Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Descriptive Emotion Sharing: Photovoice

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 73 - 83, 31.12.2023

Öz

Photovoice is a method of qualitative study that is applied as an instrument for both person-al and societal change. It is utilized in participatory community-based research and needs analysis. This method involves participants at all stages of the research process, from taking the photos to analyzing the images, using photography to show and record people’s lived ex-periences.
The main purpose of this paper is to inform researchers by explaining the definition, features, theoretical origins, and technical stages of the photovoice method. At the same time, it aims to attract the attention of researchers by noting the lack of organizational studies in the relevant literature and to be instrumental in both practical and theoretical developments. In order to meet the need for organizational studies, it is important for researchers to understand the photovoice method well. This study is expected to help researchers at this point.

Kaynakça

  • REFERENCES
  • Adams, S., Savahl, S., & Fattore, T. (2017). Children’s representations of nature using photovoice and community mapping: Perspectives from South Africa. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 12, 1–22.
  • Argan, M., Yılmaz, A., Argan, M. T., & Yetim, G. (2020). Anyone see my voice? A theoretical framework on the use potential of the photovoice method in sports sciences. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 25, 149–166.
  • Berry, K. (2011). The ethnographer’s choice: Why ethnographers do ethnography. Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies, 11, 165–177.
  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Booth, T., & Booth, W. (2003). In the frame: Photovoice and mothers with learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 18, 431–442. Carlson, E. D., Engebretson, J., & Chamberlain, R. M. (2006). Photovoice as a social process of critical consciousness. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 836–852.
  • Castleden, H., & Garvin, T. (2008). Modifying photovoice for community-based participatory indigenous research. Social Science & Medicine, 66, 1393–1405.
  • Collins, M. L., Baiardi, J. M., Tate, N. H., & Rouen, P. A. (2014). Exploration of social, environmental, and familial influences on the sexual health practices of urban African American adolescents. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 37, 1441–1457.
  • Cutclife, J. R. (2009). Methodological issues in grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 1476–1484.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications: USA.
  • Dumbrill, G. C. (2008). Your policies, our children: Messages from refugee parents to child welfare workers and policymakers. Child Welfare Journal, 88, 145–169.
  • Eaves, Y. D. (2001). A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35, 654–663.
  • Eisner, E. W. (2002). From episteme to phronesis to artistry in the study and improvement of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 375–385.
  • Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Seabury Press.
  • Hiles, D. (2001). Heuristic inquiry and transpersonal research. Paper presented at the Centre for Counseling and Psychotherapy Education, London, UK.
  • Holtslander, L. (2004). The experience of hope for informal caregivers of palliative home care patients: A grounded theory exploration. University of Saskatchewan for Degree of Master of Nursing in The College of Nursing. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
  • Hutchinson, S. A. (1993). Grounded theory: The method. In Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (2nd ed.) (Munhall, P. L., & Boyd, C. A., Eds.), National League for Nursing Press, New York, 180– 212.
  • Jurkowski, J. M., & Paul-Ward, A. (2007). Photovoice with vulnerable populations: Addressing disparities in health promotion among people with intellectual disabilities. Health Promotion Practice, 8, 358–365.
  • Kütük Yılmaz, P. (2011). Gençlerle yürütülen photovoice projeleri: Katılımlı bir araştırma yöntemi. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17, 174–192.
  • Liebenberg, L. (2018). Thinking critically about photovoice: Achieving empowerment and social change. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1–9.
  • Mahmood, A., Chaudhury, H., Michael, Y. L., Campo, M., Hay, K., & Sarte, A. (2012). A photovoice documentation of the role of neighborhood physical and social environments in older adults’ physical
  • activity in two metropolitan areas in North America. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1180–1192.
