Nohut Üreticilerinin Yabancı Otlar ve Mücadelesi Hakkında Bilinç Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi: Uşak İli Örneği

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 14 - 29, 30.06.2023

Burhan Dilek , Derya Öğüt Yavuz

https://doi.org/10.47137/usufedbid.1212855

Öz

Bu çalışmada; Uşak ili Merkez, Ulubey, Eşme, Karahallı ve Banaz ilçelerinde nohut üretimi yapan üreticilerin yetiştiricilik deneyimleri, yabancı otlar ve mücadelesindeki yaklaşımlarının ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, 2019 yılında nohut üretimi yapan rastgele seçilen 87 üreticiyle birebir görüşmeler yapılarak anket çalışması yürütülmüştür. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, üreticilerinden 10 kişiden 8’inin sadece ilkokul seviyesinde eğitim gördüğü, büyük çoğunluğunun (% 75,90) 100 da ve altında yetiştiricilik yaptığı ve % 52,90’lık kısmının kendi arazilerinde yetiştiricilik yaptığı belirlenmiştir. Üreticilerin dekara ortalama 12-15 kg nohut kullandıkları, genel olarak mibzer ile ekim yaptıkları ve 101-150 kg/da civarında verim elde ettikleri belirtilmiştir. Nohut üreticilerinin % 98,90’ının ekim nöbeti uygulaması yaptığı, genel olarak arpa (% 33,3), buğday (% 35,6) hem buğday hem de arpa (% 31,1) ekim nöbeti sisteminin üreticiler tarafından tercih edildiği belirlenmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda nohut üreticilerin % 54’ü yabancı otların bitki koruma sorunları içerisinde önemli olduğunu belirtirken, % 87,40’ı narin yabani yulaf (Avena barbata Pott ex Link subsp. barbata), % 46,60’ı yabani hardal (Sinapis arvensis L.), % 38,8’i kokarot (Bifora radians Bieb.) ve % 35,90 tarla sarmaşığını (Convolvulus arvensis L.) önemli olan türler olarak belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nohut, Yetiştiricilik, Yabancı otlar, Mücadele, Herbisit, Bilinç Düzeyi, Anket, Uşak, Chickpea, Cultivation, Weeds, Management, Herbicide, Consciousness Level, Questionnaire

Determination of that consciousness levels of weeds and management chickpeas producers: Uşak province example

Öz

The purpose of this study is to highlight the farming experiences of farmers producing chickpeas in the Uşak districts of Merkez, Ulubey, Eşme, Karahallı, and Banaz, as well as their approaches to weeds and their control. In 2019, questionnaire research was done, and the responses were analyzed by interviewing 87 randomly selected chickpea growers using. According to the results, 8 out of 10 producers had just a primary school education, most of them (75.90%) were cultivating at 100 da and below, and 52.90% were cultivate on their own land. It has been reported that producers use an average of 12-15 kilograms of chickpeas per decare, sow with seeders, and yield between 101 and 150 kg/da. Rotation is used by 98.90% of chickpea growers; in general, barley (33.3%), wheat (35.6%), and both wheat and barley (31.1%) rotation systems are preferred by the producers. As a result of the study, weeds are a significant issue for plant protection for 54% of chickpea producers. The most significant weed species were identified as delicate 87.40% slender wildoat (Avena barbata Pott ex Link subsp. barbata), 46.60% wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.), 38.8% wild bishop (Bifora radians Bieb.), and 35.90% morning glory (Convolvulus arvensis L.).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nohut, Yetiştiricilik, Yabancı otlar, Mücadele, Herbisit, Bilinç Düzeyi, Anket, Uşak, Chickpea, Cultivation, Weeds, Management, Herbicide, Consciousness Level, Questionnaire

