The Mediating Role of Organizational Identification on the Effects of Manager’s Incivility on Life Satisfaction

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 551 - 562, 31.05.2024

Selen Doğan , Fatma Gül Karaçelebi

https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1403299

Abstract

The difference between what individuals expect from life and what they get reveals their life satisfaction. It is seen that the closer one gets to the determined criteria, the more one's life satisfaction is met. Although working life has different intensities at different times, it is among the requirements determining life satisfaction. Uncertainties or negativities in working life can lead to a widening gap between what is expected from life and what is achieved. It is observed that the quality of life of employees who cannot receive the respect or courtesy they expect from their managers in their working life may decrease. Most often, this situation manifests itself through a decrease in employees' identification with their workplace. In this study, the mediating role of organizational identification in the effect of manager incivility on life satisfaction was examined. Data obtained by survey method from 204 academic personnel were analyzed. The results of the analysis indicate that organizational identification has a mediating role in the effect of manager incivility on life satisfaction. In addition, a moderating role of age on this mediating effect has been determined.

Keywords

Manager’s Incivility, Life Satisfaction, Organizational Identification

Yönetici Nezaketsizliğinin Yaşam Doyumuna Etkisinde Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Aracılık Rolü

Abstract

Bireylerin yaşamdan bekledikleri ve elde ettikleri arasındaki fark yaşam doyumlarını ortaya koymaktadır. Belirlenen kriterlere ne kadar yaklaşılırsa kişinin yaşam doyumunun o kadar karşılandığı görülmektedir. Çalışma hayatı, farklı zamanlarda farklı yoğunluğa sahip olsa da yaşam doyumunu belirleyen kriterler arasındadır. Çalışma hayatında ortaya çıkan belirsizlikler veya olumsuzluklar yaşamdan beklenenle elde edilenler arasındaki farkın açılmasını beraberinde getirebilmektedir. Çalışma hayatında yöneticilerinden beklediği saygıyı veya nezaketi göremeyen çalışanların yaşam kalitelerinin düşebileceği gözlemlenmektedir. Çoğu zaman bu durum kendisini çalışanların iş yerleri ile aralarındaki özdeş olma halinin azalması vasıtasıyla göstermektedir. Bu çalışmada, yönetici nezaketsizliğinin yaşam doyumuna etkisinde örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü incelenmiştir. 204 akademik personelden anket yöntemiyle elde edilen veriler analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları yönetici nezaketsizliğinin yaşam doyumuna etkisinde örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolünün olduğu yönündedir. Ayrıca, yaşın bu aracılık etkisi üzerinde düzenleyicilik rolü de tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Yönetici Nezaketsizliği, Yaşam Doyumu, Örgütsel Özdeşleşme

