İmplant Destekli Restorasyonlarda Pembe ve Beyaz Estetik

Year 2022, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 159 - 175, 26.10.2022

Müge Yargıcı , Gülümser Evlioğlu

https://doi.org/10.17932/IAU.DENTAL.2015.009/dental_v08i2004

Abstract

Eksik dişlerin yerine konmasında sıklıkla tercih edilen implantların estetik ve fonksiyonel olarak başarısı yumuşak ve sert dokuların biririyle uyumlu olmasına bağlıdır. Dişler, dudaklar, dişeti ve çevre dokular ile ilişkisinin yanı sıra implant pozisyonu, gülme hattı, dişeti çıkış profili, alveol kemiğin formu bu uyumu etkileyen faktörlerdendir. Bu derlemede implant çevresi sert ve yumuşak dokuların estetik olarak değerlendirilmesi anlatılmaktadır.

Keywords

implant, dişeti çıkış profili, ön bölge, pembe estetik

Pink and White Esthetic in Implant Supported Restoration

Abstract

The aesthetic and functional success of implants, which are frequently preferred for replacing missing teeth, depends on the compatibility of soft and hard tissues with each other. In addition to its relationship with teeth, lips, gingiva and surrounding tissues, implant position, smile line, gingival emergency profile, form of alveolar bone are among the factors affecting this harmony. In this review, the aesthetic evaluation of hard and soft tissues around the implant is explained.

Keywords

implant, emergence profile, anterior region, pink esthetic

References

• 1. Baumgarten AG. Aesthetica (1750) . Paris; L‟herne: 1989 - Google’da Ara. Accessed June 22, 2022.
• 2. Bhuvaneswaran M. Principles of smile design. Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2010;13(4):225. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.73387
• 3. Ricciardi MT, Pizzi P. High-risk esthetically driven restoration: begin with the end in mind. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Mar;34(3):206-10. PMID: 23931265.
• 4. Rinck M, Telli S, Kampmann IL, et al. Training approach-avoidance of smiling faces affects emotional vulnerability in socially anxious individuals. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7(JUL). doi:10.3389/FNHUM.2013.00481
• 5. Manera V, Grandi E, Colle L. Susceptibility to emotional contagion for negative emotions improves detection of smile authenticity. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7(MAR). doi:10.3389/FNHUM.2013.00006
• 6. Naini FB. Facial aesthetics : concepts & clinical diagnosis. Published online 2011:434.
• 7. Jivraj S, Chee W. Treatment planning of implants in the aesthetic zone. Br Dent J. 2006;201(2):77-89. doi:10.1038/SJ.BDJ.4813820
• 8. Belser UC, Bernard JP, Buser D. Implant-supported restorations in the anterior region: prosthetic considerations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1996;8(9).
• 9. Nisapakultorn K, Suphanantachat S, Silkosessak O, Rattanamongkolgul S. Factors affecting soft tissue level around anterior maxillary single-tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(6):662-670. doi:10.1111/J.1600-0501.2009.01887.X
• 10. Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol. 2003;74(4):557-562. doi:10.1902/JOP.2003.74.4.557
• 11. Atamer, A, Özyetim EB, Ayçiçek, F, Bayraktar G. Estetik Bölgedeki İmplant Destekli Sabit Restorasyonlarda Dişeti Çıkış Profilinin Oluşturulması: Olgu Sunumu. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg, 2019; 29: 491-496.
• 12. Papadopoulos I, Pozidi G, Goussias H, Kourtis S. Transferring the emergence profile from the provisional to the final restoration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26(3):154-161. doi:10.1111/JERD.12068
• 13. Garavaglia G, Mojon P, Belser U. Modern treatment planning approach facing a failure of conventional treatment. Part II: case report and discussion. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013;8(1):68-87.
• 14. Higginbottom F, Belser U, Jones JD, Keith SE. Prosthetic management of implants in the esthetic zone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:62-72. PMID: 15635946.
• 15. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:43-61. Accessed June 22, 2022. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15635945
• 16. Esposito M, Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl K. Radiological evaluation of marginal bone loss at tooth surfaces facing single Brånemark implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1993;4(3):151-157. doi:10.1034/J.1600-0501.1993.040306.X
• 17. Papadopoulos I, Pozidi G, Goussias H, Kourtis S. Transferring the emergence profile from the provisional to the final restoration. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2014;26(3):154-161. doi:10.1111/JERD.12068
• 18. Belser UC, Bernard JP, Buser D. Implant-supported restorations in the anterior region: prosthetic considerations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1996 Nov-Dec;8(9):875-83; quiz 884. PMID: 9242147.
• 19. Larrucea C, Conrado A, Olivares D, Padilla C, Barrera A, Lobos O. Bacterial microleakage at the abutment-implant interface, in vitro study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2018;20(3):360-367. doi:10.1111/CID.12589
• 20. Correa BD, Vieira Bittencourt MA, Machado AW. Influence of maxillary canine gingival margin asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;145(1):55-63. doi:10.1016/J.AJODO.2013.09.010
• 21. Fürhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(6):639-644. doi:10.1111/J.1600-0501.2005.01193.X
• 22. Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009;80(1):140-151. doi:10.1902/JOP.2009.080435
• 23. Gil MS, Ishikawa-Nagai S, Elani HW, et al. A prospective clinical trial to assess the optical efficacy of pink neck implants and pink abutments on soft tissue esthetics. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(6):409-415. doi:10.1111/JERD.12309
• 24. Tarnow D, Elian N, Fletcher P, et al. Vertical Distance from the Crest of Bone to the Height of the Interproximal Papilla Between Adjacent Implants. J Periodontol. Published online 2003.