Yol ağaçlarının sağladığı ekosistem hizmetlerinin değerlendirilmesi: Burdur (Türkiye) kent merkezi

Yıl 2023, , 221 - 234, 05.07.2023

Gülşah Kaçmaz , Merve Ozeren Alkan , Hatice Çobankaya , Defne Şen

https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1226241

Cited By: 1

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Burdur il merkezindeki kentsel yol ağaçlarının ekosistem hizmetleri (ES) düzenlemesini ne düzeyde gerçekleştirebileceğini ortaya koymaktır.
Materyal ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada, USDA Forest Service tarafından geliştirilen i-Tree Eco modeli adı verilen bir yazılım kullanılarak ekosistemin fiziksel faydaları araştırılmıştır. Ağaç özellikleri ve kentsel orman örtüsünün yanı sıra, hava kirliliğini azaltma, karbon depolama ve ayırma, oksijen üretimi ve önlenen akış, seçilen ve incelenen dört düzenleyici ES'dir.
Araştırma Bulguları: Yapılan ölçümler sonucunda Burdur il merkezindeki ağaçların yılda 66,79 kilogram hava kirliliğini ortadan kaldırdığı ve yol ağaçlarının brüt olarak yılda yaklaşık 12,92 metrik ton karbon tuttuğu belirlenmiştir.
Sonuç: Bu araştırma sonucunda elde edilen veriler dikkate alındığında, kent içi yol ağaçlandırmasında kullanılacak ağaç türlerinin belirlenmesinde ekosistem hizmetleri açısından avantaj sağlayan türlerin (kirlilik giderme, karbon tutma ve depolama, oksijen üretimi, yağmur sularından kaçınma) tercih edilmesi gerektiği anlaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yol ağaçları, ekosistem hizmetleri, i-Tree Eco, Burdur (Türkiye)

Assessment of ecosystem services provided by street trees: Burdur (Türkiye) city center

Öz

Objective: The objective of this study was to reveal at which level urban street trees in Burdur city center can accomplish ecosystem services (ES) regulation.
Material and Methods: In this study, ecosystem benefits in physical terms are quantified by using a software called i-Tree Eco model developed by the USDA Forest Service. Besides tree characteristics and urban forest cover, air pollution reduction, carbon storage and sequestration, oxygen production, and avoided runoff are four regulating ES selected and studied.
Results: As a result of the measurements made it was estimated that trees in Burdur city center remove 66.79 kilograms of air pollution per year and the gross sequestration of street trees was about 12.92 metric tons of carbon per year.
Conclusion: Considering the data obtained as a result of this study, it can be stated that the species to t provide an advantage in terms of ecosystem services-pollution removal, carbon sequestration and storage, oxygen production, stormwater avoided-should be preferred to determine the tree species to be used in urban street afforestation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Street trees, ecosystem services, i-Tree Eco, Burdur (Türkiye)

