MOBİLYA SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Yıl 2020, Sayı: 26, 97 - 114, 13.01.2020

Muhittin Sağnak

https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.560283

Cited By: 2

Öz

Günümüzde, kuruluşlar, müşterilerin
gereksinimlerini karşılama hedefine yönelik olarak ekonomik faktörlerin yanı
sıra, çevresel ve sosyal faktörlere de önem vermektedirler. Sürdürülebilir
tedarik zinciri yönetimi olarak tanımlanan zincirin performans değerlendirmesi
de bütünsel bir yaklaşım gerektirmektedir. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışmada,
sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri performansının değerlendirmesini yapmak amacıyla
ekonomik, çevresel ve sosyal faktörleri dikkate alarak bir kavramsal çerçeve
geliştirilmiştir. Kavramsal çerçeve hem nitel, hem nicel faktörler
içermektedir. Faktörlerin göreceli önem seviyelerini hesaplamak amacı ile
Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHS) tekniği kullanılmıştır. Toplam
performans seviyesi ise, ağırlıklı puanlama yöntemi ile bulunmuştur.
Operasyonel maliyetler ve çevresel maliyetler en önemli faktörler olarak tespit
edilmiş ve mobilya sektöründe faaliyet gösteren kuruluşun toplam sürdürülebilir
tedarik zinciri yönetimi performansı hesaplanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sürdürülebilir Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi, Performans Değerlendirmesi, Çevresel Faktörler, Ekonomik Faktörler, Sosyal Faktörler, Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci

SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IN THE FURNITURE SECTOR

Öz

Nowadays,
organizations give importance to environmental and social factors as well as
economic factors in order to meet the needs of customers. The performance
evaluation of the chain, defined as sustainable supply chain management,
requires a holistic approach. In this context, in this study, a conceptual
framework has been developed by considering economic, environmental and social
factors in order to evaluate sustainable supply chain performance. The
conceptual framework includes both qualitative and quantitative factors. Fuzzy
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique was used to calculate the relative
importance weights of the factors. Total performance level was determined by
weighted scoring method. Operational costs and environmental costs were identified
as the most important factors, and the total sustainable supply chain
management performance of the organization operating in the furniture sector
was calculated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Performance Evaluation, Environmental Factors, Economic Factors, Social Factors, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

