İNDİREKT KOMPOZİT VE SERAMİK RESTORASYONLARDA YÜZEY HAZIRLIĞI

Year 2021, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 57 - 75, 01.04.2021

Özlem Elibol Kanar , Dilek Tağtekin

Abstract

Restoratif diş hekimliğinde hastalar tarafından estetik beklentinin artması ve üretimde meydana gelen çeşitlilik, hekimleri estetik ve fonksiyonu birlikte sağlayan güncel materyallere yöneltmiştir. Bu amaçla en sık kullanılan materyallere bilgisayar destekli tasarlanan ve üretilen (CAD/CAM) kompozit ve tam seramik materyaller de dahil olmuştur. Estetik nedenlerle hastaların ilk tercihi olmayan metal destekli porselenlerin aynı zamanda fazla diş preparasyonu gerektirmesi, minimal invaziv diş hekimliğinin pratikte daha fazla yer bulması ve estetik materyallere yönelik yoğun ilgi sonucu adeziv simantasyon, klinik uygulamada ağırlık kazanmaya başlamıştır. Yapılan restorasyonların uzun süreli başarısında materyalin dayanıklılığı kadar güçlü bir bağlanma dayanımı da belirleyici bir faktördür. Adeziv siman ile restorasyon arasında iyi bir bağlantı oluşturmak için iç yüzeylerine mekanik ve kimyasal çeşitli işlemler uygulanmaktadır. Bu derlemede, indirekt kompozit ve seramik restorasyonlarda kullanılabilen yüzey hazırlık ve pürüzlendirme yöntemleri incelenecektir.

Keywords

kompozit, seramik, yüzey hazırlığı, bağlanma dayanımı

Supporting Institution

Marmara Üniversitesi Diş hekimliği Fakültesi

SURFACE PREPARATION OF INDIRECT COMPOSITE AND CERAMIC RESTORATIONS

Abstract

In restorative dentistry, increasing aesthetic expectation by patients and the diversity in production have led physicians to up-to-date materials that provide aesthetics and function together. For this purpose, composite and full ceramic materials which computer-aided desing/ computer-aided manifacturing (CAD / CAM) are also included in the most frequently used materials.. Due to the fact that metal-supported porcelains, which are not the first choice of patients because of aesthetic reasons, also require more dental preparation, minimally invasive dentistry has found more clinical application, and popularity in aesthetic materials, adhesive cementation has started to gain weight in the clinical procedure. A strong bond strength as well as the durability of the material is a determining factor in the long-term success of the restorations. Various mechanical and chemical processes are applied to the inner surfaces to create a reliable connection between the adhesive cement and the restoration. In this review, surface preparation and roughening methods that can be used in indirect composite and ceramic restorations will be examined.

