Broiler Tavuklarda Yeme İlave Edilen Saccharomyces cerevisiae ve Fitaz’ın Büyüme Performansı ve Plazma Biyokimyasal Parametreleri Üzerine Etkileri

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 1-2, 15 - 23, 12.12.2015

Bayram Suzer Burcin Altınbas Nilay Seyıdoglu Ilker Arıcan Abdulkadir Orman Huseyin Yıldız Murat Yalcın

https://doi.org/10.30782/uluvfd.385412

Cited By: 1

Öz

Saccharomyces cerevisiae ve fitaz ayrı ayrı olarak broiler tavuklarda yem katkısı amacıyla kullanılmakta-dır. Bu araştırma, farklı oranlarda S. cerevisiae’nin ve fitaz kombinasyonunun broiler tavuklarda büyüme per-formansı, plazma biyokimyasal parametreleri ve plazma enzim aktiviteleri üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmek için yapıldı. Çalışma boyunca hayvanlar ad libitum beslendi. 1 günlük yaşta 600 adet broiler tavuk rastgele se-çildi ve 8 gruba sırasıyla şu şekilde ayrıldı: Kontrol (C); Fitaz (P) (200 g Fitaz 1000 kg yeme ilave edildi); S. cerevisiae (Y1) (% 0,1 oranında S. cerevisiae yeme ilave edildi); Y1+P (grup Y1 ve P’nin kombinasyonu); Y2 (% 0,2 oranında S. cerevisiae yeme ilave edildi); Y2+P (grup Y2 ve P’nin kombinasyonu); Y4 (% 0,4 oranında S. cerevisiae yeme ilave edildi); Y4+P (grup Y4 ve P’nin kombinasyonu). Çalışmanın sonlandırıldığı 42. günde, her gruptan rastgele seçilen 15 adet hayvanın brahial veninden kan örnekleri alındı. Kan örneklerinin plazması ayrıldı ve biyokimyasal parametreler ve enzim aktivitelerinin ölçülmesi için kullanıldı.

S. cerevisiae, tek başına ve S.cerevisiae ve fitaz kombinasyonları, Y4 grubu hariç, özellikle 6. haftada tavuklarda canlı ağırlık ve canlı ağırlık kazanımını arttırdı. Sadece fitaz ve/veya S. cerevisiae ve kombinasyonlarının verildiği tavuklarda plazma trigliserid, total kolesterol, LDL_kolesterol, glukoz, kalsiyum ve GGT enzimi azalırken, hayvanlarda yüksek düzeyde HDL-kolesterol, fosfor ve ALT enzimi tespit edildi. Diğer taraftan, tavuklarda sadece fitaz ve/veya S. cerevisiae ve kombinasyonlarının yem katkısı olarak kullanılması, hematokrit, plazma protein ve AST enzim değerlerini değiştirmedi. Sonuçlar fitaz ve S. cerevisiae’nın yalnız ve/veya kombinasyonlarının yem katkısı olarak kullanılmasının büyüme performansı ve canlı ağırlık kazanımını arttırdığını göster-mektedir. Böylece, S.cerevisiae ve fitaz kombinasyonları büyümeyi arttırıcı olarak kullanılabilir. Ancak, maya ve fitaz kombinasyonlarının büyümedeki etkisinin ortaya konması için daha fazla çalışmanın yapılması gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biyokimyasal parametreler broiler tavuk, büyüme performansı, enzim aktiviteleri, Fitaz, S. cerevisiae

The Effects of Supplemental Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Phytase on Growth Performances and Plasma Biochemical Parameters of Broiler Chickens

Öz

Saccharomyces cerevisiae and phytase can be used as a feed supplement in combination or alone for broiler feeding. An experiment was performed to study the effect of supplemental different ratio S. cerevisiae and phytase combination on growth performances, plasma biochemical parameters and plasma enzyme activities of broiler chickens. Animal were feed ad libitum through the study. Sixty hundred 1 day-old broiler chicks were randomly selected and distributed into eight groups as control (C); phytase (P) (added 200 g Pyhase to 1000 kg of diet); S. cerevisiae (Y1) (added 0.1% S. cerevisiae of the diet); Y1+P (combination of group Y1 and P); S. cerevisiae (Y2) (added 0.2% S. cerevisiae of the diet); Y2+P (Combination of Y2 and P); Y4 (added 0.4% S. cerevisiae of the diet); Y4+P (Combination of Y4 and P) respectively. At the end of the study, blood samples were collected from 15 randomly selected broiler chickens from each group through the brachial vein on the 42nd day of the experiment. Plasma were separated and used for measurement of plasma biochemical parameters and enzyme activities. S.cerevisiae alone and combination of Phytase and S. cerevisiae increased body weight and body weight gain of broiler, especially in 6th week, except in group Y4. Although, the broiler chickens supple-mented with just phytase or/and S. cerevisiae and their combination had lower plasma triglyceride, total choles-terol, LDL-cholesterol, glucose, calcium and GGT enzyme activity , they had higher HDL-cholesterol, phospho-rus and ALT enzyme. Moreover, supplementation with just phytase or/and S. cerevisiae and their combination did not change the hematocrit, plasma total protein and AST enzyme levels of the broiler chickens. These results demonstrated that phytase and S. cerevisiae alone or/and their combination improved growth performance and body weight gain of the broiler chickens. So, S.cerevisiae and phytase combination may be used as an growth enhancer. However, more studies would be necessary to obtain the effects of supplementing yeast and phytase combination on growth.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biochemical parameters, Broiler chicken, Growth performance, Enzyme activities, S. cerevisiae, Phytase

