Robotik Sağımda Sürü Yönetimi

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 361 - 371, 27.11.2023

Gizem Coşkun , Özcan Şahin , İbrahim Aytekin

https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.1339586

Öz

Süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinde kaliteli üretimin olmasının yanı sıra, daha yüksek verim ile karlılığın maksimum seviyede olması için işletmedeki hayvanların potansiyellerinin bilinmesi önem arz eder. Süt üretimi yapan işletmelerde sağım, işletmelerin ana gelir kaynaklarından biri olan sütün elde edilme işlemi olmasının yanında, gerek hayvan sağlığı gerekse işletme açısından üzerinde durulması gereken en önemli sürü yönetim uygulamalarından birisidir. Her bir ineğin bireysel yönetimi ancak iyi bir sürü yönetimi ile mümkün olmaktadır. Günümüz teknolojisinde ineklerin bireysel yönetiminde en dikkat çeken sistem olan robotik sağım sistemleridir. Robotik sağım sistemleri olarak adlandırılan otomatik sağım sistemlerinin 1990'ların başında piyasaya sürülmesi, şüphesiz süt sığırcılığında büyük bir atılım sağlamaktadır. Teknolojinin ilerlemesi ve gelişmesi ile süt üretimi yapan işletmelerin kendini yenileyerek modernizasyona ayak uydurmaları sağım teknolojisinde önemli ilerlemeler sağlamıştır. Geçmişte yapılan elle sağım bu ilerlemeler sayesinde sağım durak tiplerinin gelişmesi ile sağımın makinelerle yapılmasına, daha sonra bilgisayarın geliştirilmesi ile de sağım sistemlerin bilgisayarlı ortamda yapılmasına olanak sağlamış olup, günümüzde ise modern robotik sağım sistemlerinin geliştirilmesine katkıda bulunmuştur. Bu çalışmanın amacı; süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinde yaygın olarak kullanılan geleneksel sağım ve robotik sağım sistemlerinin karşılaştırılması, robotik sağım sisteminin özellikleri, avantajları, dezavantajları, sürü yönetimindeki yeri ve önemi hakkında bilgilerin verilmesi ile robotik sağım sistemine geçiş yapmak ve üretimlerini en üst düzeye çıkarmak isteyen yetiştiricilere yön vermeye yardımcı olmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hayvan trafiği, otomatik sağım sistemi, süt sığırcılığı, süt verimi, süt kalitesi

Herd Management in Robotic Milking

Öz

It is important to know the potential of the animals in the dairy farms in order to have high quality production as well as to maximize profitability and higher efficiency. In milk production enterprises, milking is one of the most important herd management practices that should be emphasized in terms of both animal health and business, as well as the process of obtaining milk, which is one of the main income sources of the enterprises. Individual management of each cow is only possible with good herd management. Robotic milking systems are the most remarkable system in the individual management of cows in today's technology. The introduction of automatic milking systems, called robotic milking systems, in the early 1990s, undoubtedly provided a major breakthrough in dairy cattle. With the advancement and development of technology, milk production enterprises have made significant progress in milking technology by renewing themselves and keeping up with modernization. Manual milking has enabled milking to be done with machines with the development of milking stall types, and then milking systems to be made in a computerized environment with the development of the computer, and today it has contributed to the development of modern robotic milking systems. The aim of this study is to compare the traditional milking and robotic milking systems that are widely used in dairy farms, to give information about the characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, place and importance of the robotic milking system in herd management and to guide the breeders who want to switch to the robotic milking system and maximize their production.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Animal traffic, automatic milking system, dairy cattle, milk yield, milk quality

