Manufacturing Methods, Mechanical and Physical Properties of Three-Dimensional Printed Denture Base Materials

Yıl 2023, , 266 - 277, 26.01.2024

Azzahraa Al-omırı , Duygu Saraç

https://doi.org/10.58711/turkishjdentres.vi.1341374

Öz

With the advancement of technology, digitalization has affected every aspect of our lives. In dentistry, the search for materials and methods compatible with the teeth and the surrounding tissues is continuing. Accordingly, the development and the usage of the new materials has been increasing
rapidly in the recent years. Recently, Three-dimensional (3D) printing manufacturing method has become widespread in many branches of dentistry due its time reduction and low cost potential. This method eliminates some steps in the production procedure while manufacturing complex prosthesis models with higher precision. As a result, there is not enough information about this method and the materials used, which has become especially attractive in the field of Prosthetic Dentistry, and
scientific studies continue to be carried out widely. In this review, three-dimensional printing (3D) methods and especially the physical and mechanical properties of removable denture base materials prepared with these methods are explained.

Anahtar Kelimeler

3D printing, CAD-CAM, Removable dentures, Denture base materials

Üç Boyutlu Baskı Yöntemi ile Üretilen Protez Kaide Materyallerinin Üretim Yöntemleri, Mekanik ve Fiziksel Özellikleri

Öz

Teknolojinin ilerlemesi ile dijitalizasyon hayatımızın her alanında etkili olmaktadır. Diş hekimliğinde de diş ve çevre dokulara en yakın materyal ve yöntem arayışı devam etmekte ve buna bağlı olarak yeni materyallerin geliştirmesi ve kullanıma sunulması son yıllarda hızla artmaktadır. Üç boyutlu (3B)
baskı yöntemi de zaman ve maliyet kazandırma potansiyeli açısından son yıllarda diş hekimliğinin birçok branşında kullanımı yaygınlaşan bir yöntemdir. Bu üretim prosedüründe bazı aşamaların kalkması daha yüksek hassasiyet ile karmaşık protez modellerinin elde edilmesini sağlamaktadır. Özellikle Protetik Diş Tedavisi alanında cazip hale gelen bu yöntem ve kullanılan materyallerle ilgili yeterli bilgi bulunmamaktadır ve yaygın bir şeklide bilimsel çalışmalar yapılmaya devam etmektedir. Bu derlemede üç boyutlu baskı yöntemleri ve özellikle bu yöntemler ile hazırlanan hareketli protez kaide materyallerinin fiziksel ve mekanik özellikleri anlatılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ÜÇ BOYUTLU ÜRETİM, CAD-CAM, HAREKETLİ PROTEZLER, PROTEZ KAİDE MATERYALİ

