Analyzing Resource Efficiency Methods in Turkey: The Impact on Production Cost and Sales Volume

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1, 121 - 132, 29.03.2022

Mustafa İncekara

https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.899281

Cited By: 2

Öz

Rapid economic growth along with carelessness related to environmental problems have caused adverse impacts on nature and to civilization as a whole. The effects on nature include temperature changes and increased climactic and environmental disasters. To minimize the negative effects of climate change and reduce future emissions, several governments have announced charges for greenhouse gas emissions. However, these charges present extra operational costs for firms and impact their financial health. This study analyses the impact of offering ecological friendly products and services on the production costs and sales volume of resource-efficient Turkish Small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) using data from the Flash Eurobarometer 456. The findings reveal that offering “green” products do not increase the sales volume. However, resource efficiency activities can influence SMEs’ production costs. This result can help practitioners who are looking for opportunities for cost reductions in manufacturing to apply more resource-efficient mechanisms.
Key Words: Small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), Resource Efficiency Activities, Environmentally friendly products, Green economy
JEL Classification: M11

Anahtar Kelimeler

Small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), Resource Efficiency Activities, Environmentally friendly products, Green economy

Türkiye'de Kaynak Verimliliği Yöntemlerinin Analizi: Üretim Maliyeti ve Satış Hacmine Etkisi

Öz

Hızlı ekonomik büyüme, çevresel sorunlara karşı kayıtsızlıkla birlikte, doğa ve bir bütün olarak medeniyet üzerinde olumsuz etkilere yol açmaktadır. Doğa üzerindeki etkiler arasında sıcaklık değişimleri ile iklimsel ve çevresel felaketler bulunmaktadır. Hükümetler, iklim değişikliğinin olumsuz etkilerini en aza indirmek için sera gazı emisyonunu vergilendireceklerini duyurdu. Ancak bu vergiler şirketler için ekstra maliyet yaratmakta ve finansal sağlıklarını etkilemektedir. Bu çalışma, Flash Eurobarometer 456 verilerini kullanarak, ekoloji dostu ürün ve hizmetler sunmanın, kaynak bakımından verimli Türkiye Küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmeler (KOBİ'ler) üretim maliyetleri ve satış hacmi üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Bulgular, “Yeşil” ürünler sunma yönelimi, satış hacmini artırmamaktadır. Ancak, kaynak verimliliği faaliyetlerinin, KOBİ’lerin üretim maliyetlerini etkileyebileceğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu sonuç, üretimde maliyet azaltma fırsatları arayan pratisyenlerin kaynak açısından daha verimli mekanizmalar benimsemelerine yardımcı olabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmeler (KOBİ'ler), Kaynak Verimliliği Faaliyetleri, Çevre dostu ürünler, Yeşil ekonomi
JEL Sınıflandırması: M11

Anahtar Kelimeler

Küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmeler (KOBİ'ler), Kaynak Verimliliği Faaliyetleri, Çevre dostu ürünler, Yeşil ekonomi