Keywords

composite, ceramic, surface preparation, bond strenght

References

• Akpınar, Y. Z., Tak, Ö., Koç, Ö., & Üşümez, A. (2015). Protetik tedavilerde lazerlerin kullanımı. Selcuk Dental Journal, 2(1), 33-42.
• Akyıl, M. Ş., Karaalioğlu, O. F., & Yeşil Duymuş, Z. (2008). Feldspatik seramiğe rezin simanın kesme bağlanma direncine asit, ER: YAG ve ND: YAG lazer uygulamaları ve silanizasyonunun etkisi. 35(32) 87-93.
• Ali, A., Takagaki, T., Nikaido, T., Abdou, A., & Tagami, J. (2018). Influence of Ambient Air and Different Surface Treatments on the Bonding Performance of a CAD/CAM Composite Block. The journal of adhesive dentistry, 20(4), 317-324.
• Alp, G., Subaşı, M. G., Johnston, W. M., & Yilmaz, B. (2018). Effect of different resin cements and surface treatments on the shear bond strength of ceramic-glass polymer materials. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 120(3), 454-461.
• Blatz, M. B., Sadan, A., & Kern, M. (2003). Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 89(3), 268-274.
• Bottino, M. C., Özcan, M., Coelho, P. G., Valandro, L. F., Bressiani, J. C., & Bressiani, A. H. A. (2008). Micro-morphological changes prior to adhesive bonding: high-alumina and glassy-matrix ceramics. Brazilian Oral Research, 22(2), 158-163.
• Burke, F., Watts, D., Wilson, N., & Wilson, M. (1991). Current status and rationale for composite inlays and onlays. British Dental Journal, 170(7), 269-273.
• Chen, J.-R., Oka, K., Kawano, T., Goto, T., & Ichikawa, T. (2010). Carbon dioxide laser application enhances the effect of silane primer on the shear bond strength between porcelain and composite resin. Dental materials journal, 1011170089-1011170089.
• Çömlekoğlu, M. E., Dündar, M., Uzel, G., Güngör, M. A., & Özpınar, B. (2009). Farklı yüzey pürüzlendirme işlemlerinin yapıştırıcı simanların seramiğe olan bağ dayanımı üzerine etkisi. Hacettepe Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(3), 14-22.
• de Azevedo Miranda, D. (2019). Essential Considerations for the Cementation of Facets and Ceramic Laminates. J Dent Res, 1(1), 1004.
• de Carvalho, R. L. A., de Faria, J. C. B., Carvalho, R. F., Cruz, F. L. G., Goyatá, F. R., & Leite, F. P. P. (2012). Indicações, adaptação marginal e longevidade clínica de sistemas cerâmicos livre de metal: uma revisão da literatura. IJD. International Journal of Dentistry, 11(1), 55-65.
• Della-Bona, A. (2005). Characterizing ceramics and the interfacial adhesion to resin: II-the relationship of surface treatment, bond strength, interfacial toughness and fractography. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 13(2), 101-109.
• Demirtag, Z., & Culhaoglu, A. (2019). Surface roughness of ceramic-resin composites after femtosecond laser irradiation, sandblasting or acid etching and their bond strength with and without silanization to a resin cement. Operative dentistry, 44(2), 156-167.
• El-Damanhoury, H. M., & Gaintantzopoulou, M. D. (2018). Self-etching ceramic primer versus hydrofluoric acid etching: Etching efficacy and bonding performance. Journal of prosthodontic research, 62(1), 75-83.
• Ersu, B., Yuzugullu, B., Ruya Yazici, A., & Canay, S. (2009). Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments. J Dent, 37(11), 848-856. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.017
• Gholami, G. A., Fekrazad, R., Esmaiel-Nejad, A., & Kalhori, K. A. (2011). An evaluation of the occluding effects of Er; Cr: YSGG, Nd: YAG, CO2 and diode lasers on dentinal tubules: a scanning electron microscope in vitro study. Photomedicine and laser surgery, 29(2), 115-121.
• Goekce, B., Özpinar, B., Dündar, M., Cömlekoglu, E., Sen, B., & Güngör, M. (2007). Bond strengths of all-ceramics: acid vs laser etching. Operative dentistry, 32(2), 173-178.
• Gordilho, A. C., Mori, M., Gil, C., & Contin, I. (2009). A adaptação marginal dos principais sistemas de cerâmica pura. Odonto, 17(34), 82-92.
• Gracis, S., Thompson, V. P., Ferencz, J. L., Silva, N. R., & Bonfante, E. A. (2015). A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. International Journal of prosthodontics, 28(3).
• Heikkinen, T., Matinlinna, J., Vallittu, P., & Lassila, L. (2010). Effect of primers and resins on the shear bond strength of resin composite to zirconia. SRX Dentistry, 2010.
• Hill, E. E. (2007). Dental cements for definitive luting: a review and practical clinical considerations. Dental Clinics of North America, 51(3), 643-658.
• Jedynakiewicz, N., & Martin, N. (2001). The effect of surface coating on the bond strength of machinable ceramics. Biomaterials, 22(7), 749-752.
• Kern, M., & Wegner, S. M. (1998). Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dental Materials, 14(1), 64-71.
