Investigation Of University Students’ Overall Quality Of College Life And Their Satisfaction With This Life Terms Of Their Genders And Departments

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1, 154 - 160, 30.04.2020

Osman Dalaman , Rabia Özkurt , Kadir Pepe

Öz

The current study was conducted to investigate university students’ life quality and life satisfaction in the campus. The study was designed in the survey model. The population of the study is comprised of the students attending the Physical Education and Sports School, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Faculty of Education in the central campus of Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University. The sample consists of 400 students selected from among the population through random sampling. The data were collected through the questionnaire method. As the questionnaire, “The University Life Quality Scale” adapted to Turkish by (13) was used. From this scale, the overall life quality and overall life satisfaction dimensions were taken. The Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient was calculated to be 0.85 for the overall life quality dimension and 0.83 for the overall life satisfaction dimension. The questionnaire was administered to the students through face-to-face method. A total of 400 students (212 females and 188 males) responded to the questionnaire. In order to analyze the collected data, percentages (%) were calculated and Independent Samples T Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test, Bivariate Correlation were used. In the determination of the differences between the variables, 0.05 was taken as the confidence interval. The obtained findings have revealed that the students’ overall life quality and life satisfaction in the campus mean scores are low, that while their mean scores do not vary significantly by gender, their overall life quality mean scores vary significantly depending on the faculty they attend (p<0,05). As a result, it can be said that the participating students’ overall life quality and life satisfaction in the campus mean scores are low.

