Uluslararası İlişkiler Düşüncesinde “Dünya Barışı”: Immanuel Kant ve Zhao Tingyang Felsefesi Üzerine Bir Karşılaştırma

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 55, 3 - 18, 01.09.2017

Filiz Çoban Oran Cemre Pekcan

https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.513494

Cited By: 2

Öz

Bu çalışma, Uluslararası İlişkiler düşüncesinde yaygın olarak kabul gören Batı geleneği ve Batı-dışı geleneğin uzlaşmazlığı iddiasına karşı Immanuel Kant’ın aydınlanma felsefesinin ve Zhao Tingyang’ın çağdaş bir yorum getirdiği kadim Çin’in tianxia felsefesinin “dünya barışı” kavramı üzerine bir karşılaştırma yapmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, öncelikle iki kozmopolitan dünya görüşünün temel kavramlarına açıklık getirilmektedir. Bu kavramlardan hareketle bu iki görüş açısından dünya barışının sürekliliğinin koşulları araştırılmaktadır. Bu normatif karşılaştırma sonucunda Uluslararası İlişkiler literatürüne Çin ve Batı düşüncesini ‘dünya barışı’ kavramı üzerinde buluşturan ve uzlaştıran özgün bir teorik katkı yapılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Batı-dışı Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, Kosmopolitanizm, Tianxia, Barış Çalışmaları, Çin Düşüncesi

“World Peace” in International Relations Thought: A Comparison of Immanuel Kant and Zhao Tingyang Philosophy

Öz

To challenge widely accepted claims regarding irreconcilability of the Western and Non-Western traditions in International Relations thought, this study aims to make a comparison on the concept of ‘world peace’ inImmanuel Kant’s enlightenment philosophy and Zhao Tingyang’s modern interpretation of ancient Chine’s tianxia philosophy. In accordance with this purpose, first it focuses to shedding a light on the main notions of these two cosmopolitan world views. With a departure from these notions, it searches the main principles of world peace in these two perspectives. As a result of this normative comparison, it makes an original theoretical contributionto International Relations literature which meets and reconciles Chinese thought with Western thought on the concept of ‘world peace’. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Non-western International Relations Theories, Cosmopolitanism, Tianxia, Peace Studies, Chinese Thought

