Social Barriers Against Implementation of Tourism Planning: Case Study of Sapanca

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 47 - 54, 09.07.2024

Vahit Oğuz Kiper

Öz

Sapanca, a district in Sakarya, has emerged as a significant destination in recent years. Alongside, both the positive and negative impacts of tourism have become markedly noticeable in the region. This article focuses on the examination of social barriers hindering the implementation of tourism policies, specifically in Sapanca destination. It aims to elucidate why, in a collective context, tourism policies cannot be effectively executed to enhance the overall benefits and how social elements act as impediments. To achieve this, the study employs the technique of non-participatory observation. The researcher conducted long-term, objective observations in the field, drawing insights from existing literature without direct involvement with individuals and cases. In the case of Sapanca, it becomes apparent that the local community, businesses, and public authorities pose a social barrier to the implementation of tourism policies due to the lure of easy and substantial economic gains.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tourism policies, tourism planning, tourism development, social barrier, Sapanca

Etik Beyan

There is no conflict of interest within this reserch.

Turizm Planlamasının Uygulanmasının Önündeki Sosyal Engeller: Sapanca Örneği

Öz

Sakarya'nın Sapanca ilçesi son yıllarda önemli bir destinasyon olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Bununla birlikte bölgede turizmin olumlu ve olumsuz etkileri de belirgin bir şekilde hissedilmeye başlanmıştır. Bu makale, Sapanca destinasyonu özelinde turizm planlarının uygulanmasını engelleyen sosyal engellerin incelenmesine odaklanmaktadır. Kolektif bir bağlamda turizm politikalarının genel faydaları artırmak için neden etkili bir şekilde uygulamaya geçilemediği ve sosyal unsurların nasıl engel teşkil ettiğini açıklamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bunun için çalışmada katılımcı olmayan gözlem tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmacı, bireylere ve vakalara doğrudan müdahale etmeden mevcut literatürden içgörüler elde ederek sahada uzun vadeli, objektif gözlemler gerçekleştirmiştir. Sapanca örneğinde, yerel halkın, işletmelerin ve kamu otoritelerinin, kolay ekonomik kazanımların cazibesi nedeniyle turizm planlarının uygulanmasına yönelik sosyal bir engel teşkil ettiği açıkça görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Turizm politikaları, turizm planları, turizm gelişimi, sosyal engeller, Sapanca

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmada herhangi bir çıkar çatışması yer almamaktadır.

Teşekkür

Çalışma sürecindeki maddi ve manevi destekleri nedeniyle Gizem Kiper'e teşekkürlerimi iletirim.

Kaynakça

• References Adebayo, A. D., & Butcher, J. (2021). Constraints and drivers of community participation and empowerment in tourism planning and development in Nigeria. Tourism Review International, 25(2), 209-227.
• Almeida, J., Costa, C., & Da Silva, F. N. (2017). A framework for conflict analysis in spatial planning for tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives(24), 94-106.
• Ampong, A. (2018). Historical trajectories of tourism development policies and planning in Ghana. Tourism Planning and Development, 1957-2017.
• Athiyaman, A., & Robertson, R. W. (1995). Strategic planning in large tourism firms: an empirical analysis. Tourism Management, 16(3), 199-205.
• Bianchi, R. (2018). The political economy of tourism development: a critical review. Annals of Tourism Research(70), 88-102.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E. A., Ş, K., & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Corti, L., Eynden, V. V., Bishop, L., & Woodlard, M. (2014). Managing and Sharing Research Data. A Guide to Good Practice. Essex: Sage Publishing.
• Costa, C. (2001). Ana emerging tourism planning paradigm? A comparative analysis between town and tourism planning. International Journal of Tourism Research, 3(6), 425-441.
• Gahi, Y., Guennoun, M., & Mouftah, H. T. (2016). Big data analytics: security and privacy challenges. IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (s. 952-957). Messina: ISSC.
• Gibson, C. (2009). Geographies of tourism: critical research on capitalism and local livelihoods. Progress in Human Geography, 33(4), 527-534.
• Goeldner, C. R., & Ritchie, J. B. (2007). Tourism Principles, Practices, Philophies. John Wiley & Sons.
• Gunn, C. A. (1994). Tourism Planning: Basic Concepts, Cases. New York: Taylor and Francis.
• Gunn, C. A., & Var, T. (2002). Tourism Planning: Basics, Concepts, Cases. London: Routledge.
• Inskeep, E. (1991). Tourism Planning: An Integrated and Sustainable Development Approach. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
• Jagadish, H. V., Gehrke, J., Labrinidis, A., Papakonstantinou, Y., Patel, J., Ramakrishnan, J. M., & Shababi, C. (2014). Big data and its technical challenges. Communications of the ACM, 57(7), 86-94.
• Kala, D., & Bagri, S. C. (2018). Barriers to local community participation in tourism development: evidence from mountanious state Uttarakhand, India. Tourism, 66(3), 318-333.
• Karasar, N. (2017). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Lohmann, G., & Netto, A. P. (2016). Tourism Theory: Concepts, Models and Systems. Wallingford: CABI.
• Mills, R. C., & Morrison, A. M. (1998). Tourism Systems: An Introduction Text (3 b.). Iowa: Kendall Hunt Publishing.
• Nguyen, H. V., Diane, L., & Newsome, D. (2020). Kinh and ethnic tourism stakeholder participation and collaboration in tourism planning in Sapa, Vietnam. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 14(4), 579-597.
• Sarr, B., Gonzalez-Hernandez, M. M., Boza-Chirino, J., & Leon, J. (2020). Understanding communities's dissatisfection to participate in tourism in protected areas: a social representational approach. Sustainability, 12(9), 3677.
• Soteriou, E. C., & Roberts, C. (1998). The strategic planning process in national tourism organizations. Journal of Travel Research, 37(1), 21-29.
• Tosun, C., & Jenkins, C. L. (1996). Regional planning approaches to tourism development: the case of Turkey. Tourism Management, 7(7), 519-531.
• Tosun, C., & Timothy, D. J. (2001). Shortcomings in planning approaches to tourism development in developing countries: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 13(7), 352-359.
• Wanner, A., & Pröbstl-Haider, U. (2018). Barriers to stakeholder involvement in sustainable rural tourism development experiences from Southeast Europe. Sustainability, 66(3), 318-333.
• Whittington, R., & Cailluet, L. (2008). The craft of strategy. Long Range Planning(41), 241-247.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yüksel, F. (2002). Inter-organisational Relations and Central-Local Interactions in Tourism Planning in Belek Turkey. Sheffield Hallam University.