Kaynakça

• 1. Van Noort R.The future of dental devices is digital. Dental materials. 2012 Jan 1;28(1):3-12.
• 2. Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dental clinics of North America. 2011;55(3):559-ix.
• 3. Çelik G, Sarı T, Üşümez A. Bilgisayar destekli diş hekimliği ve güncel CAD/CAM sistemleri. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 2013;16(1).
• 4. Gali S, Sirsi S. 3D Printing: the future technology in prosthodontics. Journal of Dental and Orofacial Research. 2015;11(1):37-40.
• 5. Kessler A, Hickel R, Reymus M. 3D printing in dentistry- State of the art. Operative dentistry. 2020;1;45(1):30-40.
• 6. Wohlers T, Gornet T. History of additive manufacturing. Wohlers report. Belgium. Wohlers Associates, INC. 2016:(1-38).
• 7. Liu Q, Leu MC, Schmitt SM. Rapid prototyping in dentistry: technology and application. The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology. 2006;29:317-35.
• 8. Touri M, Kabirian F, Saadati M, Ramakrishna S, Mozafari M. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials− the evolution of rapid prototyping. Advanced Engineering Materials. 2019;21(2):1800511.
• 9. Dawood A, Marti BM, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. British Dental Journal 2015;219(11):521–9.
• 10. Ramiro GP, Hassan B, Navarro AF, Coronel CA, Cortes ARG, Baptista OHP, et al. Digitalization in Restorative Dentistry. In: Tamimi F, Hirayama H, editors. Digital Restorative Dentistry: A Guide to Materials, Equipment, and Clinical Procedures. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2019,7-39.
• 11. Dağ OD, Özdemir AK. Protetik tedavide yeni nesil üretim teknikleri. Protetik Materyaller ve Güncel Uygulamaları. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2020,1-9.
• 12. Lin L, Fang Y, Liao Y, Chen G, Gao C, Zhu P. 3D Printing and Digital Processing Techniques in Dentistry: A Review of Literature. Advanced Engineering Materials. 2019;21(6):1801013.
• 13. Barazanchi A, Li KC, Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Waddell JN. Additive Technology: Update on Current Materials and Applications in Dentistry. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(2):156-163.
• 14. Javaid M, Haleem A. Current status and applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: A literature-based review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019;9(3):179-185.
• 15. Vaezi M, Chianrabutra S, Mellor B, Yang S. Multiple material additive manufacturing–Part 1: a review, this review paper covers a decade of research on multiple material additive manufacturing technologies which can produce complex geometry parts with different materials. Virtual and Physical Prototyping. 2013;8(1):19-50.
• 16. Zaharia C, Gabor A-G, Gavrilovici A, Stan AT, Idorasi L, Sinescu C, et al. Digital dentistry-3D printing applications. Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine. 2017;2(1):50-3.
• 17. Bhargav A, Sanjairaj V, Rosa V, Feng LW, Fuh YH J. Applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: A review. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2018;106(5):2058-64.
• 18. Tian Y, Chen C, Xu X, Wang J, Hou X, Li K, et al. A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications. Scanning. 2021:9950131.
• 19. Sames WJ, List F, Pannala S, Dehoff RR, Babu SS. The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. International materials reviews. 2016;61(5):315-60.
• 20. Shimizu S, Shinya A, Kuroda S, Gomi H. The accuracy of the CAD system using intraoral and extraoral scanners for designing of fixed dental prostheses. Dental materials journal. 2017;36(4):402-7.
• 21. Ellakany P, Tantawi ME, Mahrous AA, Al‐Harbi F. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral dental scanners with different CAD/CAM scanning technologies: an in vitro study. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2022;31(4):314-9.
• 22. Keul C, Güth J-F. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Clinical oral investigations. 2020;24:735-45.
• 23. Dimitrova M, Corsalini M, Kazakova R, Vlahova A, Chuchulska B, Barile G, et al. Comparison between conventional PMMA and 3D printed resins for denture bases: A narrative review. Journal of Composites Science. 2022;6(3):87.
• 24. Lee JJ, Jeong ID, Park JY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Accuracy of single abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners. J Prosthet Dent.2017;117:253-9.
• 25. Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clinical oral investigations. 2013;17:1201-8.
• 26. Flügge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2013;144(3):471-8.
• 27. Trifkovic B, Budak I, Todorovic A, Vukelic D, Lazic V, Puskar T. Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems. Measurement. 2014;47:45-53.
• 28. Peng L, Chen L, Harris BT, Bhandari B, Morton D, Lin W-S. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2018;120(3):389-95.