Kaynakça

• 1. Bagheri A, Sohrabi N, Mondani F and Nosratti I. Weed infestation is affected by chickpea farmer demographics and agronomic practices. Weed Res, 2021;61:45-54.
• 2. Nair R, Schafleitner R, Easdown W, Ebert A, Hanson P and Darros, HJ. Legume improvement program at AVRDC-the world vegetable center: impact and future prospects. Ratarstvo i povrtarstvo, 2014;51:55-61. doi: 10.5937/ratpov51-5488
• 3. Merga B, and Haji J. Economic importance of chickpea: production, value, and world trade. Cogent Food Agric, 2019;5,1615718. doi: 10.1080/23311932.2019.1615718
• 4. Nyanga PH. Food security, conservation agriculture, and pulses: evidence from smallholder farmers in Zambia. Journal of Food Research, 2012;1(2). doi: 10.5539/jfr.v1n2p120
• 5. Anonim, (2019a). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Wheat Production in World”, [http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC] (Erişim tarihi: 01.12.2020).
• 6. Anonim, (2019b). Türkiye’de nohut üretimi. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr (Erişim tarihi: 01.11.2020).
• 7. Chisaka H. Weed damage to crops: Yield loss due to weed competition, integrated control of weeds, ed. by J.D. Fryer and S. Matsunaka. University of Tokyo Press, 1977;1‐16, Tokyo, Japan.
• 8. Al-Thahabi SA, Yasin JZ, Abu-Irmaileh BE, Haddad NI, and Saxena MC. Effect of weed removal on productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris med.) in a Mediterranean environment. J. Agron. Crop Sci, 1994;172: 333-334. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.1994.tb00184.x
• 9. Knott CM and Halila MH. Weeds in food legumes-problems, effects and control methods. In: Summerfield RJ (Ed), World Crops, Cool Season Food Legumes, Proceeding of International Conference on Food Legume Research, Washington, 1988; July 6-11
• 10. Taran B, Holm F and Banniza S. Response of chickpea cultivars to pre and post-emergence herbicide applications. Can. J. Plant Sci, 2013;93:279-286. doi: 10.4141/cjps2012-167
• 11. Nath CP, Dubey RP, Sharma AR, Hazra KK, Kumar N and Singh SS. Evaluation of new generation post-emergence herbicides in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett, 2018;41:1-5. doi: 10.1007/s40009-017-0604-z
• 12. Mohammadi G, Javanshir A, Khooie FR, Mohammadi SA and Zehtab Salmasi S. Critical period of weed interference in chickpea. Weed Res, 2005;45:57-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2004.00431.x
• 13. Muhammad N, Sattar A, Ashiq M and Ahmad I. Efficacy of pre and post emergence herbicides to control weeds in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan J. Weed Sci. Res. 2011;17:17-24.
• 14. Knott CM and Halila MH. Weeds in food legumes-problems, effects and control methods. In: Summerfield RJ (Ed), World Crops, Cool Season Food Legumes, Proceeding of International Conference on Food Legume Research, Washington, 1988; July 6-11
• 15. Kumar Y, Gupta OP and Gill OP. Weed control studies in irrigated chickpea in Rajasthan, India. International Chickpea Newsletter, 1989;21:28-30.
• 16. Oerke EC. Crop losses to pests. J Agric Sci, 2006;144:31-43
• 17. Pimentel D, Hepperly P, Hanson J, Douds D and Seidel R. Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience, 2005;55:573-582.
• 18. Bre-tagnolle V and Gaba S. Weeds for bees? A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2015;35:891-909.
• 19. Ruiz-Colmenero M, Bienes R, Eldridge DJ and Marques MJ. Vegetation cover reduces erosion and enhances soil organic carbon in a vineyard in the central Spain. Catena, 2013;104:153–160.
• 20. Marshall EJP, Brown VK, Boatman ND, Lutman PJW, Squire GR and Ward LK. The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Research, 2003;43:77-89.
• 21. Liebman M and Gallant ER. Many little hammers: ecological management of crop-weed interaction. In: Ecology in Agriculture (ed. LE JACKSON), 472. Academic Press, San Diego, USA; 1997.