Kaynakça

• Abdelrahman, M.M., 2013. Effects of feeding dry fat and yeast culture on broiler chicken perfor-mance. Turk J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 37, 31–37.
• Akhavan-Salamat, H., Ghasemi, H.A., Khaltabati-Farahani, A.H., Kazemi-Bonchenari, M., 2011. The effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on per-formance and nutrients digestibility in broilers fed with diet containing different levels of phosphorus. Afr. J. Biotechnology, 10, 7526–7533.
• Aluwong, T., Hassan, B.F., Raji, M.A, , Kawu, M.U, Dzenda, T, Ayo J.O., 2013. Effect of Different Levels of Supplemental Yeast on Performance Indi-ces and Serum Biochemistry of Broiler Chickens. African Journal of Biotechnology, 12, 5480–5485.
• Bekatorou, A., Psarianos, C., Koutinas, A.A., 2006. "Production of Food Grade Yeasts". Food Techno-logy Biotechnology, 44, 407–415.
• Biehl, R.R., Baker, D.H., Deluca, H.F., 1995. 1α-hydroxylated cholecalciferol compounds act additi-vely with microbial phytase to improve phosphorus, zinc and manganese utilization in chicks fed soy-based diets. J. Nutr., 125, 2407–2416.
• Bradley, G.L., Savage, T.F., 1958. The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on turkey poult perfor-mance and the retention of gross energy and selected minerals. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 55, 1–7.
• Brake, J., 1991. Lack of effect of all live yeast cultu-re on broiler, breeders and progeny Performance. Poult. Sci., 70, 1037–1039.
• Cowieson, A.J., Wilcock, P., Bedford, M.R., 2011. Super-dosing effects of phytase in poultry and other monogastrics. World's Poultry Science Journal, 67, 225–236.
• Dawson, B., Trapp, R.G., 2004. Basic&Clinical Biostatistics, In. Lange Medical Books/McGraw International Editions, 3rd ed., New York, pp, 308-315.
• Derebasi, E., Demir, E., 2004. Effects of the supple-mentation of probiotic , prebiotic and organic acid in triticale and soybean meal based broiler diets. XXII Worlds Poultry Congress, Istanbul, Turkey.
• Dowdy, S., Wearden, S., 1981. Statistics for Rese-arch. John Wiley & Sons Press-New York, pp, 262–274.
• Eckles, C.H., Williams, V.M., 1924. Yeast as a supp-lementary feed for lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci., 8, 89–93.
• Erdman, J.W., 1989. Phytic acid interactions with divalent cations in Foods and Gastrointestinal tract. In. Dintizis, F.R., Laszlo, J.A. (Eds.), Mineral ab-sorption in monogastric gastrointestinal tract. Ple-num Press, New York, pp. 161–170.
• Erkek, R., Unlu, H.B., 2003. Fitaz Enziminin Etlik Piliçlerin Beslenmesinde Kullanımı, Hayvansal Üre-tim, 44, 10–19.
• El-Arab, A.E., Foheid, S., El-Said, M., 2009. Effect of yeast and botanical β-glucan on serum lipid profile and cecum probiotic bacteria using rats fed choles-terol diet. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci., 59, 169–174.
• Fuller, R., 1977. The importance of lactobacilli in maintaining normal microbial balance in the crop. British Poultry Sci., 18,18–94.
• Hassanein, M.S., Soliman, N.K., 2010. Effect of Probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) Adding to Diets on Intestinal Microflora and Performance of Hy-Line Layers Hens. Journal of American Sci., 6, 159–169.
• Hayat, J., Savage, T.F., Mirosh, L.W., 1993. The reproductive performance of two genetically distinct lines of medium white hens when fed breeder diets with and without a yeast culture containing Saccha-romyces cerevisiae. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 43,291–301.
• Hiss, S., Sauerwein, H., 2003. Influence of dietary ss-glucan on growth performance, lymphocyte proli-feration, specific immune response and haptoglobin plasma concentrations in pigs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 87, 2–11.
• Johnston, S.L., 2000. The effect of phytase on nutri-ent availability in diets for swine and poultry. Ph,D. Thesis, Louisiana State Univ, Baton Rouge.
