Technical Analysis of 2007 and 2017 World Taekwondo Women and Men Championship Finals

Yıl 2018, , 256 - 262, 30.12.2018

Sevde Mavi Var

https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.486784

Cited By: 3

Öz

 Purpose of this study is to compare the latest world championships with
the old system and the latest world championship competitions with the new
system, and to compare the competitions in two different systems by conducting
activity and technical analysis. Thus, the technical analysis of the 2007 and
2017 world taekwondo championship women's and men's finals was performed. SPSS
22.0 package program was used for statistical analysis of the acquired data and
results were evaluated at p <0.05 significance level. Mann - Whitney U Test
was applied to the techniques used (punch, palding, pusachagi, yopchagi, dwichagi,
neryochagi, dollyochagi, pandedollyo), total technical numbers, frequency and
percentage analysis of points and penalties and pairwise comparisons. When the
findings of the study were examined, there were statistically meaningful
differences found between the number of techniques used in the competition and
the techniques used in the competitions in 2017 (women; p = .001, men; p =
.001). In the world championship finals in 2007, while women athletes used a
total of 404 techniques, they used 1152 techniques in the world championship
finals in 2017. In 2007, totally 525 techniques were used in men and in 2017,
1205 techniques were used. As a conclusion, in Taekwondo, when the competitions
between the old system and the new system are compared, it can be said that in
the new system, the athletes use much more techniques and their scores increase
considerably depending on the changing rules and the technical numbers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Match Analysis, Performance Analysis, Taekwondo

Kaynakça

• 1. Aydos L, Koç H, Yiğitbaşı İ. XXIII. Uluslararası Yaşar Doğu serbest güreş turnuvası müsabakalarının analizi. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 1999; 3 (1), 35-42.2. Boutheir D, Barthed D, David B, Grehaigne JF. Tactical analysis of play combinations in rugby union with video-computer technology – Rationalising French ‘flair’. In M.D. Hughes (Ed), Notational Analysis of Sport – I & II. UWIC, Cardiff, 1996; 135-144. 3. Bridge CA, Jones MA, Drust B. The activity profile in international taekwondo competition is modulated by weight category. International journal of sports physiology and performance, 2011; 6(3), 344-357.4. Bridge CA, Silva Santos da JF, Chaabene H, Pieter W, Franchini E. Physical and physiological profiles of taekwondo athletes. Sports Med, 2014; 44,713–733.5. Dindar MD, Toksöz İ, Taşkın C, Uluçam E. Analysis of the serves in the men's semi-fınal and final competitions of wimbledon tennis tournament. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 2011; 6 (3), 185-192. 6. Işık T, Gençer RT. Basketbolda takım performansının teknik analizi: iç saha ve dış saha performanslarının değerlendirilmesi, Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2007; 18 (3), 101-108.7. İmamoğlu O, Atan T, Kolukısa Ş, Kaldırımcı M, Kishalı NF. 2. Yıldızlar avrupa serbest ve greko-romen güreş şampiyonası müsabaka analizi. Atatürk Üniversitesi BESYO, Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2004; 6 (4). 29-37.8. İmamoğlu O, Açak M, Bayram L. Taekwondo müsabaka kurallarında yapılan bazı değişikliklerin müsabakalardan kullanılan tekniklere olan etkisinin araştırılması. Journal of Sports and Performance Researches, 2010; 1 (1), 30-37.9. İmamoğlu O, Erkin A, Mayda MH, Öztürk O, Yılmaz AK. 12th world universities wrestling championship free style competition technical analysis. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 2017; 3 (11), 181-193.10. Kazemi M, Perri G, Soave D. A profile of 2008 olympic taekwondo competitors. J Can Chiropr Assoc, 2010; 54(4), 243-249.11. Ko YJ, Chang Y, Y Rhee YC, Valacich JS, Hur Y, Park C. Value-based stakeholder loyalty toward sport technology. A case of the electronic body protector and scoring system in taekwondo events. International Journal of Sport Science, 2014; 10 (1), 46-62.12. Kolukısa Ş, İmamoğlu O, Ziyagil MA. Kıshalı NF. 46. dünya greko-romen ve 35. dünya serbest güreş şampiyonası müsabaka teknik analizi karşılaştırılması, Atatürk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2004; 6 (1), 18-29.13. Var SM, Tuncel S, Var L. Hızlı tempo müziğin taekwondocuların performansları üzerindeki bazı etkileri. SSTB International Refereed Academic Journal of Sports, Health & Medical Sciences, 2015; 17 (1), 150-167. 14. Menescardi C, Lopez-Lopez JA, Falco C, Hernandez Mendo A, Estevan I. tactical aspects of a national university taekwondo championship in relation to round and match outcome. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2015; 29(2), 466-471. 15. Mirvic E, Kazazovic B, Aleksandrovic M. Differences between winning and losing teams from World water polo Championship for women. Homo Sporticus, 2011; 13 (2), 41-48.16. Müniroğlu S. Futbolda müsabaka analizi ve gözlemin önemi, 3.Ulusal Futbol ve Bilim Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 2009; 17.17. Park YH, Seabourne T. Taekwondo Techniques & Tactics. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1997.18. Song Y, Jeon Y, Park G, An H, Hwang T, Lee H, Lee S. Development of taekwondo trainer system for training on electronic protector with hitting target indicator. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 2010; 10 (6), 51-56.19. Soygüden A, Eker H, Toy AB, Mumcu Ö. Yıldızlar serbest güreş grup müsabakalarının teknik analizlerinin incelenmesi. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, (2014) 1(3), 186-193.20. Tel M. Taekwondo as a sport branch. Sport Sciences, 2008; 3(4), 194-202.21. Tornello F, Capranica L, Chiodo S, Minganti C, Tessitore A. Time-motion analysis of youth olympic taekwondo combats. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2014; 27(1), 223-228.22. World Taekwondo Federation. Competition Rules & interpretation. Available at: http://www.wtf.org/wtf_eng/site/rules/competition.html. Accessed September 12 2018.