Maksiller gömülü kanin dişin minivida destekli ve konvansiyonel yöntemle sürdürülmesinin sonlu elemanlar analizi ile incelenmesi

Year 2024, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 60 - 68, 23.04.2024

Sümeyye Güler , Mehmet Ali Yavan , Nihal Hamamcı

https://doi.org/10.30569/adiyamansaglik.1424725

Abstract

Amaç: Gömülü kanin dişin iki farklı ankraj mekaniği yardımıyla sürdürülmesinin değerlendirilmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: İki farklı modelde gömülü kanin diş, maksiller palatinal sol bölgede modellenmiştir. Minivida destekli modelde (MD) bir minividadan; transpalatal ark (TPA) destekli modelde (TPAD) ise TPA’dan destek alınmıştır. Her iki modelde gömülü kanin dişe sarmal yaylar kullanılarak 100 gram kuvvet uygulanmıştır.
Bulgular: MD modelde dişlerde oluşan streslerin neredeyse sıfır olduğu, TPAD modelde ise sol birinci molar ve premolar dişlerde yoğunlaştığı görülmektedir. TPAD modelde en fazla yer değiştirme maksiller sol kadran dişlerinde gözlenirken, MD modelde maksiller dişlerde yer değiştirme miktarı neredeyse sıfırdır.
Sonuç: İlk anda her iki modelde de kanin dişlerde distalizasyon hareketi görülmüştür. MD modelde posterior dişlere herhangi bir kuvvet iletimi görülmezken, TPAD modelde sol posterior bölgede mezyopalatal hareket gözlenmiştir.

Keywords

Gömülü kanin, Minivida, Sonlu elemanlar analizi

Ethical Statement

Çalışmamız Adıyaman Üniversitesi Girişimsel Olmayan Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu’nun 07/04/2021 tarihli, 2021/04-17 protokol numarası ile onaylandı.

Supporting Institution

Adıyaman Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri’nin DHFDUP/2022-0001 nolu proje desteği ile gerçekleştirildi.

Project Number

DHFDUP/2022-0001

Thanks

Parsim Mühendislik Limited Şirketi’ne sonlu elemanlar analizi için teşekkür ederiz.

Investigation of eruption of maxillary impacted canine with miniscrew supported and conventional method via finite element analysis

Abstract

Aim: To examine the eruption of impacted canine via two different anchor mechanics.
Materials and Methods: In the two different models, impacted canines were modeled in the left maxillary palatal region. The anchor was a mini screw in the miniscrew supported model (MD); and a transpalatal arch (TPA) in the TPA assisted model (TPAD). 100 gram of force was applied to the impacted canine via spiral springs in both models.
Results: The stresses were almost zero in the MD model and concentrated in the first molars and the premolars on the left side in the TPAD model. The greatest displacement was observed in the maxillary left quadrant teeth in the TPAD model and while the displacements in the maxillary teeth in the MD model was almost zero.
Conclusions: At the first moment, distalization movement was observed in the canine teeth in both models. While no force transmission to the posterior teeth was observed in the MD model, mesiopalatal movement was observed in the left posterior region in the TPAD model.

Keywords

Impacted canine, Miniscrew, Finite element analysis

Ethical Statement

Our study was approved by Adıyaman University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee, dated 07/04/2021, with protocol number 2021/04-17.

Supporting Institution

The study was carried out with the support of Adıyaman University Scientific Research Projects, project number DHFDUP/2022-0001.

Project Number

DHFDUP/2022-0001

Thanks

We thank Parsim Engineering Limited Company for the finite element analysis.

