Investigation of Selected Biomotor Ability And Technical Skills in 10-11 Years Old Badminton Athletes

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3, 481 - 489, 31.12.2020

Hakan Ekin , Faruk Akçınar

Öz

This study was conducted to investigate the selected biomotor ability and technical skills of 10-11 year old badminton athletes and to determine the relationship between biomotor characteristics and technical skills. The sample of the study consists of athletes who are actively playing badminton in the 10-11 age groups in Kayseri and Batman provinces and have a badminton history of at least 1 year. For this study, French & Stalter badminton test, Lockhart & McPherson badminton test, agility t test, reaction test, vertical jump test and hand grip strength measurement were applied. Pearson correlation, independent-samples t test and one-way anova test were used for statistical analysis. Significance level was accepted as α = 0.05. While there was a negative correlation between technical tests and agility t test results; there was a positive relationship between anaerobic power. No significant correlation was found between vertical jump, hand grip left hand and handgrip right hand and technical tests. While there was a negative correlation between French & Stalter technical test and reaction visual right hand; There was no significant relationship between McPherson & Lockhart technical test. French & Stalter and McPherson & Lockhart technical tests showed no significant relationship between reaction visual left hand, reaction auditory right hand and left hand. As a result of 10-11-year-old badminton athletes selected biomotor ability and the technical skills investigated in this study, while a significant relationship was found between technical tests and agility and anaerobic power, and French & Stalter technique test and reaction visual right hand; vertical jump, hand grip left hand, handgrip right hand visual reaction left hand, auditory reaction right hand and auditory reaction left hand, no significant correlation was found between technical tests.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Badminton, Technical skills, Biomotor ability, Agility, Reaction

