A research on individual innovativeness levels of football referees (Kocaeli region case)

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3, 18 - 21, 13.02.2014

Levent Atalı , Kursad Sertbas

Öz

The aim of this research is determining innovativeness levels of football referees in Kocaeli Region, defining their differences in terms of age, education and term of refereeing and discussing such differences within the scope of literature. The sample group of the research is composed of 132 football referees selected by convenience sampling method. “Individual Innovativeness Scale” was used for determining innovativeness levels of football referees. Besides, personal information section was attached to the scale to obtain demographic data of the sample group. In data evaluation, one-way analysis of variance was used since the scores of dependent variables are distributed both homogenously and normally and since the number of groups was more than two and Levene's test was used concerning the variance homogeneity. In this research, it was determined that individual innovativeness levels of football referees were included in the “early majority” category at the rate of 44% and in the “early adopters” category at the rate of 34%. No football referee was included in the “laggards” category comprising the people who are biased towards change and who adopt the innovations later than anyone. Moreover, no significant difference was found between the individual innovativeness scores of football referees and the variables of age, education and term of refereeing (p>.05). As a result, it can be said that planning according to different variables other than age, educational background and term of refereeing will be more beneficial and appropriate in realization of new implementation and practices for football referees in the future. It must not be ignored that generalization made for all football referees has some limitations according to the data obtained as a result of this study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Football referees, innovativeness, innovation

Kaynakça

• Adıgüzel A. Öğretmen adaylarının bireysel yenilikçilik düzeyleri ile ahlaki olgunluk düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. Değerler Eğitimi Sempozyumu, Eskişehir, 2011:(Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2013,www.pegem.net).
• Alpar R. Uygulamalı istatistik ve geçerlik-güvenirlik. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık, 2010.
• Çuhadar C, Bülbül T, Ilgaz G. Exploring of the Relationship between Individual Innovativeness and Techno-pedagogical Education Elementary Education Online, 2013; 3(12): 799-807. of Pre-service Teachers.
• Desbordes M. Innovation management in the sports industry: lessons from the Salomon Case. European Sport Management Quarterly, 2001; 1(2): 124-149. 5. Devecioğlu S. 10.11.2013,www.ekospor.com). 2012: (Erişim Tarihi:
• Devecioğlu S, Altıngül O. Innovation in sports technologies. 6th International Advanced Technologies Symposium (IATS’11), 16-18 May 2011, Elazığ, Turkey.
• Gündoğdu F, Sunay H. Innovation and innovation practices in Turkish sport management. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2012; 10(2): 61-66.
• Güngör N. Futbolda teknoloji ve akıllı materyaller. Futbol Gelişim Bülteni, 2013; (7): 70-71.
• Kabakcı H. Eğitimde Yenileşme Çalışmaları ve Öğretmenlerin İlçe Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü Çalışmalarındaki Yenileşme ve Yeterliklere Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Y.Lisans Tezi, İstanbul, 2008. ve Beklentileri. Yeditepe
• Kılıçer K, Odabaşı FH.Individual innovativeness scale (is): the study of adaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 2010; (38): 150- 164.
• Newell S, Swan J. The Diffusion of innovations in sport organizations: an evaluative framework. Journal of Sport Management, 1995; 9(3): 317-337.