DETERMINING THE COMPETENCIES AND EFFICIENCY OF ACADEMIC UNITS OF ANKARA UNIVERSITY: FACULTY OF DENTISTRY PILOT STUDY

Yıl 2022, , 783 - 798, 26.10.2022

Kaan Orhan , Fehmi Gönüldaş , Ayben Sentürk Seher Yalçın , Nurper Güz , Ali Sınağ , Ahmet Yozgatligil , Necdet Ünüvar

https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.972077

Öz

Purpose: In this study, it is aimed to perform department and faculty competency analyzes for Ankara University Faculty of Dentistry, based on the study "Field Based Competency Analysis of Universities" by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBITAK).

Methodology: Within the scope of the study, the 2018-2020 period was taken as a basis for data on publications, citations and projects. Data on indicators were obtained through WOS and the Scopus database, Incites and SciVal. In addition, the activities of all faculty members in the faculty were included in the study data. Indicators for faculty members and departments were defined and criteria were established for Department Volume and Quality Indicators and Faculty Member Volume and Quality Indicators.

Findings: As a result of the study, academic competence graphs of the faculty of dentistry were created. Groups of departments and faculty members ranging from low volume and low quality to high volume and high quality were obtained.

Originality: With this study a simple and effective department and faculty member competency analysis method was created that can be used in all universities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Data Analysis, Efficiency, Productivity, Higher Education Sector

ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ AKADEMİK BİRİMLERİNİN YETKİNLİK VE VERİMLİLİKLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ: DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ PİLOT ÇALIŞMASI

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (TÜBİTAK) tarafından oluşturulan ve “Üniversitelerin Alan Bazlı Yetkinlik Analizi” çalışması esas alınarak, Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi için anabilim dalı ve öğretim üyesi yetkinlik analizlerinin yapılması amaçlanmıştır.

Yöntem: Çalışma kapsamında, yayın, atıf ve projelere ilişkin veriler için 2018-2020 dönemi baz alınmıştır. Göstergelere ilişkin veriler, WOS ve Scopus veri tabanı, Incites ve SciVal vasıtasıyla temin edilmiştir. Ayrıca fakültedeki tüm öğretim üyelerinin faaliyetleri çalışma verilerine dâhil edilmiştir. Öğretim üyeleri ve anabilim dalları için göstergeler tanımlanarak Anabilim Dalı Hacim ve Kalite Göstergeleri ile Öğretim Üyesi Hacim ve Kalite Göstergeleri için kriterler oluşturulmuştur.

Bulgular: Çalışma sonucunda diş hekimliği fakültesi akademik yetkinlik grafikleri oluşturulmuştur. Düşük hacim ve düşük kaliteden, yüksek hacim ve yüksek kaliteye kadar olan anabilim dalları ve öğretim üyelerine ilişkin gruplar elde edilmiştir.

Özgünlük: Bu çalışma ile bütün üniversitelerde kullanılabilecek basit ve efektif anabilim Dalı ve öğretim Üyesi Yetkinlik analiz yöntemi oluşturulmuştur. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Veri Analizi, Etkinlik, Verimlilik, Yüksek Öğretim Sektörü

