Socio-demographic correlates of quality of life in spinal cord injured patients

Yıl 2019, , 92 - 101, 30.06.2019

Abiodun L. Azeez Adebisi İ. Hammed

https://doi.org/10.31459/turkjkin.545176

Cited By: 1

Öz

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the greatest
calamities that can occur in humans’ life. It brings about great challenges in
the form of coping strategies as well as protocols of rehabilitation and
characterized by a high incidence of poor self-rated health. This study
investigated socio-demographic correlates of health-related quality of life
(HRQoL) among paitents with SCI. Two separate self-rated questionnaires (the
socioeconomic status questionnaire (SSQ) and generic SF-36 questionnaire) were
administered to each of the participants to evaluate both socioeconomic
statuses (SES) and HRQoL respectively. A total of 100 subjects with SCI of
mechanical origin, aged 19-59 years participated in this study. Pearson product-moment coefficient of correlation was used to analyze the relationship between
HRQoL and socio-demographic parameters (age, gender, marital status, clinical
characteristic of morbidity and SES) and however, one-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) was used to analyze the differences in HRQoL across categories of SES. This
study indicated that SES and clinical characteristic of morbidity (CCM) were
the only variables correlating significantly (p<0.05) with all the domains
of HRQoL. In specific terms, the outcome suggested that low SES and complete
SCI are associated with poor HRQoL components. However, age, gender, and marital
status were all found to associate poorly and insignificantly with most of the HRQoL
domains (p>0.05). The present study, therefore, submitted that in this
population the most important determinants of HRQoL in SCI patients are SES and
CCM. The implication of this finding is viewed in three different perspectives;
first poor SES could precipitate the onset of the initial episode of SCI, second
poor SES might lead to poor rehabilitation outcome and third long-standing SCI
can precipitate low SES.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Health-related quality of life, socioeconomic status, spinal cord injury

Kaynakça

• Blanes L, Carmagnani MI, Ferreira LM. Health-related quality of life of primary caregivers of persons with paraplegia. Spinal Cord, 2007; 45(6): 399-403.
• Boakye M, Leigh BC, Skelly AC. Quality of life in person with spinal cord injury: comparisons with other populations. J Neurosurg Spine, 2012; (17): 29-37.
• Chandra A, Ozturk A. In context: Quality of life issues and assessment tools as they relate to patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Research and Perspectives on Healthcare, 2005; 83: 33-37.
• Erosa NA, Berry JW, Elliott TR, Underhill AT, Fine PR. Predicting quality of life 5 years after medical discharge for traumatic spinal cord injury. Br J Health Psychol, 2014; 19(4): 688-700.
• Fekete C, Wahrendorf M, Reinhardt JD, Post MWM, Siegrist J. Work stress and quality of life in persons with disabilities from four European countries: the case of spinal cord injury. Qual Life Res, 2014; 3: 1661-71.
• Guttmann L. Spinal cord injuries. Comprehensive management and research. London Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1973. p. 1
• Hijmans CT, Fijnvandraat K, Oosterlaan J, Heijboer H, Peters M, Grootenhius MA. Double disadvantage: A case study of health related quality of life in children with sickle cell disease. Health Quality of Life Outcome, 2010; 8: 121.
• McColl MA, Arnold R, Charlifue S, Frankel H. Aging, spinal cord injury, and quality of life: structural relationships. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2003; 84(8): 1137-44.
• Mittmann N, Hitzig SL, Catharine Craven B. Predicting health preference in chronic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med, 2014; 37(5): 548-55.
• Olusi SO, Ademowore AS, Ajani B. Biochemical assessment of nutritional state of gravid of different socioeconomic classification at Westley Guild Hospital, Ilesha Nigeria. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1979; 82: 8-12.
• Omokhodion FO, Sanya AO. Risk factors for low back pain among office workers in Ibadan, South-West Nigeria. Occupational Medicine, 2003; 53: 287-289.
• Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine, 1995; 20(1): 899-908.
• Pellegrino ED. Decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatment: A moral algorithm. JAMA, 2000; 290(18): 283-1067.
• Pereira MEMSM, Araujo TCCFA. Coping and rehabilitation of people with spinal cord injury and their caretakers. Psico (Porto Alegre), 2006; 37(1): 37-45.
• Putzke JD, Elliott TR, Scott-Richards J. Marital Status and Adjustment 1 Year Post-Spinal-Cord-Injury. J Clin Psychol Med Sett, 2001; 8(2): 101-7.
• Sherman EMS, Griffiths YS, Akdag S, Connolly MB, Slick DJ, Wiebe S. Sociodemographic correlates of health related quality of life in pediatric epilepsy. Epilepsy and Behavior, 2007; 12: 96-101.
• Somers MF. Spinal cord injury: functional rehabilitation. Upper Saddle River, N.J., Prentice Hall, 2001.
• Suttiwong J, Vongsirinavarat M, Chaiyawat P, Vachalathiti R. Predicting community participation after spinal cord injury in Thailand. J Rehabil Med, 2015; 47(4): 325-9.
• Van-Servellen G, Chang B, Lombardi E. Acculturation, socioeconomic vulnerability, and quality of life in Spanish-speaking and bilingual Latino HIV-infected men and women. West J Nurs Res, 2002; 24: 246-263.
• Von-Rueden U, Gosch A, Ramjil L, Bisegger C, Ravens-Sieberer U. Socioeconomic determinants of health related quality of life in childhood and adolescence: Result from a European study. J Epidemiol Commun Health, 2006; 60: 130-5.
• Westgren N, Levi R. Quality of life and traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1998; 79: 1433-9.
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2001.