Kaynakça

• Alıç, D., Yener, S.M., 2006. Süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinde robotlu sağım sistemi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(04): 369-380.
• Anonymous, 2005. Device Profile: Delaval Voluntary Milking System. (https://linuxdevices.org/), (Erişim Tarihi: 19.10.2022).
• Anonim, 2016. Gea R9500 Süt Sağım Robotu. (https://www.met-farm.com/gea9500/), (Erişim Tarihi: 19.10.2022).
• Astuti, A., Obitsu, T., Taniguchi, K., Sugino, T., 2019. Effect of milking frequency on body condition score, somatic cell count, and reproductive performance of dairy cows milked by an automatic milking system. Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 251: 012055.
• Bach, A., Busto, I., 2005. Effects on milk yield of milking interval regularity and teat cup attachment failures with robotic milking systems. Journal of Dairy Research, 72(1): 101-106.
• Bach, A., Devant, M., Igleasias, C., Ferrer, A., 2009. Forced traffic in automatic milking systems effectively reduces the need to get cows, but alters eating behavior and does not improve milk yield of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 92(3): 1272-1280.
• Bach, A., Cabrera, V., 2017. Robotic milking: Feeding strategies and economic returns. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(9): 7720-7728.
• Bausewein, M., Mansfeld, R., Doherr, M.G., Harms, J., Sorge, U.S., 2022 Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of clinical mastitis by automatic milking systems in bavarian dairy herds. Animals, 12(16): 2131.
• Bijl, R., Kooistra, SR., Hogeveen, H., 2007. The profitability of automatic milking on Dutch dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(1): 239-248.
• Borderas, T.F., Fournier, A., Rushen, J., De Passille, A.M.B., 2008. Effect of lameness on dairy cows’ visits to automatic milking systems. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 88(1): 1-8.
• Borshch, O.O., Gutyj, B.V., Sobolev, O.I., Borshch, O.V., Ruban, S.Y., Bilkevich V.V., Dutka, V.R., Chernenko, O.M., Zhelavskyi, M.M., Nahirniak, T., 2020. Adaptation strategy of different cow genotypes to the voluntary milking system. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10(1): 145-150.
• Boztepe, S., Aytekin, İ., Zülkadir, U., 2015. Süt Sığırcılığı. Selçuk Üniversitesi Basımevi, Konya.
• Butler, D., Holloway, L., Bear, C., 2012. The impact of technological change in dairy farming: Robotic milking systems and the changing role of the stockperson. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, 173(622): 1-6.
• Caraviello, D., 2004. Selection for clinical mastitis and somatic cell count. Reproduction and Genetics, 613: 1-6.
• Castro, A., Pereira, J.M., Amiama, C., Bueno, J., 2012. Estimating efficiency in automatic milking systems. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(2): 929-936.
• Dearing, J., Hillerton, J.E., Poelarends, J.J., Neijenhuis, F., Sampimon, O.C., Fossing, C., 2004. Effects of automatic milking on body condition score and fertility of dairy cows. Automatic Milking, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Cambridge, MA, USA.
• De Koning, K., Vestappen-Boerekamp, J., Schuiling, E., 2002. Milk cooling systems for automatic milking. First North American Conference on Robotic Milking, March 20-22, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, pp. 25-35.
• Demir, B., Öztürk, İ., 2010. Robotlu sağım sistemleri. Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Science, 19(2): 21-27.
• Głowicka-Wołoszyn, R., Winnicki, S., Jugowar, J.L., 2010. Krotność doju krów z zastosowaniem robota VMS firmy DeLaval. Nauka Przyroda Technologie, 4(1): 1-8.
• Hansen, B.G., Jervell, A.M., 2015. Change management in dairy farming. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 22(1): 23-40.
• Hansen, B.G., Herje, H.O., Höva, J., 2019. Profitability on dairy farms with automatic milking systems compared to farms with conventional milking systems. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 22(2): 215-228.
