Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

What the Hegemonic Stability Theory Tell us About: the Test of Covid-19

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 11 - 25, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.51524/uhusbad.993970

Öz

Covid-19 pandemic is a crisis differing from other crises in many ways since it involves a combination of a global health crisis and a socioeconomic crisis, affecting many individuals. The Covid-19 pandemic has been detrimental both in economic and political terms even changing the World’s hegemonic order. Before the Covid-19 crises, the world order has already started changing but the pandemic has accelerated this transition process. The struggle with the pandemic has become a tool for power maximization. Hence the World witnessed a power struggle between the previous hegemon and emerging Powers during the pandemic. In this paper, first of all hegemonic stability theory has been elaborated in details and than the expected post-pandemic hegemonic structure has been discussed.

Kaynakça

  • Acar, A. C. Effects of COVID-19 Crisis on Employment and Working Arrangements. Reflections on the Pandemic, 463.
  • Akhvlediani, T., Ali, S. M., Angus, D. C., Arabi, Y. M., Ashraf, S., Baillie, J. K., ... & Fletcher, T. (2020). Global outbreak research: harmony not hegemony. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 20(7), 770-772.
  • Allan, B. B., Vucetic, S., & Hopf, T. (2018). The distribution of identity and the future of international order: China's hegemonic prospects. International Organization, 72(4), 839-869.
  • Baykal, E. (2020). Boosting Resilience through Spiritual Well-being: COVID-19 Example. Bussecon Review of Social Sciences (2687-2285), 2(4), 18-25.
  • Baykal, E. (2020a). Covid-19 Bağlamında Psikolojik Dayanıklılık, Kaygı ve Yaşam Doyum İlişkisi. International Journal of Social and Economic Sciences, 10(2), 68-80.
  • Baykal, E. (2020b). Boosting Resilience through Spiritual Well-being: COVID-19 Example. Bussecon Review of Social Sciences (2687-2285), 2(4), 18-25.
  • Belic, J., & Miklosi, Z. (2020). Cosmopolitanism and unipolarity: the theory of hegemonic transition. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 1-23.
  • Brooks, S. G. and Wohlforth, W. C. (2008). World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Busby, J. W. (2020). Understanding the anemic global response to COVID-19. Journal of health politics, policy and law, 45(6), 1013-1021.
  • Carroll, W. (2007). Hegemony and counter-hegemony in a global field. Studies in Social Justice, 1(1), 36-66.
  • Carroll, W. K., & Carson, C. (2003). Forging a new hegemony? The role of transnational policy groups in the network and discourses of global corporate governance. journal of world-systems research, 9(1), 67-102.
  • Choi, S. H. (2020) How the Pandemic Undermined US Hegemony in Asia-Pacific: The COVID-19 Vaccine War and the South China Sea.
  • Contreras, F., Baykal, E., & Abid, G. (2020). E-leadership and teleworking in times of COVID-19 and beyond: what we know and where do we go. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3484.
  • Curran, L., Eckhardt, J., & Lee, J. (2021). The trade policy response to COVID-19 and its implications for international business. critical perspectives on international business.
  • Drezner, D. W. (2019). Counter-hegemonic strategies in the global economy. Security Studies, 28(3), 505-531.
  • Dunford, M., & Qi, B. (2020). Global reset: COVID-19, systemic rivalry and the global order. Research in Globalization, 2, 100021.
  • El Aidi, A., & Yechouti, Y. (2017). Antonio Gramsci’s theory of cultural hegemony in Edward Said’s orientalism. Galaxy: International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 6(5), 1-9.
  • Fabbrini, S. 2019. Constructing and de-constructing the European political identity: The contradictory logic of the EU’s institutional system. Comparative European Politics 17 (4): 477–490.
  • Fayyaz, S., & Malik, S. (2020). Question of US Hegemony and COVID-19 Pandemic. Global Political Review, 1, 72-83.
  • Gauttam, P., Singh, B., & Kaur, J. (2020). COVID-19 and Chinese Global Health Diplomacy: Geopolitical Opportunity for China’s Hegemony?. Millennial Asia, 11(3), 318-340.
  • Goldstein, J. S. (2005). International relations. Pearson-Longman.
  • Goode, J., D. Stroup, and E. Gaufman. 2020. Everyday Nationalism in Unsettled Times: In Search of Normality during Pandemic. Nationalities Papers. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2020.40
  • Gramsci, Antonio.(1985)“Selections from Cultural Writings”. Ed. David Forgacs and Geoffrey
  • Grundy, C. (2012). What is the Difference Between a Realist and a Gramscian Understanding of Hegemony. Retrieved February, 20, 2017.
  • Gülseven, E. (2021). Identity, Nationalism and the Response of Turkey to COVID-19 Pandemic. Chinese Political Science Review, 6(1), 40-62.
  • Haiphong, D. (2020). The Great Unmasking: American Exceptionalism in the Age of COVID-19. International Critical Thought, 10(2), 200-213.
  • Hellman, J. (2020). Coronavirus Double Whammy: Unemployed and Uninsured. The Hill, April 9. Accessed April 21, 2020. https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/491914-coronavirus-double- whammy-unemployed-and-uninsured.
  • Hussain, M. (2021). Reimagining the New World Order Post-Covid-19. Qubahan Academic Journal, 1(1), 5-10.
  • Ikenberry, G. J., & Nexon, D. H. (2019). Hegemony studies 3.0: The dynamics of hegemonic orders.
  • Jackson, P. A. (2018). Space, theory, and hegemony: the dual crises of Asian area studies and cultural studies. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 33(S), S199-S241.
  • Jones, E. 2012. The JCMS annual review lecture: European crisis, European solidarity. Journal of Com- mon Market Studies 50: 53–67.
  • Li, H., Hameed, J., Khuhro, R. A., Albasher, G., Alqahtani, W., Sadiq, M. W., & Wu, T. (2020). The impact of the economic corridor on economic stability: a double mediating role of environmental sustainability and sustainable development under the exceptional circumstances of COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.
  • Mastanduno, M. (2019). Partner politics: Russia, China, and the challenge of extending US hegemony after the Cold War. Security Studies, 28(3), 479-504.
  • Matera, P. (2020). Under hegemonic pressure: 2018 American sanctions against Iran and Turkey’s response. Digest of Middle East Studies, 29(2), 183-199.
  • Nexon, D. H., & Neumann, I. B. (2018). Hegemonic-order theory: A field-theoretic account. European Journal of International Relations, 24(3), 662-686.
  • Norrlöf, C. (2020). Is COVID-19 the end of US hegemony? Public bads, leadership failures and monetary hegemony. International Affairs, 96(5), 1281-1303.
  • Nowell-Smith. Trans. William Boelhower. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985. Print.
  • Ranasinghe, R., & Li, C. (2017). Dimensions of mobilities, tourism and transition of cultural hegemony: A qualitative inquiry from Sri Lanka. International Journal of Tourism Anthropology, 6(1), 21-40.
  • Sachs, J. D. (2020). COVID-19 and Multilateralism. Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, (16), 30-39.
  • Salvati, E. (2021). Crisis and intergovernmental retrenchment in the European Union? Framing the EU’s answer to the COVID-19 pandemic. Chinese Political Science Review, 6(1), 1-19.
  • Schmidt, B. (2018). Hegemony: A conceptual and theoretical analysis. DOC Research Institute.
  • Silahtaroğlu, G., Baykal, E., & Canbolat, Z. N. (2020). Weekly Emotional Changes Amidst COVID-19: Turkish Experience. Ekonomi İşletme ve Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 280-304.
  • Taskinsoy, J. (2020). Diminishing Dollar Hegemony: What Wars and Sanctions Failed to Accomplish, COVID-19 Has. COVID-19 Has (April 7, 2020).
  • Toosi, Nahal, and Natasha Bertrand. 2020. “Fears Rise That Trump Will Incite a Global Vaccine Brawl.” Politico, May 3. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/03/coronavirus- vaccine-trump-world-brawl-230142.
  • Viola, L. A. (2020). US Strategies of Institutional Adaptation in the Face of Hegemonic Decline. Global Policy, 11, 28-39.
  • Webb, M. C., & Krasner, S. D. (1989). Hegemonic stability theory: An empirical assessment. Review of International Studies, 15(2), 183-198.

