Errorless and errorful learning: the effect on the discrete throwing task

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 4, 157 - 163, 30.12.2020

Abdul Muiz Nor Azmı , Jatifah Gesıkın Brynoth Alarıck Larry

https://doi.org/10.31459/turkjkin.809194

Öz

The current study aimed to investigate the effect of errorless learning (ELL) and errorful learning (EFL) on a discrete aiming task (dart-throwing). Thirty university students (male, n = 15; female, n = 15) with age of 22 ± 2.0 years old (M = 21.2; SD = 1.08) without any prior experience in dart-throwing participated in this study. After the pre-experimental evaluation, participants were randomly assigned into two groups (ELL and EFL group) by matched-pair design. There were three phases in the study, which were the acquisition, retention, and transfer phases. Both groups did not receive any instructions regarding the dart-throw. The results of variable error showed that there was a significant reduction in the ELL group over trials seemed to indicate that participants in ELL can utilize the learning to become more consistent in dart-throwing performance compared to the EFL group. The results in retention and transfer phases showed that the ELL group performed with significantly less error than the EFL group. The ELL group practiced with errorless learning performed with increased consistency during the retention phase compared to participants who practiced with errorful learning. The study concluded that implicit learning in errorless learning has been beneficial for the individual to get better dart-throwing performance as it can reduce the errors and lower cognitive demand when performing the task.

Anahtar Kelimeler

cognitive demand, dart-throw, errorful learning, errorless learning, motor learning

Kaynakça

• Abdoli, B., Farsi, A., & Barani, F.H. (2013). The effects of errorless and errorful practices on learning effort. International Journal of Sport Studies, 3(4), 472-479.
• Baddeley, A., & Wilson, B.A. (1994). When implicit learning fails: Amnesia and the problem of error elimination. Neuropsychologia, 32(1), 53-68.
• Beek, P.J. (2000). Toward a theory of implicit learning in the perceptual-motor domain. In Scientific Sport Psychology Workshop, Nov, 1997, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Edizioni Luigi Pozzi.
• Beilock, S.L, & Carr, T.H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure? J Exp Psychol Gen, 130, 701-725.
• Berry, D. C., Barry, D. P., Berry, D., & Dienes, Z. (1993). Implicit learning: Theoretical and empirical issues. Psychology Press.
• Dornyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ferguson, A.N., & Bowey, J.A. (2005). Global processing speed as a mediator of developmental changes in children’s auditory memory span. J Exp Child Psychol, 91(2), 89-112.
• Hammer, A., Heldmann, M., & Münte, T.F. (2013). Errorless and errorful learning of face-name associations: an electrophysiological study. Bio Psychol, 92(2), 169-178.
• Kessels, R. P., & Haan, E. H. (2003). Implicit learning in memory rehabilitation: A meta-analysis on errorless learning and vanishing cues methods. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 25(6), 805-814.
• Lam, W.K., Maxwell, J.P., & Masters, R.S.W. (2010). Probing the allocation of attention in implicit (motor) learning. J Sports Sci, 28(14), 1543-1554.
• Liao, C.M., & Masters, R.S. (2001). Analogy learning: a means to implicit motor learning. J Sports Sci, 19(5), 307-319.
• Masters, R.S.W., & Maxwell, J.P. (2004). Implicit motor learning, reinvestment and movement disruption: What you don’t know won’t hurt you? In A.M. Williams & N.J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice. London: Routledge.
• Masters, R.S.W., van der Kamp, J., & Capio, C. (2013). Implicit motor learning by children. Conditions of children’s talent development in sport. West Virginia: Fitness Information Technology, 21-40.
• Masters, R.S. (1992). Knowledge, knerves and know‐how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. Br J Psychol, 83(3), 343-358.
• Masters, R.S.W., Poolton, J.M., Maxwell, J.P., & Raab, M. (2008). Implicit motor learning and complex decision making in time-constrained environments. J Mot Behav, 40(1), 71-79.
• Maxwell, J.P., Masters, R.S.W., Kerr, E., & Weedon, E. (2001). The implicit benefit of learning without errors. The Q J Exp Psychol Section A, 54(4), 1049-1068.
• Maxwell, J.P. (2001). The implicit benefit of learning without errors. Q J Exp Psychol, 54A, 1049-1068.
• Metzler-BaddEley, C., & Snowden, J.S. (2005). Brief report: errorless versus errorful learning as a memory rehabilitation approach in Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 27(8), 1070-1079.
• Poolton, J.M., Masters, R.S.W., & Maxwell, J.P. (2005). The relationship between initial errorless learning conditions and subsequent performance. Hum Mov Sci, 24(3), 362-378.
• Rhea, M. R. (2004). Determining the magnitude of treatment effects in strength training research through the use of the effect size. J Strength Cond Res, 18, 918-920.
• Scheper, I., de Bruijn, E.R., Bertens, D., Kessels, R.P., & Brazil, I.A. (2019). The impact of error frequency on errorless and errorful learning of object locations using a novel paradigm. Memory, 27(10), 1371-1380.
• Seger, C.A. (1994). Implicit learning. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 163.
• Squires, E. J., Hunkin, N. M., & Parkin, A. J. (1997). Errorless learning of novel associations in amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 35(8), 1103-1111.
• Vickers, J. N., Rodrigues, S. T., & Edworthy, G. (2000). Quiet eye and accuracy in the dart throw. International Journal of Sports Vision, 6(1), 30-36.
• Zheng, W. (2013). Universally optimal crossover designs under subject dropout. Ann Stat, 41(1), 63-90.