  • McIntyre, A. (2003). Through the eyes of women: Photovoice and participatory research as tools for reimagining place. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 10, 47–66.
  • McNiff, S. (1998). Art based research. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Mead, G. H. (1992). Mind, self and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Mil, B. (2007). Araştırmalarda gömülü teori oluşturma. In A. Yüksel & B. Mil (Eds.), Y. bilim içinde nitel araştırma: Neden, nasıl, niçin? Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Mitchell, A. T., & Davis, F. J. (2021). Understanding racial capitalism using the photovoice method: Black tourism in France. Journal of Marketing Management. Westburn Publishers Ltd.
  • Molloy, J. K. (2007). Photovoice as a tool for social justice workers. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 18, 39–55.
  • Morrison, L. T., & Thomas, L. R. (2014). Survivors’ experiences of return to work following cancer: A photovoice study. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(3), 163–172.
  • Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Mova, O. (2017). Chicago sosyoloji okulunun etnografik mirasını yeniden okumak: Dijital etnografi çağında sembolik etkileşimcilik. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Kültürel Çalışmalar Dergisi, 4, 135–154.
  • Mysyuk, Y., & Huisman, M. (2019). Photovoice method with older persons: A review. Ageing & Society, 1–29. Özdemir, S., Demirel, E., & Sarı, B. (2022). Temizlik görevlileri üzerine bir fotoses (photovoice) araştırması. Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 449-460.
  • Palibroda, B., Krieg, B., Murdock, L., & Havelock, J. (2009). Practical guide to photovoice: Sharing pictures, telling stories and changing communities. Prairie Women’s Health Centre of Excellence.
  • Patton, M. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Payne, D. A., Hickey, H., Nelson, A., Rees, K., Bollinger, H., Hartley, S. (2016). Physically disabled women and sexual identity: A photovoice study. Disability & Society, 31, 1030–1049.
  • Pickering, J. C., Al-Baldavi, Z., O’Sullivan, T., Baker, L., Adan, M., McVean, L., & Amany, A. R. (2022). Photovoice and Instagram as strategies for youth engagement in disaster risk reduction. Qualitative Health Research, 32, 1897–1906.
  • Pickin, L., Brunsden, V., & Hill, R. (2011). Exploring the emotional experiences of foster carers using the photovoice technique. Adoption & Fostering, 35, 61–75.
  • Povee, K., Bishop, B. J., & Roberts, L. D. (2014). The use of photovoice with people with intellectual disabilities: Reflections, challenges and opportunities. Disability & Society, 29, 893–907.
  • Reeves, S., & Hodges, B. D. (2008). Qualitative research methodologies: Ethnography. British Medical Journal.
  • Ripat, J., Woodgate, R. L., & Bennett, L. (2019). Attitudes faced by young adults using assistive technology as depicted through photovoice. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1–8.
  • Rose, P., Beeby, J., & Parker, D. (1995). Academic rigour in the lived experience of researchers using phenomenological methods in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21, 1123–1129.
  • Stern, P. N., Allen, L., & Moxley, P. (1982). The nurse as a grounded theorist: History, process and uses. Review Journal of Philosophy and Social Science, 7, 200-215.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 273-285). London: Sage.
  • Sutton-Brown, C. A. (2014). Photovoice: A methodological guide. Photography and Culture, 7, 169–185.
  • Trout, Y. İ., & Yıdırım, F. (2021). Lisansüstü öğrencilerinin gözünden kampüs ortamı: Bir photovoice (fotoses) çalışması. Nitel Sosyal Bilimler, 3, 231–257.
  • Van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 1, 11–30.
  • Wang, C. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women's health. Journal of Women's Health, 8.
  • Wang, C., & Burris, M. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24, 369–387.
  • Wang, C., & Redwood-Jones, Y. (2001). Photovoice ethics: Perspectives from Flint Photovoice. Health Education and Behavior, 28, 560–572.
  • Wang, C., Yuan, Y. L., & Feng, M. L. (1996). Photovoice as a tool for participatory evaluation: The community’s view of process and impact. Journal of Contemporary Health, 4, 47–49.
  • Willig, C. (2007). Reflections on the use of a phenomenological method. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4, 209–225.
  • Wilson, N., Dasho, S., Martin, A. C., Wallerstein, N., Wang, C., & Minkler, M. (2007). Engaging young adolescents in social action through photovoice. Journal of Early Adolescence, 27, 241–261.

