ULUSLARARASI HUKUK ÇERÇEVESİNDE GÜNEY ÇİN DENİZİ KRİZİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3, 54 - 80, 23.12.2017

Cemre Pekcan

Öz

Dünyada
her an çatışma yaşanabilecek en önemli bölgelerden biri olan Güney Çin Denizi’nde
Çin’in artan faaliyetleri, başta ABD olmak üzere büyük güçleri
endişelendirmektedir. Bölgenin stratejik konumu nedeniyle, Hindistan gibi
ülkelerin Çin’i dengelemek amacıyla soruna dâhil edilmeye çalışmasıyla sorun
giderek karmaşık bir hal almaktadır. Bu bağlamda makalede, Güney Çin Denizi
krizinin gelişimine ve tarafların hak iddialarına uluslararası hukuk
çerçevesinde değinilecek, ABD ve Hindistan’ın bölgedeki rolü ile birlikte
geleceğe dair olası sonuçlar değerlendirilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Güney Çin Denizi, Hindistan, ABD, Uluslararası Hukuk, Çin

Assessment of South China Sea Crisis within the Framework of International Law

Öz

China’s increasing activity in the South China Sea -
one of the most important hotspots in the World- concerns great powers, mainly
the US. Due to the strategic significance of the region, the problem becomes
more complex as countries such as India become more involved to the problem to counterbalance
China. In this context, development of the South China Sea crisis and
territorial claims of the parties will be analyzed within the framework of
international law in this article and the possible consequences of the role of
India and the US will be assessed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

South China Sea, India, the US, International Law, China.

