Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Kırsal Topluluklarda Topluluk Kapasitesi ve Sosyal Sermaye İlişkisi: Erzurum Kırsalı Örneği

Yıl 2023, Sayı: 39, 75 - 91, 30.04.2023
https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.1160509

Öz

Bu çalışma, topluluk kapasitesi ve sosyal sermaye arasındaki ilişkiyi nicel verilerle ortaya koymayı amaçlamıştır. Bunun için Erzurum ili kırsal alanında 324 kişiyle tesadüfi örneklem metodu kullanılarak anket yapılmıştır. Nicel analizler için Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi kullanılmıştır. Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi sonuçları Topluluk Kapasitesi ile Sosyal Sermaye arasında pozitif yönlü çok yüksek düzeyde ilintinin olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Sosyal sermayenin “Güven” boyutunun Topluluk Kapasitesi’ni pozitif yönde ve çok yüksek düzeyde etkilediği görülmüştür. Kırsal alanda yaşayan bireyler kendi topluluk üyelerini dürüst ve güvenilir olarak görmektedir. Sosyal sermayenin bir diğer boyutu “Üyelikler ve Ağlar” Topluluk Kapasitesi’ni pozitif yönde ve çok yüksek düzeyde etkilemektedir. Bu durum kırsal alanda komşuluk ilişkilerinin ve yardımlaşmanın güçlü olduğunu göstermektedir. Yine “Kırsal Değerler ve Normlar” boyutu Topluluk Kapasitesi’ni pozitif yönde ve çok yüksek düzeyde etkilemektedir. Kırsal yaşam biçiminde dürüst olmak önemli bir değer olarak görülmektedir. Son olarak sosyal sermayenin “Aidiyet” boyutunun Topluluk Kapasitesi’ni pozitif yönde ve çok yüksek düzeyde etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Topluluk Kapasitesi kapsamında köyde yaşayan bireylerin birbirlerine karşı sadakat duydukları, komşuluk ilişkilerinin yüksek olduğu ve ortak yönlerinin yüksek olduğu görülmüştür.

