FACTORS AFFECTING BULLYING AND CYBERBULLYING IN ADOLESCENTS

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 106 - 116, 09.08.2022

Harun Özbey , Öznur Başdaş

Öz

Objective: This study was carried out as a descriptive study to determine the factors affecting bullying and cyberbullying in adolescents.
Methods: The study was conducted with 544 adolescents aged 12-17 years in primary and secondary school grades 7-12. The data of the study were collected with the Introductory Characteristics Form and the Bullying and Cyberbullying Scale for Adolescents (CIS-A). In the evaluation of the data, descriptive Statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequency, percentage, minimum, maximum), Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance were used.
Results: It has been determined that the rates of being exposed to physical, verbal, relational and cyberbullying and bullying of adolescents vary between 5-17%. In adolescents, boys (physical: p≤0.001, relational: p=0.003), 7-9. Those who study in the classroom (physical: p≤0.001, verbal: p≤0.001, relational: p=0.041, cyber: p=0.008), those who do not feel safe at school (p≤0.001), those whose parents punish (p≤0.001) and those who have low academic achievement Those with (physical: p=0.003, verbal: p=0.004, relational: p=0.018) were exposed to more bullying and boys (physical: p≤0.001, verbal: p=0.005, relational: p=0.006, cyber: p≤0.001), 7-9. those who study in the classroom (physical: p=0.005, verbal: p=0.004, cyber: p=0.021), those whose parents punish (physical: p=0.009, verbal: p≤0.001) and those with low academic achievement (physical: p=0.010, relational: p=0.008, cyber: p≤0.001).
Conclusions: It has been determined that the rate of being exposed to physical, verbal, relational and cyber bullying and bullying of adolescents is higher than 5.0%. Among the adolescents participating in the study, boys, 7-9. It has been determined that those who study in the classroom, those whose parents punish and those with low academic success are exposed to more bullying and are bullied.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bullying, cyberbullying, adolescent, nursing

ERGENLERDE ZORBALIK VE SİBER ZORBALIĞI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, ergenlerde zorbalık ve siber zorbalığı etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi amacıyla tanımlayıcı olarak
gerçekleştirilmiştir.
Yöntem: Çalışma, ilköğretim ve ortaöğretim 7-12. sınıflarda öğrenim gören 12-17 yaş arası 544 ergen ile yapılmıştır.
Çalışmanın verileri, Tanıtıcı Özellikler Formu ve Ergenler İçin Zorbalık ve Siber Zorbalık Ölçeği (ZSÖ-E) ile toplanmıştır.
Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde, tanımlayıcı istatistikler (ortalama, standart sapma, frekans, yüzde, minimum, maximum),
Mann-Whitney U testi ve Kruskal-Wallis Varyans Analizi kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Ergenlerin fiziksel, sözel, ilişkisel ve siber zorbalığa maruz kalma ve zorbalık uygulama oranlarının %5-17
arasında değiştiği belirlenmiştir. Ergenlerde, erkeklerin (fiziksel: p≤0.001, ilişkisel: p=0.003), 7-9. sınıfta okuyanların
(fiziksel: p≤0.001, sözel: p≤0.001, ilişkisel: p=0.041, siber: p=0.008), kendini okulda güvende hissetmeyenlerin (p≤0.001),
ebeveynleri ceza verenlerin (p≤0.001) ve akademik başarısı düşük olanların (fiziksel: p=0.003, sözel: p=0.004, ilişkisel:
p=0.018) daha fazla zorbalığa maruz kaldığı ve erkeklerin (fiziksel: p≤0.001, sözel: p=0.005, ilişkisel: p=0.006, siber:
p≤0.001), 7-9. sınıfta okuyanların (fiziksel: p=0.005, sözel: p=0.004, siber: p=0.021), ebeveynleri ceza verenlerin (fiziksel:
p=0.009, sözel: p≤0.001) ve akademik başarısı düşük olanların (fiziksel: p=0.010, ilişkisel: p=0.008, siber: p≤0.001) daha
fazla zorbalık uyguladıkları saptanmıştır.
Sonuç: Ergenlerin fiziksel, sözel, ilişkisel ve siber zorbalığa maruz kalma ve zorbalık uygulama oranlarının %5.0’dan yüksek
olduğu belirlenmiştir. Araştırmaya katılan ergenlerde, erkeklerin, 7-9. sınıfta okuyanların, ebeveynleri ceza verenlerin ve
akademik başarısı düşük olanların daha fazla zorbalığa maruz kaldığı ve zorbalık uyguladıkları saptanmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Zorbalık, Siber Zorbalık, Ergen, Hemşirelik