• Hale, S.A., Capuco, A.V., Erdman, R.A., 2003. Milk yield and mammary growth effects due to increased milking frequency during early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science, 86(6): 2061-2071.
• Heck, J.M.L., Van Valenberg, H.J.F., Dijkstra, J., Van Hooijdonk, A.C.M., 2009. Seasonal variation in the Dutch bovine raw milk composition. Journal of Dairy Science, 92(10): 4745-4755.
• Heikkila, A.M., Vanninen, L., Manninen, E., 2010. Economics of small-scale dairy farms having robotic milking. Proceedings of the First North American Conference on Precision Dairy Management, February 18, Toronto, Canada.
• Helgren, J.M., Reinemann, D.J., 2003. Survey of milk quality on United States dairy farms utilizing automatic milking systems. Written for presentation at the 2003 ASAE Annual International Meeting Sponsored by ASAE Riviera Hotel and Convention Center Las Vegas, Nevada, USA 27- 30 July, Paper Number: 033016.
• Hogenboom, J.A., Pellegrino, L., Sandrucci, A., Rosi, V., D'Incecco, P., 2019. Invited review: Hygienic quality, composition, and technological performance of raw milk obtained by robotic milking of cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 102(9): 7640-7654.
• Hogeveen, H., Heemskerk, K., Mathijs, E., 2004. Motivations of Dutch farmers to invest in an automatic milking system or a conventional milking parlour. In: A. Meijering, H. Hogeveen and K. de Koning (Eds.), Automatic Milking: A Better Understanding, Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp. 56-61.
• Jacobs, J.A., 2011. Dairy cow adaptation to and interaction with an automatic milking system. Master Thesis, Michigan State University, Animal Science, America.
• Jacobs, J.A., Siegford, J.M., 2012. Invited review: The impact of automatic milking systems on dairy cow management, behavior, health, and welfare. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(5): 2227-2247.
• Jago, J., Kerrisk, K., 2011. Training methods for introducing cows to a pasture-based automatic milking system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 131(3-4): 79-85.
• Kaya, E., Örs, A., 2015. Süt çiftliklerinde hassas tarım teknolojileri. 29. Ulusal Tarımsal Mekanizasyon ve Enerji Kongresi, 2-5 Eylül, Diyarbakır, Türkiye.
• Klungel, G.H., Slaghuis, B.A., Hogeveen, H., 2000. The effect of the introduction of automatic milking systems on milk quality. Journal of Dairy Science, 83(9): 1998-2003.
• Kruip, T.A.M., Morice, H., Robert, M., Ouweltjes, W., 2002. Robotic milking and its effect on fertility and cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science, 85(10): 2576-2581.
• Kuraloğlu, H., 2022. Robotik süt sağım sistemlerinde robot etkinliğinin artırılmasına ilişkin parametrelerin ve sağım değerlerinin belirlenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bursa.
• Laurs, A., Priekulis, J., 2011. Variability of milking frequency and intervals between milkings in milking robots. Agronomy Research Biosystem Engineering, 1(Special Issue): 135-141.
• Loudiyi, M., Temiz, H.T., Sahar, A., Haseeb Ahmad, M., Boukria, O., Hassoun, A., Aït-Kaddour, A., 2022. Spectroscopic techniques for monitoring changes in the quality of milk and other dairy products during processing and storage. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 62(11): 3063-3087.
• Lyons, N.A., Kerrisk, K.L., Garcia, S.C., 2014. Milking frequency management in pasture-based automatic milking systems: A review. Livestock Science, 159: 102-116.
• Mathijs, E., 2004. Socio-economic aspects of automatic milking. In: A. Meijering, H. Hogeveen and K. de Koning (Eds.), Automatic Milking: A Better Understanding, Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp. 46-55.
• Melin, M., Pettersson, G., Svennersten-Sjaunja, K., Wiktorsson, H., 2007. The effects of restricted feed access and social rank on feeding behavior, ruminating and intake for cows managed in automated milking systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 107(1-2): 13-21.
