İLETİŞİMDE ve İLİŞKİLERDE PHUBBİNG

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2, 359 - 372, 24.08.2020

İzzet Parmaksız

Öz

Modern yaşamla paralel olarak gelişen teknoloji
hayatımızın önemli bir parçasına dönüşmüştür. Teknolojinin sağladığı pek çok
kolaylıktan biri de iletişimi hızlandırmasıdır. İletişimde kaçınılmaz olarak
kullandığımız en önemli teknolojik keşif de telefonlarımızdır. Telefonlar
hayatımızı hem olumlu hem de olumsuz yönde etkilemiştir. Fakat olumsuzluklara
fazla dikkat etmiyoruz. Özellikle akıllı telefonların kullanımıyla birlikte
problemli telefon kullanımı da kendini göstermiştir. İnternet ve diğer
uygulamalar telefona bağımlılığı artırmıştır. Bu kötüye kullanım da sosyal
ilişkilerimize zarar vermektedir. Bu durumun sonucu olarak phubbing diye
adlandırdığımız yanlış bir davranış ortaya çıkmıştır. Başkalarını umursamadan
telefonuyla ilgilenmek diye tanımlanan bu davranış önemli bir soruna
dönüşmüştür. Günlük yaşamımızda ise sosyal kabalık şeklinde kendini
göstermektedir. Özellikle gençler arasında daha yaygın olarak kendini
göstermekte ve sosyal ilişkilerin kalitesini düşürmektedir. İş, aile ve arkadaş
gibi iletişim halinde olduğumuz insanlarla olan iletişimimizi olumsuz olarak
etkilemektedir. Kişisel bir problem olmaktan çıkıp global bir soruna
dönüşmüştür. Phubbingin gelecekte daha büyük tehlikeler oluşturma ihtimali
vardır. Bu nedenle phubbing ve ortaya çıkaracağı sorunlarla ilgili gerekli
tedbirle alınmalı ve insanlar bilinçlendirilmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Phubbing, İletişim, İlişki