Kaynakça

• Acharya, Amitav ve Barry Buzan. “Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction”, Amitav Acharya ve Barry
• Buzan (der.), Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives On and Beyond Asia, Routledge, 2010, s.1-26.
• Barash, David P. Approaches to Peace: A Reader in Peace Studies, NY, Oxford University Press, 2013.
• Behera, Navnita Chadha. “Reimagining IR in India”, Amitav Acharya ve Barry Buzan (der.), Non Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives On and Beyond Asia, Routledge, 2010, s.92-117.
• Bernstein, Richard ve Ross Munro. The Coming Conflict with China, NY, Vintage Books, 1997.
• Bilgin, Pınar. “The ‘Western-Centrism’of Security Studies: Blind Spot or Constitutive Practice?”, Security Dialogue, 2010, Cilt 41, No.6, s.615-622.
• Bilgin, Pınar. “Thinking Past ‘Western’IR?”, Third World Quarterly, Cilt 29, No.1, 2008, s.5-23.
• Callahan, William A. “Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-hegemonic or a New Hegemony?”, International Studies Review, Cilt 10, 2008, s.749-761.
• Callahan, William A. “Tianxia, Empire and the World: Soft Power and China’s Foreign Policy Discourse in the 21st Century”, BICC Working Paper Series, British Inter-University China Centre, No.1, 2007.
• Caranti, Luigi. “Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace? Reflections on the Realist Critique of Kant’s Project”, Journal of Human Rights, Cilt 5, No.3, 2006, s.341-353.
• Carlson, Allen. “Moving Beyond Sovereignty? A Brief Consideration of Recent Changes in China’s Approach to International Order and the Emergence of the Tianxia Concept”, Journal of Contemporary China, Cilt 20, No.68, 2011, s.89-102.
• Cheng, Joseph Y. S. “Convincing the World of China’s Tradition to Pursue Universal Harmony”, Journal of Chinese Political Science, Cilt 17, No.2, 2012, s.165-185.
• Ching, Julia. “Chinese Ethics and Kant”, Philosophy East and West, Cilt 28, No.2, Sinological Torque (Apr. 1978), s.161-172.
• Davis, Michael C. “Constitutionalism and Political Culture: The Debate over Human Rights and Asian Values”, 11 Harvard Human Rights Journal, 109, 1998, s.109-147.
• Eisenstadt, S. N. “Multiple Modernities”, Daedalus, Cilt 129, No.1, December 2000, s.1-29.
• Engle, Karen. “Culture And Human Rights: The Asian Values Debate In Context”, 32 N.Y.U. J. International Law. & Politics.291, 2000, s.291-333.
• Friedman, Edward. “Immanuel Kant’s Relevance to an Enduring Asia-Pacific Peace”, Edward Friedman ve Barrett L. McCormick (der.), What if China Doesn’t Democratize? Implications for War and Peace, NY, M. E. Sharpe, 2000, s.224-252.
• Geeraerts, Gustaaf ve Men Jing. “International Relations Theory in China”, Global Society, Cilt 15, No.3, 2001, s.251-276.
• Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Jonas Nordkavelle ve Håvard Strand. “Peace Research—Just the Study of War?” Journal of Peace Research, No.51, March 2014, s.145–158.
• Goertz, Gary, Paul F. Diehl ve Alexandru Balas. The Puzzle of Peace: The Evolution of Peace in the International System, NY, Oxford University Press, 2016.
• Guoli, Liu. “Domestic Sources of China’s Emerging Grand Strategy”, Journal of Asian and African Studies, Cilt 43, No.5, 2008, s.543-561.
• Hasgüler, Mehmet ve M. Bülent Uludağ. Uluslararası Örgütler, Ankara, Nobel Yayınevi, 2005.
• Hui, Victoria Tin-bor. “Toward a Confucian Multicultural Approach to a Liberal World Order: Insights from Historical East Asia”, 99 American Society of International Law, Cilt 99, 2005, s.413-416.
• Huntington, Samuel P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, NY, Simon&Schuster, 2011.
• Ikenberry, John. “The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive?”, International Affairs, Cilt 87, No.1, 2008, s.23-37
• Johnston, Alastair Iain. “What (If Anything) Does East Asia Tell Us About International Relations Theory?”, Annual Review of Political Science, Cilt 15, s.53-78.
• Kant, Immanuel. Seçilmiş Yazılar, İstanbul, Remzi Kitabevi, 1984.
• Kant, Immanuel. “Aydınlanma Nedir Sorusuna Yanıt (1784)”, Immanuel Kant (der.), Seçilmiş Yazılar, İstanbul, Remzi Kitabevi, 1984, s.211-221.
• Kant, Immanuel. “Sürekli (Ebedi) Barış Üstüne Felsefi Bir Deneme (1795)”, Immanuel Kant (der.), Seçilmiş Yazılar, İstanbul, Remzi Kitabevi, 1984, s.224-266.
