Enabling Pre-service Chemistry Teachers' Development of Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) through Case-Based Lesson Planning

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1, 207 - 225, 08.06.2019

Zehra Özdilek , Edward C. Robeck

https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.533233

Cited By: 2

Öz

This study aimed to enable technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) development among pre-service teachers based on case-based lesson planning. A total of 21 pre-service chemistry teachers having a bachelor’s degree participated in the study during their pedagogical certificate program in Turkey. Data were collected using analysis of instructional plans and open-ended questions. Results showed that case-based lesson planning provided a successful context for helping pre-service teachers to develop content knowledge (CK), technological knowledge (TK), pedagogical knowledge (PK), and TPACK knowledge as the basis for designing effective technology-integrated chemistry lessons.

Anahtar Kelimeler

TPACK, case-based teaching, chemistry instruction, teacher education

Enabling Pre-service Chemistry Teachers' Development of Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) through Case-Based Lesson Planning

Öz

This study aimed to enable technological, pedagogical,
and content knowledge (TPACK) development among pre-service teachers based on case-based
lesson planning. A total of 21
pre-service chemistry teachers having a bachelor’s
degree participated in the study during their pedagogical certificate
program in Turkey. Data were collected using analysis of instructional plans and
open-ended questions. Results showed that case-based lesson planning provided a
successful context for helping pre-service teachers to develop content
knowledge (CK), technological knowledge (TK), pedagogical knowledge (PK), and
TPACK knowledge as the basis for designing effective technology-integrated
chemistry lessons.

Anahtar Kelimeler

TPACK, case-based teaching, chemistry instruction, teacher education

Kaynakça

• Boubouka, M., Verginis, I., & Grigoriadou, M. (2008). Comparing the implementation of the case study method in the classroom and from distance using a course management system. IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, 285-292.
• Bybee, R., & Landes, N. M. (1990). Science for life and living: An elementary school science program from Biological Sciences Improvement Study (BSCS). The American Biology Teacher, 52(2), 92-98.
• Camill, P. (2006). Case studies add value to a diverse teaching portfolio in science courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(2), 31-37.
• Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Guzey, S. S., & Yamak, H. (2016) Assessing pre-service science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through observations and lesson plans, Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 237-251, DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2016.1144050
• Causa, M., Savin, A., & Silvi, B. (2014). Atoms and bonds in molecules and chemical explanations. Foundations of Chemistry, 16, 3–26.
• Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.C. (2010). Facilitating pre-service teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63–73.
• Chai, C.-S., Koh, J. H.-L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31–51.
• Chittleborough, G. (2014). Learning how to teach chemistry with technology: Pre-service teachers’ experiences with integrating technology into their learning and teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 373-393. doi: 10.1007/s10972-014-9387-y
• Doymuş, K., Şimşek, Ü., & Karaçöp, A. (2009). The effects of computer animations and cooperative learning methods in micro, macro and symbolic level learning of states of matter. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 36, 109-128.
• Gabel, D. L. (1993). Use of the particle nature of matter in developing conceptual understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(3), 193-194.
• Harris, J., Mishra, P., & and Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416.
• Harris, J., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers' curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229.
• Hofer, M. J. and Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in teacher education: A longitudinal study of preservice teachers in a secondary M.A.Ed. Program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 83–106
• Johnstone, A.H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem, Journal of Computer Assisted Instruction, 7(1), 75–83.
• Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59.
• Karolcik, S., & Cipkova, E. (2017). Attitudes among chemistry teachers towards increasing personal competencies in applying ICT. Chemistry Didactics Ecology Metrology, 22(1/2), 99-121.
• Khan, S. (2011). New pedagogies on teaching science with computer simulations. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 20(3), 215-232. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (CITE Journal), 9(1), 60-70.
• Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19.
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition (pp. 101-111). Springer New York. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
• Koh, J.H.L. (2013). A rubric for assessing teachers' lesson activities with respect to TPACK for meaningful learning with ICT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887-900.
• Locatelli, S., Ferreira,C. ve Arroio, A. (2010). Metavisualization: An important skill in the learning chemistry. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 24, 75-83.
• McGrath, J., Karabas, G., & Willis. J. (2011). From TPACK concept to TPACK practice: An analysis of the suitability and usefulness of the concept as a guide in the real world of teacher development. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1-23.
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
• Mouza, C.& Karchmer-Krein, R. (2013). Promoting and assessing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in the context of case development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 127-152.
• Polly, D. (2011). Developing teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) through mathematics professional development. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 18 (2), 83-96.
• Scantlebury, K. (2008). Impact of chemistry teachers' knowledge and practices on student achievement. AIP Conference Proceedings 1064, 46
• Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2-20.
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
• Stieff, M., & Wilensky, U. (2003). Connected chemistry? Incorporating interactive simulations into the chemistry classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 285. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025085023936
• Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet”. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195.
• Tatlı, Z. ve Ayas, A. (2013). Effect of a virtual chemistry laboratory on students' achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 159–170.
• Trowbridge, L. W., & Bybee, R. W. (1990). Becoming a secondary school science teacher. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
• Yadav, A. (2008). What works for them? Preservice teachers' perceptions of their learning from video case. Action in Teacher Education, 29(4), 27-38.
• Yadav, A., Shaver, G. M., & Meckl, P. (2010). Lessons learned: Implementing the case teaching method in a mechanical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 55-69.