What the Hegemonic Stability Theory Tell us About; the Test of Covid 19

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 11 - 25, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.51524/uhusbad.993970

Öz

Covid-19 pandemisi, küresel bir sağlık krizi ile bir sosyoekonomik krizin birleşimini içerdiği ve birçok kişiyi etkilediği için diğer krizlerden birçok yönden ayrılan bir krizdir. Covid-19 pandemisi, dünyanın hegemonik düzenini bile değiştirerek hem ekonomik hem de siyasi açıdan zararlı olmuştur. Covid-19 krizlerinden önce dünya düzeni değişmeye başlamış ama pandemi bu geçiş sürecini hızlandırmıştır. Salgınla mücadele, güç maksimizasyonu için bir araç haline gelmiştir. Dolayısıyla Dünya, salgın sırasında önceki hegemonya ile yükselen güçler arasında bir güç mücadelesine tanık olmuştur. Bu bildiride öncelikle hegemonik istikrar teorisi ayrıntılarıyla ele alınmış ve ardından pandemi sonrası beklenen hegemonik yapı tartışılmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • Acar, A. C. Effects of COVID-19 Crisis on Employment and Working Arrangements. Reflections on the Pandemic, 463.
  • Akhvlediani, T., Ali, S. M., Angus, D. C., Arabi, Y. M., Ashraf, S., Baillie, J. K., ... & Fletcher, T. (2020). Global outbreak research: harmony not hegemony. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 20(7), 770-772.
  • Allan, B. B., Vucetic, S., & Hopf, T. (2018). The distribution of identity and the future of international order: China's hegemonic prospects. International Organization, 72(4), 839-869.
  • Baykal, E. (2020). Boosting Resilience through Spiritual Well-being: COVID-19 Example. Bussecon Review of Social Sciences (2687-2285), 2(4), 18-25.
  • Baykal, E. (2020a). Covid-19 Bağlamında Psikolojik Dayanıklılık, Kaygı ve Yaşam Doyum İlişkisi. International Journal of Social and Economic Sciences, 10(2), 68-80.
  • Baykal, E. (2020b). Boosting Resilience through Spiritual Well-being: COVID-19 Example. Bussecon Review of Social Sciences (2687-2285), 2(4), 18-25.
  • Belic, J., & Miklosi, Z. (2020). Cosmopolitanism and unipolarity: the theory of hegemonic transition. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 1-23.
  • Brooks, S. G. and Wohlforth, W. C. (2008). World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Busby, J. W. (2020). Understanding the anemic global response to COVID-19. Journal of health politics, policy and law, 45(6), 1013-1021.
  • Carroll, W. (2007). Hegemony and counter-hegemony in a global field. Studies in Social Justice, 1(1), 36-66.
  • Carroll, W. K., & Carson, C. (2003). Forging a new hegemony? The role of transnational policy groups in the network and discourses of global corporate governance. journal of world-systems research, 9(1), 67-102.
  • Choi, S. H. (2020) How the Pandemic Undermined US Hegemony in Asia-Pacific: The COVID-19 Vaccine War and the South China Sea.
  • Contreras, F., Baykal, E., & Abid, G. (2020). E-leadership and teleworking in times of COVID-19 and beyond: what we know and where do we go. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3484.
  • Curran, L., Eckhardt, J., & Lee, J. (2021). The trade policy response to COVID-19 and its implications for international business. critical perspectives on international business.
  • Drezner, D. W. (2019). Counter-hegemonic strategies in the global economy. Security Studies, 28(3), 505-531.
  • Dunford, M., & Qi, B. (2020). Global reset: COVID-19, systemic rivalry and the global order. Research in Globalization, 2, 100021.
  • El Aidi, A., & Yechouti, Y. (2017). Antonio Gramsci’s theory of cultural hegemony in Edward Said’s orientalism. Galaxy: International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 6(5), 1-9.
  • Fabbrini, S. 2019. Constructing and de-constructing the European political identity: The contradictory logic of the EU’s institutional system. Comparative European Politics 17 (4): 477–490.
  • Fayyaz, S., & Malik, S. (2020). Question of US Hegemony and COVID-19 Pandemic. Global Political Review, 1, 72-83.
  • Gauttam, P., Singh, B., & Kaur, J. (2020). COVID-19 and Chinese Global Health Diplomacy: Geopolitical Opportunity for China’s Hegemony?. Millennial Asia, 11(3), 318-340.
