Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2018, , 105 - 110, 31.08.2018
https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.452792

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Balcı Ş, Koçak MC. Sosyal Medya Kullanımı ile Yaşam Doyumu Arasındaki İlişki: Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. 1. Uluslararası İletişimde Yeni Yönelimler Konferansı, İstanbul, 2017, 1, 34-45.
  • 2. Boyd DM, Ellison NB. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Brand On The Web. USA: New Riders Press. 2007, 13(1), 11, 210-230. 3. Buss A, Strauss N. Online Communities Handbook: Building Your Business And Brand On The Web. Berkeley, CA: New Riders. 2009.
  • 4. Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. 7. Baskı. Pagem A Yayıncılık, Ankara. 2007.
  • 5. Çetin E. Sosyal İletişim Ağları ve Gençlik: Facebook Örneği. Uluslararası Davraz Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 2009, 1094-1105.
  • 6. Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook "friends:"Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007, 12(4), 1. 7. https://royal.pingdom.com/2010/02/16/study-ages-of-social-network-users/ Erişim tarihi:01.07.2018.
  • 8. Juen J, Johnson A, Das A, Borisov N, Caesar M. Defending tor from network adversaries: A case study of network path prediction. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2015; 2015 (2):171–187.
  • 9. Kabilan MK, Ahmad N, Abidin MJZ. Facebook: An Online Environment For Learning Of English In Institutions Of Higher Education?. The Internet and Higher Implications Of Visual Cues On Initiating Friendship On Facebook. Computers in Human Behaviour, 2010, 26(2), 226-234.
  • 10. Kaplan A, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media Business Horizons, 2010, 53(1), 59—68.
  • 11. Kara F, Ayverdi B. Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Serbest Zamanda Sıkılma Algısı Alkol Kullanma Nedenlerinin Belirleyicisi midir? Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2018, 23 (1), 35-42.
  • 12. Kara F. Serbest Zamanda Sıkılma Algısının Yaşam Kalitesi Ve Evlilik Doyumu Üzerine Etkisinin Belirlenmesi. Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Beden eğitimi ve Spor Ana Bilim Dalı. 2015.
  • 13. Karal H, Kokoç M. Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal ağ siteleri kullanım amaçlarını belirlemeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 2010, 1(3). 251-263.
  • 14. Kılbaş Ş. Rekreasyon: Boş Zamanı Değerlendirme, (1. Baskı), Adana: Anaca Yayınları. 2001.
  • 15. Kim W, Jeong OR, Lee SW. On social Web sites. Information Systems, 2010, 35(2), 215-236.
  • 16. Mahajan P. Use of social networking in a linguistically and culturally rich India. International Information & Library Review, 2009, 41, 129–136.
  • 17. Mitchell K. (2009). ESOL students on Facebook. Portland, Oregon: Portland State University Master's thesis.
  • 18. O’Reilly T, Milstein S. The Twitter book Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media. 2009.
  • 19. Onat F, Alikılıç ÖA. Sosyal Ağ Sitelerinin Reklam ve Halkla İlişkiler Ortamları Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Yaşar University, 2008, 3(9), 1111-1143.
  • 20. Öner B, Yerlisu Lapa T. Lise Öğrencilerinde Serbest Zamanda Sıkılma Algısının İnternet Bağımlılığı ve Akademik Başarı Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi. 15. Uluslararası Spor Bilimleri Kongresi. 2017.
  • 21. Pempek TA, Yermolayeva YA, Calvert SL. College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2009, 30(3), 227-238.
  • 22. Ridings CM, Gefen D. Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2004, 10, 1.
  • 23. Schmalz DL, Colistra CM. & Evans, KE. Social Media Sites as a Means of Coping with a Threatened Social Identity, Leisure Sciences, 2015, 37:1, 20-38.
  • 24. Tredinnick L. Web 2.0 And Business: A Pointer To The Intranet Soft The Future. Business Information Review, 2006, 23(4), 228–234.
  • 25. Uslu KU. Yeni iletişim araçları ve toplumsal etkileri. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2007, 1.
  • 26. Vural ZBA, Bat M. Yeni bir iletişim ortamı olarak sosyal medya: Ege üniversitesi iletişim fakültesine yönelik bir araştırma. Journal of Yaşar University, 2010, 20 (5), 3348‐3382.
  • 27. Wang SS, Moon SI, Kwon KH, Evans CA, Stefanone MA. Face off: Implications of visual cues on initiating friendship on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010, 26(2), 226-234.
  • 28. Yuen F, Johnson AJ. Leisure Spaces, Community, and Third Places, Leisure Sciences, 2017, 39:3, 295-303.

