Hibrit domates fidelerinin (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) vejetatif gelişimi için hümik maddelerin uygulaması

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 462 - 468, 23.04.2022

Bruna Aline Vacelik Marcelle Michelotti Bettoni Tefide Kızıldeniz

https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1073218

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Hümik ve fulvik asitler gibi hümik maddelerle ilişkili dayanıklı çeşitlerin ve mineral beslemenin kullanımının bitki gelişimini destekleyebileceği, genel olarak bitkilerin daha iyi vejetatif gelişimi için uygun bir teknik olarak, bitkilerin toprak üstü kısımları ve köklerin büyümesini teşvik ederek bitki gelişimini destekleyebileceği bilinmektedir. Böylece daha iyi bir nihai üretkenlik sağlanmış olmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, serada yürütülen Justyne® hibrit domateslerin vejetatif gelişiminde hümik maddelere dayalı Bio Humate® gübresinin etkisini değerlendirmektir. Deneme, Bezilya'nın Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná Üniversitesi'nde ki deneme seralarında, tamamen rastgele bir deneysel tasarım ve 4 x 2 faktöriyel kullanılarak tasarlanıp, üç doz ticari ürün olarak satılan biyostimulant (1.5, 2 ve 2.5 mL L-1 Bio Humate®) uygulanarak, üç tekrarla yetiştirilen Justyne® domates hibritlerinde, ekimden sonra 42. ve 56. günlerde (DAT: Ekimden Sonraki Günler) örnekleme yapılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Uygulamalar 7 DAT'den başlayarak 14 günde bir uygulandı. Bio Humate® gübresinin toprağa uygulanması, Justyne® hibrit domateslerin vejetatif gelişiminde değerlendirilen biyometrik ve biyokimyasal parametreler için 2 mL L-1 dozunda 56 DAT'de en düşük klorofil içeriği olarak ortaya çıkmasına ragmen, daha iyi sonuçlar vermiştir.

Keywords

Domates, Lycopersicon esculentum L., Biyostimulant, Bio Humate®, Justyne®

Humic substances application for the vegetative development of hybrid tomato seedlings (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)

Abstract

It is known that the use of resistant cultivars and mineral nutrition associated with humic substances, such as humic and fulvic acids, can favor plant development, promoting aerial parts and roots growth, being a viable technique for better vegetative development of plants in general, and, consequently, for better final productivity. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of the fertilizer Bio Humate®, based on humic substances, in the vegetative development of Justyne® hybrid tomatoes. The experiment was conducted in greenhouses of University of Tuiuti do Paraná/Brazil with a completely randomized experimental design, arranged in a 4 x 2 factorial scheme with three doses of the commercial product’s application (1.5, 2, and 2.5 mL L-1 of Bio Humate®) on three repetitions Justyne® hybrid tomato seedlings that were subjected to samplings at 42nd and 56th days after transplanting (DAT)). The treatments were applied every 14 days, starting at 7 DAT at 42 and 56 DAT. The soil application of the Bio Humate® fertilizer showed better results at 2 mL L-1 of doses for the biometric and biochemical parameters evaluated in the vegetative development of Justyne® hybrid tomatoes, even though the chlorophyll content at 56 DAT is the lowest.

Keywords

Tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum L., Biostimulant, Bio Humate®, Justyne®