Kaynakça

• Aba, S. C., O. O. Ndukwe, C. J. Amu & K. P. Baiyeri, 2017. The role of trees and plantation agriculture in mitigating global climate change. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 17 (4): 12691-12707. https: //doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.80.15500
• Abdollahi, K.K., Z.H. Ning & A. Appeaning, 2000. Global Climate Change and The Urban Forest. LA: GCRCC and Franklin Press, Baton Rouge, 77 pp.
• Atkinson R. & J. Arey, 2003. Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic compounds. Chem. Rev., 103 (12): 4605-4638, https: //doi.org/10.1021/cr0206420
• Aurelle, D., S. Thomas, C. Albert, M. Bally, A. Bondeau, C. Boudouresque, A. E. Cahill, F. Carlotti, A. Chenuil, W. Cramer, H. Davi, A. De Jode, A. Ereskovsky, A. M. Farnet, C. Fernandez, T. Gauquelin, P. Mirleau, A. C. Monnet, B. Prévosto, V. Rossi, S. Sartoretto, F. Van Wambeke & B. Fady, 2022. Biodiversity, climate change, and adaptation in the Mediterranean. Ecosphere, 13 (4): e3915. https: //doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3915
• Berland, A., S. A. Shiflett, W. D. Shuster, A. S. Garmestani, H. C.,Goddard, D. L. Herrmann & M. E. Hopton, 2017. The role of trees in urban stormwater management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 162: 167-177. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.017
• Bracho-Nunez, A., N.M. Knothe, S. Welter, M. Staudt, W.R. Costa, M.A.R. Liberato, M.T.F. Piedade & J. Kesselmeier, 2013. Leaf level emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from some Amazonian and Mediterranean plants. Biogeosciences, 9 (11): 5855-5873. https: //doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-5855-2013
• Coşkun Hepcan, Ç. & A. Cangüzel, 2021. Bornova Üniversite Caddesi yol ağaçlarının hava kalitesi üzerine etkisi, Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 58 (2): 247-252. https: //doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.697540
• Coşkun Hepcan, Ç. & Ş. Hepcan, 2017. Ege Üniversitesi Lojmanlar Yerleşkesinin hava kalitesinin iyileştirilmesine yönelik düzenleyici ekosistem servislerinin hesaplanması. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 54 (1): 113-120. https: //doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.299257
• Foley, J. A., R. DeFries, G. P. Asner, C. Barford, G. Bonan, S. R. Carpenter, F. S. Shapin, M. T. Coe, D. C. Daily, H. K. Gibbs, J. H. Helkowski, T. Holloway, E. A. Howard, C. J. Kucharik, C. Monfreda, J. A. Patz, I. C. Prentice, N. Ramankutty & P. K. Snyder, 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science, 309: 5734.
• Hand, K. L., K. J. Doick & J. L. Moss, 2019. Ecosystem Services Delivery by Large Stature Urban Trees, Research Report. Edinburgh, UK. ISBN: 978-1-83915-001-2, 20 pp.
• Hewitt, C.N., K. Ashworth & A. R. MacKenzie, 2020. Using green infrastructure to improve urban air quality (GI4AQ). Ambio, 49: 62-73. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01164-3
• i-Tree, 2020. i-Tree Eco: Application Overview. (Web page: https: //www.itreetools.org/tools/i-tree-eco/i-tree-eco-overview) (Date accessed: February 2021).
• Lindenmayer, D. B. & W. F. Laurance, 2017. The ecology, distribution, conservation and management of large old trees. Biological Reviews, 92 (3): 1434-1458. https: //doi.org/10.1111/brv.12290.
• Livesley, S.J., B. Baudinette & D. Glover, 2014. Rainfall interception and stem flow by eucalypt street trees-the impacts of canopy density and bark type. Urban for Urban Green, 13 (1): 192-197. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.09.001
• Maco, S. E. & E. G. McPherson, 2003. A practical approach to assessing structure, function, and value of street tree populations in small communities. Journal of Arboriculture, 29 (2): 84-97. https: //doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2003.011
• McPherson, E.G. & J. R. Simpson, 1999. Carbon Dioxide Reductions Through Urban Forestry: Guidelines for Professional and Volunteer Tree Planters, General Technical Report 171. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 237 pp.
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, Island Press, Washington, DC., 137 pp.
• Moss, J. L., K. J. Doick, S. Smith & M. Shahrestani, 2019. Influence of evaporative cooling by urban forests on cooling demand in cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 37: 65-73. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.023
• Myers, S. S., L. Gaffikin, C. D. Golden, R. S. Ostfeld, K. H. Redford, T. H. Ricketts, W. R. Turner & S. E. Osofsky, 2013. Human health impacts of ecosystem alteration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110 (47), 18753-18760. https: //doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218656110
• Nikodinoska, N., A. Palett, F. Pastorella, M. Granvik & P.P. Franzese, 2018. Assessing, valuing and mapping ecosystem services at city level: the case of Uppsala (Sweden). Ecological Modelling, 368: 411-424. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.10.013
