Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Cementation of Indirect Resin Composite and Ceramic Restorations

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 317 - 328, 10.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.58711/turkishjdentres.vi.1390767

Öz

In today’s era, the increasing frequency of seeking dental care due to aesthetic demands has led practitioners to use materials such as resin composites and ceramics more extensively. Despite the widespread use of resin composites in clinical settings, issues related to polymerization shrinkage
still maintain their significance. To mitigate the effects of polymerization shrinkage and enhance the degree of polymerization, the indirect application of resin composites is recommended. However, when considering the indirect application, the use of ceramic materials, which offer more advantages in terms of aesthetic and mechanical properties compared to resin composites, comes into consideration.
There are numerous factors that independently influence the clinical success of indirect restorations from the indication stage to cementation. The cementation of the restoration is one of the most crucial factors affecting clinical success. Despite the use of various materials for cementation purposes, resin
cements appear to be the most preferred. Furthermore, the development of adhesive technology has progressed in parallel with these advancements
Another factor influencing the clinical success of indirect restorations is the implementation of certain physical and/or chemical treatments on the restoration surface. Positive contributions of these treatments to the longevity of the restoration have been reported. This review aims to discuss the selection of materials for the cementation of indirect
restorations made with resin composite or ceramics, as well as the effectiveness of surface preparation procedures applied to the tooth and restoration surfaces.