• 29. Braian M, Wennerberg A. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2019;122(2):129-36-e2.
• 30. Lee J-H, Yun J-H, Han J-S, Yeo I-SL, Yoon H-I. Repeatability of intraoral scanners for complete arch scan of partially edentulous dentitions: an in vitro study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019;8(8):1187.
• 31. Schimmel M, Akino N, Srinivasan M, Wittneben J-G, Yilmaz B, Abou-Ayash S. Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: an in vitro analysis. Clinical oral investigations. 2021;25:1839-47.
• 32. Zarone F, Ruggiero G, Ferrari M, Mangano F, Joda T, Sorrentino R. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 20201;124(6):761-e1.
• 33. Aati S, Akram Z, Shrestha B, Patel J, Shih B, Shearston K, et al. Effect of post-curing light exposure time on the physico–mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of 3D-printed denture base material. Dental Materials. 2022;38(1):57-67.
• 34. Meng TR, Latta MA. Physical properties of four acrylic denture base resins. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005;6(4):93- 100.
• 35. Falahchai M, Ghavami-Lahiji M, Rasaie V, Amin M, Neshandar Asli H. Comparison of mechanical properties, surface roughness, and color stability of 3D-printed and conventional heat-polymerizing denture base materials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2023.
• 36. Tzeng J-J, Yang T-S, Lee W-F, Chen H, Chang H-M. Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility of Urethane Acrylate-Based 3D-Printed Denture Base Resin. Polymers. 2021;13(5):822.
• 37. Karakurt I, Lin L. 3D printing technologies: techniques, materials, and post-processing. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering. 2020;28:134-43.
• 38. Ali IL, Yunus N, Abu‐Hassan MI. Hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus comparisons of three differently cured denture base systems. Journal of Prosthodontics: Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. 2008;17(7):545-9.
• 39. Pfeiffer P, Rolleke C, Sherif L. Flexural strength and moduli of hypoallergenic denture base materials. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2005;93(4):372-7.
• 40. Takeda Y, Lau J, Nouh H, Hirayama H. A 3D printing replication technique for fabricating digital dentures. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2020;124(3):251-6.
• 41. Bilgin MS, Baytaroğlu EN, Erdem A, Dilber E. A review of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture techniques for removable denture fabrication. European journal of dentistry. 2016;10(02):286-91.
• 42. Emera RM, Shady M, Alnajih MA. Comparison of retention and denture base adaptation between conventional and 3D-printed complete dentures. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects. 2022;16(3):179.
• 43. Alfouzan AF, Alotiabi HM, Labban N, Al-Otaibi HN, Al Taweel SM, AlShehri HA. Effect of aging and mechanical brushing on surface roughness of 3D printed denture resins: A profilometer and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Technology and Health Care. 2022;30(1):161- 73.
• 44. Son K, Lee J-H, Lee K-B. Comparison of Intaglio Surface Trueness of Interim Dental Crowns Fabricated with SLA 3D Printing, DLP 3D Printing, and Milling Technologies. Healthcare. 2021; 9(8):983.
• 45. You S-G, You S-M, Kang S-Y, Bae S-Y, Kim J-H. Evaluation of the adaptation of complete denture metal bases fabricated with dental CAD-CAM systems: An in vitro study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2021;125(3):479-85
• 46. Emir F, Ayyildiz S. Accuracy evaluation of completearch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: A three-dimensional analysis. Journal of prosthodontic research. 2021;65(3):365-70.
• 47. Hwang H-J, Lee SJ, Park E-J, Yoon H-I. Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2019;121(1):110-7.
• 48. Yoon S-N, Oh KC, Lee SJ, Han J-S, Yoon H-I. Tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary and mandibular complete denture bases manufactured by digital light processing: A clinical study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2020;124(6):682-9.
• 49. Tosun ON, Bilmenoglu C, Özdemir AK. Comparison of denture base adaptation between additive and conventional fabrication techniques. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2023;32(3):e64-e70.
• 50. Unkovskiy A, Schmidt F, Beuer F, Li P, Spintzyk S, Kraemer Fernandez P. Stereolithography vs. direct light processing for rapid manufacturing of complete denture bases: an in vitro accuracy analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021;10(5):1070.
• 51. Gad MM, Fouda SM, Abualsaud R, Alshahrani FA, Al‐Thobity AM, Khan SQ, et al. Strength and surface properties of a 3D‐printed denture base polymer. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2022;31(5):412-8.