Betimleyici Duygu Paylaşımı: Fotoses

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 73 - 83, 31.12.2023

Öz

Fotoses, hem kişisel hem de toplumsal değişim için bir araç olarak uygulanan nitel bir araştır-ma yöntemidir. Katılımcı topluluk tabanlı araştırmalarda ve ihtiyaç analizinde kullanılır. Bu yöntem, insanların deneyimlerini göstermek ve kaydetmek için fotoğraf kullanarak, araştırma sürecinin tüm aşamalarında katılımcıları içerir.
Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, fotoses, yönteminin tanımını, özelliklerini, teorik kökenlerini ve teknik aşamalarını açıklayarak araştırmacıları bilgilendirmektir. Aynı zamanda, ilgili literatür-de örgütsel çalışmalara yönelik eksikliğe dikkat çekerek araştırmacıların dikkatini çekmeyi ve hem pratik hem de teorik gelişmelere katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Örgütsel çalışmala-ra olan ihtiyacı karşılamak için araştırmacıların fotoses yöntemini iyi anlaması önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın araştırmacılara bu noktada yardımcı olması beklenmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • REFERENCES
  • Adams, S., Savahl, S., & Fattore, T. (2017). Children’s representations of nature using photovoice and community mapping: Perspectives from South Africa. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 12, 1–22.
  • Argan, M., Yılmaz, A., Argan, M. T., & Yetim, G. (2020). Anyone see my voice? A theoretical framework on the use potential of the photovoice method in sports sciences. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 25, 149–166.
  • Berry, K. (2011). The ethnographer’s choice: Why ethnographers do ethnography. Cultural Studies - Critical Methodologies, 11, 165–177.
  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Booth, T., & Booth, W. (2003). In the frame: Photovoice and mothers with learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 18, 431–442. Carlson, E. D., Engebretson, J., & Chamberlain, R. M. (2006). Photovoice as a social process of critical consciousness. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 836–852.
  • Castleden, H., & Garvin, T. (2008). Modifying photovoice for community-based participatory indigenous research. Social Science & Medicine, 66, 1393–1405.
  • Collins, M. L., Baiardi, J. M., Tate, N. H., & Rouen, P. A. (2014). Exploration of social, environmental, and familial influences on the sexual health practices of urban African American adolescents. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 37, 1441–1457.
  • Cutclife, J. R. (2009). Methodological issues in grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 1476–1484.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications: USA.
  • Dumbrill, G. C. (2008). Your policies, our children: Messages from refugee parents to child welfare workers and policymakers. Child Welfare Journal, 88, 145–169.
  • Eaves, Y. D. (2001). A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35, 654–663.
  • Eisner, E. W. (2002). From episteme to phronesis to artistry in the study and improvement of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 375–385.
  • Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Seabury Press.
  • Hiles, D. (2001). Heuristic inquiry and transpersonal research. Paper presented at the Centre for Counseling and Psychotherapy Education, London, UK.
  • Holtslander, L. (2004). The experience of hope for informal caregivers of palliative home care patients: A grounded theory exploration. University of Saskatchewan for Degree of Master of Nursing in The College of Nursing. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
  • Hutchinson, S. A. (1993). Grounded theory: The method. In Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (2nd ed.) (Munhall, P. L., & Boyd, C. A., Eds.), National League for Nursing Press, New York, 180– 212.
  • Jurkowski, J. M., & Paul-Ward, A. (2007). Photovoice with vulnerable populations: Addressing disparities in health promotion among people with intellectual disabilities. Health Promotion Practice, 8, 358–365.
  • Kütük Yılmaz, P. (2011). Gençlerle yürütülen photovoice projeleri: Katılımlı bir araştırma yöntemi. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17, 174–192.
  • Liebenberg, L. (2018). Thinking critically about photovoice: Achieving empowerment and social change. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1–9.
  • Mahmood, A., Chaudhury, H., Michael, Y. L., Campo, M., Hay, K., & Sarte, A. (2012). A photovoice documentation of the role of neighborhood physical and social environments in older adults’ physical
  • activity in two metropolitan areas in North America. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1180–1192.
  • McIntyre, A. (2003). Through the eyes of women: Photovoice and participatory research as tools for reimagining place. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 10, 47–66.