• Johnston, S.L., Williams, S.B., Southern, L.L., Bidner, T.D., Bunting, L.D., Matthews, J.O., Olcott, B.M., 2004. Effect of phytase addition and dietary calcium and phosphorus levels on plasma metaboli-tes and ileal and total-tract nutrient digestibility in pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 82,705–714.
• Kabir, S.M.L., 2009. The Role of Probiotics in Po-ultry. Industry Int. J. Mol. Sci., 10, 3531– 3546. Kim, S.H., Yu, D.J., Park, S.Y., Lee, S.J., Ryu, K.S., 2002. Effects of single or mixed feeding of lactoba-cillus and yeast on performance, nutrient digestibility intestinal microflora, and fecal NH3 gas emission in laying hens. Korean Journal of Poultry Sci., 29, 225–231.
• Levic, J., Djuragic, O., Sredanovic, S., 2006. Phytase as a factor of improving broilers growth perfor-mance and environmental protection. Archiva Zoo-technica, 9, 95-100.
• Liu, N., Ru, Y., Wang, J., Xu, T., 2010. Effect of dietary sodium phytate and microbial phytase on the lipase activity and lipid metabolism of broiler chickens. Br. J. Nutr., 103, 862–8.
• Mannan, F., Ahmed, H.H., Estefan, S.F., Sharaf, H.A., Eskander, E.F., 2005. Saccharomyces cerevi-siae intervention for relieving flutamide-induced hepatoxicity in male rats. Pharmazie, 60, 689–695.
• Monika, B.T., Roman, S., Anna, P., 2012. The level of major proteins and minerals in the blood serum of chickens fed diets with pure cellulose. Folio biologi-ca (Krakow), 60, 65–70.
• National Research Council – NRC, 1994.
• Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. Ed., National Acad., Press, Washington-DC. Nilson, A., Peralta, J.M.F., Miazzo, R.D., 2004. Use of brewer yeast (S,cerevisiae) to replace part of the vitamin mineral premix in finisher broiler diets. XXII World Poultry Congress, Istanbul, Turkey
• Onifade, A.A., Odunsi, A.A., Babatunde, G.M., Olorede, B.R., Muma, E., 1999. Comparison of the supplemental effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and antibiotics in low-protein and high fibre diets fed to broiler chickens. Arch. Tierernahr, 52, 29–39.
• Onwurah, F.B., Amaefule, K.U., Ahamefule, F.O., 2014. Effect of Baker’s Yeast (Saccharomycescere-visiae) Inclusion in Feed and in DrinkingWater on Performance of Broiler Birds. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 4, 144-151.
• Onyango, E.M., Bedford, M.R., Adeola, O., 2004. The yeast production system in which Escherichia coli phytase is expressed may affect growth perfor-mance, bone ash, and nutrient use in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci., 83, 421–427.
• Ozsoy, B., Yalcin, S., 2011. The effects of dietary supplementation of yeast culture on performance, blood parameters and immune system in broiler turkeys. J. Ankara Univ. Vet. Fac., 58, 117–122.
• Paryad, A., Mahmoudi, M., 2008. Effect of different levels of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevi-siae) on performance, blood constituents and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(12), 835–842.
• Pirgozliev, V., Karadas, F., Pappas, A., Acamovic, T., Bedford, M.R., 2010. The effect on performance, energy metabolism and hepatic carotenoid content when phytase supplemented diets were fed to broiler chickens. Research in Veterinary Sci., 89, 203–205.
• Pouraziz, S., Aghdam Shahryar, H., Chekani-Azar, S., 2013. Effects of Dietary Saccharomyces cerevi-siae and Butyric Acid Glycerides on Performance and Serum Lipid Level of Broiler Chickens. J. Kaf-kas Univ. Vet. Fac., 19, 903-907. Rojas, S.W., Scott, M.L., 1969. Factors affecting the nutritive value of cottonseed meal as a protein source in chick diets. Poult. Sci., 48, 819–835.
• Rozeboom, D.W., Shaw, D.T., Tempelman, R.J., Miguel, J.C., Pettigrew, J.E., Connolly, A., 2005. Effects of mannan oligosaccharide and an antimicrobial product in nursery diets on performan-ce of pigs reared on three different farms. J. Anim. Sci., 83, 2637–2644.
• Saied, J.M., Al-Jabary, Q.H., Thalij, K.M., 2011. Effect of Dietary Supplement Yeast Culture on Pro-duction Performance and Hematological Parameters in Broiler Chicks. International Journal of Poultry Science, 10, 376–380.