• 22. Lechenet M, Bretagnolle V, Bockstaller C, Boissinot F, Petit MS, Petit S and Munier-Jolain, NM. Reconciling pesticide reduction with economic and environmental sustainability in arable farming. PLoS ONE, 2014; 9(6): e97922. doi:10.1371/journal pone.0097922
• 23. Baastians L, Paolini R and Baumann DT. Focus on ecological weed management: what is hindering adoption? Weed Res, 2008;48:481-491
• 24. Doré T, Makowski D, Malézieuxc E, Munier-Jolaind N, Tchamitchiane M and Tittonell P. Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. Europ J Agron, 2011;34:197-210
• 25. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R and Polasky S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 2002;418:671-677
• 26. Uttley NL. Agrochemical proprietary off-patent products-what are they? Outlooks on Pest Management, 2009;20:85-88
• 27. Zhang WJ, Jiang FB and Ou JF. Global pesticide consumption and pollution: with China as a focus. Proc Int Acad Ecol Environ Sci, 2011;1:125-144
• 28. Norsworthy JK, Bond J and Scott RC. Crop weed management practices and needs in Arkansas and Mississippi rice. Weed Technol, 2013;27:623–630. 29. Heap IM and Duke S. Overview of glyphosate-resistant weeds worldwide. Pest Manag Sci, 2018;74:1040–1049
• 30. Myers JP, Antoniou MN, Blumberg B, Carroll L, Colborn T, Everett LG, Hansen M, Landrigan PG, Lanphear BP, Mesnage R, Vandenberg LN, vom Saal FS, Welshons WV and Benbrook CM. Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: a consensus statement. Environmental Health, 2016;15:19 31. Scalone R, Kolf M and Albach DC. Mating system variation in Veronica (Plantaginaceae): inferences from pollen/ovule ratios and other reproductive traits. Nordic Journal of Botany, 2013;31,372-384
• 32. Guillerm, JL, Floc’h, EL, Maillet, J and Boulet C. The invading weeds within the Mediterranean Basin. In: Biological Invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin ( F. Di Castri, A.J. Hansen & M. Debussche, eds), pp. 61-84. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1990.
• 33. Breitsameter L, Bürger J, Edler B, Peters K, Gerowitt, B and Steinmann, HH. Klimafolgenforschung zu Ackerunkräutern-Daten, Methoden und Anwendungenauf verschiedenen Skalen. [Climate change impact research on arable weeds-data, methods and applications at various scale levels] Proceedings of the 26th German Conference on Weed Biology and Weed Control. Julius-Kühn-Archiv, 2014; 443, 123-132. DOI 10.5073/jka.2014.443.014.
• 34. Mehrtens J, Schulte M and Hurle K. Unkrautflora in Mais - Ergebnisse eines Monitorings in Deutschland. Gesunde Pflanz, 2005; 57:206–218. doi:10.1007/s10343-005-0097-4
• 35. Baessler C and Klotz S. Effects of changes in agricultural land-use on landscape structure and arable weed vegetation over the last 50 years. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2006;115:43–50. doi:10.1016/j.agee. 2005.12.007
• 36. Pautasso M, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Holdenrieder O, Pietravalle S, Salama N, Jeger MJ, Lange E and Hehl-Lange S. Plant health and global change - some implications for landscape management. Biol. Rev.,2010; 85, pp. 729- 755. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00123.x
• 37. Fleming A and Vanclay F. Farmer responses to climate change and sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev, 2010;30:11-19. doi: 10.1051/agro/2009028
• 38. Singh V, Barman K, Singh R and Sharma A. Weed management in conservation agriculture systems. In: Farooq, M. & Siddique, K.H.M. (Eds.) Conservation Agriculture. Switzerland: Springer, 2015; pp. 39-77.
• 39. Beckie HJ, Hall LM, Meers S, Laslo JJ and Stevenson FC. Management practices influencing herbicide resistance in wild oat. Weed Technology, 2004;18:853-859.
• 40. Chauhan B and Opeña J. Effect of tillage systems and herbicides on weed emergence, weed growth, and grain yield in dry-seeded rice systems. Field Crops Research, 2012;137:56-69.
