Şeker pancarı yaprağı silajına arpa ezmesi, arpa samanı ve buğday kepeği ilavesinin yem değeri, silaj kalitesi ve in vitro organik madde sindirilebilirliği üzerine etkisi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 951 - 956, 18.10.2022

Sevilay Gül

https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1139624

Cited By: 1

Öz

This study has been carried out to investigate the effects of adding barley paste, barley straw, and wheat bran to sugar beet leaves (SBL) silages on the nutrient content, silage quality and in vitro organic matter digestibility of the silages. Following the sugar beet harvest, 10% barley paste (BP), 10% barley straw (BS), and 10% wheat bran (WB) were added to the sugar beet leaves taken after the sugar beet harvest, and then they were ensiled in 1 liter special glass jars and four application groups were formed as being control, SBL+BP, SBL+BS, and SBL+WB. Analyzes were carried out in three replications for each silage group. According to the study findings, for the control, SBL+BP, SBL+BS and SBL+WB groups respectively, dry matter at percentages of 18.65%, 23.35%, 21.40%, 21.02%, pH at levels of 4.01, 3.89, 3.94, 3.91, and crude protein at percentages of 11.24%, 12.06%, 7.83%, 11.32% were found. At the end of the study, it was determined that the addition of 10% barley paste to the sugar beet leaves increased the silage dry matter content and fleig score.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Şeker pancarı yaprağı, besin değeri, silaj katkı maddesi, OM sindirilebilirliği

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Proje Numarası

herhangi bir proje tarafından desteklenmedi

The effect of barley paste, barley straw and wheat bran addition to sugar beet leaves silages on feed value, silage quality and in vitro organic matter digestibility

Öz

This study has been carried out to investigate the effects of adding barley paste, barley straw, and wheat bran to sugar beet leaves (SBL) silages on the nutrient content, silage quality and in vitro organic matter digestibility of the silages. Following the sugar beet harvest, 10% barley paste (BP), 10% barley straw (BS), and 10% wheat bran (WB) were added to the sugar beet leaves taken after the sugar beet harvest, and then they were ensiled in 1 liter special glass jars and four application groups were formed as being control, SBL+BP, SBL+BS, and SBL+WB. Analyzes were carried out in three replications for each silage group. According to the study findings, for the control, SBL+BP, SBL+BS and SBL+WB groups respectively, dry matter at percentages of 18.65%, 23.35%, 21.40%, 21.02%, pH at levels of 4.01, 3.89, 3.94, 3.91, and crude protein at percentages of 11.24%, 12.06%, 7.83%, 11.32% were found. At the end of the study, it was determined that the addition of 10% barley paste to the sugar beet leaves increased the silage dry matter content and fleig score.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sugar beet leaves, feed value, silage additive, OM digestibility