• Lin, S., Caputo, A. A., Eversole, L. R., & Rizoiu, I. (1999). Topographical characteristics and shear bond strength of tooth surfaces cut with a laser-powered hydrokinetic system. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 82(4), 451-455.
• Lung, C. Y. K., & Matinlinna, J. P. (2012). Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dental Materials, 28(5), 467-477.
• Makhija, S. K., Lawson, N. C., Gilbert, G. H., Litaker, M. S., McClelland, J. A., Louis, D. R., . . . Mungia, R. (2016). Dentist material selection for single-unit crowns: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Journal of dentistry, 55, 40-47.
• Matinlinna, J., & Vallittu, P. (2007). Bonding of resin composites to etchable ceramic surfaces–an insight review of the chemical aspects on surface conditioning. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 34(8), 622-630.
• Miletic, V. (2018). Dental composite materials for direct restorations: Springer.
• Moezizadeh, M., Ansari, Z. J., & Fard, F. M. (2012). Effect of surface treatment on micro shear bond strength of two indirect composites. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD, 15(3), 228.
• Moreno, M. B. P., Murillo-Gómez, F., & de Goes, M. F. (2019). Physicochemical and morphological characterization of a glass ceramic treated with different ceramic primers and post-silanization protocols. Dental Materials, 35(8), 1073-1081.
• Morford, C. K., Buu, N. C., Rechmann, B. M., Finzen, F. C., Sharma, A. B., & Rechmann, P. (2011). Er: YAG laser debonding of porcelain veneers. Lasers in surgery and medicine, 43(10), 965-974.
• Özcan, M. (2003). Adhesion of resin composites to biomaterials in dentistry. University of Groningen.
• Özcan, M., Alander, P., Vallittu, P., Huysmans, M.-C., & Kalk, W. (2005). Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 16(1), 21-27.
• Özcan, M., & Volpato, C. Â. M. (2016). Surface conditioning and bonding protocol for nanocomposite indirect restorations: how and why? Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 18(1), 82.
• Özyöney, G., Yanıkoğlu, F., Tağtekin, D., & Hayran, O. (2013). The efficacy of glass-ceramic onlays in the restoration of morphologically compromised and endodontically treated molars. International Journal of prosthodontics, 26(3).
• Peutzfeldt, A., & Asmussen, E. (1990). A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay techniques. Operative dentistry, 15(4), 129-135.
• Reymus, M., Roos, M., Eichberger, M., Edelhoff, D., Hickel, R., & Stawarczyk, B. (2019). Bonding to new CAD/CAM resin composites: influence of air abrasion and conditioning agents as pretreatment strategy. Clinical oral investigations, 23(2), 529-538.
• Ruyter, I. (1992). Types of resin-based inlay materials and their properties. International dental journal, 42(3), 139-144.
• Sevmez, H., Güngör, M. B., & Yılmaz, H. Tam Seramik Restorasyonlarda Uygulanan Yüzey İşlemleri.
• Shimada, Y., Yamaguchi, S., & Tagami, J. (2002). Micro-shear bond strength of dual-cured resin cement to glass ceramics. Dental Materials, 18(5), 380-388.
• Soares, C. J., Giannini, M., Oliveira, M. T. d., Paulillo, L. A. M. S., & Martins, L. R. M. (2004). Effect of surface treatments of laboratory-fabricated composites on the microtensile bond strength to a luting resin cement. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 12(1), 45-50.
• Souza, E. M., De Munck, J., Pongprueksa, P., Van Ende, A., & Van Meerbeek, B. (2016). Correlative analysis of cement–dentin interfaces using an interfacial fracture toughness and micro-tensile bond strength approach. Dental Materials, 32(12), 1575-1585.
• Tagtekin, D., Özyöney, G., & Yanikoglu, F. (2009). Two-year clinical evaluation of IPS Empress II ceramic onlays/inlays. Operative dentistry, 34(4), 369-378.
• Tian, T., Tsoi, J. K.-H., Matinlinna, J. P., & Burrow, M. F. (2014). Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dental Materials, 30(7), e147-e162.
• Tzanakakis, E.-G. C., Tzoutzas, I. G., & Koidis, P. T. (2016). Is there a potential for durable adhesion to zirconia restorations? A systematic review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 115(1), 9-19.
• Yoshihara, K., Nagaoka, N., Maruo, Y., Nishigawa, G., Irie, M., Yoshida, Y., & Van Meerbeek, B. (2017). Sandblasting may damage the surface of composite CAD–CAM blocks. Dental Materials, 33(3), e124-e135.
• Yucel, M. T., Aykent, F., Akman, S., & Yondem, I. (2012). Effect of surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength between resin cement and all-ceramic core materials. Journal of non-crystalline solids, 358(5), 925-930.