TRAİNİNG AND SOCİO-ECONOMİCAL STATUS OF OTRHOPEDİC MEDİCAL COMPANY STAFF

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 26 - 32, 31.12.2021

Abuzer Uludağ , Hacı Bayram Tosun , Sancar Serbest , İsmail Ağır Seyit Ali Gümüştaş , Suat Çelik , Ramazan Atiç , Mehmet Mete Yaşar , Abdussamed Günay , Ebubekir Şeramet

Öz

Objective: By participating in most orthopedic surgery, the positions, trainings and demographic features of Orthopedic Implant Providers, which helps physician in the specifications and practices of the implants was investigated.

Material and Methods: In the study, 90 Orthopedic Implant Providers (Medics) included in Turkey's different regions. Age, education, working times and socioeconomic situations were questioned.

Findings: In this study, the average age of employees was 31.4 years (19-48 years) and the avarage vocational time was 9.7 years (1-25 years). When the educational status of employees were examined; high school graduates were 70%, middle school graduates were 12.2%, and college and / or faculty graduates were 17.8%. It has been observed that 70% of Orthopedic Implant Providers have not received any courses and training related to health apart from that they have certified with electronic examination from the Ministry of Health.

Conclusion: It is a fact that everyone who participate to a surgical operation is both legally and socially responsible to the operated patient. However, it is very difficult to expect for high level responsibility for ethic and health and health care that works with the certificate that has not received an education in the field of health or with the certificate earned by health-related electronic examination We believe that stakeholders providing health care in this regard should establish a standard of work on this group in terms of patient, physician and public wellbeing.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Health, orthopedics, ımplant providers, technician

Kaynakça

• Referans1. www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/05/2014 0515-4.htm
• Referans2. Uzunkoy A. Surgical site infections: risk factors and methods of prevention. Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi 2005; 11: 269-81.
• Referans3. Doğan P, Aktaş S. Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin hastane atıklarının yönetimine ilişkin bilgi düzeyleri. Kocatepe tıp dergisi, 2017;18: 94-99.
• Referans4. Arslan E. T, Demir H. Sağlık çalışanlarının hasta mahremiyetine ilişkin tutumu: nitel bir araştırma. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2017; 17:191-220.
• Referans5. Murray T.L, Mona C, Nayna C. P. "Privacy, confidentiality, HIPAA, and HITECH: Implications for the health care practitioner." The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 2011; 7: 747-752.
• Referans6. Hakeri H. Tıp Hukuku. 6. Baskı. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık; 2013.
• Referans7. Yürümez Y, Çevik T, Yavuz Y. Hasta Haklarını Biliyor muyuz? Akademik Acil Tıp Dergisi 2010;9: 67-71.
• Referans8. Akgün S, Zencir M. Bı̇r ünı̇versı̇te hastanesı̇nde çalışan hemşı̇re ve teknı̇syenlerı̇n meslekı̇ rı̇sk algısının belı̇rlenmesı̇. Mesleki Sağlık ve Güvenlik Dergisi 2017; 16:60-61.
• Referans9. Pehlivan İ. Örgütsel ve bireysel gelişme aracı olarak hizmet içi eğitim. Amme İdaresi Dergisi 1997; 30:105-120.
• Referans10. Selimoğlu E, Yılmaz H.B. Hizmet içi eğitimin kurum ve çalışanlar üzerine etkileri. Ekonomi, Sosyoloji ve Politika Dergisi.2009;11-12