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

Proje Numarası

Yok

Kaynakça

  • Aghion, P., & Durlauf, S. (2005). Handbook of economic growth. Elsevier.
  • Beggs, J., Haines, V., & Hurlbert, J. (1996). Revisiting the Rural‐Urban Contrast: Personal Networks in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Settings. Rural sociology, 61(2), 306-325.
  • Bentler, P., & Yuan, K. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate behavioral research, 34(2), 181-197.
  • Bordens, K., & Abbott, B. (2011). Research design and methods: A process approach. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique, Paris, Minuit, 1980. The translations from the original French texts are ours. JMB.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). Polity 1998. Bourdieu, Pierre: The forms of capital. Practical Reason. On the Theory of Action. içinde Cambridge.
  • Bourdieu, P. (2020). Outline of a Theory of Practice. The new social theory reader (s. 80-86). içinde Routledge.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage, Vol 4.
  • Bowen, G., Martin, J., Mancini, J., & Nelson, J. (2000). Community capacity: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Community Practice, 8(2), 1-21.
  • Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American journal of political science, 999-1023.
  • Bryden, J., & Hart, K. (2004). A new approach to rural development in Europe: Germany, Greece, Scotland, and Sweden. Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press.
  • Carroll, F. (2001). Social capital, local capacity building, and poverty reduction . (No. 3). Asian Development Bank.
  • Chaskin, R. (2001). Community capacity: A definition framework and implications from a comprehensive community initiative. Urban Affairs Review, 36(3), 292-323.
  • Chen, C., Chen, X., & Meindl, J. (1998). How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism. Academy of management review, 23(2), 285-304.
  • Cheung, G., & Rensvold, R. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, 95-120.
  • Coleman, J. (1994). Foundations of social theory. Harvard university press.
  • Fisman, R., & Khanna, T. (1999). Is trust a historical residue? Information flows and trust levels. 38(1), 79-92.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1996). rust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Simon and Schuster.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2000). Social capital and civil society. Available at SSRN 879582.
  • Grootaert, C., Narayan, D., Jones, V., & Woolcock, M. (2003). Integrated questionnaire for the measurement of social capital. The World Bank Social Capital Thematic Group.
  • Hershberger, S. L. (2003). The growth of structural equation modeling: 1994-2001. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(1), 35-46.
  • İlhan, M., & Çetin, B. (2014). LISREL ve AMOS programları kullanılarak gerçekleştirilen yapısal eşitlik modeli (yem) analizlerine ilişkin sonuçların karşılaştırılması. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 5(2), 26-42.
  • Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
  • Kahn, J. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances and applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 684-718.
  • Keskin, A., & Keleş, Ş. (2018). Formation of the social capital by its dimensions in rural areas of Erzurum province in Turkey. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND PLANT SCIENCES, 28(6), 1854-1867.
  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly journal of economics, 112(4), 1251-1288.
  • Kretzmann, J., & McKnight, J. (1993). Building communities from the inside out. Evanston, IL: Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Neighborhood Innovations Network. (s. 2-10). içinde
  • Lee, J., Árnason, A., Nightingale, A., & Shucksmith, M. (2005). Networking: social capital and identities in European rural development. Sociologia ruralis, 45(4), 269-283.
  • Lomax, R., & Schumacker, R. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. psychology press.
  • Lyon, F. (2000). Trust, networks and norms: The creation of social capital in agricultural economies in Ghana. World Development, 28(4), 663-681.
  • Lyons, T., & Reimer, B. (2006). A literature review of capacity frameworks: Six features of comparison. In National Rural Research Network Conference, Vol 8.
  • Marré, A., & Weber, B. (2010). Assessing community capacity and social capital in rural America: lessons from two rural observatories. Community Development, 41(1), 92-107.
  • Mayer, R., Davis, J., & Schoorman, F. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734.
  • Mellow, M. (2005). The Work of Rural Professionals: Doing the Gemeinschaft‐Gesellschaft Gavotte. 70(1), 50-69.
  • Molina‐Morales, F., & Martínez‐Fernández, M. (2010). Social networks: effects of social capital on firm innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2), 258-279.
  • Mulaik, S. (2009). Linear causal modeling with structural equations. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Narayan, D., & Cassidy, M. (2001). A dimensional approach to measuring social capital: development and validation of a social capital inventory. Current sociology, 49(2), 59-102.
  • Olweus, D. (1995). Bullying or peer abuse at school: Facts and intervention. Current directions in psychological science, 4(6), 196-200.
  • Poole, D. (1997). Building community capacity to promote social and public health: challenges for universities. Health & Social Work, 22(3), 163.
  • Putnam, R. (1992). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton university press.
  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. (2006). On multilevel model reliability estimation from the perspective of structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(1), 130-141.
  • Schreiber, B., Stage, F., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-337.
  • Siisiainen, M. (2003). Two concepts of social capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam. International journal of contemporary sociology, 40(2), 183-204.
  • Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Troughton, M. (1999). Redefining “rural” for the twenty-first century. Health in rural settings: Contexts for action, 21-38.
  • Tütengil, C. (1983). Kırsal Türkiye'nin yapısı ve sorunları. İstanbul: Gerçek.
  • Wetson, R., & Gore Jr, P. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation model. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719-751.
  • Yılmaz, V. (2005). Tüketici memnuniyeti ve ihtiyaçlarının marka sadakatine etkisi: sigara markasına uygulanması. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1, 257-271.
  • Ziembroski, J., Fluharty, C., Mueller, K., Weber, B., Dabson, B., & Shambaugh-Miller, M. (2005). What is a healthy rural community?: Understanding community capacity. August.

COMMUNITY CAPACITY AND SOCIAL CAPITAL RELATIONSHIP IN RURAL COMMUNITIES: THE CASE OF ERZURUM RURAL

Yıl 2023, Sayı: 39, 75 - 91, 30.04.2023
https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.1160509