Kaynakça

  • Kanar ÖE, Tağtekin D. İndirekt Kompozit ve Seramik Restorasyonlarda Yüzey Hazırlığı. J Aydın Dent. 2021; 7: 57-5.
  • Uludamar DA, Aygün DŞ, Özkan P. Tam Seramik Restorasyonların Simantasyonu. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2011; 2: 150-62.
  • Blatz MB, Conejo J, Alammar A, Ayub J. Current Protocols for Resin-Bonded Dental Ceramics. Dent Clin. 2022; 66: 603-25.
  • Leung GKH, Wong AWY. Update on Dental Luting Materials. J Dent, 2022; 10: 208.
  • Lad PP, Kamath M, Tarale K, Kusugal PB. Practical clinical considerations of luting cements: A review. J İnt Oral Health. 2014; 6:116.
  • Gül S, Eser R, Deniz Arısu H. İndirekt Restorasyonların Adeziv Simantasyonu. Üçtaşlı MB. Güncel Adeziv Yaklaşımlar ve Klinik Adeziv Uygulamalar Özel sayı. Ankara. Türkiye Klinikleri. 2022: 30-37.
  • Çetin GY, Dilek Nalbant A. Rezin Matriks Seramiklere Uygulanan Yüzey İşlemlerinin Bağlanma Dayanımına Etkisi. Ado Clin Sci. 2022;11: 346-53.
  • Kim SH, Lee YK, Lim BS. Influence of Porcine Liver Esterase on The Color of Dental Resin Composites by CIEDE2000 System. J Biomed Mat Res. 2005; 72: 276-83.
  • Baena E, Vignolo V, Fuentes MVF, Ceballos L. Influence of Repair Procedure on Composite to Composite Microtensile Bond Strength. Am J Dent. 2015; 28: 255-260.
  • Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on The Composite-Composite Repair Bond Strength. Clin Oral Investig. 2009; 13: 317-23.
  • Haddad MF, Rocha EP, Assuncao WG. Cementation of Prosthetic Restorations: From Conventional Cementation to Dental Bonding Concept. J Craniofac Surg. 2011; 22: 952-58.
  • Heboyan A. Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive Review. Molecules. 2023, 28.4: 1619.
  • Türk AG, Ulusoy M, Önal B. İndirekt Restorasyonlarda Kullanılan Kompozit Rezin Simanlar. Ege Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2014; 35: 1-8.
  • Hill EE. Dental Cements for Definitive Luting: A Review and Practical Clinical Considerations. Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51: 643-58.
  • Caprak YO, Turkoglu P, Akgungor G. Does The Translucency of Novel Monolithic Cad/Cam Materials Affect Resin Cement Polymerization with Different Curing Modes?. J Prosthodont. 2019; 28: 572-79.
  • Kurtoğlu C. Geleneksel ve Adeziv Dental Simanlar Hakkında Bir Derleme Çalışması. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2012; 2: 205-16.
  • D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Casinelli M, Frascaria M, De Angelis F, Vadini M, D’Amario M. Adhesive Cementation of İndirect Composite İnlays and Onlays: A Literature Review. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015; 36: 570-77.
  • Ercan E, İbrahimov D, Hamidi MM. Kompozit İnley, İndirekt Porselen İnley ve Cad/Cam İnley Sistemi ile Restore Edilen Dişlerin Kenar Sızıntılarının İncelenmesi: İn Vitro Çalışma. Atatürk Ünivi Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2016; 26: 29-37 .
  • Da Rosa LS et al. Does Adhesive Luting Reinforce The Mechanical Properties of Dental Ceramics Used as Restorative Materials? A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis. J. Adhes Dent. 2022; 24: 209-22.
  • Carville R, Quinn F. The Selection of Adhesive Systems for Resin-Based Luting Agents. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2008; 54: 218- 22.
  • Baena E, Vignolo V, Fuentes MVF, Ceballos L. Influence of Repair Procedure on Composite to Composite Microtensile Bond Strength. Am J Dent. 2015; 28: 255-260.
  • Stamatacos C, Simon JF. Cementation of İndirect Restorations: An Overview of Resin Cements. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013; 34: 42-6.