Kaynakça

• 1. Ağaoğlu SA, Ergin R. 9-14 Yaş badmintoncularda çeviklik, reaksiyon zamanı ve denge parametrelerinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Spor Egzersiz ve Antrenman Bilimi Dergisi 2017, 3: 109–119.
• 2. Amusa LO, Goon DT, Amey AK. Gender differences in neuromotor fitness of rural South African Children. Med Sport 2010, 63: 221-237.
• 3. Arabacı R. 15 yaş altı kız ve erkek badmintoncularının fiziksel uygunluklarının karşılaştırılması. Nwsa: Sports Sciences 2008, 3: 1-10.
• 4. Baron R, Petschnig R, Bachl N, Raberger G, Smekal G, Kastner P. Catecholamine excretion and heart rate as factors of psychophysical stress in table tenis. Int J Sports Med 1992, 13: 501-5.
• 5. Cinthuja P, Jayakody JAOA, Perera MPM, Weerarathna WVDN, Nirosha SE, Indeewari DKDC, Kaethieswaran T, Adikari SB. Physical fitness factors of school badminton players in Kandy district. Euro. J. Sports Exerc. Sci. 2015, 4: 14-25.
• 6. Demir E, Karagözoğlu C, Karahüseyinoğlu F. Badminton temel becerilerinin öğretiminde kavram haritaları. NWSA 2009, 4: 236-243.
• 7. Demirci A, Demirci N. Adım Adım Badminton, 2. Baskı. İstanbul, Sokak Kitapları Yayıncılık, 2012: 15-6.
• 8. Ding H, Sun H, Chen A. Impact of expectancy value and situational interest motivation specificity on physical education outcomes. J. Teac. Phys. Educ. 2013, 32: 253–269.
• 9. Esen N, Çoknaz H, Şemşek Ö. The comparison of physical parametres of badminton players under 15 years olda and sedantery youths in the same age. The 46th ICHPER• SD Anniversary World Congress, 9-13 November, İstanbul, 2005.
• 10. Farrow AC. Skill And Knowledge Proficiencıes For Selected Activıties In The Required Program At Memphis State University. University of North Carolina, for the Degree Doctor of Education. Greensboro, 1971.
• 11. Günay M. Tamer K. Cicioğlu İ. Spor Fizyolojisi ve Performans Ölçümü, Gazi Kitabevi, Baran Ofset, Ankara 2006; 177-9.
• 12. Güven F, İnceler A, Aktas A, Koç S, Yılgın A, Er Y. Effects of badminton training on some physical parameters in badminton players aged 10 to 12 years. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise 2017, 19: 345-9.
• 13. Hastie PA, Sinelnikov OA, Guarino AJ. The development of skill and tactical competencies during a season of badminton. Euro J Sport Sci. 2009, 9: 133-140.
• 14. K Bozdoğan T, Kızılet A. Gelişim çağındaki (11-13 yaş) badminton oyuncularında sırt ve bacak kuvvetinin çeviklik yeteneği ile ilişkisi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 2017, 2: 69-82.
• 15. Kafkas ME. Taşkıran C. Arslan C. Açak M. Yıldız erkek milli ve amatör badmintoncuların bazı fiziksel, fizyolojik ve antropometrik parametrelerinin karşılaştırılması. Niğde Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 2009, 3: 13-20.
• 16. Kamar A. Sporda Yetenek, Beceri ve Performans Testleri, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara: 2003.
• 17. Kaplan DS, Akcan F, Çakır Z, Kılıç T, Yıldırım C. Visuomotor and audiomotor reaction time in elite and non-elite badminton players. Euro J Phys Educ Sport Sci 2017, 3: 84-93.
• 18. Kızılet A, Atılan O, Erdemir İ. 12-14 yaş grubu basketbol oyuncularının çabukluk ve sıçrama yetilerine farklı kuvvet antrenmanlarının etkisi. Atabesbd 2010, 12: 44-57.
• 19. Kürkçü R, Afyon AY, Yaman Ç, Özdağ S. 10-12 yaş grubundaki futbolcu ve badmintoncularda bazı fiziksel ve fizyolojik özelliklerin karşılaştırılması, Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi 2009, 6: 547-556.
• 20. Larson G, Zaichkowsky L. Physical, Motor, and Fitness Development in Children and Adolescents. J Educ 1995, 177: 55.
• 21. Lieshout KA, Physiological Profile of Elite Junior Badminton Players in South Africa, Department of SpA. O. and Movement Studies, Rand Afrikaans University, for the Degree of MPhil (Sport Science), Johannesburg, 2002.
• 22. Omosegaard B. Physical Training for Badminton, International Badminton Federation, Denmark, 1996.
• 23. Paradis SA. The effects of 6 week speed and agility program on the development of explosive power, strength, speed, and agility in youth soccer players. University Of Pitsburg, Doctor of Philosophy, 2003.
• 24. Peker İ, Çiloğlu F, Burak Ş, Bulca Z. Egzersiz Biyokimyası ve Obezite. Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri Ltd. İstanbul 2000; 3–11.
• 25. Poyraz A, Baş O, Ocak Y, Yıldırım İ, Tortop Y. Avrupa badminton takım şampiyonasına katılan sporcuların bazı fiziksel ve fizyolojik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi 2015, 6: 121-133.
• 26. Rana MS, Rajpoot YS. Impact and role of selected coordinative abilities in racket sports. IJSR 2013, 4: 66-9.
• 27. Rasaniya S, Chahar Ps. Influence of training effect on badminton volley ability among beginners. IJOBSMS 2013, 2: 76-81.
• 28. Reilly T, Secher N, Snell P, Williams C. Physiology of Sports. E. & F.N. Spon. London. 1990.
• 29. Revan S, Aydoğmuş M, Balcı ŞS, Pepe H, Eroğlu H. Türk ve yabancı ülke milli takım badmintoncularının bazı fiziksel ve fizyolojik özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Niğde Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 2007, 1: 63-70.
• 30. Seminck D. The T-test, Strength Cond J 1990, 12: 36-7.
• 31. Singh J, Raza S, Mohammad A. Physical characteristics and level of performance in badminton: a relationship study. J Educ. Pract. 2011, 2: 6-9.
• 32. Singh LB, Mitra S. Effects of seven weeks training programme on playing ability of sub junior badminton players. IJMER 2016, 1: 42-4.
• 33. Talbot D. Top Coach Badminton. Queen Anne Press, Macdonald & Co. Ltd. Holborn, London, 1989.
• 34. Tamer K. Fiziksel ve Fizyolojik Performansın Ölçülmesi ve Değerlendirilmesi, Bağırgan Yayım evi; Ankara: 2000.
• 35. Yüksel MF, Cengiz A, Zorba E, Gökdemir K. Effects of badminton training on physical parameters of players. The Anthropologist 2015, 21: 542-547.
• 36. Zhu X, Chen A. Adolescent expectancy-value motivation and learning: A disconnected case in physical education. Learn. Ind. Diff. 2010, 20: 512–6.