Öz

Proje Numarası

Yok

Kaynakça

  • Aghion, P., & Durlauf, S. (2005). Handbook of economic growth. Elsevier.
  • Beggs, J., Haines, V., & Hurlbert, J. (1996). Revisiting the Rural‐Urban Contrast: Personal Networks in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Settings. Rural sociology, 61(2), 306-325.
  • Bentler, P., & Yuan, K. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate behavioral research, 34(2), 181-197.
  • Bordens, K., & Abbott, B. (2011). Research design and methods: A process approach. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique, Paris, Minuit, 1980. The translations from the original French texts are ours. JMB.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). Polity 1998. Bourdieu, Pierre: The forms of capital. Practical Reason. On the Theory of Action. içinde Cambridge.
  • Bourdieu, P. (2020). Outline of a Theory of Practice. The new social theory reader (s. 80-86). içinde Routledge.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage, Vol 4.
  • Bowen, G., Martin, J., Mancini, J., & Nelson, J. (2000). Community capacity: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Community Practice, 8(2), 1-21.
  • Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American journal of political science, 999-1023.
  • Bryden, J., & Hart, K. (2004). A new approach to rural development in Europe: Germany, Greece, Scotland, and Sweden. Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press.
  • Carroll, F. (2001). Social capital, local capacity building, and poverty reduction . (No. 3). Asian Development Bank.
  • Chaskin, R. (2001). Community capacity: A definition framework and implications from a comprehensive community initiative. Urban Affairs Review, 36(3), 292-323.
  • Chen, C., Chen, X., & Meindl, J. (1998). How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism. Academy of management review, 23(2), 285-304.
  • Cheung, G., & Rensvold, R. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, 95-120.
  • Coleman, J. (1994). Foundations of social theory. Harvard university press.
  • Fisman, R., & Khanna, T. (1999). Is trust a historical residue? Information flows and trust levels. 38(1), 79-92.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1996). rust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Simon and Schuster.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2000). Social capital and civil society. Available at SSRN 879582.
  • Grootaert, C., Narayan, D., Jones, V., & Woolcock, M. (2003). Integrated questionnaire for the measurement of social capital. The World Bank Social Capital Thematic Group.
  • Hershberger, S. L. (2003). The growth of structural equation modeling: 1994-2001. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(1), 35-46.
  • İlhan, M., & Çetin, B. (2014). LISREL ve AMOS programları kullanılarak gerçekleştirilen yapısal eşitlik modeli (yem) analizlerine ilişkin sonuçların karşılaştırılması. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 5(2), 26-42.
  • Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
  • Kahn, J. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances and applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 684-718.
  • Keskin, A., & Keleş, Ş. (2018). Formation of the social capital by its dimensions in rural areas of Erzurum province in Turkey. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND PLANT SCIENCES, 28(6), 1854-1867.
  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly journal of economics, 112(4), 1251-1288.
  • Kretzmann, J., & McKnight, J. (1993). Building communities from the inside out. Evanston, IL: Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Neighborhood Innovations Network. (s. 2-10). içinde
  • Lee, J., Árnason, A., Nightingale, A., & Shucksmith, M. (2005). Networking: social capital and identities in European rural development. Sociologia ruralis, 45(4), 269-283.
  • Lomax, R., & Schumacker, R. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. psychology press.
  • Lyon, F. (2000). Trust, networks and norms: The creation of social capital in agricultural economies in Ghana. World Development, 28(4), 663-681.
  • Lyons, T., & Reimer, B. (2006). A literature review of capacity frameworks: Six features of comparison. In National Rural Research Network Conference, Vol 8.
  • Marré, A., & Weber, B. (2010). Assessing community capacity and social capital in rural America: lessons from two rural observatories. Community Development, 41(1), 92-107.
  • Mayer, R., Davis, J., & Schoorman, F. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734.
  • Mellow, M. (2005). The Work of Rural Professionals: Doing the Gemeinschaft‐Gesellschaft Gavotte. 70(1), 50-69.
  • Molina‐Morales, F., & Martínez‐Fernández, M. (2010). Social networks: effects of social capital on firm innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2), 258-279.
  • Mulaik, S. (2009). Linear causal modeling with structural equations. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Narayan, D., & Cassidy, M. (2001). A dimensional approach to measuring social capital: development and validation of a social capital inventory. Current sociology, 49(2), 59-102.
  • Olweus, D. (1995). Bullying or peer abuse at school: Facts and intervention. Current directions in psychological science, 4(6), 196-200.
  • Poole, D. (1997). Building community capacity to promote social and public health: challenges for universities. Health & Social Work, 22(3), 163.
  • Putnam, R. (1992). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton university press.
  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. (2006). On multilevel model reliability estimation from the perspective of structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(1), 130-141.
  • Schreiber, B., Stage, F., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-337.
  • Siisiainen, M. (2003). Two concepts of social capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam. International journal of contemporary sociology, 40(2), 183-204.
  • Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Troughton, M. (1999). Redefining “rural” for the twenty-first century. Health in rural settings: Contexts for action, 21-38.
  • Tütengil, C. (1983). Kırsal Türkiye'nin yapısı ve sorunları. İstanbul: Gerçek.
  • Wetson, R., & Gore Jr, P. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation model. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719-751.
  • Yılmaz, V. (2005). Tüketici memnuniyeti ve ihtiyaçlarının marka sadakatine etkisi: sigara markasına uygulanması. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1, 257-271.
  • Ziembroski, J., Fluharty, C., Mueller, K., Weber, B., Dabson, B., & Shambaugh-Miller, M. (2005). What is a healthy rural community?: Understanding community capacity. August.
Toplam 50 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Ekonomi
Bölüm MAKALELER
Yazarlar

Şerafettin Keleş 0000-0002-5147-0825

Proje Numarası Yok
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Nisan 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Sayı: 39

Kaynak Göster

APA Keleş, Ş. (2023). Kırsal Topluluklarda Topluluk Kapasitesi ve Sosyal Sermaye İlişkisi: Erzurum Kırsalı Örneği. Uluslararası İktisadi Ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi(39), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.1160509


______________________________________________________

Adres: KTÜ-İİBF. Oda No:213    61080 TRABZON
e-mailuiiidergisi@gmail.com