  • Özyöney G, Yanıkoğlu F, Tağtekin D. The Efficacy of Glass- Ceramic Onlays in The Restoration of Morphologically Compromised and Endodontically Treated Molars. Int J Prosthodont. 2013; 26: 230-34.
  • Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile Bond Strength of Resin Composite Repair in Vitro Using Different Surface Preparation Conditionings to an Aged CAD/CAM Resin Nanoceramic. Clin Oral Inves. 2015; 19: 299-08.
  • Borges GA, Sophr AM, De Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of Etching and Airborne Particle Abrasion on The Microstructure of Different Dental Ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 479-88.
  • Dutra D, Pereira G, Kantorski KZ, Exterkate R, Kleverlaan CJ, Valandro LF. Grinding With Diamond Burs and Hydrothermal Aging of a Y-TZP Material: Effect on The Material Surface Characteristics and Bacterial Adhesion. Oper Dent. 2017; 42: 669-78.
  • Zogheib LV, Bona AD, Kimpara ET, JF M. Effect of Hydrofluoric Acid Etching Duration on The Roughness and Flexural Strength of a Lithium Disilicate-Based Glass Ceramic. Braz Dent J. 2011; 22: 45-0.
  • Papia E, Larsson C, du Toit M, Vult von Steyern P. Bonding Between Oxide Ceramics and Adhesive Cement Systems: A Systematic Review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014; 102: 395-13.
  • Vargas MA, Bergeron C, Diaz-Arnold A. Cementing All- Ceramic Restorations: Recommendations for Success. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011; 142: 20-4.
  • Shimada Y, Yamaguchi S, Tagami J. Micro-Shear Bond Strength Of Dualcured Resin Cement To Glass Ceramics. Dent Mater. 2002; 18: 380-88.
  • Tzanakakis EG, Tzoutzas IG, Koidis PT. Is There a Potential for Durable Adhesion to Zirconia Restorations? A Systematic Review. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115: 9-19.
  • Moravej-Salehi E, Moravej-Salehi E, Valian A. Surface Topography and Bond Strengths of Feldspathic Porcelain Prepared Using Various Sandblasting Pressures. J Investig Clin. Dent 2016; 7: 347-54.
  • Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin Ceramic Bonding: A Review of the Literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 268-74.
  • Çapa DN, Özkurt DZ, Kazazoğlu PDE. Ağız İçi Porselen Tamir Sistemleri. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2006; 1: 34-0.
  • Kimyai S, Mohammadi N, Navimipour EJ, Rikhtegaran S. Comparison of The Effect of Three Mechanical Surface Treatments on The Repair Bond Strength of a Laboratory Composite. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010; 28: 25-0.
  • Korkmaz Y, Özel E, Attar N, Bicer CO, Fıratlı E. Investigation of All-İn-One Self-Etch Adhesives and Their Nanocomposites İmaged with Erbium: Yttrium-Aluminum- Garnet Laser by Microleakage and Scanning Electron Microscopy. Lasers Med Sci. 2009; 25: 493-02.
  • Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Bonding of Resin Composites to Etchable Ceramic Surfaces an İnsight Review of the Chemical Aspects on Surface Conditioning. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34: 622-30.
  • Tijan T, Tsoi JK-H, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of Bonding Between Resin Luting Cements and Glass Ceramic Materials. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 147-62.
  • Filho AM, Vieira LC, Araújo E, Monteiro S. Effect of Different Ceramic Surface Treatments on Resin Microtensile Bond Strength. J Prosthodont 2004; 13: 28-5.
  • Della Bona A, Donassollo TA, Demarco FF, Barrett AA, Mecholsky Jr JJ. Characterization and Surface Treatment Effects on Topography of A Glass-İnfiltrated Alumina/ Zirconia-Reinforced Ceramic. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 769- 75.
  • Jedynakiewicz N, Martin N. The Effect of Surface Coating on The Bond Strength of Machinable Ceramics. Biomater 2001; 22: 749-52.