• 41. Munier-Jolain N, Chavvel B and Gasquez J. Long-term modelling of weed control strategies: analysis of threshold-based options for weed species with contrasted competitive abilities. Weed Research, 2002;42:107-122.
• 42. Erskine W. The Lentil: Botany, Production and Uses. Oxfordshire, 2009; UK: CABI.
• 43. Zimdahl RL. Fundamentals of Weed Science. 2007; USA: Academic Press, Elsevier.
• 44. Zimdahl RL. A History of Weed Science in the United States, 2010; London, UK: Elsevier.
• 45. Abang A, Kouamé C, Abang M, Hanna R and Fotso A. Assessing vegetable farmer knowledge of diseases and insect pests of vegetable and management practices under tropical conditions. International Journal of Vegetable Science, 2014;20: 240-253.
• 46. Gao Y, Zhao D, Yu L and Yang H. Duration analysis on the adoption behavior of green control techniques. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019; 26:6319–6327.
• 47. Çiçek A ve Erkan O. Tarım ekonomisinde araştırma ve örnekleme yöntemleri, Gazi Osman Paşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, 1996; No: 12, Ders Notları Serisi No:6, Tokat.
• 48. Anonim, (2019c). “Yaş gruplarına göre Türkiye nüfusu” Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1059 (Erişim tarihi: 01.12.2020).
• 49. Akdeniz M, Gözener B, Önen H ve Sayılı, M. Turunçgil yetiştiricilerinin yabancı otlarla mücadelede karşılaştıkları sorunlar ve çözüm yolları üzerine bir araştırma, Bahri Dağdaş Bitkisel Araştırma Dergisi, 2015;4(2):38-49.
• 50. Uzundumlu AS, Kılıç B ve Tozlu G. Fındık üretiminde kimyasal ilaç kullanımını etkileyen faktörlerin analizi: Giresun İli Örneği, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 2017;7 (1):1-9.
• 51. Öztürk A. Seydişehir ilçesinde nohut yetiştiriciliği yapılan tarım işletmelerinin ekonomik analizi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 108s, Konya, Türkiye, 2019.
• 52. Kayek H. Şırnak ilinde pamuk yetiştiriciliğinde yabancı ot sorunu, Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek lisans, 41s, Van, Türkiye, 2018.
• 53. Çakır A, Karakaya E ve Uçar HK. Mardin ili savur ilçesi bağ işletmelerinin mevcut durumu ve potansiyeli. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enst. Der, 2015;5 (1):9-19, 2015.
• 54. Aydın Ö. Kahramanmaraş ili Elbistan ilçesinde nohut üretimi yapan çiftçilerin bitki koruma sorunlarının ve zirai mücadele konusundaki bilgi düzeylerinin belirlenmesi, Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 60s, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, 2019.
• 55. Şimşek A, Dinler H ve Duru S. Uşak ili sert çekirdekli meyve üreticilerinin fitopatolojik sorunlara yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, 2020; 3(2):127-147, DOI: 10.38001/ijlsb.703382.
• 56. Gündoğmuş E. Ankara ili Akyurt ilçesi tarım işletmelerinde ekmeklik buğday (Triticum aestivum L.) üretiminin fonksiyonel analizi ve üretim maliyetinin hesaplanması, Tr. J. of Agriculture and Forestry, 1998;22:251-260.
• 57. Lökçü AO, Öğüt Yavuz D ve Duru, S. Uşak ili buğday yetiştiriciliğinde yabancı ot sorunlarının belirlenmesi, Turkish Journal of Weed Science, 2020;23(1):2020: 52-62.
• 58. Erdoğan F ve Bayramoğlu Z. Tarım işletmelerinde Finne-Kinney yöntemi ile risk analizi. Tarım Ekonomisi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2017; 3.2(2017): 19-28.
• 59. Ülker M ve Ceyhan E. Konya ilinde fasulye tarımında karşılaşılan problemler ve çözüm önerileri. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2006;20(40):73-82.
• 60. Kadıoğlu İ. Tokat ilinde üreticilerin zirai mücadele etkinlikleri üzerine bir araştırma, GOÜ. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2003;20(1),7-15.
• 61. Belen M, Yanar D ve Erdal G. Sivas ilinde buğday üretiminde karşılaşılan bitki koruma sorunlarının belirlenmesi, Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 2020;8(1):208-214.