Kaynakça

• Abeele, M. M. V., Antheunis, M. L., & Schouten, A. P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 562–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04
• Abel, P.J.; Buff, C.L.; Burr, S.A. (2016). Social media and fear of missing out: Scale development and assessment. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 14, 34–44.
• Abramova, O., Baumann, A., Krasnova, H., & Lessmann, S. (2017). To Phub or not to Phub: Understanding off-task smartphone usage and its consequences in the academic environment (No. 87717). Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
• Akçay, D. (2013). The effects of interaction design in mobile publishing: Research on Newspaper Web pages Compality to Mobile Devices. Doktora Tezi. Graduate Instıtute Of Socıal Scıences, Yeditepe University, İstanbul
• Aktaş, H. ve Yılmaz, N. (2017). Üniversite gençlerinin yalnızlık ve utangaçlık unsurları açısından akıllı telefon bağımlılığı, International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 3 (1): 85-100.
• Anderson, M. (2015). Technology device ownership: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: http://pewinternet.org/2015/10/29/technology-deviceownership-2015/.
• Aydoğdu Karaaslan, İ. ve Budak, L. (2012). Üniversite öğrencilerinin cep telefonu özelliklerini kullanımlarının ve gündelik iletişimlerine etkisinin araştırılması. Journal of Yasar University, 26(7), 4548-4525.
• Baron, N. S., & Campbell, E. M. (2012). Gender and mobile phones in cross-national context. Language Sciences, 34(1), 13e27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.langsci.2011.06.018
• Billieux, J., Philippot, P., Schmid, C., Maurage, P., De Mol, J., & Van der Linden, M. (2014). Is dysfunctional use of the mobile phone a behavioural addiction? Confronting symptom-based versus process-based approaches. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1910.
• Broadbent, S. (2016). Intimacy at Work: How digital media bring private life to the workplace. Routledge.
• Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9-18. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018
• Chotpitayasunondh, V., Douglas, K.M.(2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages 304-316.
• Coyne, S. M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D. M. (2011). “I luv u :)!”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 60(2), 150–162
• Çakır, Ö. ve Oğuz, E. (2017). Lise Öğrencilerinin Yalnızlık Düzeyleri ile Akıllı Telefon Bağımlılığı Arasındaki İlişki, Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13 (1): 418-429.
• Geser, H. (2004). Towards a sociological theory of the mobile phone. E-Merging media: Communication and the Media Economy of the Future, 235–260.
• Gökdağ, R. (2018). Which One Has Priority in Interpersonal Communication? Individual or Mobile Phone. (Ed. Oze, N.). Public Relations & Communicatıon Studies,(9-20). London: IJOPEC Publication.
• Güzeller, C. O., & Coşguner, T. (2012). Development of a problematic mobile phone use scale for Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 205–211.
• Haigh, A. (2015). Stop phubbing. Retrieved fromhttp://stopphubbing.com
• Han, Sehee, Jinyoung Min, and Heeseok Lee (2015), “Antecedents of Social Presence and Gratification of Social Connection Needs in SNS: A Study of Twitter Users and Their Mobile and Non-mobile Usage,” International Journal of Information Management, 35 (4), 459–471.
• Hawkins, B. P., & Hertlein, K. M. (2013). Treatment strategies for online role-playing gaming problems in couples. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 12, 150e167. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2013.779100
• Hertlein, K. M. (2012). Digital dwelling: Technology in couple and family relationships. Family Relations, 61, 374e387.
• Jones, T. (2014). Cell phone use while walking across campus: an observation and survey. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 5(1). Retrieved from http://www.studentpulse.com/a?id-975.
• Karaaziz, M. ve Keskindağ, B. (2015). “I Love My Smartphone”: A ReviewStudy of Smartphone Addiction and Related Psychological Risk Factors, Bağımlılık Dergisi, 16 (2): 78-85.
• Kelly, L., Miller-Ott, A. E., & Duran, R. L. (2017). Sports Scores and Intimate Moments: An Expectancy Violations Theory Approach to Partner Cell Phone Behaviors in Adult Romantic Relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 1-23. doi:10.1080/10570314.2017.1299206
• Kim, E.,Cho, I. ve Kim, E. J. (2017). Structural Equation Model of Smartphone Addiction Based on Adult Attachment Theory: Mediating Effects of Loneliness and Depression, Asian Nursing Research, 11: 92-97.
• Krasnova, H., Abramova, O., Notter, I., & Baumann, A. (2016). Why phubbing is toxic for your relationship: Understanding the role of smartphone jealousy among “Generation Y” users. In Twenty-fourth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), _ Istanbul,Turkey.
• Kruger, D.J., Djerf, J.M. (2016). High ringxiety: Attachment anxiety predicts experiences of phantom cell phone ringing. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw., 19, 56–59.
• Kuss, Daria J., and Mark Griffiths (2011), “Online Social Networking and Addiction: A Review of the Psychological Literature,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8 (9), 3528–3552, http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8093528.
• Lee, J. and Shrum, L. J. (2012), “Conspicuous Consumption versus Charitable Behavior in Response to Social Exclusion: A Differential Needs Explanation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (3), 530–44.
• Lee, Y., Chang, C., Lin, Y., & Cheng, Z. (2014). The dark side of smartphone usage: psychological traits, compulsive behavior and technostress. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 373e383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.047.
• Lei, L., & Wu, Y. (2007). Adolescents’ paternal attachment and internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(5), 633–639.
• Lin, Y. H., Chang, L. R., Lee, Y. H., Tseng, H. W., Kuo, T. B., & Chen, S. H. (2014). Development and validation of the smartphone addiction inventory (SPAI). PloS One, 9(6), e98312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098312.
• McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women's personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85-98. https:// doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065.
• McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. (2017). Technoference: Parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12822.
• Mead, N. L., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., Rawn, C. D., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation. Journal of consumer research, 37(5), 902-919.