Determination of Leisure Time Orientations in University Students, The Relationship Between Leisure Time Boredom Perceptions and Social Network Sites Usage Purposes

Yıl 2018, , 105 - 110, 31.08.2018
https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.452792

Öz

The purpose of this study is to determine the
leisure time preferences of the university students and to examine the
relationship between leisure time perception and usage of social network sites
The research was conducted in accordance with the
relational screening model.
The
study group consists of 230 female (65.7%), 120 male (34.3%), total 350
students studying at Konya Selçuk University.
As
a means of data collection in the study that personal information form, activity
preference form and "Social Network Sites Usage Scale" developed by
Karal and Kokoç (2010) and "Leisure Time Boredom Perception Scale" (LTBPS)
developed by Iso-Ahola and Weissinger and adapted to Turkish by Kara et al.
(2014) was used.
SPSS
16.0 statistical package program was used to evaluate the data and to find the
calculated values.
The
data are summarized by giving percent, mean and standard deviations.
Independent group t test was used for binary
cluster comparisons and One Way Variance Analysis (ANOVA) was used for multiple
cluster comparisons due to the data showed normal distribution.
Significance level in the study was
taken as (p <0.05).



As a result of the study, in favour of male
participants in the sub-dimension of boredom from LTBPS sub-dimensions
according to gender variable, in favour of male participants in all SNSUPS
sub-dimensions; for 1-3 hours according to the weekly leisure time variable in
the case of two of the LTBPS sub-dimensions, and SNSUPS sub-dimensions for 1-3
hours and 4-6 hours in sub-dimension for identification and recognition; there
was no significant difference in the LTBPS sub-dimension according to the
activity preference variable, but significant results were observed in all SNSUPS
sub-dimension.
According
to the relationship test between SNSUPS and LTBPS, low and moderate positive
correlations were found in all sub-dimensions of the two dimensions.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Balcı Ş, Koçak MC. Sosyal Medya Kullanımı ile Yaşam Doyumu Arasındaki İlişki: Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. 1. Uluslararası İletişimde Yeni Yönelimler Konferansı, İstanbul, 2017, 1, 34-45.
  • 2. Boyd DM, Ellison NB. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Brand On The Web. USA: New Riders Press. 2007, 13(1), 11, 210-230. 3. Buss A, Strauss N. Online Communities Handbook: Building Your Business And Brand On The Web. Berkeley, CA: New Riders. 2009.
  • 4. Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. 7. Baskı. Pagem A Yayıncılık, Ankara. 2007.
  • 5. Çetin E. Sosyal İletişim Ağları ve Gençlik: Facebook Örneği. Uluslararası Davraz Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 2009, 1094-1105.
  • 6. Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook "friends:"Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007, 12(4), 1. 7. https://royal.pingdom.com/2010/02/16/study-ages-of-social-network-users/ Erişim tarihi:01.07.2018.
  • 8. Juen J, Johnson A, Das A, Borisov N, Caesar M. Defending tor from network adversaries: A case study of network path prediction. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2015; 2015 (2):171–187.
  • 9. Kabilan MK, Ahmad N, Abidin MJZ. Facebook: An Online Environment For Learning Of English In Institutions Of Higher Education?. The Internet and Higher Implications Of Visual Cues On Initiating Friendship On Facebook. Computers in Human Behaviour, 2010, 26(2), 226-234.
  • 10. Kaplan A, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media Business Horizons, 2010, 53(1), 59—68.
  • 11. Kara F, Ayverdi B. Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Serbest Zamanda Sıkılma Algısı Alkol Kullanma Nedenlerinin Belirleyicisi midir? Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2018, 23 (1), 35-42.
  • 12. Kara F. Serbest Zamanda Sıkılma Algısının Yaşam Kalitesi Ve Evlilik Doyumu Üzerine Etkisinin Belirlenmesi. Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Beden eğitimi ve Spor Ana Bilim Dalı. 2015.
  • 13. Karal H, Kokoç M. Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal ağ siteleri kullanım amaçlarını belirlemeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 2010, 1(3). 251-263.
  • 14. Kılbaş Ş. Rekreasyon: Boş Zamanı Değerlendirme, (1. Baskı), Adana: Anaca Yayınları. 2001.
  • 15. Kim W, Jeong OR, Lee SW. On social Web sites. Information Systems, 2010, 35(2), 215-236.
  • 16. Mahajan P. Use of social networking in a linguistically and culturally rich India. International Information & Library Review, 2009, 41, 129–136.
  • 17. Mitchell K. (2009). ESOL students on Facebook. Portland, Oregon: Portland State University Master's thesis.
  • 18. O’Reilly T, Milstein S. The Twitter book Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media. 2009.
  • 19. Onat F, Alikılıç ÖA. Sosyal Ağ Sitelerinin Reklam ve Halkla İlişkiler Ortamları Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Yaşar University, 2008, 3(9), 1111-1143.
  • 20. Öner B, Yerlisu Lapa T. Lise Öğrencilerinde Serbest Zamanda Sıkılma Algısının İnternet Bağımlılığı ve Akademik Başarı Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi. 15. Uluslararası Spor Bilimleri Kongresi. 2017.
  • 21. Pempek TA, Yermolayeva YA, Calvert SL. College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2009, 30(3), 227-238.
  • 22. Ridings CM, Gefen D. Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2004, 10, 1.
  • 23. Schmalz DL, Colistra CM. & Evans, KE. Social Media Sites as a Means of Coping with a Threatened Social Identity, Leisure Sciences, 2015, 37:1, 20-38.
  • 24. Tredinnick L. Web 2.0 And Business: A Pointer To The Intranet Soft The Future. Business Information Review, 2006, 23(4), 228–234.
  • 25. Uslu KU. Yeni iletişim araçları ve toplumsal etkileri. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2007, 1.
  • 26. Vural ZBA, Bat M. Yeni bir iletişim ortamı olarak sosyal medya: Ege üniversitesi iletişim fakültesine yönelik bir araştırma. Journal of Yaşar University, 2010, 20 (5), 3348‐3382.
  • 27. Wang SS, Moon SI, Kwon KH, Evans CA, Stefanone MA. Face off: Implications of visual cues on initiating friendship on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010, 26(2), 226-234.
  • 28. Yuen F, Johnson AJ. Leisure Spaces, Community, and Third Places, Leisure Sciences, 2017, 39:3, 295-303.
Toplam 26 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makeleler
Yazarlar