• Monov, V., Karastoyanov, D., 2021. Innovations in robotic cow milking systems. 2021 20th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), December 6-10, Ljubljana, Sloveniai, pp. 58-63.
• Nogalski, Z., Czerpak, K., Pogorzelska, P., 2011. Effect of automatic and conventional milking on somatic cell count and lactation traits in primiparous cows. Annals of Animal Science, 11(3): 433-441.
• Oudshoorn, F.W., Kristensen, T., Van Der Zijpp, A.J., De Boer, I.J.M., 2012. Sustainability evaluation of automatic and conventional milking systems on organic dairy farms in Denmark. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 59(1-2): 25-33.
• Örs, A., Oğuz, C., 2016. Süt sağım robotları, satın almaya değer mi? XII. Ulusal Tarım Ekonomisi Kongresi, 25-27 Mayıs, Isparta, s. 1605-1614.
• Önenç, A., Şimşek, Ş., 2015. Robotik sağımda özgür hayvan trafiğine geçiş sonrası bazı sağım, yem tüketimi ve meme sağlığı parametrelerindeki değişim. 9. Ulusal Zootekni Bilim Kongresi, 3-5 Eylül, Konya, s. 456-459.
• Piwczyński, D., Brzozowski, M., Sitkowska, B., 2020. The impact of the installation of an automatic milking system on female fertility traits in Holstein-Friesian cows. Livestock Science, 240: 104-140.
• Priekulis, J., Laurs, A., 2012. Research in automatic milking system capacity. 11th International Scientific Conference Engineering For Rural Development, May 24-25, Jelgava, pp. 24-25.
• Rodenburg, J., 2002. Robotic milkers: What, where... and how much!!?? In Proceedings of Ohio Dairy Management Conference, December 16-17, Ohio, USA, pp. 1-18.
• Rotz, C.A., Coiner, C.U., Soder, K.J., 2003. Automatic milking systems, farm size, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science, 86(12): 4167-4177.
• Roy, D., Ye, A., Moughan, P.J., Singh, H., 2020. Composition, structure, and digestive dynamics of milk from different species-A review. Frontiers in Nutrition, 7: 577759.
• Salovuo, H., Ronkainen, P., Heino, A., 2005. Introduction of automatic milking system in Finland effect on milk quality. Agricultural and Food Science, 14(4): 346-353.
• Steeneveld, W., Tauer, L.W., Hogeveen, H., Lansink, A.O., 2012. Comparing technical efficiency of farms with an automatic milking system and a conventional milking system. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(12): 7391-7398.
• Suh, J.H., 2022. Critical review: Metabolomics in dairy science-evaluation of milk and milk product quality. Food Research International, 154: 110984.
• Täubert, H., Brade, W., Simianer, H., 2004. Genetic parameters of production traits in automatic and conventional milking systems. 55th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, September 5-9, Bled, Slovenia, pp. 1-6.
• Tranel, L.F., Schulte, K.M., 2013. The economics of robotic milking systems. Proceedings of The Precision Dairy Conference And Expo-A Conference on Precision Dairy Technologies, June 26-27, Minnesota, USA, pp. 49-51.
• Tse, C., Barkema, H.W., DeVries, T.J., Rushen, J., Pajor, E.A., 2017. Effect of transitioning to automatic milking systems on producers' perceptions of farm management and cow health in the Canadian dairy industry. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(3): 2404-2414.
• Türkyılmaz, M., 2005. Süt sığırcılık işletmelerinde sağım robotu kullanımı. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1): 61-65.
• Ünal H., Kuraloğlu, H., 2016. Robotik sağım sistemlerinde optimum hayvan kapasitesinin belirlenmesi. Tarım Makinaları Bilimi Dergisi, 12(2): 149-156.
• Wade, K.M., Van Asseldonk, M.A.P.M., Berentsen, P.B.M., Ouweltjes, W., Hogeveen, 2004. Economic efficiency of automatic milking systems with specific emphasis on increases in milk production. In: A. Meijering, H. Hogeveen and K. de Koning (Eds.), Automatic Milking: A Better Understanding, Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp. 62-67.
• Wagner-Storch, A.M., Palmer, R.W., 2003. Feeding behavior, milking behavior, and milk yields of cows milked in a parlor versus an automatic milking system. Journal of Dairy Science, 86(4): 1494-1502.