İndirekt Rezin Kompozit ve Seramik Restorasyonların Simantasyonu

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 317 - 328, 10.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.58711/turkishjdentres.vi.1390767

Öz

Günümüzde estetik talep nedeniyle diş hekimine başvurma sıklığının artması, hekimlerin rezin kompozit ve seramik gibi materyalleri daha fazla kullanmasına neden olmuştur. Rezin kompozitler klinikte yaygın olarak kullanılmasına rağmen, polimerizasyon büzülmesi ile ilgili problemler hala önemini korumaktadır. Polimerizasyon büzülmesinin etkilerini azaltmak ve polimerizasyon miktarını arttırmak amacıyla rezin
kompozitlerin indirekt olarak kullanımı önerilmektedir. Ancak indirekt kullanım söz konusu olduğunda, estetik ve mekanik özellikler açısından rezin kompozite göre daha fazla avantajları olan seramik materyallerin kullanımı gündeme gelmektedir.
İndirekt restorasyonların klinik başarısını endikasyon aşamasından simantasyona kadar birbirinden bağımsız olarak etkileyen birçok faktör bulunmaktadır. Bu faktörlerden simantasyon aşaması klinik başarıyı etkileyen en önemli faktörlerden biridir. Simantasyon amacıyla birbirinden farklı birçok materyal kullanılmasına rağmen, en fazla tercih edilen materyalin rezin simanlar olduğu görünmektedir. Ayrıca adeziv teknolojinin gelişimine paralel olarak gelişim göstermiştir.
İndirekt restorasyonların klinik başarısını etkileyen diğer bir faktör ise restorasyon yüzeyine fiziksel ve/veya kimyasal bazı uygulamaların yapılmasıdır. Bu uygulamaların restorasyonun ömrü üzerine olumlu katkıları olduğu rapor edilmiştir. Bu derlemede rezin kompozit veya seramik ile yapılan indirekt restorasyonların simantasyonunda kullanılacak materyalin seçimi ve ayrıca diş ve restorasyon yüzeyine uygulanacak yüzey hazırlık işlemlerinin etkinliğinin tartışılması amaçlanmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • Kanar ÖE, Tağtekin D. İndirekt Kompozit ve Seramik Restorasyonlarda Yüzey Hazırlığı. J Aydın Dent. 2021; 7: 57-5.
  • Uludamar DA, Aygün DŞ, Özkan P. Tam Seramik Restorasyonların Simantasyonu. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2011; 2: 150-62.
  • Blatz MB, Conejo J, Alammar A, Ayub J. Current Protocols for Resin-Bonded Dental Ceramics. Dent Clin. 2022; 66: 603-25.
  • Leung GKH, Wong AWY. Update on Dental Luting Materials. J Dent, 2022; 10: 208.
  • Lad PP, Kamath M, Tarale K, Kusugal PB. Practical clinical considerations of luting cements: A review. J İnt Oral Health. 2014; 6:116.
  • Gül S, Eser R, Deniz Arısu H. İndirekt Restorasyonların Adeziv Simantasyonu. Üçtaşlı MB. Güncel Adeziv Yaklaşımlar ve Klinik Adeziv Uygulamalar Özel sayı. Ankara. Türkiye Klinikleri. 2022: 30-37.
  • Çetin GY, Dilek Nalbant A. Rezin Matriks Seramiklere Uygulanan Yüzey İşlemlerinin Bağlanma Dayanımına Etkisi. Ado Clin Sci. 2022;11: 346-53.
  • Kim SH, Lee YK, Lim BS. Influence of Porcine Liver Esterase on The Color of Dental Resin Composites by CIEDE2000 System. J Biomed Mat Res. 2005; 72: 276-83.
  • Baena E, Vignolo V, Fuentes MVF, Ceballos L. Influence of Repair Procedure on Composite to Composite Microtensile Bond Strength. Am J Dent. 2015; 28: 255-260.
  • Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on The Composite-Composite Repair Bond Strength. Clin Oral Investig. 2009; 13: 317-23.
  • Haddad MF, Rocha EP, Assuncao WG. Cementation of Prosthetic Restorations: From Conventional Cementation to Dental Bonding Concept. J Craniofac Surg. 2011; 22: 952-58.
  • Heboyan A. Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive Review. Molecules. 2023, 28.4: 1619.
  • Türk AG, Ulusoy M, Önal B. İndirekt Restorasyonlarda Kullanılan Kompozit Rezin Simanlar. Ege Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2014; 35: 1-8.
  • Hill EE. Dental Cements for Definitive Luting: A Review and Practical Clinical Considerations. Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51: 643-58.
  • Caprak YO, Turkoglu P, Akgungor G. Does The Translucency of Novel Monolithic Cad/Cam Materials Affect Resin Cement Polymerization with Different Curing Modes?. J Prosthodont. 2019; 28: 572-79.
  • Kurtoğlu C. Geleneksel ve Adeziv Dental Simanlar Hakkında Bir Derleme Çalışması. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2012; 2: 205-16.
  • D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Casinelli M, Frascaria M, De Angelis F, Vadini M, D’Amario M. Adhesive Cementation of İndirect Composite İnlays and Onlays: A Literature Review. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015; 36: 570-77.
  • Ercan E, İbrahimov D, Hamidi MM. Kompozit İnley, İndirekt Porselen İnley ve Cad/Cam İnley Sistemi ile Restore Edilen Dişlerin Kenar Sızıntılarının İncelenmesi: İn Vitro Çalışma. Atatürk Ünivi Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2016; 26: 29-37 .
  • Da Rosa LS et al. Does Adhesive Luting Reinforce The Mechanical Properties of Dental Ceramics Used as Restorative Materials? A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis. J. Adhes Dent. 2022; 24: 209-22.