Kaynakça

• Aluise, J.J., Scmitz, C.C., Bland C.J. ve McArtor, R.E. (1989). “Administrative Skills for Academic Physicians”, Medical Teacher, 11, 205-212.
• Bickel, J. ve Brown, A.J. (2005). “Generation X: Implications for Faculty Recruitment and Development in Academic Health Centers”, Academic Medicine, 80, 205-210.
• Bolden, R. ve Gosling, J. (2006). “Leadership Competencies: Time to Change the Tune?”, Leadership, 2(2), 147-163.
• Carraccio, C., Wolfsthal, S.D., Englander, R., Ferentz K. ve Martin, C. (2002). “Shifting Paradigms: From Flexner to Competencies”, Academic Medicine, 77, 361-367.
• Delia Davila Quintana, C., Mora Ruiz, J.G. ve Vila, L.E. (2014). “Competencies which Shape Leadership”, International Journal of Manpower, 35(4), 514-535.
• DiPerna, J.C. (1997). “Academic Competence: The Construct and Its Measurement via Teacher Ratings”, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Wisconsin, ABD.
• DiPerna, J.C. (1999). “Testing Student Models of Academic Achievement”, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, ABD.
• DiPerna, J.C. ve Elliot, S.N. (2000). “The Academic Competence Evaluation Scales (ACES College)”. The Psychological Association, San Antonio, TX.
• Elliot, S.N. ve DiPerna, J.C. (2002). “Assessing the Academic Competence of College Students: Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Skills and Enablers”, Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 15(2), 87-100.
• Ferrer, R.L. ve Katerndahl, D.A. (2002). “Predictors of Short-Term and Long-Term Scholarly Activity by Academic Faculty: a Departmental Case Study”, Family Medicine, 34(6), 455-461.
• Garand, L., Matthews, J.T., Courtney K.L., Davis, M., Lingler, J.H., Schlenk, E.A., Yang, K., Bender, C.M. ve Burke, L.E. (2010). “Development and Use of a Tool to Guide Junior Faculty in Their Progression toward Promotion and Tenure”, Journal of Professional Nursing, 26(4):207-213.
• Görlitz, A., Ebert, T., Baver, D., Grast, M., Hofer, M., Lammerding-Köppel, M. ve Fabry, G. (2015). “Core Competencies for Medical Teachers (KLM)”, A position paper of the GMA Committee on Personal and Organizational Development in Teaching, GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Austiktung, 32(2);1/14-7/14.
• Grigsby, R.K., Hefner, D.S., Souba, W.W. ve Kirch, D.G. (2004). “The Future-Oriented Department Chair”, Academic Medicine, 79, 571-577.
• Alma Harris & Michelle Jones (2019) Teacher leadership and educational change, School Leadership & Management, 39, 123-126.
• Miranda, S., Orciuoli, F., Loia, V. ve Sampson, D. (2017). “An Ontology-Based Model for Competence Management”, Data Knowledge Engineering, 107, 51-66.
• Packard T. (2014). “How Competent Are Competencies?”, Human Service Organizations Management, 38(4), 313-319.
• Rodriguez, T.E., Zhang, M.B., Tucker-Lively, F.L., Ditmyer, M.M., Back Brallier, L.G., Haden, N.K. ve Valachovic, R.W. (2016). “Profile of Department Chairs in U.S. and Canadian Dental Schools: Demographics, Requirements for Success, and Professional Development Needs”, Journal of Dental Education, 80, 365-373.
• Scheid, D.C., Hamm, R.M. ve Crawford, S.A. (2002). “Measuring Academic Production”, Family Medicine, 34(1), 34-44.
• Shah, D., Goettler, C.E., Torrent, D.J, Riddick, A., Whitehurst, K., Garrison, H. Waibel, B. ve Haisch, C.E. (2015). “Milestones: The Road to Faculty Development”, Journal of Surgical Education, 72(6), e226-e235.
• Shahmandi, E., Silong, A.D., Ismail, I.A., Samah, B.B.A. ve Othman, J. (2011). “Competencies, Roles and Effective Academic Leadership in World Class University”, International Journal of Bussiness Administration, 2(1), 44-53.
• Spendlove, M. (2007). “Competencies for Effective Leadership in Higher Education”, International Journal of Educational Management, 21(5), 407-417.
• Srinivasan M., Li, S.T., Meyers F.J., Pratt, D., Collins, J., Braddock, C., Skeff, K., West, D., Henderson, M., Hales, R.E. ve Hilty, D.M. (2011). “Teaching as a Competency”: Competencies for Medical Educators”, Academic Medicine, 86(10), 1211-1220.
• Steinert, Y. (2000). “Faculty Development in the New Millennium: Key Challenges and Future Directions”, Medical Teacher, 22, 44-50.
• Stigler, F.L., Duvivier, R.J., Weggemans, M. ve Salzer, H.J. (2010). “Health Professionals for the 21st Century: A Students' View”, Lancet, 376, 1877-1878.
• Thorndyke, L.E., Gusic, M.E., George, J.H., Quillen, D.A. ve Milner, R.J. (2006). “Empowering Junior Faculty: Penn State's Faculty Development and Mentoring Program”, Academic Medicine, 81, 668-673. Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (TÜBİTAK) (2020). “Üniversitelerin Alan Bazında Yetkinlik Analizi”, https://tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/18842/universitelerin_alan_bazli_yetkinlik_analizi_raporu.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 01.08.2021).