Metin Özlü Bu kişi benim

Nazlı Deniz Öz

Erdal Taşgın Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ağustos 2018
Kabul Tarihi 3 Eylül 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018

Kaynak Göster

APA Özlü, M., Öz, N. D., & Taşgın, E. (2018). Determination of Leisure Time Orientations in University Students, The Relationship Between Leisure Time Boredom Perceptions and Social Network Sites Usage Purposes. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 20(2), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.452792
AMA Özlü M, Öz ND, Taşgın E. Determination of Leisure Time Orientations in University Students, The Relationship Between Leisure Time Boredom Perceptions and Social Network Sites Usage Purposes. Turk J Sport Exe. Ağustos 2018;20(2):105-110. doi:10.15314/tsed.452792
Chicago Özlü, Metin, Nazlı Deniz Öz, ve Erdal Taşgın. “Determination of Leisure Time Orientations in University Students, The Relationship Between Leisure Time Boredom Perceptions and Social Network Sites Usage Purposes”. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise 20, sy. 2 (Ağustos 2018): 105-10. https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.452792.
EndNote Özlü M, Öz ND, Taşgın E (01 Ağustos 2018) Determination of Leisure Time Orientations in University Students, The Relationship Between Leisure Time Boredom Perceptions and Social Network Sites Usage Purposes. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise 20 2 105–110.
IEEE M. Özlü, N. D. Öz, ve E. Taşgın, “Determination of Leisure Time Orientations in University Students, The Relationship Between Leisure Time Boredom Perceptions and Social Network Sites Usage Purposes”, Turk J Sport Exe, c. 20, sy. 2, ss. 105–110, 2018, doi: 10.15314/tsed.452792.
ISNAD Özlü, Metin vd. “Determination of Leisure Time Orientations in University Students, The Relationship Between Leisure Time Boredom Perceptions and Social Network Sites Usage Purposes”. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise 20/2 (Ağustos 2018), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.452792.
JAMA Özlü M, Öz ND, Taşgın E. Determination of Leisure Time Orientations in University Students, The Relationship Between Leisure Time Boredom Perceptions and Social Network Sites Usage Purposes. Turk J Sport Exe. 2018;20:105–110.
MLA Özlü, Metin vd. “Determination of Leisure Time Orientations in University Students, The Relationship Between Leisure Time Boredom Perceptions and Social Network Sites Usage Purposes”. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, c. 20, sy. 2, 2018, ss. 105-10, doi:10.15314/tsed.452792.
Vancouver Özlü M, Öz ND, Taşgın E. Determination of Leisure Time Orientations in University Students, The Relationship Between Leisure Time Boredom Perceptions and Social Network Sites Usage Purposes. Turk J Sport Exe. 2018;20(2):105-10.
Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi (TJSE) Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.