  • Carville R, Quinn F. The Selection of Adhesive Systems for Resin-Based Luting Agents. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2008; 54: 218- 22.
  • Baena E, Vignolo V, Fuentes MVF, Ceballos L. Influence of Repair Procedure on Composite to Composite Microtensile Bond Strength. Am J Dent. 2015; 28: 255-260.
  • Stamatacos C, Simon JF. Cementation of İndirect Restorations: An Overview of Resin Cements. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013; 34: 42-6.
  • Özyöney G, Yanıkoğlu F, Tağtekin D. The Efficacy of Glass- Ceramic Onlays in The Restoration of Morphologically Compromised and Endodontically Treated Molars. Int J Prosthodont. 2013; 26: 230-34.
  • Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile Bond Strength of Resin Composite Repair in Vitro Using Different Surface Preparation Conditionings to an Aged CAD/CAM Resin Nanoceramic. Clin Oral Inves. 2015; 19: 299-08.
  • Borges GA, Sophr AM, De Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of Etching and Airborne Particle Abrasion on The Microstructure of Different Dental Ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 479-88.
  • Dutra D, Pereira G, Kantorski KZ, Exterkate R, Kleverlaan CJ, Valandro LF. Grinding With Diamond Burs and Hydrothermal Aging of a Y-TZP Material: Effect on The Material Surface Characteristics and Bacterial Adhesion. Oper Dent. 2017; 42: 669-78.
  • Zogheib LV, Bona AD, Kimpara ET, JF M. Effect of Hydrofluoric Acid Etching Duration on The Roughness and Flexural Strength of a Lithium Disilicate-Based Glass Ceramic. Braz Dent J. 2011; 22: 45-0.
  • Papia E, Larsson C, du Toit M, Vult von Steyern P. Bonding Between Oxide Ceramics and Adhesive Cement Systems: A Systematic Review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014; 102: 395-13.
  • Vargas MA, Bergeron C, Diaz-Arnold A. Cementing All- Ceramic Restorations: Recommendations for Success. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011; 142: 20-4.
  • Shimada Y, Yamaguchi S, Tagami J. Micro-Shear Bond Strength Of Dualcured Resin Cement To Glass Ceramics. Dent Mater. 2002; 18: 380-88.
  • Tzanakakis EG, Tzoutzas IG, Koidis PT. Is There a Potential for Durable Adhesion to Zirconia Restorations? A Systematic Review. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115: 9-19.
  • Moravej-Salehi E, Moravej-Salehi E, Valian A. Surface Topography and Bond Strengths of Feldspathic Porcelain Prepared Using Various Sandblasting Pressures. J Investig Clin. Dent 2016; 7: 347-54.
  • Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin Ceramic Bonding: A Review of the Literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 268-74.
  • Çapa DN, Özkurt DZ, Kazazoğlu PDE. Ağız İçi Porselen Tamir Sistemleri. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2006; 1: 34-0.
  • Kimyai S, Mohammadi N, Navimipour EJ, Rikhtegaran S. Comparison of The Effect of Three Mechanical Surface Treatments on The Repair Bond Strength of a Laboratory Composite. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010; 28: 25-0.
  • Korkmaz Y, Özel E, Attar N, Bicer CO, Fıratlı E. Investigation of All-İn-One Self-Etch Adhesives and Their Nanocomposites İmaged with Erbium: Yttrium-Aluminum- Garnet Laser by Microleakage and Scanning Electron Microscopy. Lasers Med Sci. 2009; 25: 493-02.
  • Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Bonding of Resin Composites to Etchable Ceramic Surfaces an İnsight Review of the Chemical Aspects on Surface Conditioning. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34: 622-30.
  • Tijan T, Tsoi JK-H, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of Bonding Between Resin Luting Cements and Glass Ceramic Materials. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 147-62.
  • Filho AM, Vieira LC, Araújo E, Monteiro S. Effect of Different Ceramic Surface Treatments on Resin Microtensile Bond Strength. J Prosthodont 2004; 13: 28-5.
  • Della Bona A, Donassollo TA, Demarco FF, Barrett AA, Mecholsky Jr JJ. Characterization and Surface Treatment Effects on Topography of A Glass-İnfiltrated Alumina/ Zirconia-Reinforced Ceramic. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 769- 75.
  • Jedynakiewicz N, Martin N. The Effect of Surface Coating on The Bond Strength of Machinable Ceramics. Biomater 2001; 22: 749-52.
Toplam 41 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Restoratif Diş Tedavisi
Bölüm Derlemeler
Yazarlar

Serra Yaren Yeşil 0000-0002-7101-5950

Ayşenur Çelik 0000-0002-0371-4565

Oya Bala 0000-0001-5446-2583

Yayımlanma Tarihi 10 Mayıs 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 15 Kasım 2023
Kabul Tarihi 14 Ocak 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Yeşil SY, Çelik A, Bala O. İndirekt Rezin Kompozit ve Seramik Restorasyonların Simantasyonu. J Turkish Dent Res. 2024;3(1):317-28.

Türk Diş Hekimliği Araştırma Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

Dergimize Diş Hekimliği alanından yayın kabulü yapılmaktadır. Diğer alanlardan gönderilen yayınlar değerlendirmeye alınmamaktadır.