YOUTUBE ENDOKRONLARLA İLGİLİ YETERLİ BİR BİLGİ KAYNAĞI MIDIR? İÇERİK-KALİTE ANALİZİ

Year 2023, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 61 - 70, 01.12.2023

Gülhan Yıldırım , Yelda Erdem Hepşenoğlu

Abstract

Amaç: YouTube sağlıkla ilgili pek çok video içermektedir. "Endokron" YouTube'da sıklıkla aranan bir kelimedir. Ancak YouTube'un endokronlar hakkında bilgi arayan kişiler için yararlı olup olmadığı belirsizdir. Bu çalışma, YouTube'daki endokronlar ile ilgili bilgilerin içerik kalitesini ve yeterliliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: “Endokron” anahtar kelime olarak kullanıldı ve YouTube'da arama yapıldı. Sonuç olarak çalışmaya 193 video dahil edildi. Bu videolardan yalnızca 49 video dahil edilme kriterlerini karşıladı ve Video Bilgi Kalitesi İndeksi (VIQI) ve Küresel Kalite Ölçeği (GQS) kullanılarak bilgi kalitesi açısından değerlendirildi. Videolar düşük ve yüksek içerik gruplarına ayrıldı. İstatistiksel analizde Shapiro-Wilk, Mann-Whitney U ve Pearson ki-kare testleri kullanıldı.
Bulgular: Videoların çoğu (%79,2) sağlık çalışanları tarafından yüklenmiştir. Genel olarak videoların %21'i ve %28'i yüksek içerikli ve düşük içerikli videolar olarak sınıflandırıldı. En sık konu materyal türleri (%75,5) olurken, en az bahsedilen konu ise psikolojik ve psikososyal etkileri (%22,4) oldu. Yüksek içerikli grubun GQS ve VIQI puanları önemli ölçüde daha yüksekti. Toplam içerik ile VIQI (p<0,001) ve GQS (p<0,001) puanları arasında pozitif korelasyon görüldü.
Sonuç: Endokronlarla ilgili YouTube videolarının içeriği yeterli bir bilgi kaynağı olarak değerlendirilemez. Çoğu video endokronlara ilişkin endikasyonları içerirken ve az sayıda videoda komplikasyonlardan bahsedilmekteydi.

Keywords

Endokron, YouTube, GQS, VIQI

Ethical Statement

yok

Supporting Institution

yok

Thanks

yok

IS YOUTUBE AN ADEQUATE SOURCE OF INFORMATION REGARDING ENDOCROWNS? A CONTENT- QUALITY ANALYSIS

Abstract

Objectives: YouTube contains many videos on health-related topics. "Endocrown" is a frequently searched word on YouTube. But it is unclear whether YouTube is useful for individuals seeking information about endocrowns. This study aimed to evaluate the content quality and adequacy of information related endocrowns on YouTube.
Materials and Methods: Using the keyword “endocrown”, we searched YouTube; consequently, 193 videos were included in the study. Only 49 videos met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated for the quality of information using the Video Information Quality Index (VIQI) and Global Quality Scale (GQS). Videos were categorized into low- and high-content groups. The Shapiro–Wilk, Mann–Whitney U, and Pearson’s chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis.
Results: Most of videos were uploaded by healthcare professionals (79.2%). Overall, 21% and 28% of the videos were classified as high-content and low-content videos. The commonest topic included the types of materials (75.5%), and the least mentioned topic (22.4%) included psychological and psychosocial effects. The high-content group had significantly higher GQS and VIQI scores. A positive correlation was noted between the total content and VIQI (p<0.001) and GQS (p<0.001) scores.
Conclusions: The content of YouTube videos on endocrowns cannot be considered an adequate source of information. Most videos included indications for endocrowns, and fewer videos mentioned the complications.

Keywords

Endocrown, YouTube, GQS, VIQI

References

• Ploumaki A, Bilkhair A, Tuna T et al. Success rates of prosthetic restorations on endodontically treated teeth; a systematic review after 6 years. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:618-30.
• Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. Fiber-reinforced resin coating for endocrown preparations: a technical report. Oper Dent. 2013;38:242-8.
• Dejak B, Młotkowski A. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation. Dent Mater. 2013;29:309-17.
• da Cunha LF, Gonzaga CC, Pissaia JF, Correr GM. Lithium silicate endocrown fabricated with a CAD-CAM system: A functional and esthetic protocol. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118:131-4.
• Berk RA. Multimedia teaching with video clips: TV, movies, YouTube™ ™®, and mtvU in the college classroom. Int J Learn Teach. 2009;5.
• Fages M, Bennasar B. The endocrown: a different type of all-ceramic reconstruction for molars. J Can Dent Assoc. 2013;79:140.
• Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent. 2012;37:130-6.
• Graham C, Nikolova M. Does access to information technology make people happier. Insights from well-being surveys from around the world. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2013;44: 126–139.
• Ignatowicz A, Slowther AM, Elder P, et al. Ethical implications of digital communication for the patient-clinician relationship: analysis of interviews with clinicians and young adults with long term conditions (the LYNC study). BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19:11.
• Duffy P. Engaging the YouTube™ ™® Google-Eyed Generation: Strategies for Using Web 2.0 in Teaching and Learning. Enhancing learning through technology: research on emerging technologies and pedagogies. 2008;6:119-130.
• Alexa. YouTube™ ™®.com competitive analysis, marketing mix and traffic. Available at: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/YouTube™ ™®.com. Accessed April 8 2020.
• Knösel M, Jung K. Informational value and bias of videos related to orthodontics screened on a video-sharing Web site. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:532-9.
• https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnnosta/2017/05/08/the-internet-is-making-us-lose-trust-in-our-doctors/?sh =651c9feb65fa
• Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V et al. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube™ ™®. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82469.
• Sezici YL, Gediz M, Dindaroğlu F. Is YouTube™ ™® an adequate patient resource about orthodontic retention? A cross-sectional analysis of content and quality. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;161: e72-e79.
• Altan Şallı G, Egil E. Are YouTube™ ™® videos useful as a source of information for oral care of leukemia patients? Quintessence Int. 2020;51:78-85.
• Dogramacı EJ, Rossi-Fedele G. The quality of information on the Internet on orthodontic retainer wear: a cross-sectional study. J Orthod. 2016;43:47-58.
• Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube™ ™ as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis. 2016;22:202-8.
• Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2070-7.
• Ho A, McGrath C, Mattheos N. Social media patient testimonials in implant dentistry: information or misinformation? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:791-800.
• Hatipoğlu Ş, Gaş S. Is Information for Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion Available on YouTube™ ™® Reliable? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78:1017.e1-1017.e10.
• Eksi Ozsoy H. Evaluation of YouTube™ ™® videos about smile design using the DISCERN tool and Journal of the American Medical Association benchmarks. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125:151-4.
• Kurian N, Varghese KG, Daniel S et al. Are YouTube™ ™® videos on complete arch fixed implant-supported prostheses useful for patient education? J Prosthet Dent. 2022; S0022–3913(22)00138-X.
• Menziletoglu D, Guler AY, Isik BK. Are YouTube™ ™® videos related to dental implant useful for patient education? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;121:661-4.
• El–Ma’aita A, A Al-Rabab’ah M, Abu-Awwad M et al. Endocrowns Clinical Performance and Patient Satisfaction: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Three Monolithic Ceramic Restorations. J Prosthodont. 2022;31:30-7.
• Lena Y, Dindaroğlu F. Lingual orthodontic treatment: A YouTube™ ™®™ video analysis. Angle Orthod. 2018;88:208-14.