  • McNiff, S. (1998). Art based research. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Mead, G. H. (1992). Mind, self and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Mil, B. (2007). Araştırmalarda gömülü teori oluşturma. In A. Yüksel & B. Mil (Eds.), Y. bilim içinde nitel araştırma: Neden, nasıl, niçin? Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Mitchell, A. T., & Davis, F. J. (2021). Understanding racial capitalism using the photovoice method: Black tourism in France. Journal of Marketing Management. Westburn Publishers Ltd.
  • Molloy, J. K. (2007). Photovoice as a tool for social justice workers. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 18, 39–55.
  • Morrison, L. T., & Thomas, L. R. (2014). Survivors’ experiences of return to work following cancer: A photovoice study. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(3), 163–172.
  • Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Mova, O. (2017). Chicago sosyoloji okulunun etnografik mirasını yeniden okumak: Dijital etnografi çağında sembolik etkileşimcilik. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Kültürel Çalışmalar Dergisi, 4, 135–154.
  • Mysyuk, Y., & Huisman, M. (2019). Photovoice method with older persons: A review. Ageing & Society, 1–29. Özdemir, S., Demirel, E., & Sarı, B. (2022). Temizlik görevlileri üzerine bir fotoses (photovoice) araştırması. Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 449-460.
  • Palibroda, B., Krieg, B., Murdock, L., & Havelock, J. (2009). Practical guide to photovoice: Sharing pictures, telling stories and changing communities. Prairie Women’s Health Centre of Excellence.
  • Patton, M. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Payne, D. A., Hickey, H., Nelson, A., Rees, K., Bollinger, H., Hartley, S. (2016). Physically disabled women and sexual identity: A photovoice study. Disability & Society, 31, 1030–1049.
  • Pickering, J. C., Al-Baldavi, Z., O’Sullivan, T., Baker, L., Adan, M., McVean, L., & Amany, A. R. (2022). Photovoice and Instagram as strategies for youth engagement in disaster risk reduction. Qualitative Health Research, 32, 1897–1906.
  • Pickin, L., Brunsden, V., & Hill, R. (2011). Exploring the emotional experiences of foster carers using the photovoice technique. Adoption & Fostering, 35, 61–75.
  • Povee, K., Bishop, B. J., & Roberts, L. D. (2014). The use of photovoice with people with intellectual disabilities: Reflections, challenges and opportunities. Disability & Society, 29, 893–907.
  • Reeves, S., & Hodges, B. D. (2008). Qualitative research methodologies: Ethnography. British Medical Journal.
  • Ripat, J., Woodgate, R. L., & Bennett, L. (2019). Attitudes faced by young adults using assistive technology as depicted through photovoice. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1–8.
  • Rose, P., Beeby, J., & Parker, D. (1995). Academic rigour in the lived experience of researchers using phenomenological methods in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21, 1123–1129.
  • Stern, P. N., Allen, L., & Moxley, P. (1982). The nurse as a grounded theorist: History, process and uses. Review Journal of Philosophy and Social Science, 7, 200-215.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 273-285). London: Sage.
  • Sutton-Brown, C. A. (2014). Photovoice: A methodological guide. Photography and Culture, 7, 169–185.
  • Trout, Y. İ., & Yıdırım, F. (2021). Lisansüstü öğrencilerinin gözünden kampüs ortamı: Bir photovoice (fotoses) çalışması. Nitel Sosyal Bilimler, 3, 231–257.
  • Van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 1, 11–30.
  • Wang, C. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women's health. Journal of Women's Health, 8.
  • Wang, C., & Burris, M. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24, 369–387.
  • Wang, C., & Redwood-Jones, Y. (2001). Photovoice ethics: Perspectives from Flint Photovoice. Health Education and Behavior, 28, 560–572.
  • Wang, C., Yuan, Y. L., & Feng, M. L. (1996). Photovoice as a tool for participatory evaluation: The community’s view of process and impact. Journal of Contemporary Health, 4, 47–49.
  • Willig, C. (2007). Reflections on the use of a phenomenological method. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4, 209–225.
  • Wilson, N., Dasho, S., Martin, A. C., Wallerstein, N., Wang, C., & Minkler, M. (2007). Engaging young adolescents in social action through photovoice. Journal of Early Adolescence, 27, 241–261.
Toplam 52 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Ekonometri (Diğer)
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Emel Esen 0000-0001-5753-3252

Edibe Özbay 0000-0003-4233-5792

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 6 Kasım 2023
Kabul Tarihi 21 Aralık 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Esen, E., & Özbay, E. (2023). Betimleyici Duygu Paylaşımı: Fotoses. Yildiz Social Science Review, 9(2), 73-83.