• Misra, S., & Stokols, D. (2012). Psychological and health outcomes of perceived information overload. Environment and Behavior, 44, 737–759.
• Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2014). The iphone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275–298.
• Mok, J. Y., Choi, S. W., Kim, D. J., Choi, J. S., Lee, J., Ahn, H. And Song, W. Y. (2014). Latent class analysis on internet and smartphone addiction in college students. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 10, 817e828. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ NDT.S59293.
• Nazir, T., Pişkin, M. (2016). Phubbing: A Technological Invasion Which Connected the World But Disconnected Humans. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(4), No: 68, pp. 175-182.
• O'Connor, S. S., Whitehill, J. M., King, K. M., Kernic, M. A., Boyle, L. N., Bresnahan, B. W., & Ebel, B. E. (2013). Compulsive cell phone use and history of motor vehicle crash. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(4), 512-519.
• Oduor, E., Neustaedter, C., Odom, W., Tang, A., Moallem, N., Tory, M., & Irani, P. (2016, June). The frustrations and benefits of mobile device usage in the home when co-present with family members. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 1315-1327). ACM.
• Palackal, A., Mbatia, P., Dzorgbo, D.-B. S., Duque, Y. B., Ynalvez, M., & Shrum, W. (2011). Are mobile phones changing social networks? A longitudinal study of core networks in Kerala. New Media & Society, 13, 391–410.
• Prasad, S.; Harshe, D.; Kaur, N.; Jangannavar, S.; Srivastava, A.; Achanta, U.; Khan, S.; Harshe, G. A (2018). Study of Magnitude and Psychological Correlates of Smartphone Use in Medical Students: A Pilot Study with A Novel Telemetric Approach. Indian J. Psychol. Med., 40, 468–475.
• Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237–246.
• Przybylski, A.K., Weinstein, N. (2012). “Can You Connect With me Now? How the Presence of Mobile Communication Technology Influences Face-to-Face Conversation Quality”. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, pp. 1-10. Doi: 10.1177/0265407512
• Rainie, L. (2012). Two-thirds of young adults and those with higher income are smartphone owners. Pew Internet & American Life Project (September 11, 2012).
• Ranie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. Pew Research Center. August, 2015. ). Retrieved 13 April, 2019 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-onmobile-etiquette/.
• Rappleyea, D. L., Taylor, A. C., & Fang, X. (2014). Gender differences and communication technology use among emerging adults in the initiation of dating relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 50(3), 269e284. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01494929.2013.879552.
• Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Hickson III, M. L. (2008). Eye behavior. In Nonverbal behavior in interpersonal relations (pp. 85-96). Boston, MA: Pearson. Education, Inc.
• Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141.
• Shalom, J. G., Israeli, H., Markovitzky, O., & Lipsitz, J. D. (2015). Social anxiety and physiological arousal during computer mediated vs. face-to-face communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 202–208.
• Shellenbarger S. (2013). Secrets of effective office humour. Wall street journal, August 13.
• Silk, J. S., Stroud, L. R., Siegle, G. J., Dahl, R. E., Lee, K. H., & Nelson, E. E. (2012). Peer acceptance and rejection through the eyes of youth: pupillary, eyetracking and ecological data from the Chatroom Interact task. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(1), 93-105. doi:10.1093/scan/nsr044
• Srivastava, L. (2005). Mobile phones and the evolution of social behavior. Behavior & Information Technology, 24, 111–129.
• Statista. (2019a). Number of smartphone users worldwide from 2019 to 2023 (in billions). Retrieved 12 April, 2019, from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/218984/number-of-global-mobil-users-since 2010/.
• Statista. (2019b). Number of smartphone users in Turkey from 2017 to 2023 (in millions). Retrieved 12 April, 2019, from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/467181/forecast-of-smartphone-users-in-turkey/
• Takao, M., Takahashi, S., & Kitamura, M. (2009). Addictive personality and problematic mobile phone use. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 12(5), 501e507.
• Tangmunkongvorakul, A., Musumari, P. M., Thongpibul, K., Srithanaviboonchai, K., Techasrivichien, T., Suguimoto, S. P., …& Kihara, M. (2019). Association of excessive smartphone use with psychological well-being among university students in Chiang Mai, Thailand. PloS one, 14(1), e0210294.
• Tong, S. T., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Relational maintenance and CMC. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication and personal relationships (pp. 98–118). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
• Turkle, S. (2012). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
• Walther, J. B., van der, H. B., Kim, S. Y., Westerman, D., & Tong, S. T. (2008). The role of friends' appearance and behaviour and evaluations of individuals on Facebook: are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34(1), 28e49.
• Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain Drain: The mere presence of One's own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2, 140–15
• Wirth, J. H., Sacco, D. F., Hugenberg, K., & Williams, K. D. (2010). Eye gaze as relational evaluation: Averted eye gaze leads to feelings of ostracism and relational devaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 869-882. doi:10.1177/0146167210370032
• Yayan, E.H.; Arikan, D.; Saban, F.; Gürarslan Ba¸s, N.; Özel Özcan, Ö. (2017). Examination of the correlation between ınternet addiction and social phobia in adolescents.
• Western Journal of Nursing Research., 39, 1240–1254.
• Young, K. (2017, October 17). 98% of gen Z own a smartphone. Retrieved 13 April 2019 from http://blog. globalwebindex.net/chart-of-the-day/98-percent-of-gen-z-own-a-smartphone/.
• Yu Wang., Qingfeng Meng. (2015). An analysis of the "phubbing" phenomenon in university classes and a research on guiding strategies. Science & Technology Vision, Volume 17, Pages 53-55.
• Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., & Pei, T. (2015). Mediating effect of loneliness on relationship between interpersonal adaptation and mobile phone addiction in college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 29, 774–779.
• https://www.macmillandictionary.com/buzzword/entr ies /phubbing.html. (Erişim Tarihi: 30.05.2019).