• Nowak, D. J., J. C. Stevens, S. M. Sisinni & C. J. Luley, 2002. Effects of urban tree management and species selection on atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Arboriculture, 28 (3): 113-122.
• Nowak, D. J., S.,Hirabayashi, M. Doyle, M. McGovern & J. Pasher, 2018. Air pollution removal by urban forests in Canada and its effect on air quality and human health. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29: 40-48. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.019
• Nowak, D., D. Crane, J. Stevens, R. Hoehn, J. Walton & J. Bond, 2008. A groundbased method of assessing the urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 34: 347-358.
• Nowak, D.J., R. Hoehn & D.E. Crane 2007. Oxygen production by urban trees in the United States. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 33 (3): 220-226, DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2007.026.
• Phillips, D. L., 2011. Assessment of Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Forests: Public Lands within the Urban Growth Boundary of Corvallis, Oregon, Presented at City of Corvallis, Commission on Civic Beautification and Urban Forestry meeting, Corvallis, OR, May 05, 2011.
• Pörtner, H.-O., D.C. Roberts, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, M. Tignor, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller & A. Okem, 2022. IPCC, 2022. “Summary for Policymakers, 3-33”. In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 3056 pp. https: //doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.001
• Rahman, M.A., A. Moser, M. Anderson, C. Zhang, T. Rötzer & S. Pauleit, 2019. Comparing the infiltration potentials of soils beneath the canopies of two contrasting urban tree species. Urban Forestry & Urban Green, 38: 22-32, https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.11.002
• Rogers, K., J. Goodenough, K. Frediani & J. Watson, 2018. Hyde Park tree benefits: i-tree eco technical report. treeconomics. (Web page: https: //www.itreetools.org/documents/350/TreeconomicsHydeParkReport.pdf) (Date accessed: August 2021).
• Safford, H., E. Larry, E.G McPherson, D.J. Nowak & L.M. Westphal, 2013. Urban forests and climate change, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Climate Change Resource Center. (Web page: www.fs.usda.gov/ccrc/topics/urban-forests) (Date accessed: November 2021).
• Scharenbroch, B. C., J. Morgenroth & B. Maule, 2016. Tree species suitability to bioswales and impact on the urban water budget. Journal of Environmental Quality, 45 (1): 199-206. https: //doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.01.0060
• Selim, C. & S. Atabey, 2020. Kentsel yol ağaçlandırmalarının sağladığı faydaların belirlenmesi: Antalya Atatürk Bulvarı Örneği. Bursa Uludag Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 34 (Özel Sayı): 235-247.
• Shadman, S., P. A. Khalid, M. M. Hanafiah, A. K. Koyande, M. A. Islam, S. A. Bhuiyan, K. S. Woon & P. Show, 2022. The carbon sequestration potential of urban public parks of densely populated cities to improve environmental sustainability. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 52: 1020649. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102064
• Shah, A. M., G. Liu, Z. Huo, Q. Yang, W. Zhang, F. Meng, L. Yao & S. Ulgiati, 2022. Assessing environmental services and disservices of urban street trees. an application of the emergy accounting. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 186: 106563. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106563
• TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity), 2011. TEEB manual for cities: ecosystem services in urban management. (Web page: http: //teebweb.org/publications/other/teeb-cities/) (Date accessed: September 2021).
• Tırnakçı, A., 2021. Sürdürülebilir Kentsel Açık-Yeşil Alanlar Olarak Mezarlıklar Ve Sunduğu Ekosistem Hizmetleri: Tarihi Seyyid Burhaneddin Mezarlığı-Kayseri. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (1): 18-35. https: //doi.org/10.24011/barofd.785895
• Tuğluer, M. & A. Gül, 2018. Kent ağaçlarının çevresel etkileri ve değerinin belirlenmesinde ufore modelinin kullanımı ve Isparta örneğinde irdelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 19 (3): 293-307. https: //doi.org/10.18182/tjf.341054
• Turner‐Skoff, J. B. & N. Cavender, 2019. The benefits of trees for livable and sustainable communities. Plants, People, Planet, 1 (4): 323-335. https: //doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.39
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2013. Stormwater to Street Trees: Engineering Urban Forests for Stormwater Management. Office of Wetlands. 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460, 31 pp.
• Wai, K. M., T. Z. Tan, T. E. Morakinyo, T. C. Chan & A. Lai, 2020. Reduced effectiveness of tree planting on micro-climate cooling due to ozone pollution-A modeling study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52 (101803). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101803
• Wood, E. M. & S. Esaian, 2020. The importance of street trees to urban avifauna. Ecological Applications, 30 (7): e02149 (1-20). https: //doi.org/10.1002/eap.2149