  • Goldstein, J. S. (2005). International relations. Pearson-Longman.
  • Goode, J., D. Stroup, and E. Gaufman. 2020. Everyday Nationalism in Unsettled Times: In Search of Normality during Pandemic. Nationalities Papers. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2020.40
  • Gramsci, Antonio.(1985)“Selections from Cultural Writings”. Ed. David Forgacs and Geoffrey
  • Grundy, C. (2012). What is the Difference Between a Realist and a Gramscian Understanding of Hegemony. Retrieved February, 20, 2017.
  • Gülseven, E. (2021). Identity, Nationalism and the Response of Turkey to COVID-19 Pandemic. Chinese Political Science Review, 6(1), 40-62.
  • Haiphong, D. (2020). The Great Unmasking: American Exceptionalism in the Age of COVID-19. International Critical Thought, 10(2), 200-213.
  • Hellman, J. (2020). Coronavirus Double Whammy: Unemployed and Uninsured. The Hill, April 9. Accessed April 21, 2020. https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/491914-coronavirus-double- whammy-unemployed-and-uninsured.
  • Hussain, M. (2021). Reimagining the New World Order Post-Covid-19. Qubahan Academic Journal, 1(1), 5-10.
  • Ikenberry, G. J., & Nexon, D. H. (2019). Hegemony studies 3.0: The dynamics of hegemonic orders.
  • Jackson, P. A. (2018). Space, theory, and hegemony: the dual crises of Asian area studies and cultural studies. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 33(S), S199-S241.
  • Jones, E. 2012. The JCMS annual review lecture: European crisis, European solidarity. Journal of Com- mon Market Studies 50: 53–67.
  • Li, H., Hameed, J., Khuhro, R. A., Albasher, G., Alqahtani, W., Sadiq, M. W., & Wu, T. (2020). The impact of the economic corridor on economic stability: a double mediating role of environmental sustainability and sustainable development under the exceptional circumstances of COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.
  • Mastanduno, M. (2019). Partner politics: Russia, China, and the challenge of extending US hegemony after the Cold War. Security Studies, 28(3), 479-504.
  • Matera, P. (2020). Under hegemonic pressure: 2018 American sanctions against Iran and Turkey’s response. Digest of Middle East Studies, 29(2), 183-199.
  • Nexon, D. H., & Neumann, I. B. (2018). Hegemonic-order theory: A field-theoretic account. European Journal of International Relations, 24(3), 662-686.
  • Norrlöf, C. (2020). Is COVID-19 the end of US hegemony? Public bads, leadership failures and monetary hegemony. International Affairs, 96(5), 1281-1303.
  • Nowell-Smith. Trans. William Boelhower. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985. Print.
  • Ranasinghe, R., & Li, C. (2017). Dimensions of mobilities, tourism and transition of cultural hegemony: A qualitative inquiry from Sri Lanka. International Journal of Tourism Anthropology, 6(1), 21-40.
  • Sachs, J. D. (2020). COVID-19 and Multilateralism. Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, (16), 30-39.
  • Salvati, E. (2021). Crisis and intergovernmental retrenchment in the European Union? Framing the EU’s answer to the COVID-19 pandemic. Chinese Political Science Review, 6(1), 1-19.
  • Schmidt, B. (2018). Hegemony: A conceptual and theoretical analysis. DOC Research Institute.
  • Silahtaroğlu, G., Baykal, E., & Canbolat, Z. N. (2020). Weekly Emotional Changes Amidst COVID-19: Turkish Experience. Ekonomi İşletme ve Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 280-304.
  • Taskinsoy, J. (2020). Diminishing Dollar Hegemony: What Wars and Sanctions Failed to Accomplish, COVID-19 Has. COVID-19 Has (April 7, 2020).
  • Toosi, Nahal, and Natasha Bertrand. 2020. “Fears Rise That Trump Will Incite a Global Vaccine Brawl.” Politico, May 3. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/03/coronavirus- vaccine-trump-world-brawl-230142.
  • Viola, L. A. (2020). US Strategies of Institutional Adaptation in the Face of Hegemonic Decline. Global Policy, 11, 28-39.
  • Webb, M. C., & Krasner, S. D. (1989). Hegemonic stability theory: An empirical assessment. Review of International Studies, 15(2), 183-198.
Toplam 46 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Elif Baykal 0000-0002-4966-8074