Kaynakça

• 1982 BM Deniz Hukuku Sözleşmesi, http://denizmevzuat.udhb.gov.tr/dosyam/denizhukuku.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 26.04.2017). “2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea”, Centrel for International Law, https://goo.gl/MNKGb9, ( Erişim Tarihi: 26.04.2017). AKSAR, Yusuf, Evrensel Yargı Kuruluşları, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2007. BLANCHARD, Ben, “Duterte Aligns Philippines with China, Says US Has Lost”, Reuters, 20 October 2016, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-philippines-idUSKCN12K0AS, (Erişim Tarihi: 05.05.2017). BRODERICK, Kelsey, “Chinese Activities in the South China Sea: Implications for the American Pivot to Asia”, Project 2049 Institute, 2015, s.3. BURGESS, J. Peter, “The Politics of the South China Sea: Territoriality and International Law”, Security Dialogue, Vol: 34, No: 1, 2003, s.7-10. BUSZYNSKI, Leszek ve Christopher Roberts, eds., “The South China Sea and Australia’s Regional Security Environment”, National Security College Occasional Paper, No.5, 2013. CHANG, Gordon G., “Hillary Clinton Changes America’s China Policy”, Forbes, 28 July 2010, https://www.forbes.com/2010/07/28/china-beijing-asia-hillary-clinton-opinions-columnists-gordon-g-chang.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 15.05.2017). “China passports claim ownership of South China Sea and Taiwan”, The Guardian, 23 November 2012, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/nov/23/china-passports-ownership-sea-taiwan (Erişim Tarihi: 02.05.2017). COHEN, Zachary, “Photos reval growth of Chinese military bases in South China Sea”, CNN, 15 May 2016, http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/13/politics/china-military-south-china-sea-report/ (Erişim Tarihi: 09.05.2017). “Güney Çin Denizi Tahkim Davası (Filipinler Cumhuriyeti/Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti)”, çev. Selahattin Doğan, Küresel Bakış, Cilt: 6, Sayı: 21, 2016, s. 22. “Duterte bows to China’s demand not to raise flag on disputed island”, The Japan Times, April 13, 2017, http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/04/13/asia-pacific/duterte-bows-chinas-demand-not-raise-flag-disputed-island/#.WQzfhNryjIU, (Erişim Tarihi: 05.05.2017). ERYİĞİT, Musab, “Güney Çin Denizi’nde Sınır Anlaşmazlıkları ve ABD-ÇHC İlişkilerine Etkileri”, DÜBAM Yayınları, 2012. FORSBY, Andreas Boje, The South China Sea: A Breeding Ground for Geopolitical Rivalry, DIIS Report, Danish Institute for International Studies, 2016, s. 20. FRAVEL, M. Taylor, “US Policy Towards the Disputes in the South China Sea Since 1995”, Policy Report, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, 2014. GLASER, Bonnie S., “The Growing Militarisation of the South China Sea”, The Interpreter, 29 July 2015, http://www.lowyinterpreter.org/post/2015/07/29/The-growing-militarisation-of-the-South-China-Sea.aspx, (Erişim Tarihi: 17.05.2017). GRAHAM, Euan, “The Hague Tribuna’s South China Sea Ruling: Empty Provocation or Slow-Burning Influence”, Council of Councils, 18 August 2016, http://www.cfr.org/councilofcouncils/global_memos/p38227, (Erişim Tarihi: 09.05.2017). HÖRHAGER, Elisa I., “China-ASEAN Relations and the South China Sea: Beyond Balancing and Bandwagooning?”, Enrico Fels, Truong- Minh Vu, eds., Power Politics in Asia’s Contested Waters: Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea, Springer, 2016, s. 359-386. HUNT, Katie, “South China Sea: Court Rules in Favour of Philippines Over China”, CNN, 12 July 2016, http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/12/asia/china-philippines-south-china-sea/, (Erişim Tarihi: 09.05.2017). JASH, Amrita, “South China Sea in India’s Strategic Gambit: Interests and Policies”, SADF Focus, 15 November 2016, No: 23. KEYUAN, Zou, “Building a ‘Harmonious World’: A Mission Impossible”, The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, Vol: 30, No: 2, 2012. KIM, Jihyun, “Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea: Implications for Security in Asia and Beyond”, Strategic Studies Quarterly, 2015, s. 107-141. LAWRENCE, Susan V., US-China Relations: An Overview of Policy Issues, CRS Report for Congress, Congressional Research Service, 1 August 2013, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41108.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 15.05.2017). Lİ, Mingjiang, “China’s South China Sea Dilemma”, Sam Bateman-Ralf Emmers, eds., Security and International Politics in the South China Sea: Towards a Cooperative Manegement Regime, Routledge, 2009, s. 140-154. LUNN, Jon-Arabella Lang, “The South China Sea Dispute: July 2016 Update”, House of Commons Library Briefing Paper, No: 7481, 2016. MEARSHEİMER, John, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, 2001, New York: Norton. ORGANSKİ, A.F.K., World Politics, Alfred A Knopf, 2nd Edition, 1968. PEKCAN, Cemre, “Güney Çin Denizi Sorunu Çerçevesinde Çin-Hindistan İlişkileri”, ÇOMÜ Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1, No: 1, 2016, s.19-32. PETTY, Martin, “Vietnam Protesters Denounce China on Anniversary of Navy Battle”, Reuters, 14 March 2016, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-vietnam-idUSKCN0WG0C9, (Erişim Tarihi: 09.05.2017). Philippine’s Duterte calls Obama ‘son of a whore’”, Daily Mail, 5 September 2016, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-3774386/Philippines-Duterte-calls-Barack-Obama-son-whore.html (Erişim Tarihi: 09.05.2017). PHILLIPS, Tom to., “Beijing Rejects Tribunal’s Ruling in South China Sea Case”, The Guardian, 12 July 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/12/philippines-wins-south-china-sea-case-against-china (Erişim Tarihi: 09.05.2017). SALIL, Saloni, China’s Strategy in the South China Sea: Role of the United States and India, KW Publishers Pvt. Ltd, 2012. “South China Sea: Tribunal backs case against China brought by Philippines”, BBC News, 12 July 2016, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-36771749 (Erişim Tarihi: 26.04.2017). “Stirring up the South China Sea”, Asia Report, International Crisis Group, No: 223, 23 April 2012. TIEZZI, Shannon, “China’s Peaceful Rise and the South China Sea”, The Diplomat, 17 May 2014, http://thediplomat.com/2014/05/chinas-peaceful-rise-and-the-south-china-sea/ (Erişim Tarihi: 21.05.2017). TURKSANYI, Richard, “The long term perspective of the South China Sea Dispute”, Institute of Asian Studies, Policy Paper, 2013. TYSON, Ann Scott, “US Protests Chinese Shadowing in International Waters”, The Washington Post, 10 Marc 2009, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/ 2009/03/09/AR2009030900956.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.05.2017). “White Paper: China’s Peaceful Development Road”, State Council Information Office of China, http://www.china.org.cn/english/2005/Dec/152669.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 07.03.2015). WU, Shicun, Solving Disputes for Regional Cooperation and Development in the South China Sea: A Chinese Perspective, Chandos Publishing, 2013.