References

• Aminifard, M. H., Aroiee, H., Nemati, H., Azizi, M. and Hawa, Z. E. J. 2012. Fulvic acid affects pepper antioxidant activity and fruit quality. African Journal of Biotechnology, v. 11, n. 68, p. 13179-13185, 23 ago.
• Baldotto, L. E. B., Baldotto, M. A., Giro, V. B., Canellas, L. P., Olivares, F. L. and Bressan-Smith, R. 2009. Desempenho do abacaxizeiro “Vitória” em resposta à aplicação de ácidos húmicos durante a aclimatação. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo 33 (4): 979–990.
• Bernardes, J. M., Reis, J. M. R. and Rodrigues, J. F. 2011. Efeito da aplicação de substância húmica em mudas de tomateiro. Global science and technology 4 (3): 92–99.
• Bettoni, M. M., Mogor, Á. F., Pauletti, V. and Goicoechea, N. 2014. Growth and metabolism of onion seedlings as affected by the application of humic substances, mycorrhizal inoculation and elevated CO2. Scientia Horticulturae, v. 180, p. 227-235.
• Bettoni, M. M., Mogor, Á. F., Pauletti, V., Goicoechea, N., Aranjuelo, I. and Garmendia, I. 2016. Nutritional quality and yield of onion as affected by different application methods and doses of humic substances. Journal of food composition and analysis, v. 51, p. 37-44.
• Bettoni, M. M., Mogor, Á. F., Pauletti, V. and Goicoechea, N. 2017. The interaction between mycorrhizal inoculation, humic acids supply and elevated atmospheric CO2 increases energetic and antioxidant properties and sweetness of yellow onion. Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology, v. 58, p. 432-440.
• Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Kuhlmann, H. and Lammel, J. 2004. Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodology: I. Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production. European Journal of Agronomy, 20(3), 247-264.
• Calvo, P., Nelson, L., and Kloepper, J. W. 2014. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil, v. 383, n. 1-2, p. 3-41.
• Canellas, L. P., Olivares, F. L., Okorokova-Façanha, A. L. and Façanha, A. R. 2002. Humic acids isolated from earthworm compost enhance root elongation, lateral root emergence, and plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity in maize roots. Plant physiology 130 (4): 1951–1957.
• Canellas, L. P. and Olivares, F. L. 2014. Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, v. 1, n. 3, p. 3-14. DOI: 10.1186/2196-5641-1-3.
• Chitarra, M. I. F. and Chitarra, A. B. 1990. Pós-colheita de frutos e hortaliças: fisiologia e manejo. 2 ed. Lavras: ESAL/FAEPE, 320 p.
• Ertani, A., Francioso, O., Tugnoli, V., Righi, V. and Nardi, S. 2011. Effect of commercial lignosulfonate-humate on Zea mays L. metabolism. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, v. 59, n. 22, p. 11940-11948.
• Fan, H. M., Wang, X. W., Sun, X., Li, Y. Y., Sun, X. Z. and Zheng, C. S. 2014. Effects of humic acid derived from sediments on growth, photosynthesis and chloroplast ultrastructure in chrysanthemum. Scientia Horticulturae, v. 177, p. 118-123. DOI: 10.1016/j. scienta.2014.05.010.
• Ferrara, G. and Brunetti, G. 2008. Influence of foliar applications of humic acids on yield and fruit quality of table grape cv. Itália. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin, v. 42, n. 2, p. 79-87.
• Ferreira, D. F. 2008. SISVAR: um programa para análises e ensino de estatística. Revista Symposium, v. 6, p. 36-41.
• Hernandez, O. L., Calderín, A., Huelva, R., Martínez-Balmori, D., Guridi, F., Aguiar, N. O. and Canellas, L. P. 2015. Humic substances from vermicompost enhance urban lettuce production. Agronomy for sustainable development, v. 35, n. 1, p. 225-232.
• IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Estatística mensal da Produção Agrícola Levantamento Sistemático da Produção Agrícola. 2018. https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas-novoportal/economicas/agricultura-e-pecuaria (Access date: 5.12.2018)
• Primo, D.C., Menezes, R.S.C. and Silva, T.O. 2011. Substâncias húmicas da matéria orgânica do solo: uma revisão de técnicas analíticas e estudos no nordeste brasileiro. Scientia Plena, 7: 1-13.
• Lichtenthaler, H. K. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. In Methods in enzymology (Vol. 148, pp. 350-382). Academic Press.
• Lima, A. A., Alvarenga, M. A. R., Rodrigues, L. and Chitarra, A. B. 2011. Yield and quality of tomato produced on substrates and with application of humic acids. Horticultura Brasileira, v. 29, p. 269-274.
• Nardi, S., Muscolo, A. and Vaccaro, S. 2007. Relationship between molecular characteristics of soil humic fractions and glycolytic pathway and krebs cycle in maize seedlings. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 39 (12): 3138–3146.
• Nardi, S., Pizzeghello, D., Muscolo, A. and Vianello, A. 2002. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34 (11): 1527–1536.
• Noordwijk, M. V. and Cadisch, G. (2002). Access and excess problems in plant nutrition. In Progress in plant nutrition: plenary lectures of the XIV international plant nutrition colloquium (pp. 25-40). Springer, Dordrecht.
• Primo, D.C., Menezes, R.S.C. and Silva, T.O. 2011. Substâncias húmicas da matéria orgânica do solo: uma revisão de técnicas analíticas e estudos no nordeste brasileiro. Scientia Plena, 7: 1-13.
• Rosa, C. M. D., Castilhos, R. M. V., Vahl, L. C., Castilhos, D. D., Pinto, L. F. S., Oliveira, E. S. and Leal, O. D. A. 2009. Efeito de substâncias húmicas na cinética de absorção de potássio, crescimento de plantas e concentração de nutrientes em Phaseolus vulgaris L. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 33 (4): 959–967.
• TAKII. 2018. Tomate: Justyne. Hortaliças Disponível em: https://takii.com.br/produto/justyne (Access date: 5.12.2018).
• Vieira, L. S., Emrich, E. B., Costa, L. A. S., Ribeiro, F. A. G., Melo, D. F. M., Emrich, R. P. S. and Simoes Junior, R. G. S. 2018. Avaliação foliar de substância húmica em mudas de alface. Anais do II Seminário de Pesquisa e Inovação Tecnológica, Uberaba, MG, v.2, n.1, set.
• Zandonadi, D. B., Canellas, L. P. and Façanha, A. R. 2007. Indolacetic and humic acids induce lateral root development through a concerted plasmalemma and tonoplast H+ pumps activation. Planta 225 (6): 1583–1595.