Kaynakça

• Ahi, P. ve Searcy, C. (2015). An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86 (1), 360-377.
• Ates, M.A., Bloemhof, J., van Raaij, E.M. ve Wynstra, F. (2012). Proactive Environmental Strategy in a Supply Chain Context: The Mediating Role of Investments. International Journal of Production Research, 50(4), 1079-1095.
• Beske, P. ve Seuring, S. (2014). Putting sustainability into supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 322-331.
• Caniato, F., Caridi, M., Crippa, L. ve Moretto, A. (2012). Environmental sustainability in fashion supply chains: an exploratory case based research. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 659-670.
• Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268-295.
• Carter, C.R. ve Rogers, D.S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387.
• Carter, C.R. ve Easton, P.L. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), 46-62.
• Chung, S.H., Lee, A.H. ve Pearn, W.L. (2005). Product mix optimization for semiconductor manufacturing based on AHP and ANP analysis. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25, 1144-1156.
• Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1-13.
• Dong, C., Shen, B., Chow, P.S., Yang, L. ve Ng, C.T. (2016). Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation. Annals of Operations Research, 240(2), 509-531.
• Duran, O. ve Aguilo, J. (2008). Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy-AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 1787-1794.
• Dünya Çevre ve Kalkınma Komisyonu (WCED) (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
• Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37-51.
• Feng, T., Zhao, G. ve Su, K. (2014). The Fit between Environmental Management Systems and Organisational Learning Orientation. International Journal of Production Research, 52(10), 2901-2914.
• Field, J.M. ve Sroufe, R.P. (2007). The Use of Recycled Materials In Manufacturing: Implications for Supply Chain Management and Operations Strategy. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4439-4463.
• Fisher, C., Bashyal, S. ve Bachman, B. (2012). Demographic impacts on environmentally friendly purchase behaviors. Journal of Targeting Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 20(3-4), 172-184.
• Flynn, B.B., Huo, B. ve Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58-71.
• Genovese, A., Acquaye, A.A., Figueroa, A. ve Koh, S.L. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega, 66, 344-357.
• Gimenez, C. ve Sierra, V. (2013). Sustainable supply chains: Governance mechanisms to greening suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 189-203.Glavas, A. ve Mish, J. (2015). Resources and capabilities of triple bottom line firms: going over old or breaking new ground? Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 623-642.
• Gold, S., Seuring, S. ve Beske, P. (2010a). Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, 230-245.
• Gold, S., Seuring, S. ve Beske, P. (2010b). The constructs of sustainable supply chain management – A content analysis based on published case studies. Progress in Industrial Ecology – An International Journal, 7(2), 114-137.
• Golicic, S.L. ve Smith, C.D. (2013). A meta-analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 78-95.
• Govindan, K., Jha, P.C., Agarwal, V. ve Darbari, J.D. (2019). Environmental management partner selection for reverse supply chain collaboration: A sustainable approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 236(2019), 784-797.
• Harangozó, G. ve Zilahy, G. (2015). Cooperation between business and non-governmental organizations to promote sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 89, 18-31.
• Hart, S.L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
• Hart, S.L. ve Dowell, G. (2011). Invited editorial: a natural-resource-based view of the firm fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464-1479.
• Hassini, E., Surti, C. ve Searcy, C. (2012). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 69-82.
• Heidrich, O. ve Tiwary, A. (2013). Environmental Appraisal of Green Production Systems: Challenges Faced by Small Companies Using Life Cycle Assessment. International Journal of Production Research, 51(19), 5884-5896.
• Heikkurinen, P. ve Mäkinen, J. (2018). Synthesising corporate responsibility on organizational and societal levels of analysis: an integrative perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(3), 589-607.
• Hsueh, C. (2015). A bilevel programming model for corporate social responsibility collaboration in sustainable supply chain management. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 73, 84-95.
• Kim, J., Park, K., Hwang, Y. ve Park, I. (2010). Sustainable Manufacturing: A Case Study of the Forklift Painting Process. International Journal of Production Research, 48(10), 3061-3078.
• Kleindorfer, P.R., Singhal, K. ve Wassenhove, L.N. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and Operations Management, 14(4), 482-492.
• Lin, Y.H. ve Tseng, M.L. (2016). Assessing the competitive priorities within sustainable supply chain management under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2133-2144.
• Linton, J.D., Klassen, R. ve Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1075-1082.
• Liu, S., Kasturiratne, D. ve Moizer, J. (2012). A hub-and-spoke model for multidimensional integration of green marketing and sustainable supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(4), 581-588.
• Luthra, S. ve Mangla, S.K. (2018). When strategies matter: adoption of sustainable supply chain management practices in an emerging economy’s context. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 138, 194-206.
• Luzzini, D., Brandon-Jones, E., Brandon-Jones, A. ve Spina, G. (2015). From sustainability commitment to performance: The role of intra- and inter-firm collaborative capabilities in the upstream supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 51-63.
• Mangla, S., Madaan, J. ve Chan, F.T. (2013). Analysis of flexible decision strategies for sustainability-focused green product recovery system. International Journal of Production Research, 51(11), 3428-3442.
• Manzini, R. ve Accorsi, R. (2013). The new conceptual framework for food supply chain assessment. Journal of Food Engineering, 115(2), 251-263.
• Margolis, J.D. ve Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.
• Memery, J., Megicks, P. ve Williams, J. (2005). Ethical and social responsibility issues in grocery shopping: a preliminary typology. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(4), 399-412.
• Moisander, J. ve Pesonen, S. (2002). Narratives of sustainable ways of living: constructing the self and the other as a green consumer. Management Decision, 40(4), 329-342.
• Newholm, T. ve Shaw, D. (2007). Studying the ethical consumer: a review of research. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 6(5), 253-270.
• Önüt, S., Kara, S.S. ve Işık, E. (2009). Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: A case study for a telecommunication company. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 3887-3895.
• Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the relationships between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply management and organizational sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 19-37.
• Rao, P. ve Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), 898-916.
• Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q. ve Lai, K.H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 1-15.
• Seuring, S. ve Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710.
• Seuring, S. ve Gold, S. (2013). Sustainability management beyond corporate boundaries: from stakeholders to performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 1-6.
• Sharma, A. ve Kearins, K. (2011). Interorganizational collaboration for regional sustainability: what happens when organizational representatives come together? The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(2), 168-203.
• Simpson, D. (2010). Use of Supply Relationships to Recycle Secondary Materials. International Journal of Production Research, 48(1), 227-249.
• Srivastava, S.K. (2007). Green supply chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53-80.
• Tanzil, D. ve Beloff, B.R. (2006). Assessing impacts: overview on sustainability indicators and metrics. Environmental Quality Management, 15(4), 41-56.
• Taticchi, P., Tonelli, F. ve Pasqualino, R. (2013). Performance measurement of sustainable supply chains. International Journal of Production & Performance Management, 62, 782-804.
• Taylor, K.M. ve Vachon, S. (2018). Empirical research on sustainable supply chains: IJPR’s contribution and research avenues. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 950-959.
• Tseng, M.L., Lim, K.M. ve Wong, W.P. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management: a closed-loop network approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(3), 436-461.
• Turban, D.B. ve Greening, D.W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.
• Turnhout, E., Hisschemoller, M. ve Eijsackers, H. (2007). Ecological indicators: between the two fires of science and policy. Ecological Indicators, 7, 215-228.
• Veleva, V. ve Ellenbecker, M. (2001). Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 519-549.
• Wolf, J. (2014). The relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119, 317-328.
• Xia, D., Chen, B. ve Zheng, Z. (2015). Relationships among circumstance pressure, green technology selection and firm performance Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 487-496
• Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information Control, 8, 338-353.
• Zhu, Q. ve Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265-289.
• Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., Sarkis, J. ve Lai, K.H. (2011). Evaluating green supply chain management among Chinese manufacturers from the ecological modernization perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 808-821.