Proje Numarası

herhangi bir proje tarafından desteklenmedi

Kaynakça

• Ak. İ., Canbolat. Ö., Bölüktepe, S., Çarli. T., Önder. N., (2000). Şeker Pancarı Yaprağının Silolanma Olanakları. U.Ü. Araştırma Fonu 96-25 nolu proje sonuç raporu
• Alhan R, Can A., (2017). Determining effect of straw and inoculant addition on silage quality of sugar beet leaves silage. Bulg J Agric Sci.; 23:639–43.
• Anonymus. (1986). The Analysis of Agricultural Material, Reference Book. 427-428, London,
• AOAC (2012). Official Methods of Analysis. 19th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists: International, USA.
• Brabender, D. L., Andries, J. I., Vanacker, J. M., Buysse, F., (1983). The value of ensiled sugar beet leaves for dairy cows. Revue de L’Arriculture. 36,2:379-391
• Can, A., Denek, N., Yazgan, K., 2003. Şekerpancarı yaprağına değişik katkı maddeleri ilavesinin silaj kalitesi ile invitro kuru madde sindirilebilirlik düzeyine etkisi. YY. Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Derg., 14 (2): 26-29.
• Corporaal, J., 1987. Ensiling trials with beet leaves and straw. Publikatie, Proefstation voor de Rundveehouderij. Schapenhouderij en Paardenhouderij, Netherlands, 46: 31-35.
• FAOSTAT. (2014). Production/Crop: Sugar beet 1993 - 2013. Retrieved 5-02-2015, 2015, from http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E Gerlach, K., Reimink, A., Messerschmidt, U., Südekum, K., 2017. Ensiled sugar beets as dietary component and their effect on preference and dry matter intake by goats. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 71(4), 297-310. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2017.1322795
• Goktepe, A. E., Selcuk, Z., (2017). Relative feed value and digestibility of caramba (Lolium multiflorum cv. Caramba) for ruminants. Anim Nutr Feed Techn, 17, 423-431. Gürsoy E, Macit M (2015). Erzurum ili meralarında doğal olarak yetişen bazı baklagil yem bitkilerinin in vitro gaz üretim değerlerinin belirlenmesi. Anadolu J Agr Sci, 30, 292-299.
• Gurbuz Y., Kaplan M., (2008). Chemical composition, organic matter digestibility, in vitro gas production characteristics and ensilling of sugar beet leaves as alternative feed resource. J Anim Vet Sci. 7(12):1568–1574.
• Hellwing, A.L.F., Messerschmidt, U., Larsen, M., Weisbjerg, R.W., (2017). Effects of feeding sugar beets, ensiled with or without an additive, on the performance of dairy cows. Livestock Science. 206, 37–44.
• Keady, T. W. J., (2000). Beyond the science: what the farmer looks for in the production of silage. In, Biotechnology in the feed industry. Proceedings of Alltech’s 16th Annual Symposium, 1 July,;439-452, Kentucky, USA.
• Kılıç, A., (1984). Silo yemi (silage feed). Bilgehan Presser, Izmir, Turkey, pp: 350.
• Kılıç, A., (1986). Silo Yemi. Bilgehan Basımevi. Bornova-İzmir, 327 s
• Naumann, C., Bassler, R., (1993). Die Chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitte ln. VDLUFA Methodenbuch, Band III. 3. Erg., Verlag Naumann, Melsungen.
• National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press
• Pimlott, A., 1991. Some practical aspects of sugar beet tops silage. Br. Sugar Beet Rev., 59 (3): 36-38.
• Przybyl, J., (1994): Comparison of sugar beet harvesting techniques in respect of leaf utilization mode. Zeszyty Problemowe Postepow Nauk Rolniczych. 416:125-130.
• Statical Analysis Sistem (2005). SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
• Suliman, AIA., Baiomy, AA., Awad-Allah MAA., (2013). Productive performance of growing lambs fed silages of sugarcane tops, sugar beet leaves and green maize stems. Egyptian Journal of Animal Production. 50(2),59-67
• Sun, Q., Wang, H., (2013). The effect of additives on mixed silage quality of sugar beet and corn stalks. Proceedings of the 22nd ınternational Grassland Congress.
• Thaysen, J., Auerbach H, Weißbach, F., (2012). Fermentation losses during ensiling of sugar beets as substrate for biogas production. In: Kuoppala K, Rinne M, Vanhatalo A, editors. Proc XVIth Int Silage Conference. July 2-4 2012, Hämeenlinna, Finland; p. 460–461
• TSE (1991). Animal feeds-Determination of metabolizable energy (chemical method). Turkish Standards Institute (TSE), Publ. No. 9610, 1-3, Ankara, Turkey.
• Türkşeker, (2021). 2020 Faaliyet Raporu. 247 s.
• Undiandeye, j., Gallegos, D., Lenz, J., Nelles, M., Stinner, M., (2022). Effect of novel Aspergillus and Neurospora species-based additive on ensiling parameters and biomethane potential of sugar beet leaves. Applied Sciences. 12, 2684. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052684.
• Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., Lewis, B. A., (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583-3597.
• Van Soest, P. J., (1994). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2nd ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.