Anahtar Kelimeler

Zorbalık, siber zorbalık, ergen, hemşirelik

Kaynakça

• 1. Bradshaw J, Crous G, Rees G, Turner N. Comparing children's experiences of schools-based bullying across countries. Children and Youth Services Review 2017; 80: 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.060
• 2. Thomas HJ, Scott JG, Coates JM, Connor JP. Development and validation of the Bullying and Cyberbullying Scale for Adolescents: A multi‐dimensional measurement model. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2019; 8: 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12223
• 3. Han Z, Zhang G, Zhang H. School bullying in urban China: Prevalence and correlation with school climate. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2017; 14: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101116
• 4. Beckman L, Hellström L, von Kobyletzki L. Cyber bullying among children with neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2020; 61(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12525
• 5. Campbell M, Bauman S. Cyberbullying: Definition, consequences, prevalence. In: Campbell M, Bauman S (Eds). Reducing Cyberbullying in Schools. Academic Press, 2018; p.3-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811423-0.00001-8
• 6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data Summary & Trends Report 2009-2019. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/YRBSDataSummaryTrendsReport2019-508.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 28.01.2022
• 7. Baldry AC, Farrington DP, Sorrentino A. School bullying and cyberbullying among boys and girls: Roles and overlap. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 2017; 26(9): 937-951. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1330793
• 8. Gini G, Pozzoli T. Bullied children and psychosomatic problems: A metaanalysis. Pediatrics 2013; 132(4): 720-729. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-0614
• 9. Heerde JA, Hemphill SA. Are bullying perpetration and victimization associated with adolescent deliberative self-harm? A meta-analysis. Archives of Suicide Research 2019; 23: 353-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2018.1472690
• 10. Lee J. Pathways from Childhood Bullying Victimization to Young Adult Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms. Child Psychiatry and Human Development 2021; 52(1): 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-00997-4
• 11. Moore SE, Norman RE, Suetani S, Thomas HJ, Sly PD, Scott JG. Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Psychiatry 2017; 22: 60-76. https://dx.doi.org/10.5498%2Fwjp.v7.i1.60
• 12. Sigurdson JF, Undheim AM, Wallander JL, Lydersen S, Sund AM. The longitudinal association of being bullied and gender with suicide ideations, self-harm, and suicide attempts from adolescence to young adulthood: A cohort study. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior 2018; 48: 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12358
• 13. Özbey H, Başdaş Ö. Ergenlerde zorbalık ve hemşirelik yaklaşımı. ERÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 2020; 7(1): 46-50.
• 14. de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, et al. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2007; 85: 660-667.
• 15. Özbey H. Başdaş Ö. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Bullying and Cyber Bullying Scale for Adolescents (BCS-A). Psychiatry Research 2020; 289: 12994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112994
• 16. Smahel D, Machackova H, Mascheroni G, Dedkova L, Staksrud E, Olafsson K, et al. EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. https://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/assets/documents/research/eu-kids-online/reports/EU-Kids-Online-2020-March2020.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 23.08.202128.01.2022
• 17. Eroğlu Y, Aktepe E, Akbaba S, Işık A. Özkorumak E. Siber zorbalık ve mağduriyetin yaygınlığının ve risk faktörlerinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim 2015; 40(177): 93-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.3698
• 18. Lee C, Shin N. Prevalence of cyberbullying and predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among Korean adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior 2017; 68: 352-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.047
• 19. Taştekin E, Bayhan P. Ergenler arasındaki siber zorbalığın ve mağduriyetin incelenmesi. Online Journal of Technology Addiction and Cyberbullying 2018; 5(2): 21-45.
• 20. Chen J-K, Pan Z, Wang L-C. Parental Beliefs and Actual Use of Corporal Punishment, School Violence and Bullying, and Depression in Early Adolescence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20121; 18(12): 62-70. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126270
• 21. Kelleci M, Tel H, Akgül Gündoğdu N, Temel Mert Z. Evaluation of peer bullying, internet addiction, and psychological adaptation level of students aged 9-15. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing 2021; 34(4): 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcap.12336
• 22. Esposito C, Bacchini D, Affuso G. Adolescent non-suicidal self-injury and its relationships with school bullying and peer rejection. Psychiatry Research 2019; 274: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.02.018
• 23. Blakeslee T, Snethen J, Schiffman RF, Gwon SH, Sapp M, Kelber S. Adolescent Characteristics, Suicide, and Bullying in High School. Journal of School Nursing 2021; 16: 10598405211038235. https://doi.org/10.1177/10598405211038235
• 24. Hemphill SA, Kotevski A, Heerde JA. Longitudinal associations between cyber-bullying perpetration and victimization and problem behavior and mental health problems in young Australians. Internaitonal Journal of Public Health 2015; 60: 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-014-0644-9
• 25. Dalmaç- Polat Z, Bayraktar S. Ergenlerde siber zorbalık ve siber mağduriyetle ilişkili değişkenleri incelenmesi. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities 2016; 4(1): 115-132.
• 26. Mesch GS. Parental mediation, online activities and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2009; 12(4): 387-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0068
• 27. Özer G, Cemaloğlu N. (Eds). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin siber zorbalık yaşama düzeylerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Eğitim Yönetimi Araştırmaları (e-kitap). Pegem Akademi, 2016.
• 28. Browser J, Larson JD, Bellmore A, Olsin C, Resnik F. Bullying type and feeling unsafe in middle school. The Journal of School Nursing 2018; 34: 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059840518760983
• 29. Ergün Başak B, Baştürk E. Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Siber Zorbalık Deneyimlerinin Olweus’un Akran Zorbalığı Modeli Çerçevesinde İncelenmesi. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International 2019; 9(1): 240-278.
• 30. Akbıyık C, Kestel M. Siber zorbalığın öğrencilerin akademik, sosyal ve duygusal durumları üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2016; 12(3): 844-859. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.282384
• 31. Kowalski RM, Limber SP. Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health 2013; 53(1Suppl): 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018
• 32. Peled Y. Cyberbullying and its influence on academic, social and emotional development of undergraduate students. Heliyon 2019; e01393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01393
• 33. Olweus D. Bullying at School: What we know and What we can do. Cambridge MA: Blackwell,1999; 8-13.
• 34. Malm EK, Henrich CC. Longitudinal Relationships Between Parent Factors, Children's Bullying, and Victimization Behaviors. Child Psychiatry and Human Development 2019; 50(5): 789-802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-019-00882-9
• 35. Murphy TP, Laible D, Augustine M. The Influences of Parent and Peer Attachment on Bullying. Journal of Child and Family Studies 2017; 26(5): 1388-1397. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10826-017-0663-2
• 36. Smith AU, Norris AE. Parent Communication and Bullying Among Hispanic Adolescent Girls. Journal of School Nursing 2020; 36(3): 222-232. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1059840518808013