Kaynakça

• Bonney, M. and Jaber, M.Y. (2011). Environmentally Responsible Inventory Models: Non-Classical Models for a Non-Classical Era. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 133, No.1, 43–53.
• Brown, D.T and Ratledge, E.C. (2011). Energy, the Environment and Delaware Jobs: Defining and Describing Green Businesses, Center for Applied Demography & Survey Research, University of Delaware.
• Čekanavičius, L., Bazytė, R. and Dičmonaitė, A. (2014). Green Business: Challenges and Practices, Ekonomika, Vol. 93, No. 1, 74–88.
• Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B. and Wen, C.-T. (2006). The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan, Journal of Business Ethics, (67)4, 331–339.
• Croston, G.E. (2009). Starting Green: An Ecopreneur's Toolkit for Starting a Green Business. Irvine, Calif.: Entrepreneur.
• Delmas, M.A. and Pekovic, S. (2015). Resource Efficiency Strategies and Market Conditions, Long Range Planning, Vol. 48, No.2, 80–94.
• European Parliament (2015). Green Growth Opportunities for SMEs: European Parliament Resolution of 19 May 2015 on Green Growth Opportunities for SMEs (2014/2209(INI)).
• Fernando, Y., Chiappetta, J., Charbel, J. and Wah, W.-X. (2019). Pursuing Green Growth in Technology Firms Through the Connections Between Environmental Innovation and Sustainable Business Performance: Does Service Capability Matter?, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 141, 8–20.
• Gadenne, D.L., Kennedy, J. and McKeiver, C. (2009). An Empirical Study of Environmental Awareness and Practices in SMEs, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 84, No. 1, 45–63.
• Hall, J.K., Daneke, G.A. and Lenox, M.J. (2010). Sustainable Development and Entrepreneurship: Past Contributions and Future Directions, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 25, No. 5, 439–448.
• Hart, S.L. (1995), A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 4, 986.
• Jabbour, C. J. C., Jabbour de Sousa, A. B. L., Govindan, K., de Freitas, T. P., Soubihia, D. F., Kannan, D. and Latan, H. (2016). Barriers to the Adoption of Green Operational Practices at Brazilian Companies: Effects on Green and Operational Performance, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 54, No. 10, 3042–3058.
• Jacobs, M. (2012). Green Growth: Economic Theory and Political Discourse, Working Paper. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London.
• Kabiraj, S., Topkar, V. and Walke, R.C. (2010), Going Green: A Holistic Approach to Transform Business, International Journal of Managing Information Technology, Vol. 2, No. 3, 10–31.
• Kunapatarawong, R. and Martínez-Ros, E. (2016). Towards Green Growth: How Does Green Innovation Affect Employment?, Research Policy, Vol. 45, No. 6, 1218–1232.
• Lin, C.-Y. and Ho, Y.-H. (2010). The Influences of Environmental Uncertainty on Corporate Green Behavior: An Empirical Study with Small and Medium-Size Enterprises, Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, Vol. 38, No. 5, 691–696.
• Machiba, T. (2010). Eco-Innovation for Enabling Resource Efficiency and Green Growth: Development of an Analytical Framework and Preliminary Analysis of Industry and Policy Practices, International Economics and Economic Policy, Vol. 7, No. 2-3, 357–370.
• Makower, J. (2009). Strategies for the Green Economy: Opportunities and Challenges in the New World of Business. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Molina‐Azorín, J.F., Claver‐Cortés, E., López‐Gamero, M.D. and Tarí, J.J. (2009). Green Management and Financial Performance: A Literature Review, Management Decision, Vol. 47, No.7, 1080–1100.
• Neves, T., Drohomeretski, E., da Costa, S.E.G. and de Lima, E.P. (2014). Sustainable Operations Management: Practices and Measures in the Food Industry, International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, Vol. 6, No. 4, 335.
• OECD (2018). Environmental Policy Toolkit for SME Greening in EU Eastern Partnership Countries. OECD Green Growth Studies.
• Olson, E.L. (2013). It’s Not Easy Being Green: The Effects of Attribute Tradeoffs on Green Product Preference and Choice, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.41, No. 2, 171–184.
• Parker, C.M., Redmond, J. and Simpson, M. (2009). A Review of Interventions to Encourage SMEs to Make Environmental Improvements, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol.27, No.2: 279–301.
• Pekanov Starčević, D., Mijoč, J. and Zrnić, A. (2017). Is It Worth Going Green in Croatia? Empirical Evidence from SMEs, Ekonomski vjesnik, Vol.30, No.1, 141–154.
• Saleh, A., and Ndubisi, N. (2006). “An Evaluation of SME Development in Malaysia”, International Review of Business Research Papers, Vol. 2, No.1, 1–14.
• Schaltegger, S. and Synnestvedt, T. (2002). The Link Between ‘Green’ And Economic Success: Environmental Management as the Crucial Trigger Between Environmental and Economic Performance, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 65, No. 4, 339–346.
• Stefan, A. and Paul, L. (2008). Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 22, No. 4, 45–62.