References

• Bishara SE, Ortho D. Impacted maxillary canines: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;101(2):159-171.
• Cooke M, Nute S. Maxillary premolar resorption by canines: three case reports. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15(3):210-212.
• Ericson S, Kurol J. Resorption of incisors after ectopic eruption of maxillary canines: a CT study. Angle Orthod. 2000;70(6):415-423.
• Lai CS, Bornstein MM, Mock L, Heuberger BM, Dietrich T, Katsaros C. Impacted maxillary canines and root resorptions of neighbouring teeth: a radiographic analysis using cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35(4):529-538.
• Rimes RJ, Mitchell C, Willmot D. Maxillary incisor root resorption in relation to the ectopic canine: a review of 26 patients. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19(1):79-84.
• Ericson S, Bjerklin K, Falahat B. Does the canine dental follicle cause resorption of permanent incisor roots? A computed tomographic study of erupting maxillary canines. Angle Orthod. 2002;72(2):95-104.
• Ericson S, Kurol J. Resorption of maxillary lateral incisors caused by ectopic eruption of the canines: a clinical and radiographic analysis of predisposing factors. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;94(6):503-513.
• Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM, Ackerman JL. Contemporary Orthodontics. St. Louis. Mosby, Inc; 2000.
• Costa A, Raffainl M, Melsen B. Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998;13(3):201-209.
• Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:763-767.
• Ludwig B, Baumgaertel S, Böhm B, et al. Mini-implants in Orthodontics. Innovation. Anchorage. Concepts. Quintessence International. 2007.
• Wilmes B, Drescher D. Vertical periodontal ligament distraction–a new method for aligning ankylosed and displaced canines. J Orofac Orthop. 2009;70(3):213-223.
• Kocsis A, Seres L. Orthodontic screws to extrude impacted maxillary canines. Springer; 2012.
• Szwedowski TD, Whyne CM, Fialkov JA. Toward characterization of craniofacial biomechanics. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(1):202-207.
• Wakabayashi N, Ona M, Suzuki T, Igarashi Y. Nonlinear finite element analyses: advances and challenges in dental applications. J Dent. 2008;36(7):463-471.
• Manfredini D, Lombardo L, Siciliani G. Temporomandibular disorders and dental occlusion. A systematic review of association studies: end of an era? J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44(11):908-923.
• Kornhauser S, Abed Y, Harari D, Becker A. The resolution of palatally impacted canines using palatal-occlusal force from a buccal auxiliary. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;110(5):528-534.
• Reitan K. Effects of force magnitude and direction of tooth movement on different alveolar bone types. Angle Orthod. 1964;34(4):244-255.
• Yadav S, Chen J, Upadhyay M, Jiang F, Roberts WE. Comparison of the force systems of 3 appliances on palatally impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;139(2):206-213.
• Han G, Huang S, Von den Hoff JW, Zeng X, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Root resorption after orthodontic intrusion and extrusion: an intraindividual study. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(6):912-918.
• Ammar HH, Ngan P, Crout RJ, Mucino VH, Mukdadi OM. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;139(1):e59-e71.
• Kuroda S, Nishii Y, Okano S, Sueishi K. Stress distribution in the mini-screw and alveolar bone during orthodontic treatment: a finite element study analysis. J Orthod. 2014;41(4):275-284.
• Meher AH, Shrivastav SS, Vibhute PJ, Hazarey PV. Deflection and stress distribution around mini-screw implants: A finite element investigation into the effect of cortical bone thickness, force magnitude and direction. J Orthod. 2012;39(4):249-255.
• Park H-S, Kwon O-W, Sung J-H. Micro-implant anchorage for forced eruption of impacted canines. J Clin Orthod. 2004;38:297-302.
• Lee M-Y, Park JH, Jung J-G, Chae J-M. Forced eruption of a palatally impacted and transposed canine with a temporary skeletal anchorage device. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2017;151(6):1148-1158.
• Makedonas D, Lund H, Gröndahl K, Hansen K. Root resorption diagnosed with cone beam computed tomography after 6 months of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance and the relation to risk factors. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(2):196-201.
• Thiruvenkatachari B, Ammayappan P, Kandaswamy R. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;134(1):30-35.
• Sharma M, Sharma V, Khanna B. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthod. 2012;39(2):102-110.
• Stivaros, N., Lowe, C., Dandy, N., Doherty, B., Mandall, N. A. A randomized clinical trial to compare the Goshgarian and Nance palatal arch. Eur J Orthod. 32(2):171-176.
• Williams, J., Fixed orthodontic appliances: Principles and practice. 1995: Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Kojima, Y. and H. Fukui, Effects of transpalatal arch on molar movement produced by mesial force: a finite element simulation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008. 134(3):335. e1-335. e7.