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 27 Aralık 2021
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi 10 Eylül 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Baykal, E. (2021). What the Hegemonic Stability Theory Tell us About; the Test of Covid 19. Uluslararası Hukuk Ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.51524/uhusbad.993970
AMA Baykal E. What the Hegemonic Stability Theory Tell us About; the Test of Covid 19. UHUSBAD. Aralık 2021;3(2):11-25. doi:10.51524/uhusbad.993970
Chicago Baykal, Elif. “What the Hegemonic Stability Theory Tell Us About; The Test of Covid 19”. Uluslararası Hukuk Ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 3, sy. 2 (Aralık 2021): 11-25. https://doi.org/10.51524/uhusbad.993970.
EndNote Baykal E (01 Aralık 2021) What the Hegemonic Stability Theory Tell us About; the Test of Covid 19. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 3 2 11–25.
IEEE E. Baykal, “What the Hegemonic Stability Theory Tell us About; the Test of Covid 19”, UHUSBAD, c. 3, sy. 2, ss. 11–25, 2021, doi: 10.51524/uhusbad.993970.
ISNAD Baykal, Elif. “What the Hegemonic Stability Theory Tell Us About; The Test of Covid 19”. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 3/2 (Aralık 2021), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.51524/uhusbad.993970.
JAMA Baykal E. What the Hegemonic Stability Theory Tell us About; the Test of Covid 19. UHUSBAD. 2021;3:11–25.
MLA Baykal, Elif. “What the Hegemonic Stability Theory Tell Us About; The Test of Covid 19”. Uluslararası Hukuk Ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 3, sy. 2, 2021, ss. 11-25, doi:10.51524/uhusbad.993970.
Vancouver Baykal E. What the Hegemonic Stability Theory Tell us About; the Test of Covid 19. UHUSBAD. 2021;3(2):11-25.

Cited By

20472   1903718612 18578 1855718501  17353      18731    18926   20416  18968 17352