Improving Pink Esthetic Score by Using Custom Impression Coping: Case Report

Yıl 2024, , 382 - 389, 30.08.2024

Tansu Simsar

https://doi.org/10.58711/turkishjdentres.vi.1468228

Öz

Implant treatment is one of the frequently applied treatments to compensate for the deterioration of function and phonation of patients due to missing teeth, with the advantage of providing aesthetics.
A 47-year-old systemically healthy male patient applied to our clinic for renewal of his prosthesis. In this case report, after removing of the existing implant prosthesis, a screw-retained temporary prosthesis with an anatomical gingival emergence profile was used. Following the healing period, the gingival
emergence profile was transferred to the open impression coping, after laboratory procedures, the patient’s prosthesis was finalized.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dental Implant, Implant-supported dental prosthesis, Single-Tooth Implants

Proje Numarası

1

Kişisel Ölçü Postu Kullanımıyla Pembe Estetik Skorunun Yükseltilmesi: Olgu Sunumu

Öz

Diş hekimliğinde, hastaların eksilen dişlerle beraber fonksiyon kaybı ve fonasyonunun bozulması durumlarının telafisinde implant tedavisi seçeneği, özellikle de estetiğin sağlanabilmesi avantajı nedeniyle sıkça uygulanan tedavilerdendir. 47 yaşında sistemik olarak sağlıklı erkek hasta, santral diş
hizasında bulunan mevcut implant protezinin yenilenmesi için kliniğimize başvurdu. Bu vaka raporunda, implant protezinden estetik memnuniyetsizlik yaşaması sebebiyle kliniğimize başvuran hastamızın mevcut siman retansiyonlu implant protezi vida retansiyonlu bir protetik restorasyon ile yenilendi. Bu
amaçla anatomik dişeti çıkış profiline sahip vida retansiyonlu geçici protez kullandırıldı. İyileşme dönemini takiben, dişeti çıkış profili, açık ölçü postuna, daha sonra ölçüye aktarılarak, laboratuvar işlemlerinden sonra hastanın protezi son haline getirildi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Diş implantı, implant-destekli diş protezi, Tek-diş implantlar

Etik Beyan

Olgu sunumu olduğundan etik kurul onayı gerekmemektedir.

Destekleyen Kurum

İstanbul Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Protetik Diş Tedavisi AD. / İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü

Proje Numarası

1

Teşekkür

Değerli vaktinize teşekkür ederim.

Kaynakça

• 1. Shadid R, Sadaqa N. A Comparison Between Screw- and Cement-Retained Implant Prostheses. A Literature Review. J Oral İmplant. 2012;38(3), 298–307.
• 2. Tole N, Lajnert V, Kovacevic Pavicic D, Spalj S. Gender, age, and psychosocial context of the perception of facial esthetics. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26(2):119-30.
• 3. Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009;80(1):140-151.
• 4. Attard N, Barzilay I. A modified impression technique for accurate registration of peri-implant soft tissues. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69(2):80-3.
• 5. Hochwald DA. Surgical template impression during stage I surgery for fabrication of a provisional restoration to be placed at stage II surgery. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66(6):796- 8.
• 6. D’Addona A, Ghassemian M, Raffaelli L, Manicone PF. Soft and hard tissue management in implant therapy-part I: surgical concepts. Int J Biomater. 2012;2012:531202.
• 7. Al-Harbi SA, Edgin WA. Preservation of soft tissue contours with immediate screw-retained provisional implant crown. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(4):329-32.
• 8. Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Schneider D. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 6:163-201.
• 9. Gotfredsen K, Wiskott A; Working Group 4. Consensus report - reconstructions on implants. The Third EAO Consensus Conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 6:238-41.
• 10. Tsai BY. A method for obtaining peri-implant soft-tissue contours by using screw-retained provisional restorations as impression copings: a clinical report. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37(5):605-9.
• 11. Gomez‐Meda, R., Esquivel, J., & Blatz, M. B. (2021). The esthetic biological contour concept for implant restoration emergence profile design. J Esthet Rest Dent, 33(1), 173– 184.
• 12. Tarnow, DP., Magner, AW., & Fletcher, P. The Effect of the Distance From the Contact Point to the Crest of Bone on the Presence or Absence of the Interproximal Dental Papilla. J Periodontol, 63(12), 995–996.
• 13. Azer SS. A simplified technique for creating a customized gingival emergence profile for implant-supported crowns. J Prosthodont. 2010;19(6):497-501.
• 14. Papadopoulos I, Pozidi G, Goussias H, Kourtis S. Transferring the emergence profile from the provisional to the final restoration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 May- ;26(3):154-61.
• 15. Parpaiola A, Sbricoli L, Guazzo R, Bressan E, Lops D. Managing the peri-implant mucosa: a clinically reliable method for optimizing soft tissue contours and emergence profile. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(5):317-23.
• 16. Cooper LF. Objective criteria: guiding and evaluating dental implant esthetics. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20(3):195- 205.
• 17. Yao JW, Wang HL. Assessment of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Adaptive Pressure and Time After Provisional Restorations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(6):809-815.
• 18. Wittneben JG, Buser D, Belser UC, Brägger U. Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning with provisional restorations in the esthetic zone: the dynamic compression technique. Int J Periodon Resto Dent. 2013;33(4):447-55.
• 19. Shor A, Schuler R, Goto Y. Indirect implant-supported fixed provisional restoration in the esthetic zone: fabrication technique and treatment workflow. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20(2):82-95;96-7.
• 20. Nelson SJ. Wheeler’s dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion. 9th ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2009