• Santin, E., Mariorka, A., Macari, M., Grecco, M., Sanchez, J.C., 2001. Performance and intestinal mucosa development in broiler chickens fed ration containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 10, 236–244.
• Scott, T.A., 2002. Evaluation of lighting programs, diet density, and short-term use of mash as to 35 days of age. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 82, 375–383.
• Sebastian, S., Touchburn, S.P., Chavez, E.R., Lague, P.C., 1996a. The effects of supplemental microbial phytase on the performance and utilization of dietary calcium, phosphorus, copper and zinc in broiler chickens fed corn-soyabean diets. Poultry Sci., 75, 729–736
• Sebastian, S., Touchburn, S.P., Chavez, E.R., Lague, P.C. (1996b). Efficacy of supplemental microbial phytase at different dietary calcium levels on growth performance and mineral utilization of broiler chic-kens. Poultry Sci., 75, 1516–1523.
• Selle, P.H., Ravindran, V., Partridge, G.G., 2009. Beneficial effects of xylanase and/or phytase inclusions on ileal amino acid digestibility, energy utilisation, mineral retention and growth performan-ce in wheat-based broiler diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech-nol., 153, 303–313.
• Shareef, A.M., Al-Dabbagh, A.A.S., 2009. Effect of probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on performan-ce of broiler chicks. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sci., 1, 23–29.
• Shrivastava, A.K., Jha, R.R., 2010. Effects Of Diffe-rent Chemical Composition And Probiotic On The Haematobiochemical Profile Of Rabbit. EJEAFChe., 9, 1507–1513.
• Simons, P.C.M, Versteegh, H.A.J, Jongbloed, A.W., Kemme, P.A., Slump, P., Bos, K.D., Wolters, M.G.E., Beudeker, R.F., Verschooor G.J., 1990. Improvement of phosphorus availability by micro-bial phytase in broilers and pigs. British Journal of Nutr., 64, 525–540.
• Simpson, C.J., Wise, A., 1990. Binding of zinc and calcium to inositol phosphates (phytate) in vitro. Brit. J. Nutr., 64, 225–232.
• Singh, P.K., Khatta, V.K., 2002. Phytase supplemen-tation for economic and eco-friendly broiler produc-tion. Journal of Eco- Physiology, 5,117–121.
• Singh, P.K., Khatta, V.K., 2003a. Effect of phytase supplementation on the broiler production. Poultry Planner, 4, 13–14.
• Singh, P.K., Khatta, V.K., 2003b. Effect of phytase supplementation on the performance of broiler chic-kens fed wheat based diets. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 20, 57–62.
• SPSS. SPSS software package for Windows. Version 17,0, Chicago.
• Thayer, R.H., Burkitt, R.F., Morrison, R.D., Murray, E.E., 1978. Efficiency of utilization of dietary phosphorus by Caged turkey breeder hens fed rations supplemented with live yeast culture. Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Stillwate, 173–181.
• Thompson, L.U., 1986. Phytic acid, chemistry, nutri-tional effect and removal. Proc. Fourth World Congress of Animal Feeding, International Permanent Committee of the World Congresses on Animal Feeding, Madrid, 319–30.
• Thompson, L.U., 1993. Potential health benefits and problems associated with antinutrients in foods. Food Research International, 26, 131–149.
• Thongsong, B., Kalandakanond-Thongsong, S., Chavananikul, V., 2008. Effects of the addition of probiotic containing both bacteria and yeast or an antibiotic on performance parameters, mortality rate and antibiotic residue in broilers. The Thai J. Vet. Med., 38, 17–26.
• Veide, J., Andlid, T., 2006. Improved extracellular phytase activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by modifications in the PHO system. Int. J. Food Mic-robiol., 15; 108, 60–7.
• Yalcin, S., Yalçın, S., Uzunoğlu, K., Duyum, H.M., Eltan, O., 2012. Effects of dietary yeast autolysate (Sachaccaromyces cerevisiae) and Black cumin seed (Nigella sativa L,) on performance, egg traits, some blood characteristics and antibody production of laying hens. Livest. Sci., 145, 13–20.