoğlu 0000-0003-3563-8939
Proje Numarası	TAGEM/HAYSUD/2011/09/02/04
Yayımlanma Tarihi	15 Ekim 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi	10 Nisan 2020
Kabul Tarihi	11 Eylül 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2020 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA	İşmen, A., Arslan İhsanoğlu, M., Daban, İ. B., İnceoğlu, H. (2020). AGE, GROWTH AND OTOLITH BIOMETRY-BODY LENGTH RELATIONSHIPS OF RED BANDFISH (Cepola macrophthalma L., 1758) IN THE SEA OF MARMARA, TURKEY. Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences, 21(2), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.23902/trkjnat.714201
AMA	İşmen A, Arslan İhsanoğlu M, Daban İB, İnceoğlu H. AGE, GROWTH AND OTOLITH BIOMETRY-BODY LENGTH RELATIONSHIPS OF RED BANDFISH (Cepola macrophthalma L., 1758) IN THE SEA OF MARMARA, TURKEY. Trakya Univ J Nat Sci. Ekim 2020;21(2):107-113. doi:10.23902/trkjnat.714201
Chicago	İşmen, Ali, Mukadder Arslan İhsanoğlu, İsmail Burak Daban, ve Haşim İnceoğlu. “AGE, GROWTH AND OTOLITH BIOMETRY-BODY LENGTH RELATIONSHIPS OF RED BANDFISH (Cepola Macrophthalma L., 1758) IN THE SEA OF MARMARA, TURKEY”. Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences 21, sy. 2 (Ekim 2020): 107-13. https://doi.org/10.23902/trkjnat.714201.
EndNote	İşmen A, Arslan İhsanoğlu M, Daban İB, İnceoğlu H (01 Ekim 2020) AGE, GROWTH AND OTOLITH BIOMETRY-BODY LENGTH RELATIONSHIPS OF RED BANDFISH (Cepola macrophthalma L., 1758) IN THE SEA OF MARMARA, TURKEY. Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences 21 2 107–113.
IEEE	A. İşmen, M. Arslan İhsanoğlu, İ. B. Daban, ve H. İnceoğlu, “AGE, GROWTH AND OTOLITH BIOMETRY-BODY LENGTH RELATIONSHIPS OF RED BANDFISH (Cepola macrophthalma L., 1758) IN THE SEA OF MARMARA, TURKEY”, Trakya Univ J Nat Sci, c. 21, sy. 2, ss. 107–113, 2020, doi: 10.23902/trkjnat.714201.
ISNAD	İşmen, Ali vd. “AGE, GROWTH AND OTOLITH BIOMETRY-BODY LENGTH RELATIONSHIPS OF RED BANDFISH (Cepola Macrophthalma L., 1758) IN THE SEA OF MARMARA, TURKEY”. Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences 21/2 (Ekim 2020), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.23902/trkjnat.714201.
JAMA	İşmen A, Arslan İhsanoğlu M, Daban İB, İnceoğlu H. AGE, GROWTH AND OTOLITH BIOMETRY-BODY LENGTH RELATIONSHIPS OF RED BANDFISH (Cepola macrophthalma L., 1758) IN THE SEA OF MARMARA, TURKEY. Trakya Univ J Nat Sci. 2020;21:107–113.
MLA	İşmen, Ali vd. “AGE, GROWTH AND OTOLITH BIOMETRY-BODY LENGTH RELATIONSHIPS OF RED BANDFISH (Cepola Macrophthalma L., 1758) IN THE SEA OF MARMARA, TURKEY”. Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences, c. 21, sy. 2, 2020, ss. 107-13, doi:10.23902/trkjnat.714201.
Vancouver	İşmen A, Arslan İhsanoğlu M, Daban İB, İnceoğlu H. AGE, GROWTH AND OTOLITH BIOMETRY-BODY LENGTH RELATIONSHIPS OF RED BANDFISH (Cepola macrophthalma L., 1758) IN THE SEA OF MARMARA, TURKEY. Trakya Univ J Nat Sci. 2020;21(2):107-13.

Cited By

Otolith Morphometrics and Variations Between Two Populations of Sillago sinica (Perciformes, Sillaginidae) in the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea

Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences

https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-024-00711-4

Makale Dosyaları

Tam Metin

You can reach the journal's archive between the years of 2000-2011 via https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/trakyafbd/archive (Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences (=Trakya University Journal of Science)

Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.