• Kant, Immanuel. Ahlak Metafiziğinin Temellendirilmesi, Ankara, Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, 2002.
• Kleingeld, Pauline. “Approaching Perpetual Peace: Kant’s Defence of a League of States and his Ideal of a World Federation”, European Journal of Philosophy, Cilt 12, No.3, 2004, s.304-325.
• Lucht, Marc. “Toward Lasting Peace: Kant on Law, Public Reason, and Culture”, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Cilt 68, No.1, 2009, s.303-326.
• Noesselt, Nele. “Is There a Chinese School of IR?”, GIGA Working Papers, No.188, 2012.
• Qin, Yaqing. “Why There is no Chinese International Relations Theory”, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Cilt 7, 2007, s.313-340.
• Reihman, Gregory M. “Categorically Denied: Kant’s Criticism of Chinese Philosophy”, Journal of Chinese Philosophy, Cilt 33, No.1, 2006, s.51-65.
• Ross, Robert. “Balance of Power Politics and the Rise of China: Accommodation and Balancing in East Asia”, Security Studies, Cilt 15, No.3, 2006, s.355-395
• Shambaugh, David. “International Relations Studies in China: History, Trends and Prospects”, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Cilt 11, No.3, 2011, s.339-372.
• Shani, Giorgio. “Towards a Post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical International Relations Theory”, International Studies Review, Cilt 10, No.4, 2008, s.722-734.
• Smith, Karen. “Has Africa Got Anything to Say? African Contributions to the Theoretical Development of International Relations”, The Round Table, Cilt 98, No.402, 2009, s.269-284.
• Suri, Manik V. “Conceptualizing China Within the Kantian Peace”, Harvard International Law Journal, Cilt 54, No.1, Winter 2013, s.219-232.
• Tong, Shijun. “Chinese Thought and Diological Universalism”, Gerard Delanty (der.), Europe and Asia Beyond East and West, Routledge, 2006, s.305-316.
• Wang, Fei-Ling. “Between Tianxia and Westphalia: Chinese Searches its Position in the World”, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seatle, 2011.
• Wang, Gungwu. Renewal: The Chinese State and the New Global History, The Chinese University Press, 2013.
• Webel, Charles ve Johan Galtung (der.). Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies, NY, Routledge, 2009.
• Yan, Xuetong.Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power,Princeton University Press, 2011.
• Yurdusev, Nuri. “Uluslararası İlişkiler Öncesi”, Atila Eralp(der.), Devlet, Sistem ve Kimlik: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Temel Yaklaşımlar, İletişim Yayınları, 1996, s. 47-51.
• Zhang, Yongjin. “China’s Entry into International Society: Beyond the Standart of ‘Civilisation’”, Review of International Studies, Cilt 17, No.1, 1991, s.3-16.
• Zhang, Yongjin ve Teng-chi Chang.Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations, Routledge, 2016.
• Zhao, Tingyang. “All-Under-Heaven and Methodological Relationism: An Old Story and New World Peace”, Fred Dallmayr veZhao Tingyang (der.), Contemporary Chinese Political Thought: Debates and Perspectives, The University Press of Kentucy, 2012, s.46-66.
• Zhao Tingyang. “Chinese World Outlook: All-under-Heaven System”, Zhenglai Deng (der.) Globalization and Localization: The Chinese Perspective, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2011, s.139-155.
• Zhao Tingyang. “Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept ‘All-under-Heaven’”, Social IdentitiesCilt12, No.1, 2006, s.29-41.
• Zhao, Tingyang. The Tianxia System: An Introduction to the Philosophy of a World Institution, China Renmin University Press, 2011.
• Zhao, Tingyang. “The Concept of All-under-heaven: A Semantic and Historical Introduction”, http://www.doc88.com/p-998593945884.html (Erişim Tarihi15 Eylül 2015).
• Zhao, Tingyang. “A Political World Philosophy in terms of All-Under-Heaven (Tian-xia)”, Diogenes, Cilt 56, No.5, 2009, s.5-18.
• Zheng, Feng. “Debating the Chinese Theory of International Relations”, Fred Dallmayr ve Zhao Tingyang (der), Contemporary Chinese Political Thought: Debates and Perspectives, The University Press of Kentucy, 2012, s.67-87.
• Zhou, Lain. “The Most Fashionable and the Most Relevant: A Review of Contemporary Chinese Political Philosophy”, Diogenes, Cilt 56, No.1, 2009, s.128-137.