References

• Andersson, L.M., & Pearson, C.M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiralling effect of incivility in the workplace. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452.
• Antonovsky, A. (1993). Complexity, conflict, chaos, coherence, coercion and civility. Social Science & Medicine, 37(8), 969-981.
• Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
• Boen, F., Vanbeselaere, N., & Cool, M. (2006). Group status as a determinant of organizational identification after a takeover: A social identity perspective. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(4), 547-560.
• Cortina, L.M., & Magley, V.J. (2001). Incivilitiy in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(1), 64-80.
• Dhanani, L.Y., & Wolcott, A.M. (2018). A meta analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of workplace incivility. from https://spiral.lynn.edu/facpubs/562/
• Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., &Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assesment, 49(1).
• Dutton, J.E., Dukerich J.M., & Harquail C.V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263.
• Edwards, M.R. (2005). Organizational identification: A conceptual and operational review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4), 207-283. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00114.x
• Eker, D. (2015). Öğretim elemanı örgütsel özdeşleşme ölçeği geçerlik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(4).
• Erdogan, B., Bauer, T.N., Truxillo, D.M., & Mansfield, L.R. (2012). Whistle while you work: A review of the life satisfaction literature. Journal of Management, 38, 1038. doi: 10.1177/0149206311429379
• Ersöz, S., & Çiftçi, G.E. (2022). Çalışanlarda farklılıkların yönetimi ve örgütsel özdeşleşme ilişkisi. Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(2), 297-317. doi: 10.17218/hititsbd.1079118
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
• Frijns, M. (2010). Determinants of life satisfaction. Maastrict University School of Business and Economics Academic Year 2009/1010 Master of Science in International Business Concentration: Organisation Final Thesis.
• Hardıng, Warren G., Jasmin Tahmaseb Mcconatha, & V.K. Kumar. (2020). The relationship between just world beliefs and life satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(17), 6410. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176410
• Harold, C.M., & Holtz, B.C. (2015). The effects of passive leadership on workplace incivility. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 16-38.
• Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Perspective. New York: NY: The Guilford Press.
• He, Y., Walker, J.M., Payne, S.C. & Miner, K.N. (2021). Explaining the negative impact of workplace incivility on work and non‐work outcomes: The roles of negative rumination and organizational support. Stress and Health, 297-309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2988
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. SEM, 61, 1-55.
• Hwang, Y.K., Yoon, D.H., & Lee, C.S. (2020). The dual mediating effects of self-esteem and hope in the relationship between boss’s incivility and life satisfaction. Medico-legal Update, 20(1). doi:10.37506/v20/i1/2020/mlu/194550
• Guo J., & Qiu Y. (2019). Workplace incivility and organisational identification: The role of affective organisational commitment and perceived insider status. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 29(5), 452-459, doi: 10.1080/14330237.2019.1675992
• Guo, J., Qıu, Y., & Gan, Y. (2022) Workplace incivility and work engagement: The chain mediating effects of perceived ınsider status, affective organizational commitment and organizational ıdentification. Curr Psychol 41, 1809–1820. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00699-z
• Güldür, B., & Yaşartürk, F. (2020). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin rekreasyon faaliyetlerine katılımındaki fayda ve yaşam doyum düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Güncel Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 495-506.
• Jelavic, S.R., Aleksic, A., & Braje, I.N. (2021). Behind the curtain: Workplace incivility—individual actors in cultural settings. Sustainability, 13. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031249
• Judge, T.A., & Watanabe, S. (1993). Another look at the job satisfaction-life satisfaction relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6). doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.939
• Jungert, T., & Holm, K. (2021). Workplace incivility and bystanders’ helping intentions. International Journal of Conflict Management Communication Quarterly. doi:10.1108/IJCMA-08-2021-0131
• Kanten, P., & Kanter, S. (2015). İş yaşamının kalitesinin yaşam doyumu üzerindeki etkisinde iş doyumunun aracılık rolü. In S. Doğan (Ed.), Yaşam Doyumu Seçme Konular. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Koçel, T. (2020). İşletme Yöneticiliği. İstanbul: Beta
• Larsen, R.J., & Eid, M. (2008). Ed Diener and the Science of Subjective Well-Being. In M. Eid ve R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The Science of Subjective Well-Being. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Lee, S.M. (1971). An empricical analysis of organizational identification. The Academy of Management Journal, 14(2), 213-236.
• Lee, E.S., Park, T.Y., & Koo, B. (2015). “Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review”, Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 1049-1080.
• Mael, F., & Ashforth, B.E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
• Martinez, J.O., & Eisenberg, J. (2019). Incivility and beyond at the top management team level. Organizational Management Journal, 16(2), 98-110.
• Park, L.S., Martinez, L., & Xu, S. (2022). Job experience as a buffer against incivility: A daily diary study. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 37(3), 243-263.
• Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164-172.
• Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and tne emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137-152. doi:10.1080/17439760701756946
• Pearson, C.M., Andersson, L.M., & Porath, C.L. (2000). Assessing and attacking workplace Incivility. Organizational Dynamics, 29(2), 123-137.
• Pearson, C.M., Andersson, L.M., & Wegner, J.W. (2001). When workers flout convention: A Study of workplace incivility. Human Relations, 54(11), 1387-1419.
• Pearson, C., & Porath, C. (2009). The cost of bad behavior: How incivility is damaging your business and what to do it. England: Penguin.
• Polat, M. (2009). Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin öncülleri ve ardılları üzerine bir saha çalışması. (Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı Yönetim ve Organizasyon Bilim Dalı Doktora Tezi), Uludağ Üniversitesi, Bursa.
• Porath, C.L. (2015). The costs of bad behavior: And what leaders and organizations can do to manage it. Organizadtional Dynamics, 44 (4), 254-257.
• Porath, C.L., & Pearson, C.M. (2010). The cost of bad behavior. Organizadtional Dynamics, 39(1), 64-71.
• Riketta, M. (2004). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2005), 358-384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005
• Reich, T.C., & Hershcovis, M.S. (2014). Observing workplace incivility. Journal of Applied Psychology. 100(1), 203. doi:10.1037/a0036464.
• Saygılı, M., Onay, Ö.A., & Ayhan, M. (2017). Kişilik özellikleri bağlamında yaşam memnuniyeti üzerine bir araştırma. Yorum- Yönetim -Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim Ekonomi ve Felsefe Dergisi, 5(2), 61-72.
• Schilpzand, P., Pater, I.E.D., & Erez, A. (2016). Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 57-88. doi:10.1002/job.1976.
• Shin, D.C., & Johnson, D.M. (1977). Avowed happiness as an overall assesment of the qualitiy of life. Social Indicators Research, 5(4), 475-492.
• Trent, S.B., & Allen, J.A. (2019). Resilience only gets you so far: Volunteer incivility and burnout. Organizational Management Journal, 16(2), 69-80.
• Van Dick, R., & Wagner, U. (2002). Social identification among school teachers: Dimensions, foci, and correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 129-149.
• Veenhoven, R. (1996). The study of life satisfaction. In W. E. Saris, R. Veebhoven, A. C. Scherpenzeel ve B. Bunting (Eds.), A Comparative Study of Satisfaction with Life in Europe (pp. 11-48): Eötvös University Press.
• Veenhoven, R., Scherpenzeel, A.C., & Bunting B. (1996). 'A comparative study of satisfaction with life in Europe. (eds) Eötvös University Press, Chapter 1 in: Saris, 1996, ISBN963 463 081 2, pp. 11-48
• Vickers, M.H. (2006). Writing what's relevant: Workplace incivility in public administration? a wolf in sheep's clothing. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 28(1), 69-88.