• 52. Prpić V, Schauperl Z, Ćatić A, Dulčić N, Čimić S. Comparison of mechanical properties of 3D‐printed, CAD/CAM, and conventional denture base materials. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2020;29(6):524-8.
• 53. Ayman A-D. The residual monomer content and mechanical properties of CAD\CAM resins used in the fabrication of complete dentures as compared to heat cured resins. Electronic physician. 2017;9(7):4766.
• 54. Pacquet W, Benoit A, Hatège-Kimana C, Wulfman C. Mechanical Properties of CAD/CAM Denture Base Resins. The International journal of prosthodontics. 2019;32(1):104-6.
• 55. Al‐Dwairi ZN, Al Haj Ebrahim AA, Baba NZ. A Comparison of the Surface and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printable Denture‐Base Resin Material and Conventional Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Journal of Prosthodontics. 2023;32(1):40-8.
• 56. Di Fiore A, Meneghello R, Brun P, Rosso S, Gattazzo A, Stellini E, et al. Comparison of the flexural and surface properties of milled, 3D-printed, and heat polymerized PMMA resins for denture bases: An in vitro study. Journal of prosthodontic research. 2022;66(3):502-8.
• 57. Gad MM, Al‐Harbi FA, Akhtar S, Fouda SM. 3D‐printable denture base resin containing SiO2 nanoparticles: An in vitro analysis of mechanical and surface properties. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2022;31(9):784-90.
• 58. Alshaikh AA, Khattar A, Almindil IA, Alsaif MH, Akhtar S, Khan SQ, et al. 3D-printed nanocomposite denture-base resins: effect of ZrO2 nanoparticles on the mechanical and surface properties in vitro. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(14):2451.
• 59. Freitas RFCPd, Duarte S, Feitosa S, Dutra V, Lin WS, Panariello BHD, et al. Physical, Mechanical, and Anti‐ Biofilm Formation Properties of CAD‐CAM Milled or 3D Printed Denture Base Resins: In Vitro Analysis. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2023;32(S1):38-44.
• 60. Srinivasan M, Kalberer N, Kamnoedboon P, Mekki M, Durual S, Özcan M, et al. CAD-CAM complete denture resins: An evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface characteristics. Journal of dentistry. 2021;114:103785.
• 61. Shim JS, Kim J-E, Jeong SH, Choi YJ, Ryu JJ. Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2020;124(4):468-75.
• 62. Aati S, Aneja S, Kassar M, Leung R, Nguyen A, Tran S, et al. Silver-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles enhanced the mechanical and antimicrobial properties of 3D printed denture base resin. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2022;134:105421.
• 63. Farid M, Mohamed F, Mehanna R, Abd-ELLAH M, Abdelrahman H. Cytotoxic assessment of 3D printed photoinitiated prosthodontic resins versus heat polymerized acrylic resin (In-Vitro Study). Research Square.1:2022.
• 64. Srinivasan M, Kalberer N, Kamnoedboon P, Mekki M, Durual S, Özcan M, et al. CAD-CAM complete denture resins: an evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface characteristics. Journal of Dentistry. 2021;114:103785
• 65. Dimitrova M, Capodiferro S, Vlahova A, Kazakova R, Kazakov S, Barile G, et al. Spectrophotometric Analysis of 3D Printed and Conventional Denture Base Resin after Immersion in Different Colouring Agents—An In Vitro Study. Applied Sciences. 2022;12(24):12560.
• 66. Alfouzan AF, Alotiabi HM, Labban N, Al-Otaibi HN, Al Taweel SM, AlShehri HA. Color stability of 3D-printed denture resins: Effect of aging, mechanical brushing and immersion in staining medium. The journal of advanced prosthodontics. 2021;13(3):160.
• 67. Çakmak G, Molinero-Mourelle P, De Paula MS, Akay C, Cuellar AR, Donmez MB, Yilmaz B. Surface Roughness and Color Stability of 3D-Printed Denture Base Materials after Simulated Brushing and Thermocycling. Materials. 2022; 15(18):6441.
• 68. Ain S, Sayed M, Ahmed WM, Halawi AHA, Najmi NMA, Aggarwal A, et al. An in-vitro study to evaluate the effect of denture cleansing agents on color stability of denture bases fabricated using CAD/CAM milling, 3D-printing and conventional techniques. Coatings. 2021;11(8):962.
• 69. Alqanas SS, Alfuhaid RA, Alghamdi SF, Al-Qarni FD, Gad MM. Effect of denture cleansers on the surface properties and color stability of 3D printed denture base materials. Journal of Dentistry. 2022;120:104089.
• 70. Gruber S, Kamnoedboon P, Özcan M, Srinivasan M. CAD/ CAM complete denture resins: an in vitro evaluation of color stability. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2021;30(5):430-9.
• 71. Mugri MH, Jain S, Sayed ME, Halawi AHA, Hamzi SAI, Aljohani RAS, et al. Effects of Smokeless Tobacco on Color Stability and Surface Roughness of 3D-Printed, CAD/ CAM-Milled, and Conventional Denture Base Materials: An In Vitro Study. Biomedicines. 2023;11(2):491.