Anahtar Kelimeler

University, Quality of life, Life satisfaction, Student

Kaynakça

• 1. Arslan S, Akkaş OA. Quality of college life (QCL) of students in Turkey: Students’ life satisfaction and identifi cation. Social Indicators Research, 2014; 115, 869-884. 2. Benjamin M. The quality of student life: Toward a coherent conceptualization. Social Indicators Research, 1994; 31, 205-264. 3. Borden VMH. Segmenting student markets with a student satisfaction and priorities survey. Research in Higher Education, 1995; 36(1), 73-88. 4. Bozkurt N. Kaliteli Yaşamın Felsefesi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Dergisi, 2003; 2–3, 15–24. 5. Bilir N, Özcebe H, Vazioğlu SA, Aslan D, Subaşı N, Telatar TG. “Van İlinde 15 Yaş Üzeri Erkeklerde SF-36 ile Yaşam Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi”, Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 2005; 25, 663-668. 6. Bowling A. Measuring Health, a Rewiev of Quality of Life Measurement Scales, Buckingham, Open University Pres, 1997; 1-23. 7. Chow HPH. Life satisfaction among university students in a Canadian prairie city: A multivariate analysis. Social Indicators Research, 2005; 70, 139-150. 8. Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 1984; 95(3), 542-575. 9. Diener E, Smith H, Fujita F. The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995; 69, 130-141. 10. Diener E, Oishi S, Lucas RE. Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evalutions of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 2003; 54, 403-425. 11. Elliott KM Shin D. Student satisfaction: An alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2002; 24(2), 197-209. 12. Gilman R, Huebner ES. Review of life satisfaction measures for adolescents. Behaviour Change, 2000; 17(3), 178-195. 13. Kangal Demir A. Üniversite Yaşam Kalitesi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması, e-international journal of educational research. 2012; Volume: 3 Issue: 1- Winter 2012, pp. 16-32 14. Kapıkıran NA. Positive and negative affectivity as mediator and moderator of the relationship between optimism and life satisfaction in Turkish university students. Social Indicators Research, 2012; 106, 333-345. 15. Köker S. Normal ve Sorunlu Ergenlerin Yaşam Doyumu Düzeyinin Karşılaştırılması, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara. 1991. 16. Marans R. Kentsel Yaşam Kalitesinin Ölçülmesi. Çev. H. Dülger Türkoğlu, Mimarlık Dergisi, 2007; 335, 23–35. 17. Martilla RJ, Rinne UK. “Epidemiology of Parkinson’s Disease in Finland”, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 1976; 53, 81–102. 18. Michalos AC, Orlando JA. A note on student quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 2006; 79, 51-59. 19. Orley J, Kuyken W. “Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives”. Proceedings of the Meeting Organized by the Who and the Foundation IPSEN, Paris, July 1993; 2-3, 41-57. 20. Pavot W, Diener E, Colvin CR, Sandvik E. Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1991; 57(1), 149-161. 21. Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 1993; 5(2), 164-172. 22. Pavot W, Fujita F, Diener E. The relation between self-aspect congruence, personality and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 1997; 22(2), 183-191. 23. Posadzki P, Musonda P, Debska G, Polczyk R. Psychosocial conditions of quality of life among undergraduate students: A cross sectional survey. Applied Research Quality of Life, 2009; 4, 239-258. 24. Pilcher JJ. Affective and daily event predictors of life satisfaction in college students. Social Indicators Research, 1998; 43, 291-306. 25. Pichler F. Subjective quality of life of young Europeans. Feeling happy but who knows why. Social Indicators Research, 2006; 75, 419-444. 26. Proctor CL, Linley PA, Maltby J. Youth life satisfaction: A review of the literature. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2009; 10, 583-630. 27. Ratelle CF, Simard K, Guay F. University students’ subjective well-being: The role of autonomy support from parents, friends and the romantic partner. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2013;14, 893-910. 28. Rode JC, Arthaud-Day ML, Mooney CH, Near JP, Baldwin TT, Bommer WH, Rubin RS, Life satisfaction and student performance. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2005; 4(4), 421-433. 29. Sapancalı F. Toplumsal açıdan yaşam kalitesi. İzmir: Altın Nokta. 2009. 30. Sirgy MJ, Grzeskowiak S, Rahtz D. Quality of college life (QCL) of students: Developing and validating a measure of well-being. Social Indicators Research, 2007; 80, 343 360. 31. Sirgy MJ, Lee DJ, Grzeskowiak S, Yu GB, Webb D, El-Hasan K, Vega JG, Ekici A, Johar JS, Krishen A, Kangal A, Swoboda B, Claiborne CB, Maggino F, Rahtz D, Canton A, Kuruuzum A. Quality of college life (QCL) of students: Further validation of a measure of well-being. Social Indicators Research, 2010; 99, 375-390. 32. Sirgy MJ, Grzeskowiak S, Rahtz D. Quality of college life (QCL) of students: Developing and validating a measure of well-being. Social Indicators Research, 2000; 80, 343-360. 33. Top MŞ, Özden SY, Sevim ME. “Psikiyatride Yaşam Kalitesi”, Düşünen Adam, 2003; (1), 18-23. 34. Van Kamp I, Leidelmeijer K, Marsman A, Hollander de A. Urban environmental quality and human well-being. Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study, Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003; No: 65, 5–18. 35. Yu GB, Lee DJ. A model of quality of college life (QCL) of students in Korea. Social Indicators Research, 2008; 87, 269-285. 36. Yu GB, Kim JH. Testing the mediating effect of the quality of college life in the student satisfaction and student loyalty relationship. Applied Research Quality Life, 2008; 3, 1-21. 37. Zullig KJ, Valois RF, Huebner ES, Drane JW. Adolescent health-related quality of life and perceived satisfaction with life. Quality of Life Research, 2005; 14, 1573-1584. 38. Xiao JJ, Tang C, Shim S. Acting for happiness: Financial behavior and life satisfaction of college students. Social Indicators Research, 2009; 92, 53-68. 39. Wang WC, Kao CH, Huan TC, Wu CC. Free time management contributes to better quality of life: A study of undergraduate students in Taiwan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2011; 12, 561-573. 40. World Health Organization QOL Group). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment. Position Paper from the World Health Organization, Social Science and Medicine, 1995; 41, 1403–1409.